‘Can not be censored’- Bitcoin proposal to block Ordinals wins under 1% support

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-04Last updated on 2026-07-04

Abstract

The Bitcoin Improvement Proposal BIP-110, a controversial soft fork designed to restrict non-financial data like Ordinals and Runes inscriptions to combat network spam, has decisively failed to gain sufficient miner support. By the July 4th deadline for miner activation, it received backing in less than 1% of the required 2,016-block period, far short of the 55% threshold needed. The proposal aimed to preserve Bitcoin's core function as a low-cost payment network by blocking memecoins and other data-heavy transactions, which supporters argue increase transfer costs. However, critics, including BitMEX Research and Blockstream CEO Adam Back, strongly opposed the measure. They warned it would break existing wallets, potentially lock over 1.7 million BTC, and fundamentally undermine Bitcoin's reliability and censorship-resistant nature. With negligible miner backing, the proposal's chance of activation in the upcoming user phase in August appears highly unlikely, highlighting a community division over network governance and functionality.

The controversial Bitcoin soft fork aimed at combating network spam, BIP-110, has failed to garner enough support from miners.

As of 4th July, the final day for miners (miner-activated soft fork, MASF) to implement the temporary upgrade, the support was surprisingly negligible. Notably, only 10 blocks out of 2,016 supported the move, or less than 1% of the total Bitcoin hashrate power.

Source: BIP110 monitor

For the soft fork to be activated, 55% of blocks should signal support in a 2,016-block period.

Reacting to the low support by miners, David Bailey, founder of the Bitcoin Conference and treasury firm Nakamoto, termed it “bullish” for BTC.

It’s incredibly bullish for Bitcoin that the hostile takeover attempt known as BIP-110 failed. This attack was a multi-year campaign of information warfare led by Bitcoin’s most eccentric developer.

The proposal was first introduced by pseudonymous developer Dathon Ohm to help restrict non-financial data on Bitcoin transactions. In other words, Ordinals and Runes that incorporate images, videos, or large texts would be blocked out of the network.

For supporters, like Luke Davis Jr, a renowned Bitcoin protocol developer, the soft fork would ensure the network maintains its core money function by encouraging low-cost P2P transfers.

For them, memecoins on Bitcoin would increase transfer costs and make such a vision impossible.

Critics warn BIP-110 could crack Bitcoin wallets

However, for the critics, the planned soft fork goes beyond just preventing anti-spamming. BitMEX Research claimed that the plan can easily break wallets and would ban over 1.7M BTC from transfers.

Bitcoin has never banned existing transaction formats like this before. This essentially breaks Bitcoin as a reliable money and something people can depend on.

Source: X

On his part, Adam Back, Blockstream CEO and another public critic of the BIP-110, warned those pushing for a soft fork that Bitcoin cannot be censored, just like the internet.

Same logic for Bitcoin: it’s also similarly hard to censor. Why do you think anyone cares about your pro-censorship views?

The final window for activation of the BIP-110 will be in August by users. Given the low support from miners, it is unclear whether Bitcoin supporters will fail to back the soft fork.


Final Summary

  • The BIP-110 soft fork failed to garner enough miner backing, with less than 1% of hashrate power signaling support. The
  • Bitcoin community remained divided over the upgrade, with critics claiming the protocol can not be ‘censored.’

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the purpose of the BIP-110 soft fork proposal?

AThe purpose of the BIP-110 soft fork proposal was to combat network spam by restricting non-financial data, such as Ordinals and Runes that incorporate images, videos, or large texts, from Bitcoin transactions.

QHow much miner support did the BIP-110 proposal receive and why did it fail?

AThe BIP-110 proposal received support from only 10 out of 2,016 blocks, which is less than 1% of the total Bitcoin hashrate power. It failed because it did not meet the 55% support threshold required for activation within a 2,016-block period.

QWhat was David Bailey's reaction to the failure of BIP-110, and why did he consider it 'bullish'?

ADavid Bailey, founder of the Bitcoin Conference and treasury firm Nakamoto, termed the failure 'bullish' for BTC. He viewed the proposal as a 'hostile takeover attempt' and its failure as a positive sign for Bitcoin's resilience.

QWhat were the main criticisms of the BIP-110 proposal according to its opponents?

AOpponents criticized BIP-110 by warning that it could break existing Bitcoin wallets, potentially ban over 1.7 million BTC from transfers, and undermine Bitcoin's reliability as a censorship-resistant money and platform. They argued Bitcoin's core value includes being hard to censor.

QWhat is the next possible activation window for BIP-110, and what is its outlook given the miner vote?

AThe next possible activation window for BIP-110 is in August through user activation (UASF). However, given the extremely low support (less than 1%) from miners in the MASF period, it is unclear if it will receive enough backing from the wider Bitcoin community to succeed.

Related Reads

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

600 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片