Loopring 关闭其 DEX – 以太坊L2先驱出了什么问题?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-06-29Last updated on 2026-06-29

Abstract

以太坊二层扩容协议Loopring宣布将关闭其去中心化交易所(DEX),标志着这一早期二层先驱的落幕。其衰落主要源于多年来用户参与度持续下降,而根本原因在于zkEVM技术的兴起。zkEVM能完全支持以太坊虚拟机(EVM),允许现有Solidity应用无需大量重构即可部署,从而加速了生态增长,这使Loopring(LRC)专用的zkRollup设计逐渐失去了竞争力。 在6月28日关闭之前,Loopring的日活跃地址、交易量、DEX活动和协议费用均已持续下滑。这表明,即使创新技术能在扩展性上建立领先优势,若缺乏广泛的兼容性和可组合性,也难以维持地位。 Loopring的关闭引发了对其技术未来的疑问。尽管其zkRollup架构本身仍以安全、高吞吐量为特点,但协议的总锁仓价值(TVL)、交易量、每日用户和流动性等关键指标全面衰退,使其独立DEX日益边缘化。官方将下滑归因于采用率低、可组合性不足、商业实践问题以及2026年LRC从多家交易所下架。 最终,Loopring的命运取决于其zkRollup技术能否通过集成到Layer-3或模块化基础设施中获得新生,否则,这可能意味着以太坊首个专用二层创新方案的终结。

以太坊 [ETH] 二层扩容协议 Loopring 已宣布将关闭其去中心化交易所,这标志着以太坊最早的二层扩容先驱之一走向终结。

多年来用户参与度的下降是 Loopring 衰落的主要因素。然而,这种参与度的下降似乎很大程度上归因于提供完整 EVM 支持的 zkEVM 技术日益流行。

来源:X

与 Loopring (LRC) 专用的 zkRollup 设计不同,zkEVM 允许现有的 Solidity 应用程序无需大量重开发即可部署,从而加速了生态系统增长。这一转变在6月28日关闭之前,逐步减少了每日活跃地址、交易量、DEX 活动和协议费用。

因此,看起来创新技术可以确立一个平台在可扩展性方面的领先地位。但如果这样一个平台不能同时提供广泛的组合性,那么它最终将无法维持这一地位。

然而,除非 Loopring 将其 zk-Rollup 技术发展成第三层(Layer-3)或模块化解决方案,否则 Loopring 的关闭标志着以太坊在可扩展性方面迈出下一步的开始。

Loopring 的技术能否在其 DEX 之外继续生存?

Loopring 的关闭引发了疑问:随着二层领域的创新,以太坊在多大程度上失去了其最早的二层先驱之一?总锁定价值(TVL)、交易量、日活跃用户和流动性等所有关键指标的下降,使得 Loopring 的独立 DEX 变得不再重要。

该二层协议直接指出,这种下降趋势的原因在于采用率低、组合性差、糟糕的商业实践,以及2026年使用 LRC 的交易所将其下架。这些趋势表明原始协议可能无法逆转局面。

来源:Loopring 在 X

然而,该网络的技术讲述了一个不同的故事。Loopring 当前的 zkRollup 架构继续提供已知的安全且高吞吐量的设计。

只要这些特性能被第三层(Layer-3)或模块化基础设施中的其他协议所利用,那么 Loopring 对以太坊历史的贡献就可能延续下去。反之,如果不能,这可能标志着以太坊首个专用二层创新之一的终结。


最终总结

  • Loopring 的关闭反映了其多年来采用率低、活动减少以及来自 zkEVM 竞争对手的压力。
  • Loopring 的未来取决于其 zkRollup 技术能否通过第三层(Layer-3)或模块化基础设施得以延续。

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QLoopring为何决定关闭其去中心化交易所(DEX)?

ALoopring关闭其去中心化交易所的主要原因是多年来的用户参与度持续下降,这很大程度上源于能完全支持EVM的zkEVM技术的兴起和普及。

Q与Loopring的zkRollup相比,zkEVM技术有何主要优势?

AzkEVM技术的主要优势在于它允许现有的Solidity应用程序无需大量重写即可部署,这极大加速了生态系统的发展,而Loopring的专用zkRollup设计在这方面兼容性较差。

Q文章认为一个平台要保持其领先地位,除了可扩展性技术外,还需要具备什么?

A文章认为,一个平台要保持其领先地位,除了拥有创新的可扩展性技术,还必须提供广泛的互操作性或组合性,否则最终将难以维持其地位。

QLoopring的Layer-2协议指出了导致其颓势的哪些具体原因?

ALoopring的Layer-2协议指出,导致其颓势的原因包括采用率低、互操作性差、不良的商业实践,以及其代币LRC在2026年从多家交易所下架。

QLoopring的技术在未来可能以何种方式继续存在和发展?

ALoopring的技术未来可能通过将其zkRollup架构应用于Layer-3解决方案或模块化基础设施中而继续存在和发展,否则这可能标志着以太坊早期Layer-2特定创新的终结。

Related Reads

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

In May, Meta imposed internal restrictions on its engineers regarding the use of Claude Code and Codex, two widely used AI programming tools. Despite being a major client, Meta's guidelines, still in effect, prohibit these external models from being used for specific tasks to prevent potential "escalations with partners." The core concern is "distillation"—the risk that outputs from Claude or Codex could inadvertently contaminate the training data and evaluation processes for Meta's in-house AI coding assistant, MetaCode. If MetaCode is trained or evaluated using data generated by these external models, it risks learning their capabilities rather than developing its own, blurring the line of intellectual origin. The restrictions are precise: engineers cannot use the external models to generate test questions, debug source code, or suggest test cases. AI-generated content is also barred from environments accessible to MetaCode. However, AI can still assist with peripheral tasks like workflow setup and code organization, provided all outputs are manually reviewed. This caution reflects a broader industry dilemma. While distillation is a common technique, using a competitor's model output for training raises legal and ethical questions about the ownership of derived capabilities. Contractual terms from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic explicitly forbid using their outputs to build competing products, putting enforcement power in the hands of rivals. The move is also financially motivated, as Meta seeks to reduce its hefty internal AI spending, estimated in the billions this year. Meta's policy illustrates the delicate balance companies must strike: leveraging powerful external AI tools while safeguarding the integrity and independence of their own AI development. As AI systems increasingly help build other AIs, distinguishing the origin of capabilities becomes a fundamental challenge for the entire industry.

marsbit2h ago

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

marsbit2h ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

The article "Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?" explores the complex and often contentious integration of AI into the cultural and creative industries, particularly film and television. It begins with the cancellation of Amazon's AI-generated animation "Punky Duck," highlighting the ethical debates surrounding AI content. AI's rapid advancement is transforming video production, enabling cost-effective, full-length AI films (e.g., "RAPHAEL," "Dreams of Violets") while sparking industry resistance over issues like "synthetic actors." The core debate has shifted from whether to use AI to how to use it responsibly. The article analyzes why AI's entry into film is uniquely unsettling. It distinguishes between "cultural fast food" (short-form, fast-paced content like micro-dramas) and "cultural main courses" (traditional, long-form film/TV). AI currently excels at the former, matching its fragmented narratives, shallow emotional needs, and free-to-consumer models. However, venturing into the latter challenges the human-centric essence of storytelling—creativity, emotional depth, and the unique value of human labor and experience. While AI can generate massive volumes of content and lower costs, it risks devaluing human creativity, leading to homogenized output, and creating unfair competition through potential intellectual property infringement. Its efficiency also amplifies content safety risks, making preemptive governance crucial. To counter these risks, the article proposes establishing clear boundaries guided by a human-centered AI content perspective. It outlines four principles: 1) Amplify, rather than displace, human creative space; 2) Respect and protect human creative output; 3) Ensure human creative control and responsibility remain paramount; and 4) Guarantee transparency and traceability in AI creation. The conclusion emphasizes that humans must act as the "helmsmen" of technology, steering AI development to enhance, not replace, the core human values at the heart of cultural expression.

marsbit2h ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片