Loopring在历经数年用户采用率低下后,关闭其开创性的zk-Rollup DEX

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-06-29Last updated on 2026-06-29

Abstract

路印协议正式关闭其去中心化交易所,标志着这一以太坊早期ZK-rollup平台的终结。所有交易功能已立即停止,继官方在X平台发布公告后,中继器也已关闭。 该项目曾展示零知识卷叠如何有效扩展以太坊,并于2017年通过首次代币发行筹集了4500万美元。然而,团队承认平台从未获得大规模用户采用,原因包括平台缺乏虚拟机,限制了开发者构建更复杂的现实世界应用;缺少支付用例和持续发展的生态系统,使其难以与为区块链技术构建的新基础设施竞争。此外,团队擅长软件但缺乏推动采用的商业敏锐度,且LRC代币在2026年持续被下架加剧了问题。 团队坦承,基于zkEVM的现代网络(如zkSync、Scroll和StarkNet)已超越其专有技术,能更轻松地部署智能合约和发展去中心化应用生态,继续运营已无意义。此前,项目因扩展问题已于2025年7月终止钱包服务。 关于用户资产,团队保证所有资金安全,将计算最终余额并提供资产清单,预留两周供用户核对,之后团队将分批直接将资产分发至用户钱包,自动处理流动性池资产转换并承担所有Gas费,整个过程无需Merkle证明。

Loopring正式关闭了其去中心化交易所,标志着以太坊最早的zk-rollup平台之一落下帷幕。所有交易功能已立即停止,中继器也在Loopring的X账户发布官方公告后旋即关闭。

这一关闭结束了一个曾经展示零知识汇总(zk-rollups)如何有效扩展以太坊的项目。Loopring在2017年通过首次代币发行筹集了4500万美元。

尽管具备技术优势,Loopring承认用户从未大规模采用该平台。团队指出,平台上缺乏虚拟机使得开发者无法构建和开发更高级的现实世界应用程序。由于缺乏支付用例和不断发展的生态系统,Loopring发现很难与为区块链技术构建的新基础设施竞争。

来源: X文章

此外,Loopring承认其擅长软件技术,但未能建立推动采用所需的商业敏锐度。它还提到,2026年全年LRC代币的下架只会让问题变得更糟。

新的zkEVM网络超越了Loopring的技术

最终,开发团队承认,基于现代zkEVM的网络已经能够超越其专有技术。诸如zkSync、Scroll和StarkNet等新项目创建了基于以太坊的环境,使得部署智能合约和开发区块链去中心化应用生态系统变得更加容易。

团队承认,继续开发Loopring已不再有意义。这就是为什么交易所被有序关闭。该项目之前因扩展性问题已于2025年7月结束了钱包服务。最新更新标志着Loopring最终退出了最初的去中心化交易所业务。

团队直接分配资产

Loopring团队保证,尽管即将关闭,所有用户资金仍然是安全的。最终余额将被计算,资产清单将被提供,并在任何分配开始前留出两周时间用于核对余额。

分配将在两周后进行,Loopring团队将分批将资产直接分配到钱包。团队将自动把流动性池中的资产转换为相应的代币,处理所有Gas费用,并在无需Merkle证明的情况下完成整个过程。

重点加密新闻:

Polymarket遭300万美元攻击:第三方数据泄露后用户将获得全额退款

标签区块链加密货币DEX以太坊Ethereum (ETH)LoopringZK-rollups零知识汇总

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QLoopring 关闭其去中心化交易所的主要原因是什么?

A主要原因包括用户采用规模始终有限、平台缺乏虚拟机导致开发者无法构建更复杂的现实应用、缺乏支付用例和不断发展的生态系统使其难以与新基础设施竞争、团队承认在商业敏锐度方面存在不足,以及新的zkEVM网络(如zkSync、Scroll、StarkNet)在技术上已超越其专有技术。

QLoopring 项目的初始代币发行(ICO)筹集了多少资金?

ALoopring 在2017年的初始代币发行中筹集了4500万美元。

QLoopring 团队如何保证用户在平台关闭后的资产安全?

ALoopring 团队保证所有用户资金仍然安全,并将计算最终余额、提供资产清单,并预留两周时间供用户核对余额。之后,团队将分批直接向用户的钱包分发资产,自动转换流动性池持仓,并承担所有Gas费,整个过程无需默克尔证明。

Q文章中提到哪些新的zkEVM网络项目超越了Loopring的技术?

A文章中提到的新zkEVM网络项目包括zkSync、Scroll和StarkNet。这些项目创建了允许更轻松部署智能合约和开发区块链应用生态系统的环境。

Q在关闭DEX之前,Loopring在2025年7月因为什么问题停止了另一项服务?

A在2025年7月,由于扩展性问题,Loopring提前结束了其钱包服务。

Related Reads

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

In May, Meta imposed internal restrictions on its engineers regarding the use of Claude Code and Codex, two widely used AI programming tools. Despite being a major client, Meta's guidelines, still in effect, prohibit these external models from being used for specific tasks to prevent potential "escalations with partners." The core concern is "distillation"—the risk that outputs from Claude or Codex could inadvertently contaminate the training data and evaluation processes for Meta's in-house AI coding assistant, MetaCode. If MetaCode is trained or evaluated using data generated by these external models, it risks learning their capabilities rather than developing its own, blurring the line of intellectual origin. The restrictions are precise: engineers cannot use the external models to generate test questions, debug source code, or suggest test cases. AI-generated content is also barred from environments accessible to MetaCode. However, AI can still assist with peripheral tasks like workflow setup and code organization, provided all outputs are manually reviewed. This caution reflects a broader industry dilemma. While distillation is a common technique, using a competitor's model output for training raises legal and ethical questions about the ownership of derived capabilities. Contractual terms from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic explicitly forbid using their outputs to build competing products, putting enforcement power in the hands of rivals. The move is also financially motivated, as Meta seeks to reduce its hefty internal AI spending, estimated in the billions this year. Meta's policy illustrates the delicate balance companies must strike: leveraging powerful external AI tools while safeguarding the integrity and independence of their own AI development. As AI systems increasingly help build other AIs, distinguishing the origin of capabilities becomes a fundamental challenge for the entire industry.

marsbit1h ago

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

marsbit1h ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

The article "Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?" explores the complex and often contentious integration of AI into the cultural and creative industries, particularly film and television. It begins with the cancellation of Amazon's AI-generated animation "Punky Duck," highlighting the ethical debates surrounding AI content. AI's rapid advancement is transforming video production, enabling cost-effective, full-length AI films (e.g., "RAPHAEL," "Dreams of Violets") while sparking industry resistance over issues like "synthetic actors." The core debate has shifted from whether to use AI to how to use it responsibly. The article analyzes why AI's entry into film is uniquely unsettling. It distinguishes between "cultural fast food" (short-form, fast-paced content like micro-dramas) and "cultural main courses" (traditional, long-form film/TV). AI currently excels at the former, matching its fragmented narratives, shallow emotional needs, and free-to-consumer models. However, venturing into the latter challenges the human-centric essence of storytelling—creativity, emotional depth, and the unique value of human labor and experience. While AI can generate massive volumes of content and lower costs, it risks devaluing human creativity, leading to homogenized output, and creating unfair competition through potential intellectual property infringement. Its efficiency also amplifies content safety risks, making preemptive governance crucial. To counter these risks, the article proposes establishing clear boundaries guided by a human-centered AI content perspective. It outlines four principles: 1) Amplify, rather than displace, human creative space; 2) Respect and protect human creative output; 3) Ensure human creative control and responsibility remain paramount; and 4) Guarantee transparency and traceability in AI creation. The conclusion emphasizes that humans must act as the "helmsmen" of technology, steering AI development to enhance, not replace, the core human values at the heart of cultural expression.

marsbit2h ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy ZK

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing ZKsync (ZK) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy ZKsync (ZK) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your ZKsync (ZK)After purchasing your ZKsync (ZK), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade ZKsync (ZK)Easily trade ZKsync (ZK) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

3.3k Total ViewsPublished 2024.06.17Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy ZK

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ZK (ZK) are presented below.

活动图片