尽管以太坊需求疲软,Sharplink仍增持价值6240万美元的以太坊——原因如下

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-06-28Last updated on 2026-06-28

Abstract

摘要:以太坊第二大持仓公司Sharplink在经历八个月停顿后,于6月27日斥资约4670万美元增持29,196枚ETH。数据显示,该公司过去三天累计购入价值约6240万美元的39,196枚ETH,使其总持有量达到868,699枚ETH(含22,102枚质押代币)。消息公布后,其股价上涨5.48%。 与此同时,最大以太坊持仓公司Bitmine也在6月22日以9200万美元增持52,203枚ETH,总持仓价值达89.2亿美元。Bitmine计划持续增持至2026年。 尽管机构在积累,但以太坊市场表现疲软,价格跌至1,568.75美元(2025年4月以来低点),现货买家动能减弱,需求呈现疲态,与一年前的强势积累阶段形成对比。

以太坊 [ETH] 第二大国库公司 Sharplink 于 6 月 27 日增购了 29,196 ETH,价值 4670 万美元。事实上,据 Lookonchain 报道,该公司的以太坊 DATs(数字资产信托)在过去三天内累计积累了 39,196 ETH,价值 6240 万美元。

来源:Lookonchain/X

这是 Sharplink 在暂停八个月后的第二次购买。第一次发生在该公司通过 FalconX 增持 5,000 ETH,均价约 1,576 美元,价值约 788 万美元。通过这些收购,Sharplink 目前总共持有 868,699 ETH,其中包括 22,102 枚质押代币。与此同时,其股票收于 4.81 美元,较前一个交易日上涨 5.48%。

Sharplink 与 Bitmine

与此同时,在 6 月 22 日,最大的以太坊 DAT 公司 Bitmine 支付了 9200 万美元,增购了 52,203 枚以太坊。截至目前,Bitmine 持有 5,672,956 ETH,价值 89.2 亿美元。

Bitmine 的 Tom Lee 还强调,他的公司计划稳步增长至 2026 年,并最终实现 "5% 炼金术" 的目标。尽管 Sharplink 尚未披露此类计划,但其 ETH 积累策略相对类似。

以太坊市场动态描绘出一幅令人担忧的景象

这一切发生之际,ETH 的交易价格为 1,568.75 美元,是自 2025 年 4 月以来的最低水平。与此同时,以太坊的 Spot Taker CVD(现货吃单者累计成交量差额)已失去部分激进的购买势头,这与 2025 年 6 月相比是一个重大转变。

尽管市场上仍有买家,但其影响力已减弱。与一年前出现的强劲积累阶段不同,当前的需求表明买家已显疲态。

来源:CryptoQuant

最终总结

  • Sharplink 在过去三天增持了更多 ETH,使其总持仓量达到 868,699 ETH。
  • 在积累 ETH 后,Sharplink 的股价也有所上涨,但 ETH 价格仍在 1500 美元水平附近交易。

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QSharplink在最近一次增持中购入了多少ETH,价值多少美元?

ASharplink在6月27日购入了29,196 ETH,价值约为4,670万美元。在过去三天里,其以太坊DATs共积累了39,196 ETH,总价值约为6,240万美元。

QSharplink和Bitmine目前各自的ETH持仓总量分别是多少?

ASharplink目前持有总计868,699 ETH。Bitmine目前持有5,672,956 ETH,价值约89.2亿美元。

Q文章中提到,ETH当前的市场价格是多少,其需求状况如何?

A文章提到ETH当时的价格为1,568.75美元,是自2025年4月以来的最低水平。市场需求方面,现货买家势头减弱,呈现出买方疲惫的迹象,这与一年前的强劲积累阶段形成对比。

QSharplink在暂停增持ETH多久后进行了最新一次购买?

ASharplink在暂停了八个月之后,进行了最新一次ETH购买。

QBitmine的Tom Lee提到的“5%的炼金术”目标是指什么?

ABitmine的Tom Lee提到,其公司计划稳步增长到2026年,并最终实现“5%的炼金术”目标。这很可能是指通过持有ETH等策略,实现公司资产或利润增长5%的目标,但文章未提供该术语的具体细节定义。

Related Reads

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

In May, Meta imposed internal restrictions on its engineers regarding the use of Claude Code and Codex, two widely used AI programming tools. Despite being a major client, Meta's guidelines, still in effect, prohibit these external models from being used for specific tasks to prevent potential "escalations with partners." The core concern is "distillation"—the risk that outputs from Claude or Codex could inadvertently contaminate the training data and evaluation processes for Meta's in-house AI coding assistant, MetaCode. If MetaCode is trained or evaluated using data generated by these external models, it risks learning their capabilities rather than developing its own, blurring the line of intellectual origin. The restrictions are precise: engineers cannot use the external models to generate test questions, debug source code, or suggest test cases. AI-generated content is also barred from environments accessible to MetaCode. However, AI can still assist with peripheral tasks like workflow setup and code organization, provided all outputs are manually reviewed. This caution reflects a broader industry dilemma. While distillation is a common technique, using a competitor's model output for training raises legal and ethical questions about the ownership of derived capabilities. Contractual terms from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic explicitly forbid using their outputs to build competing products, putting enforcement power in the hands of rivals. The move is also financially motivated, as Meta seeks to reduce its hefty internal AI spending, estimated in the billions this year. Meta's policy illustrates the delicate balance companies must strike: leveraging powerful external AI tools while safeguarding the integrity and independence of their own AI development. As AI systems increasingly help build other AIs, distinguishing the origin of capabilities becomes a fundamental challenge for the entire industry.

marsbit2h ago

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

marsbit2h ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

The article "Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?" explores the complex and often contentious integration of AI into the cultural and creative industries, particularly film and television. It begins with the cancellation of Amazon's AI-generated animation "Punky Duck," highlighting the ethical debates surrounding AI content. AI's rapid advancement is transforming video production, enabling cost-effective, full-length AI films (e.g., "RAPHAEL," "Dreams of Violets") while sparking industry resistance over issues like "synthetic actors." The core debate has shifted from whether to use AI to how to use it responsibly. The article analyzes why AI's entry into film is uniquely unsettling. It distinguishes between "cultural fast food" (short-form, fast-paced content like micro-dramas) and "cultural main courses" (traditional, long-form film/TV). AI currently excels at the former, matching its fragmented narratives, shallow emotional needs, and free-to-consumer models. However, venturing into the latter challenges the human-centric essence of storytelling—creativity, emotional depth, and the unique value of human labor and experience. While AI can generate massive volumes of content and lower costs, it risks devaluing human creativity, leading to homogenized output, and creating unfair competition through potential intellectual property infringement. Its efficiency also amplifies content safety risks, making preemptive governance crucial. To counter these risks, the article proposes establishing clear boundaries guided by a human-centered AI content perspective. It outlines four principles: 1) Amplify, rather than displace, human creative space; 2) Respect and protect human creative output; 3) Ensure human creative control and responsibility remain paramount; and 4) Guarantee transparency and traceability in AI creation. The conclusion emphasizes that humans must act as the "helmsmen" of technology, steering AI development to enhance, not replace, the core human values at the heart of cultural expression.

marsbit2h ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片