老牌国产公链 NEO 两位创始人撕逼，财务不透明为核心原因

marsbitPubblicato 2026-01-01Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-01

Introduzione

老牌国产公链NEO的两位联合创始人张铮文（Erik Zhang）与达鸿飞（Da Hongfei）近日公开爆发矛盾，核心争议在于基金会财务不透明问题。张铮文指责达鸿飞长期单独控制除NEO/GAS代币以外的基金会资产，运作缺乏审计和披露，形同“黑箱”。他此前曾因达鸿飞称‘两人共治效率低’而暂离管理层，后发现对方利用NEO资源开发独立公链项目EON，于是回归并介入治理。张铮文还揭露NEO过去依赖黑客松制造“虚假繁荣”，许多项目拿奖后即消失，缺乏真实用户。12月，他要求达鸿飞公开财务，并单方面宣称自2026年1月1日起达鸿飞将不再参与NEO主网事务，转而负责侧链及新项目。达鸿飞则反击称张铮文实际控制大部分生态资金及节点投票权，并拖延资金转移至多签地址，同时承诺将于2026年Q1发布2025年末财务报告。双方在社交媒体持续互怼，矛盾彻底公开化。

没想到老牌国产公链也能有这么一天,更令人唏嘘的是,国产顶级 AI 项目 Manus、Kimi、Minimax 连续两日接连有重磅新闻,不是被数十亿美金收购,就是几亿的融资,但老牌公链居然开始撕逼了。

目前看来,2014 年创立的 NEO 公链的两位联合创始人张铮文(Erik Zhang)与达鸿飞(Da Hongfei)基本上是彻底决裂,在 X 上依然持续互怼。根据双方的发言,以及网上的公开消息,尝试理出这条老牌公链的两位创始人之间究竟发生了什么事。

财务黑箱

其实张铮文前几年已经离开了 NEO,这在他自己的推特上也证实了,随后在今年 9 月正式回归。这场撕逼的导火索在 11 月,据社区消息与公开资料显示,作为技术核心的张铮文在寻求获取 Neo 基金会详细财务报告及资金流向时遭遇阻碍。

随后张铮文指责 Neo 基金会长期运作不透明,资产状况宛如「黑箱」。他指出,达鸿飞长期单一控制除 NEO/GAS 代币以外的基金会资产,且缺乏完整、可审计的披露机制。

在今天双方的互怼中,我们也发现了张铮文此前离开的原因,他说达鸿飞单独找过他,说两人负责 NEO 的话效率很低,所以他为了「提高效率」而选择暂时退出管理层。然而,他发现达鸿飞在利用 NEO 的资源开发独立公链项目 EON。这也促使他回归并介入基金会治理。

在 11 月的社区交流中,张铮文曾表示 NEO 之前都是靠黑客松制造「虚假繁荣」,没有真实用户,很多黑客松项目拿了奖就消失了。

矛盾激化

12 月,张铮文公开发布声明,要求达鸿飞履行自 12 月 9 日起承诺的财务披露义务。更具爆炸性的是,张铮文单方面宣布,依据双方此前的电话协议,自 2026 年 1 月 1 日起,达鸿飞将不再参与 NEO 主网事务,转而专注于侧链 NeoX 和新项目 SpoonOS 的开发与运营。

达叔也马上回应,说张铮文实际上控制着 NEO 生态中绝大部分的资金(包括核心资产 NEO 和 GAS 代币),并主导着共识节点的投票权,也指责张铮文多年来以各种理由(如等待 N3 迁移完成)拖延将资金转移至基金会的多签地址(Multisig)。

达鸿飞承诺将在 2026 年第一季度发布 2025 年末的财务报告,并会提前分享初步数据。

Domande pertinenti

QNEO公链的两位创始人是谁？他们之间发生了什么？

ANEO的两位联合创始人是张铮文（Erik Zhang）和达鸿飞（Da Hongfei）。他们之间因财务不透明问题发生公开争执，张铮文指责达鸿飞长期单一控制基金会资产且缺乏审计披露，而达鸿飞则指责张铮文控制大部分资金和节点投票权，双方在社交媒体上持续互怼，关系彻底决裂。

Q张铮文指责NEO基金会存在什么问题？

A张铮文指责NEO基金会运作不透明，资产状况宛如“黑箱”，达鸿飞长期单一控制除NEO/GAS代币以外的基金会资产，且缺乏完整、可审计的财务披露机制。

Q张铮文为什么离开NEO后又回归？

A张铮文前几年离开NEO是因为达鸿飞声称两人共同负责效率低下，建议他暂时退出管理层。但他后来发现达鸿飞在利用NEO资源开发独立公链项目EON，这促使他回归并介入基金会治理。

Q达鸿飞对张铮文的指责是如何回应的？

A达鸿飞回应称张铮文实际控制着NEO生态中绝大部分资金（包括NEO和GAS代币）和共识节点投票权，并指责张铮文以等待N3迁移完成为由拖延资金转移至基金会多签地址。他承诺将在2026年第一季度发布2025年末的财务报告。

Q张铮文单方面宣布了什么决定？

A张铮文单方面宣布，依据双方之前的电话协议，自2026年1月1日起，达鸿飞将不再参与NEO主网事务，转而专注于侧链NeoX和新项目SpoonOS的开发与运营。

Letture associate

Behind HYPE's Repeated Record Highs, the 'Minions' in the Ecosystem Can't Keep Up

While HYPE, the native token of the Hyperliquid ecosystem, surges to new all-time highs above $76 and attracts significant institutional ETF inflows, a starkly different reality unfolds within its HyperEVM application layer. Multiple core DeFi protocols across lending, NFTs, stablecoins, and DEXs have announced shutdowns between May and June. The article argues HYPE functions more like an "application stock" than a traditional ecosystem token. Its value is anchored to the trading fees from Hyperliquid's core perpetual contracts platform (HyperCore), which boasts a diversified revenue stream from crypto, commodities, and indices. Approximately 97% of protocol fees fund buybacks and burns of HYPE. This means HYPE's price is largely decoupled from the health of projects built on HyperEVM. The closures of significant projects like lending protocol HypurrFi (peak TVL >$300M) and NFT marketplace Drip.Trade highlight a structural tension. Hyperliquid's minimalist philosophy offers infrastructure without official grants, liquidity support, or marketing coordination for HyperEVM projects. This forces protocols into a fiercely competitive environment from day one. Furthermore, the success of HyperCore creates a liquidity vacuum, and mechanisms like HIP-3 (allowing direct perpetual market deployment) divert user attention and capital away from application-layer projects. The stronger the core perpetual trading business becomes, the more difficult it is for peripheral "DeFi lego" projects to survive and capture value, despite the flagship token's rising price.

Foresight News9 min fa

Behind HYPE's Repeated Record Highs, the 'Minions' in the Ecosystem Can't Keep Up

Foresight News9 min fa

Conversation with Arthur Hayes: AI Has Drained Market Liquidity, BTC Will Be Below 100k by Year-End

In this June 2026 podcast interview, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes explains his decision to sell his major crypto holdings (HYPE, NEAR, Worldcoin, Zcash). His rationale is based on a macro view linking oil prices, the Iran conflict, US politics, and an impending AI bubble burst. Hayes argues that high oil prices, driven by the ongoing war, will pressure domestic US inflation. To salvage the Republican Party's chances in the midterm elections, he believes Donald Trump may pivot to a populist, anti-AI stance—advocating for taxes and regulation—which would deflate the AI investment narrative. He sees the AI sector, particularly massive capital expenditure on data centers, as having absorbed nearly all excess market liquidity (around $1.5 trillion in debt issuance since 2025), starving other assets like Bitcoin. He highlights the upcoming SpaceX IPO at a ~$1.8 trillion valuation and 100x price-to-sales ratio as a potential tipping point. If these hyped IPOs underperform, it could shatter market confidence in AI. In such a scenario, all risk assets, including crypto, would fall together as correlations converge to 1 during a broad correction. Hayes has moved his portfolio into Treasuries and energy stocks (like ExxonMobil), predicting Bitcoin will be below $100k by year-end. He sees a potential crypto bull market only after the AI frenzy cools, liquidity stops flowing exclusively into AI, and possibly after a significant market downturn prompts new monetary stimulus.

marsbit20 min fa

Conversation with Arthur Hayes: AI Has Drained Market Liquidity, BTC Will Be Below 100k by Year-End

marsbit20 min fa

Bitcoin Decouples From Global M2 Liquidity As Money Supply Hits Record High

Bitcoin is diverging from a record-high global M2 money supply (over $135 trillion), challenging the historical assumption that rising liquidity directly lifts BTC prices. While a bullish view suggests Bitcoin is merely lagging and will eventually catch up as capital rotates into riskier assets, a more cautious "regime-change" argument posits that factors like spot ETFs, institutional flows, and a stronger dollar may have weakened the direct correlation. For traders, this divergence presents a clear macro question to monitor: whether Bitcoin's price will confirm a delayed rally or signal a lasting change in its relationship with global liquidity. The outcome will shape how future liquidity data is interpreted.

bitcoinist1 h fa

Bitcoin Decouples From Global M2 Liquidity As Money Supply Hits Record High

bitcoinist1 h fa

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

U.S. Federal Reserve officials who previously advocated for rate cuts, including Governor Christopher Waller, have recently shifted their stance, with many now not ruling out the possibility of future rate hikes. This sets a challenging stage for new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's first policy meeting. Appointed by President Trump based on his dovish views, Warsh now faces a committee where the debate has pivoted from "when to cut" to "whether to hike," driven by persistent inflation above 3%, a strong labor market, and supply-side pressures from AI infrastructure demands and geopolitical tensions. Key figures illustrate the shift. Governor Waller, once concerned about employment, now says data has pushed him toward considering rate increases. Even moderate voices like Governor Lisa Cook, while expecting inflation to ease, have indicated readiness to hike if it fails to do so. Long-time hawks such as regional Fed presidents Beth Hammack, Lorie Logan, and Neel Kashkari have grown more vocal, arguing that the real policy rate is effectively falling and that action may soon be needed. The upcoming Fed meeting is expected to keep rates steady but will likely remove the "easing bias" from its statement, signaling a neutral stance between cuts and hikes. The quarterly "dot plot" is anticipated to show most officials projecting no cuts this year, with some potentially indicating hikes. Chair Warsh, a critic of the Fed's reliance on forward guidance like the dot plot, must navigate communicating this pivot using tools he has questioned, all while steering policy in a direction counter to the preferences of the president who appointed him. The consensus suggests the Fed's next move could well be a rate increase.

marsbit1 h fa

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

marsbit1 h fa

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit1 h fa

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare CORE

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di CORE (CORE) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente CORECORE.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva CORE (CORE)Dopo aver acquistato CORE (CORE), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia CORE (CORE)Scambia facilmente CORE (CORE) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

229 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.13Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di CORE CORE sono presentate come di seguito.