Decoding Strategy’s [MSTR] 168-Bitcoin buy amid market volatility

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-10-21Last updated on 2025-10-21

Key Takeaways

How does Strategy fund its Bitcoin purchases?

The purchases are funded through at-the-market (ATM) sales of its perpetual preferred stocks (STRK, STRF, STRD, STRC) and its broader “42/42” equity plan.

How did the market react to Strategy’s purchases?

MSTR stock traded at $296.61, up 2.33%, while Bitcoin was at $107,792.91 after a 3.14% drop in 24 hours.

Bitcoin [BTC] treasury giant Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) continues its aggressive accumulation strategy despite market volatility.

Last week, the company purchased 168 BTC for approximately $18.8 million at an average price of $112,051 per coin. This purchase was made after the market sell-off triggered by the Black Friday crypto crash on the 10th of October. 

Between the 13th and the 14th of October, the company completed the acquisition. As a result, Strategy now holds a total of 640,418 BTC. 

And the average cost across all purchases stands at $74,010 per BTC.

Strategy’s funding tactics

Strategy funded its latest Bitcoin acquisitions using proceeds from at-the-market (ATM) sales of its perpetual preferred stocks, STRK, STRF, and STRD.

The company’s ATM programs include $21 billion for STRK, $4.2 billion for STRF, and $4.2 billion for STRD, alongside $2.1 billion for STRC, supplementing its broader “42/42” plan.

This initiative, upsized from the original “21/21” strategy, aims to raise a total of $84 billion in equity offerings and convertible notes for Bitcoin purchases through 2027. This reflects Strategy’s commitment to long-term accumulation.

The announcement coincided with Strategy’s MSTR stock trading at $296.61, marking a 2.33% gain according to Google Finance.

Strategy’s rising confidence in Bitcoin

While critics like gold advocate Peter Schiff questioned the timing and average purchase price, Strategy remains a benchmark for institutional Bitcoin adoption.

Additionally, data from BitBo shows the company holds 640,031 BTC, valued at roughly $71.84 billion, making it the world’s largest corporate Bitcoin holder.

Finally, CoinGecko’s Bitcoin Treasury Holdings data further confirms the firms’s leading position, highlighting its role as a trailblazer in integrating Bitcoin into corporate reserves. 

Next:
Share

Related Reads

Mystery Bitcoin Whale Dumps $1.3B In BlackRock’s IBIT As Market Barely Blinks

An unidentified entity sold approximately $1.3 billion worth of shares in BlackRock's spot Bitcoin ETF, IBIT, in a large dark pool block trade on Tuesday morning. ETF analysts, including Galaxy's Alex Thorn and Bloomberg's Eric Balchunas, confirmed the unprecedented 29-million-share transaction. Notably, the market absorbed the massive sale with minimal price disruption to IBIT. This sale occurs amid a broader trend of significant outflows from US spot Bitcoin ETFs. Recent weeks have seen over $2.5 billion in net outflows, with IBIT itself accounting for $1.008 billion in outflows during the May 18–22 period. Analysts suggest the sustained selling pressure, despite the market's resilience, may indicate institutional skittishness in a rising inflation and interest rate environment. At the time of reporting, Bitcoin was trading around $75,730.

bitcoinist1h ago

Mystery Bitcoin Whale Dumps $1.3B In BlackRock’s IBIT As Market Barely Blinks

bitcoinist1h ago

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

The article profiles two prominent figures, Serenity and Leopold Aschenbrenner, who are gaining attention for their unconventional investment strategies focused on the physical constraints of the AI boom, moving beyond mainstream software narratives. Serenity, an anonymous online trader, advocates a "shiso leaf" theory. He targets small-cap companies with monopolies on critical, overlooked components in the AI hardware supply chain, such as specific semiconductor materials. His deep, technical analysis of bottlenecks in areas like co-packaged optics (CPO) has reportedly yielded massive returns, though his anonymity and focus on illiquid micro-cap stocks pose significant risks for followers. Leopold Aschenbrenner, a former OpenAI researcher, founded a multi-billion dollar hedge fund. His macro thesis argues that physical infrastructure—power grids, land, data centers—is the true bottleneck for AI growth, lagging far behind chip production. Consequently, his fund employs an infrastructure arbitrage strategy: heavily investing in storage and compute infrastructure companies while placing massive bearish bets (put options) against major semiconductor stocks, betting their valuations will correct as physical constraints become apparent. While their methods differ—Serenity drills into microscopic supply chain details, while Leopold takes a macroscopic, infrastructure-focused view—both share a core belief: the real power and investment alpha in the AI era lie in controlling scarce physical resources, not just software. The article concludes by noting the inherent risks in both approaches, such as liquidity issues for micro-caps and timing risks for macro bets, but suggests they signal a broader market re-evaluation of AI's foundational assets.

marsbit3h ago

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

marsbit3h ago

Nocera Rebrands as Nocera Holdings, Expands Holistically into AI, Data Centers, Robotics, Biotechnology, and Digital Assets

Nocera, Inc. (Nasdaq: NCRA) announces a major corporate transformation, rebranding as Nocera Holdings to become a diversified holding company targeting high-growth tech sectors. The company plans to aggressively pursue mergers, strategic investments, and alliances in AI and AI infrastructure, data centers, robotics, biotechnology, and blockchain/digital assets. To support this expansion, Nocera has amended a previously announced financing agreement, broadening the use of up to $300 million in capital to also include working capital and global market expansion. CEO Andy Jin stated the move positions the company at the intersection of several accelerating, infrastructure-intensive industries. Key focus areas include capitalizing on surging AI computing and cloud demands through data center opportunities in Asia and Eastern Europe, exploring biotech and AI-driven healthcare technologies, advancing into robotics and "physical AI" automation, and continuing its blockchain and digital asset initiatives. The company is undergoing a comprehensive rebranding and has engaged strategic advisors for its global positioning. Nocera will leverage its existing relationships and operational base in Asia while continuing efforts to strengthen its balance sheet and maintain Nasdaq compliance.

marsbit4h ago

Nocera Rebrands as Nocera Holdings, Expands Holistically into AI, Data Centers, Robotics, Biotechnology, and Digital Assets

marsbit4h ago

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

In the Agents era of blockchain, traditional value capture theories face challenges. The "Fat Protocol" theory, dominant since 2016, suggested protocols capture most value as their tokens are essential for network use. However, the proliferation of interchangeable L1s, L2s, and modular layers has eroded protocol scarcity and pricing power. Conversely, the "Fat App" theory posits that applications capturing user relationships (like wallets and exchanges) become the primary value layer by controlling distribution and transaction flows. This aligns with the current "Great Repricing" cycle. Agents disrupt this logic. As software users, they lack brand loyalty, prioritize cost and efficiency, and switch between platforms seamlessly. This undermines the front-end UX moats that "Fat Apps" rely on. The article explores several potential futures: 1. **Headless Applications:** Current leading apps could strip their front-ends and become backend API infrastructure for Agents, preserving their role. 2. **Protocol Resurgence:** If integration becomes trivial, Agents might bypass aggregators and interact directly with protocols, reviving "Fat Protocol" dynamics. 3. **Pricing Power Collapse:** Agents' rational, frictionless routing could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward cost and leaving little profit for intermediaries. 4. **Unprecedented Activity:** Agents may enable new, high-frequency, machine-to-machine economic activities, expanding the total value pie even if margins are thin. 5. **A New, Unnamed Model:** Historically, major tech shifts (like the internet's attention economy) create unforeseen business models. The Agents era may spawn entirely new ways to capture value. The most likely outcome is a coexistence where "Fat Apps" continue to serve human users valuing UX, while a separate, Agent-driven economy emerges governed by different rules—where loyalty is based on factors like liquidity, latency, and settlement guarantees rather than brand.

marsbit4h ago

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow