Chainlink In-Depth Research Report: From Oracle to On-Chain Financial Infrastructure, LINK's Flywheel Mechanism and Future Pathways

HTX LearnPublished on 2025-08-28Last updated on 2026-06-15

Abstract

As the flagship project of the decentralized oracle network, Chainlink has gradually become irreplaceable in the crypto industry since its launch in 2017. Oracles are the critical infrastructure connecting the blockchain world with real-world data, undertaking core functions such as price feeds, cross-chain messaging, and the integration of real-world assets (RWAs).

I. Introduction

As the flagship project of the decentralized oracle network, Chainlink has gradually become irreplaceable in the crypto industry since its launch in 2017. Oracles are the critical infrastructure connecting the blockchain world with real-world data, undertaking core functions such as price feeds, cross-chain messaging, and the integration of real-world assets (RWAs). As decentralized finance (DeFi), cross-chain ecosystems, and asset tokenization have gradually evolved into dominant narratives in crypto, Chainlink's value and strategic importance stand out more than ever. This report aims to provide a systematic analysis of LINK's investment logic and medium-to-long-term potential by comprehensively examining macro market trends, RWA industry developments, Chainlink's technology and economic models, token value-capture mechanisms, the competitive landscape, and future prospects.

 

II. Macro Market Trends and Strategic Opportunities

In recent years, the tokenization of real-world assets (RWAs) has emerged as one of the most closely watched sectors in the crypto market. RWA refers to the process of mapping real-world assets, such as bonds, foreign exchange, real estate, certificates of deposit, gold, carbon credits, intellectual property, and even computing power resources, onto blockchains, where they become programmable, transferable, and composable through smart contracts. According to market research, the potential size of the RWA market could reach tens of trillions of dollars. For example, the tokenized U.S. Treasury market alone has exceeded $26 trillion, whereas the total crypto market capitalization stood at only about $2.5 trillion at the beginning of 2025. This implies that once RWAs reach the stage of scale development, they could expand the crypto market more than tenfold. Research institutions such as M31 Capital forecast that global asset tokenization could reach $30 trillion within the next decade, becoming the most powerful force driving blockchain applications. At the same time, financial titans are rapidly shifting their attitudes. BlackRock is advancing tokenized money-market funds, J.P. Morgan is piloting tokenized Treasury settlements through its Onyx platform, and SWIFT and DTCC are running blockchain experiments in cross-border payments and clearing. All these initiatives signal that traditional finance is gradually entering the on-chain economy through regulated pilot programs. As the bridge between on-chain and off-chain worlds, oracles are key to whether tokenized assets can realize their value. As the world's largest oracle network, Chainlink accounts for over 80% of data calls on Ethereum and other mainstream blockchains, making it indispensable in RWA infrastructure. Thus, in the macro context of explosive RWA growth, Chainlink has become one of the underlying assets that are set to benefit most strategically.

RWAs and the entry of institutions into blockchain have emerged as the dominant themes, with a three-in-one toolkit consisting of trusted data + cross-chain settlement + compliant implementation required for on-chain operations. Take U.S. stocks and ETFs as an example. On-chain products need more than just price data; they must also be able to identify contextual metadata such as trading hours, circuit breakers/suspensions, and data freshness. Otherwise, clearing and risk-control procedures could be triggered by mistake. In August 2025, Chainlink formally standardized this data stream "oriented toward traditional market contexts" into its Data Streams product, which has already been adopted by top protocols like GMX and Kamino, covering high-profile assets such as SPY, QQQ, NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT. Data Streams are currently available across 37 networks, significantly lowering the barrier for developers to build compliant-grade derivatives, synthetic assets, and protocols for collateralization/lending and others. According to industry data platforms, the RWA market has already reached hundreds of billions of dollars, with multiple top institutions projecting it will reach trillions of dollars before 2030. Within this trajectory, oracles and compliance-driven interoperability are necessities, not options. Furthermore, SWIFT's multiple rounds of experiments and proofs-of-concept (PoCs) conducted in 2023–2024 validated the feasibility of "connecting banks to multiple chains via existing SWIFT standards and Chainlink infrastructure". Meanwhile, DTCC's Smart NAV pilot brought key reference data such as fund NAVs on-chain, explicitly positioning CCIP as the interoperability layer. These initiatives demonstrate a key paradigm for traditional financial infrastructure to bring data, rules, and settlement on-chain.

The core value of Chainlink lies in its oracle service capacities. Public blockchains such as Ethereum cannot directly access off-chain data. Oracles' job is to supply authentic, reliable, and decentralized data inputs. Chainlink ensures data accuracy through thousands of independent nodes working together, thereby preventing single points of failure and manipulation. Its technical products already span multiple dimensions, including price feeds, the Verifiable Random Function (VRF), and the Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP). According to the latest statistics, Chainlink's Total Value Secured (TVS) has exceeded $11.3 billion, accounting for about 46% of the oracle market share, well ahead of competitors such as Pyth and Band. In the Ethereum DeFi ecosystem, more than 90% of lending protocols and derivatives platforms call Chainlink data, with core protocols including Aave, Synthetix, and Compound dependent on Chainlink's price feeds. Compared with other tokens with high market caps but limited applications, like XRP, LINK's advantages in real-world integration and revenue generation are more pronounced. Research shows that at one point, XRP's market cap was more than 15 times that of LINK, but XRP's ecosystem integration and institutional adoption lagged far behind Chainlink's. This reveals that LINK remains significantly undervalued and has strong potential for a rally via revaluation in the long term.

III. Core Value-Capture Mechanism and RWA Expansion

The most innovative aspect of Chainlink's economic model is its flywheel mechanism for value capture. First of all, Protocol users must pay data call fees in LINK tokens. A portion of these fees goes to node operators, while another portion flows into the "LINK Reserve" mechanism. The reserve mechanism automatically repurchases LINK with these revenues and deposits it into reserves, creating sustained buy-side pressure in the market to drive up the token price. Second, as applications of RWAs and DeFi expand, demand for high-frequency data calls and cross-chain messaging will continue to grow, and protocol revenue will multiply exponentially. This in turn fuels greater reserve buybacks and pushes up LINK's value. Third, LINK's staking mechanism provides token holders with a stable annualized yield (around 4.3%), encouraging long-term holding and node participation, which reduces market circulating supply. Ultimately, adoption, revenue, buybacks, price appreciation, and ecosystem expansion form a self-reinforcing positive feedback loop, constituting the flywheel effect that captures value. Between late 2023 and early 2025, LINK's price rose by nearly 50%, reflecting market expectations of this mechanism.

From a revenue perspective, Chainlink is already beginning to demonstrate commercial viability. Statistics show that over the past 30 days, it generated more than $110,000 in revenue, with a clear upward trajectory. Although still modest compared to the transaction fees generated by major DeFi protocols, its revenue growth is more stable, considering that oracles are B2B infrastructure. At the same time, Chainlink maintains an overwhelming market share of over 46%, underscoring its de facto position as the industry standard. Compared with competitors such as Pyth and Band, Chainlink boasts a larger number of nodes, deeper partnerships, and stronger integration with financial institutions. With the rollout of RWA use cases, the volume of data calls from asset tokenization will vastly exceed today's DeFi levels, significantly amplifying LINK’s revenue potential.

Chainlink primarily charges on-demand service fees for "B2D/B2B2C" (price/data service fees, CCIP cross-chain fees, PoR auditing/monitoring fees, and Data Streams subscription fees, etc.). These fees are routed through the network to nodes and the security budget, and are linked with staking/collateralization and alerts/slashing under the Economics 2.0 framework. This creates a virtuous cycle of higher economic security → stronger willingness to pay → higher service fees → larger security budget. Staking v0.2 has increased the pool cap to 45 million LINK (approximately 40.875 million allocated to the community, with the remainder reserved for node operators) and introduced an unbonding mechanism (a 28-day cooldown + a 7-day claim window) to strike a balance between security and flexibility. For node collateral, a baseline reward rate has been set, which can be supplemented by delegation rewards. As the weight for user-fee distribution increases over time, the cash flow attributes of staking are expected to strengthen further. Meanwhile, the new concept "LINK Reserve" (an on-chain reserve mechanism that periodically purchases LINK using corporate revenues/service fees) has been cited multiple times in media reports and research papers throughout 2025. It aims to improve fluctuating liquidity and supply elasticity for exchanges. However, it must be stressed that this mechanism is still primarily a subject of media and industry analyses, with no official systematic whitepaper released. Therefore, we treat it as a "scenario-based optional parameter" rather than a baseline fact in our valuation assumption.

In addition, Chainlink has been highly active in expanding its RWA infrastructure. First, it partnered with ICE to bring off-chain pricing for foreign exchange and precious metals onto the blockchain, providing trusted quotes for tokenized assets. Second, the CCIP cross-chain interoperability protocol makes it possible to transfer assets and exchange data across different blockchains, which is a critical prerequisite for the circulation of RWAs in a multichain environment. Third, products such as the DeFi Yield Index introduced by Chainlink attempt to generate trackable revenue indices by aggregating yields from multiple DeFi protocols, offering financial institutions an on-chain, index-based tool that can be integrated into their systems. Apart from these, Chainlink is becoming the standard interface for bringing both data and value on-chain across diverse use cases, including agricultural assets, intellectual property, computing power, and cross-border money market funds. As RWAs represent a structural opportunity for multiple industries, their tokenization inevitably depends on trusted data inputs and cross-chain settlement, areas where Chainlink has built a formidable moat.

 

 IV. Product Features and Ecosystem Partnerships

Chainlink's product suite can be categorized into four layers –– (1) Data: Price Feeds, Proof of Reserve (PoR), State Pricing (pricing methods designed for assets traded on DEXs), and Data Streams (low-latency, high-frequency data and contextual metadata). (2) Interoperability: CCIP (cross-chain messaging/value transfers, programmable transfers, CCT standards). In 2025, v1.6 integrated Solana as its first non-EVM mainnet while upgrading its architecture to significantly reduce cross-chain execution costs and accelerate the expansion to new chains. (3) Computation and Automation: Functions, Automation, VRF, and more. (4) Compliance and Governance: Risk management, monitoring, and compliance modules aligned with financial market standards (the official team recently introduced capabilities such as ACE). Specifically, apart from Solana, CCIP v1.6 also announced mainnet support for 57+ blockchains and designated many of them as "canonical cross-chain infrastructure". On the Solana network, projects like Zeus Network have already integrated CCIP and PoR to enable assets such as zBTC to move seamlessly across Base, Ethereum, Solana, and Sonic, thus expanding BTCFi use cases. On the data side, the ICE Consolidated Feed was introduced in August 2025 as a source of institutional-grade data for foreign exchange and precious metals. When combined with Data Streams's low latency and anti-manipulation mechanisms, this helps asset classes ideal for institutional adoption, such as foreign exchange and gold/silver, operate on-chain with reduced signal-to-noise ratios.

In terms of ecosystem and partnership network, Chainlink is creating network effects by working across four fronts, i.e., financial institutions, public blockchains, DeFi protocols, and data providers. On the institutional side, multiple rounds of Swift experiments showcased how existing messaging standards and CCIP could be utilized to connect multiple chains. In 2024, a Swift/UBS/Chainlink pilot bridged tokenized assets with traditional payment systems. Between 2024 and 2025, DTCC's Smart NAV pilot explicitly designated CCIP as the interoperability layer. In August 2025, ICE and Chainlink announced a data partnership to bring ICE's Consolidated Feed of foreign exchange and precious metals into Data Streams, delivering real-time data to more than 2,000 on-chain applications and institutions. On the asset management and banking front, ANZ, Fidelity International, and Sygnum, among others, feature in Chainlink's official list of capital market partners. On the public blockchain and protocol side, after stable deployment on Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Base, Avalanche, and BNB, CCIP integrated Solana in 2025. Protocols, including Kamino and GMX-Solana, are already connected to Data Streams. Meanwhile, the availability of U.S. stocks and ETF data further accelerates institutional-grade derivatives and collateralized lending use cases in non-EVM ecosystems. On the data side, beyond aggregating traditional crypto market data, Chainlink is expanding in 2025 to include U.S. stocks/ETFs, foreign exchange, and precious metals, thus achieving multi-asset coverage.

V. Investment Valuation Logic and Potential

From a technical analysis perspective, LINK broke through the critical $20 resistance level at the end of 2024 and has since established a new support structure between $22 and 30. If it could stabilize in this range, it would lay the foundation for the next round of rise. Historical precedent suggests that when ETH surpassed the $400 threshold in 2020, it soon entered a phase of exponential growth. LINK could follow a similar structural rally. Fund flows from whale addresses show large volumes of LINK being moved from exchanges into cold wallets or staking contracts, signaling that long-term investors are increasing their holdings. Coupled with the sustained buy-side pressure generated by the reserve mechanism, both technical and capital indicators point toward a medium-to-long-term bullish trend.

From third-party data aggregation, Chainlink has long ranked top in the Oracle category, with an estimated overall market share fluctuating between 46% and 68%. Within Ethereum's DeFi data provision, many research institutions and media outlets estimate its share at over 80%. This is related to its strategy of "prioritizing high-value use cases while expanding steadily". Meanwhile, competitors (such as Pyth) entered the market in 2023–2024 by leveraging direct exchange connections and high-frequency market data, with TVS growth briefly surging. However, this did not reshape Chainlink's broader advantageous landscape of "high-value multi-scenario coverage + institutional compliance". We highlight three distinctions in competitive comparison: First, Institutional-grade interoperability and compliance — partnerships with Swift, DTCC, and ICE carry exceptional weight in terms of compliance and standardization; second, evolution of product matrix from "pricing" toward "scenario-based data and risk-control metadata", catering to traditional market contexts; and third, cross-EVM/non-EVM coverage, where the integration of Solana marks a major milestone. In conclusion, short-term fluctuations in market share are normal, but in a complex sector of "multi-asset + multichain + compliance", the cohesion between standards and ecosystems is far more critical.

In terms of valuation logic, Chainlink can be viewed both as a target for infrastructure investment and as a leveraged beneficiary of an RWA bull market. Research from M31 Capital suggests that LINK has 20–30x upside potential if RWAs grow explosively. This view rests upon two dimensions: First, the RWA market could potentially reach $30 trillion in scale, with Chainlink already established as the standard data provisioning layer; second, LINK's current market cap remains undervalued, with a significant mismatch compared to projects such as XRP. From a risk-reward perspective, LINK is supported by steady revenue streams and has revaluation potential, making it suitable for long-term investors to build positions at relatively low cost.

LINK's total supply is capped at 1 billion tokens. The initial distribution, as commonly believed, is: 35% public sale, 35% node incentives/ecosystem rewards, and 30% company/treasury (SmartContract.com/Chainlink Labs). This distribution has been corroborated in research and educational publications by Glassnode, Crypto.com University, Sygnum, and others. Staking v0.2 has linked network security with value capture. Following the introduction of user fees, LINK's revenue model is transitioning from being driven purely by growth expectations to a combination of service-fee cash flows and network security budget returns. We suggest distinguishing three layers of demand in valuation: First, usage demand (payments for data/services/cross-chain transfers following protocol integrations); second, security demand (node staking and community staking); and third, liquidity/strategic demand (market-making and governance, potential reserve purchases, and so on). On the supply side, the release schedule and utilization of "node incentives/ecosystem rewards" (direct node subsidies vs. market-based service procurement) will directly shape the balance between supply and demand in the secondary market over the coming years.

In 2025, industry media and third-party trackers have repeatedly recorded Chainlink's TVS at tens of billions of dollars, and it remains a leader in both the number of protocols and multi-chain coverage. The official homepage also claims that it has supported a cumulative on-chain transaction volume of tens of trillions of dollars. On the fee side, aggregation platforms show that Chainlink's recent fee/revenue is ramping up. However, we observe penetration into high-quality use cases (for example, adoption of Data Streams by GMX and Kamino, and the onboarding of new asset categories such as U.S. stocks, ETFs, foreign exchange, and precious metals), which are more likely to trigger a structural inflection point. The staking pool was rapidly filled following the launch of v0.2, demonstrating that the community and node operators are willing to foot the bill for the network security budget. Instead of relying on simplistic, linear extrapolation of TVS across the network, we construct forward-looking indicators based on "per-unit TVS fee rates, weight of high-quality use cases, and multichain coverage".

We break down LINK's value into three components –– (A) Platform Option Value: corresponding to the premium for data and interoperability as "tax-like" infrastructure in the event of explosive growth in RWAs and institutional tokenization; (B) Operating Cash Flow: estimated by multiplying the number of active contracts across multiple product lines, including data services, cross-chain services, Proof of Reserve, and automation, by ARPU per contract, while also factoring in increased chain expansion and non-EVM penetration elasticity; and (C) Security Budget and Collateral Rewards: becoming increasingly explicit as staking/delegation scale grows and user-fee revenue sharing increases. We outline three scenario curves: In the conservative case, only crypto-native derivatives and stablecoin ecosystems expand, with LINK steadily increasing its share of "high-quality use cases". In the neutral case, we incorporate medium- to high-frequency applications driven by Data Streams, such as U.S. stocks, ETFs, foreign exchange, and precious metals, pushing ARPU significantly higher. In the optimistic case, we introduce institutional-grade cross-border settlement and multi-market tokenization (including fund NAV distribution, custody, and settlement automation), which drives CCIP message and transaction volumes higher, alongside increases in user fees and revenue-sharing. In terms of indicators, we recommend tracking: (1) Number of active Data Streams channels and protocols; (2) scale of monthly CCIP cross-chain messages and value transfers; (3) scale of assets monitored through PoR; (4) net staking inflows and node yields; (5) subscription and call frequency for ICE/U.S. stock ETF data; and (6) milestones in the adoption of "standard-based institutions" such as Swift and DTCC.

VI. Potential Risks and Strategic Recommendations

While Chainlink is a market leader, several risks warrant attention. First, shifts in the competitive landscape. In certain sectors, high-frequency market data and direct exchange connections have cost advantages and may erode market shares in certain use cases. Second, slower-than-expected fee and value capture. If the commercialization of Data Streams/CCIP progresses slowly, the "cash flow attributes" of LINK may materialize later than expected. Third, compliance uncertainty. Regulatory and licensing requirements for cross-border data, foreign exchange, and securitized products could delay product rollouts. Fourth, technology and operational risks. Low-latency data and cross-chain messaging require sustained depth of defense and node governance. Fifth, for new mechanisms mentioned in the media, such as LINK Reserve, unless they are systematically implemented by the official team, their marginal impact on the supply and demand dynamics in the secondary market should be treated with caution and should not be given significant weight in baseline valuations.

From an investor perspective, LINK is suitable for a medium- to long-term holding strategy, with a dollar-cost averaging strategy and regular investments to reduce volatility risks. For those interested in staking, the 4.3% annualized yield provides additional returns while simultaneously reducing circulating supply. For project teams, they should work closer with financial institutions and enterprises, further standardizing the data sources and settlement mechanisms for RWAs to broaden the scope of application. For ecosystem developers, Chainlink offers stable data and cross-chain service interfaces, on the basis of which more DeFi solutions, cross-chain applications, and RWA products can be developed in the future.

We position LINK (Chainlink) as the core asset of "Onchain Finance universal infrastructure + data/interoperability hub", driven by three long-term themes: First, data and compliance-oriented oracles will run through the entire lifecycle of crypto-native and the tokenization of traditional assets. Chainlink has already become the de facto standard (third-party trackers such as DeFiLlama have long shown its dominance in oracle rankings; various media and research institutions estimate its share of the overall oracle market at around 46%–68%, and its share of Ethereum DeFi data provision at over 80%). Second, the cross-chain interoperability layer CCIP continues to advance from public blockchains toward institutional-grade applications, rolling out in Swift, DTCC, and now Solana, with increasingly clear network effects and standardization pathway. Third, the suite of data products (price oracles, Proof of Reserve, Data Streams, State Pricing, etc.) and institutional data providers (ICE, etc.) form a "high-frequency, low-latency + compliant, modular" product matrix, driving expansion beyond crypto-native assets into a broader spectrum of traditional asset data, including U.S. stock ETFs, foreign exchange, precious metals, and fund NAVs. In terms of on-chain value capture, Chainlink's economic model revolves around a cycle of "fees—services—staking—nodes—ecosystem reinvestment" (Economics 2.0 and Staking v0.2), supplemented by the BUILD program and supply-side measures such as the "LINK reserve" mentioned in media reports. The goal is to integrate network usage fees with security budgets and ecosystem growth, progressively enhancing LINK's utility and its potential cash flow attributes. Considering institutional-grade partnerships (Swift, DTCC, ICE), multi-chain coverage, surging demand for RWAs and cross-chain interoperability, and the integration of non-EVM ecosystems such as Solana, we believe that LINK will continue to exhibit the combined characteristics of both β (returns correlated with market volatility) and α (excess returns beyond the benchmark) in the subsequent cycle.

VII. Conclusion

In summary, as the leading project in oracles and cross-chain infrastructure, Chainlink possesses unique strategic value in RWA tokenization. Its value-capture flywheel mechanism, LINK reserve repurchase model, and staking incentives together constitute a robust economic model. As the RWA market steadily expands, Chainlink's applications will encompass a wider range of financial scenarios, driving sustained growth in both revenue and token value. From a valuation perspective, LINK remains undervalued relative to other tokens with larger market caps yet lacking meaningful applications, leaving significant room for future appreciation and revaluation. While technological, competitive, and regulatory risks persist, over the long run, Chainlink is well-positioned to become a hidden winner of the on-chain economy, accelerating the deep integration of crypto with traditional finance.

Related Reads

Claude Requires ID Verification and Facial Recognition? The Facial Recognition Requirement is an Old Story from Two Months Ago, and "Sharing Data with Police" is a Misinterpretation

Anthropic's updated privacy policy, effective July 8th, has sparked misinterpretations in Chinese social media, primarily concerning new identity verification and data sharing with law enforcement. A detailed comparison reveals these claims are largely unfounded. First, identity verification (including submitting government ID and a live selfie via third-party provider Persona) is not a new July policy. This mechanism was actually implemented in mid-April 2026 for certain high-use or flagged accounts, particularly Claude Max subscribers. The July update merely formally documents this existing practice in the policy text under a new "Verification Data" section. Second, the widespread claim that the new policy lowers the threshold for sharing user data with law enforcement is incorrect. Comparing the new text with the old version (dated September 28, 2025) shows no substantive tightening. While the new policy more clearly structures the conditions for disclosure—including having a "good-faith belief" it's necessary for legal compliance, preventing harm, fraud detection, or enforcing terms—the old policy already allowed Anthropic to disclose data based on its judgment for similar reasons (e.g., protecting safety, preventing fraud, or complying with law). The term "good-faith belief" acts as a limiting standard, not a lowered barrier. A 2025 court case where Anthropic resisted disclosing user data in a copyright lawsuit further demonstrates the complexity of such standards. The policy's actual substantial changes address data flows for Claude's Agent capabilities. New clauses clarify that when users connect third-party services or instruct Claude to perform multi-step tasks (reading files, sending messages), their inputs, outputs, and instructions are shared with those third parties, governed by the third parties' own policies. This update fills a compliance gap for Claude's evolving functionality beyond simple Q&A. Other additions include a "Research Participation Data" section and refined marketing legal bases. Anthropic reaffirms core commitments: not selling user data, keeping Claude ad-free, and allowing users to control if chats are used for model training. Overall, this update is primarily a compliance catch-up to existing product features, not a significant new privacy tightening. The heightened concern stems from conflating April's verification rollout, standard legal clauses, and the genuine new provisions regarding Agent tasks.

marsbit9m ago

Claude Requires ID Verification and Facial Recognition? The Facial Recognition Requirement is an Old Story from Two Months Ago, and "Sharing Data with Police" is a Misinterpretation

marsbit9m ago

The World Cup Has Only Just Begun, But AI Predictions Already Have Models Hailed as 'Godly' and Others Flipping Over

After only a few days of the World Cup, AI models are being widely used for match predictions, with mixed early results. These models analyze details like scores, upsets, red cards, and key players, offering users in prediction markets an extra layer of analysis beyond odds and news. Qwen gained early attention for its remarkably accurate calls on the opening day, correctly predicting Mexico's 2-0 win over South Africa and Korea's 2-1 victory over the Czech Republic, while also highlighting red card risks and match flow. Copilot had its own highlights, accurately forecasting the Mexico 2-0 result, the Korea 2-1 win, and a surprising 1-1 draw between Brazil and Morocco. However, it also misjudged several matches, like predicting a Swiss win that ended in a draw with Qatar and missing Australia's upset over Turkey. ChatGPT provided detailed pre-match analysis and correctly called the Mexico 2-0 score, explaining factors like home-field advantage. Yet, it struggled to anticipate upsets, often siding with the stronger team on paper, as seen in its missed calls for the Australia-Turkey and Japan-Netherlands matches. Social media tests pitted models like Gemini, Grok, and Claude against each other for the same games, revealing different predictive "scripts" even for the same fixture. Overall, while AI models like Qwen and Copilot have shown promising, high-profile successes in early matches, their consistency and ability to predict genuine upsets remain in question. As the tournament progresses, more data will be needed to determine which models offer the most reliable insights for prediction markets.

Odaily星球日报13m ago

The World Cup Has Only Just Begun, But AI Predictions Already Have Models Hailed as 'Godly' and Others Flipping Over

Odaily星球日报13m ago

The Unfinished Tale of Jueying, DaXiao Robotics Swiftly "Raises Funds"

Following a major fundraising round involving several prominent investment institutions, DaXiao Robotics, a company backed by SenseTime, has secured hundreds of millions of US dollars in financing for the first half of 2026. This move signals SenseTime's renewed and substantial bet on "Physical AI" through embodied intelligence, following the relative underperformance of its autonomous driving unit, Jueying. While Jueying achieved mass production partnerships in the smart vehicle sector, it failed to become a pivotal player in the high-level autonomous driving landscape, leading to its gradual independence from SenseTime's core financials. DaXiao Robotics now emerges as SenseTime's next major venture into the physical world. The new funding will focus on developing a "world model" and integrated hardware-software solutions for commercial applications like retail, security, and hospitality. This ambition is significantly more complex and capital-intensive than previous projects. A world model requires understanding spatial relationships, physics, and causality to guide robots in long-term tasks, demanding immense computational resources, data, and engineering. The article highlights several challenges. First, the massive funding, while substantial, may still be strained by the high costs of R&D, data collection, and commercial deployment. Second, SenseTime itself, despite narrowing losses, continues its high-investment growth model and cannot solely bankroll this new, expensive endeavor. Third, DaXiao Robotics, led by SenseTime co-founder Wang Xiaogang, carries the technical heritage and resources of its parent company but also potentially its organizational inertia. It operates in a field increasingly dominated by agile, young technical founders. Ultimately, DaXiao Robotics represents SenseTime's attempt to secure a leading industrial position in embodied intelligence—a goal its Jueying unit did not fully achieve in autonomous driving. The new venture starts with strong capital backing, but faces the critical task of rapidly transitioning from technological narrative to sustainable commercial delivery in an early-stage, costly, and highly competitive arena.

marsbit23m ago

The Unfinished Tale of Jueying, DaXiao Robotics Swiftly "Raises Funds"

marsbit23m ago

Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Forecast for the Four-Year Cycle of the Cryptocurrency Industry

Title: Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Four-Year Cycle Prediction for the Encryption Industry This article outlines a detailed, stage-by-stage prediction for the crypto industry from the present to 2029, focusing on tangible shifts rather than abstract theory. Key predictions include: **2026 Mid-Year:** The market shifts focus from traditional tokens to synthetic perpetual contracts for private company shares (e.g., SpaceX on Hyperliquid), which become primary price discovery tools for pre-IPO assets. Most altcoins languish as the market seeks assets with real underlying value. **2026 Year-End:** The "AI + crypto" narrative fades as the AI industry itself does not require crypto infrastructure, except for prediction markets betting on model performance. Concurrently, a quiet institutional adoption of asset tokenization (e.g., money market funds) begins under new regulations like the CLARITY Act, creating a dual economy. **2027:** Major public blockchain foundations pivot decisively to serve institutional clients with compliance tools and enterprise sales, while quietly building infrastructure for a future wave of accredited retail investors. Three sectors hit growth ceilings: private perpetual contracts (due to legal restrictions on marketing), stablecoins (due to political uncertainty ahead of the 2028 US election), and tokenized assets (due to cautious institutional scaling). **2028:** Speculative trading diminishes as market efficiency drains liquidity. A major liquidation cascade in synthetic perpetual contracts exposes the flaw of lacking a legally enforceable underlying asset. In response, regulations are revised to allow marketing of private security secondary sales to accredited investors. This creates a legal, direct market for private company equity, absorbing much of the demand previously met by synthetic derivatives. **2029:** A new bull market emerges, driven not by tokens but by tradable equity in innovative private companies (biotech, robotics, AI). Tokens without legally enforceable claims to real assets lose all liquidity. Successful blockchains become invisible settlement infrastructure. Stablecoins grow steadily at a policy-capped rate. Speculation becomes a niche. Core Questions Answered: 1. **Token Value:** Determined solely by legally enforceable claims to real-world assets. 2. **Tech Adoption:** Achieved through blockchain-based primary/secondary markets for private equity, not through forcing tokens onto tech firms. 3. **Crypto as Infrastructure:** The transition happens silently; the technology becomes a mundane, unseen utility like traditional settlement systems. The entire thesis hinges on one testable variable: by late 2028, whether accredited retail investors gain legal, direct access to private asset markets. If not, the core premise—that legal frameworks, not technology, are the main bottleneck—fails.

Foresight News30m ago

Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Forecast for the Four-Year Cycle of the Cryptocurrency Industry

Foresight News30m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy LINK

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing ChainLink (LINK) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy ChainLink (LINK) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your ChainLink (LINK)After purchasing your ChainLink (LINK), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade ChainLink (LINK)Easily trade ChainLink (LINK) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

9.1k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy LINK

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of LINK (LINK) are presented below.

活动图片