30% of Bitcoin is locked up by big players – So why is BTC’s price falling?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-16Last updated on 2025-12-16

Abstract

Bitcoin's price decline is occurring despite significant institutional accumulation, with large holders now controlling nearly 30% of the circulating supply (approximately 5.94 million BTC). This institutional ownership, spread across ETFs, public companies, and government treasuries, has reduced sell-side pressure. Major U.S. financial institutions are also expanding Bitcoin-related services. However, the recent price drop was primarily driven by leveraged long liquidations in the futures market. As highly leveraged positions were automatically closed during price dips, forced sell orders triggered a cascading effect. The key level to watch is Bitcoin's two-year simple moving average (SMA) near $82,800, which has historically acted as a critical regime indicator. A monthly close below this level could signal further downward pressure, while holding above it maintains long-term bullish structure.

Institutions love their Bitcoin! Large holders now control a huge share of supply, U.S. banks are rolling out more Bitcoin-linked products, and demand hasn’t disappeared.

Yet prices have slipped, because leverage broke first.

The big hands holding up Bitcoin

Source: Glassnode

Institutional holders now control roughly 5.94 million Bitcoin [BTC] (close to 30% of the circulating supply). The holding is spread across exchanges, ETFs, public companies, and government treasuries.

Long-term balances are rising, while exchange-held BTC has stagnated. This means reduced sell-side pressure over time.

Source: River

Meanwhile, Wall Street doesn’t want to miss out.

According to River, 14 of the top 25 U.S. banks are now building or exploring Bitcoin products, from trading desks to custody services. These are largely aimed at high-net-worth clients.

The infrastructure is being built before the next demand phase arrives.

When leverage breaks, price follows

The accumulation makes the latest dip easier to misread.

The sell-off was led by leverage snapping in the Futures market. As the chart shows, every sharp drop in Bitcoin’s price lines up with spikes in long liquidations across exchanges.

Source: CryptoQuant

In recent weeks, traders piled into highly leveraged long positions, betting on more upside. When prices slipped below key levels, those positions were automatically closed.

This caused forced market sell orders. This kind of selling snowballs fast, with one liquidation pushing price lower, setting off the next.

A line the market can’t ignore

Now the attention shifts to where Bitcoin stands structurally.

On the long-term 2Y SMA Multiplier chart from Alphractal, BTC is dangerously close to its two-year SMA, at near $82,800. This level has mattered in every cycle.

Source: Alphractal

Monthly closes below the 2Y SMA have so far coincided with long bear phases, while holding or reclaiming it has helped reset the market after excess. It acts like a regime marker.

As the end of the year comes to a close, holding above this line keeps the long-term structure intact. Slipping below it would mean more pressure ahead.


Final Thoughts

  • Nearly 30% of Bitcoin’s supply is now owned by institutions.
  • Recent price weakness came from leverage liquidations. $82,800 (2Y SMA) is now the key line to watch.
Next: Short squeeze or structural shift? Here’s why MYX’s price rally is drawing attention
Share
  • Share
  • Tweet

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片