Powell, tariffs, and BTC: The perfect storm for Bitcoin’s next big move?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-07-27Last updated on 2025-07-28

Key Takeaways

Bitcoin sits at a pivotal level, with liquidity clustering around $123k and $112k–$115k, as macro catalysts and fiscal easing collide.


Just as markets brace for a Fed pivot, tariff relief drops into the mix. Perfectly timed, or perfectly planned? 

Either way, Bitcoin [BTC] looks primed for a move. It either breaks clean, or we see a rejection that flushes back into the $112k-$115k demand zone to retest bid depth.

With liquidity now clustering on both sides, the stage is set. Bitcoin’s next directional impulse will likely be triggered by whichever zone gives way first, all while macro headwinds start circling back in.

Markets brace for Powell

July wraps with macro risk dialed up. Fed Chair Powell opens the next FOMC setup with a fresh read on the economy, and the market’s locked in on inflation risk for good reason.

June CPI came in hot at 2.7% YoY, a four-month high and the first real 0.3% MoM jump this year. What’s more, that’s two back-to-back monthly upticks, breaking the prior trend of soft prints that averaged -0.2% MoM.

Put simply, the disinflation narrative just took a hit. With inflation stickier than expected, the market is now questioning just how dovish the Fed can afford to be heading into H2.

U.S. inflation rateU.S. inflation rate

Source: TradingEconomics

The CME FedWatch Tool shows traders are fully pricing in a “hold” at the 30th of July FOMC meeting.

In fact, there’s a 97.4% chance the Fed keeps rates locked at 425-450 bps, while a 25 bps cut is getting just 2.6% odds, showing there’s little conviction around immediate easing.

Naturally, the focus now shifts to how Bitcoin handles a macro tape that’s still tight on liquidity. Is tight policy the key reason BTC’s next leg higher keeps stalling out?

Bitcoin caught between policy and positioning

With no Fed pivot yet, Bitcoin’s next real liquidity injection clearly stems from fiscal relief, namely, the tariff unwind. Conveniently, it drops right into the FOMC window.

Take June’s tariff rollback headlines, for example. The U.S. reversed China import duties, delivering stealth fiscal easing even as the Fed remained hawkish.

The market caught on quickly. Bitcoin’s Coinbase Premium Index turned sustainably positive from mid-April, peaking at 0.105 in early June, right as those tariff headlines dropped.

Bitcoin CPIBitcoin CPI

Source: CryptoQuant

The price action followed through.

Bitcoin printed three green monthlies in a row, with June defending the $100k handle cleanly. That zone fueled a breakout to $123k by mid-July, locking in an 11.31% gain on the month. 

Structurally, the setup favors a squeeze. Sticky CPI keeps rates high, while fiscal easing underpins the bid. With $9.5 billion in shorts parked at $123k, Bitcoin’s poised to rip into price discovery.

Share

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The Impact of OUSD on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Landscape

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: A Nuanced Competitive Reshuffle The launch of OUSD, a new stablecoin initiative, has complex implications for the stablecoin market. For Circle (CRCL), the initial 15-20% stock drop reflects legitimate competitive concerns but is not a "death sentence." Circle retains deep liquidity, existing integrations, and first-mover advantages. A potential restructuring or termination of its Coinbase partnership could even double its net revenue in the short term, providing more competitive freedom. However, OUSD, backed by Stripe's engineering and product strengths, could become the default stablecoin within the Stripe ecosystem for new adopters, challenging USDC's position. OUSD does not solve the core barrier for corporate adoption: it remains a credit exposure to its issuer (likely a Bridge-related entity), which, like Circle, is not an investment-grade entity. Large banks and asset managers could still capture the most lucrative enterprise use cases. Circle must accelerate its payment/fintech product development and consider defensive M&A. For Tether, OUSD targets a different market segment. Tether will continue focusing on distribution channels not prioritized by Stripe or Circle. Its market share may decline over time, but within a significantly growing total market. Paxos faces the greatest pressure. OUSD undermines the key selling points of its USDG stablecoin, and Paxos's regulatory advantages may diminish as frameworks mature. This poses a more existential challenge, explaining Paxos's recent shift back to its brokerage-as-a-service business.

marsbit1h ago

The Impact of OUSD on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Landscape

marsbit1h ago

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Reshuffle

This article analyzes the impact of the newly announced stablecoin OUSD, backed by a consortium including Stripe, on major incumbents like Circle (USDC), Tether (USDT), and Paxos (USDG). For Circle, the announcement is not a simple negative. While the initial market reaction was rational, it's not a "death sentence." Circle retains deep liquidity, existing integrations, and first-mover advantage. A potential restructuring or termination of its exclusive revenue-sharing deal with Coinbase could even near-double its net income in the short term, providing more competitive flexibility. However, within the Stripe ecosystem, OUSD, with its strong engineering and product focus, could become the default choice, displacing USDC for new integrations. Circle must accelerate its own fintech product development and consider defensive M&A. OUSD does not directly threaten Tether's core markets, which focus on different distribution channels. Tether's market share may decline over time but within a significantly growing overall market. Paxos faces the greatest pressure. OUSD undermines the primary value proposition of its USDG stablecoin, and Paxos's regulatory advantages may erode as frameworks mature, posing a more existential challenge. This explains Paxos's recent strategic pivot towards brokerage-as-a-service. A fundamental unresolved issue for enterprise adoption remains: if issued by a Bridge-related entity, OUSD, like USDC, still represents a credit exposure to a non-investment-grade issuer, unless a parent company guarantee is provided. Large banks and asset managers entering the space later could still compete for the most lucrative enterprise use cases.

链捕手1h ago

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Reshuffle

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片