Will this Senator’s crypto bill force Trump out of the memecoin business?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-05Last updated on 2026-07-05

Abstract

In a July press release, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand addressed ethical concerns regarding former President Donald Trump's cryptocurrency involvement. Trump's 2025 financial disclosure, filed with the Office of Government Ethics, revealed he earned over $1.4 billion from crypto ventures. The primary source was $636 million from CIC Digital LLC, which licenses the official TRUMP memecoin. In response, Senator Gillibrand is pushing legislation to prohibit elected officials, including the President, Vice President, Congress members, and their spouses, from issuing, promoting, or sponsoring digital assets while in office. The proposal aims to prevent self-dealing and restore public trust. Gillibrand argues that such a ban is a commonsense, bipartisan measure necessary to strengthen consumer protections and stop officials from profiting from their office.

In a press release dated the 3rd of July, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand addressed the mounting ethical questions surrounding U.S President Donald Trump’s personal involvement in the cryptocurrency sector.

This, after President Trump’s 2025 financial disclosures, where the main source of income came from issuing memecoins.

Details of Trump’s income sources via his crypto ventures

In his most recent 927-page financial disclosure, the Office of Government Ethics revealed Trump’s extensive involvement in the digital asset industry.

It disclosed that in 2025, he earned over $1.4 billion from cryptocurrency-related activities. CIC Digital LLC, the company involved in licensing the Official Trump (TRUMP) memecoin, contributed the most with $636 million.

Meanwhile, First Lady Melania Trump, who is also under investigation, is said to have made about $6 million from NFTs and other digital collectibles.

As expected, President Trump has defended these earnings in the face of much criticism from many quarters.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand’s proposal

The President’s statement is is what pushed Senator Gillibrand to redouble her efforts to pass legislation that would make it illegal for elected officials to issue, promote, or sponsor digital assets while they are in office.

This proposal also includes the President, Vice President, members of Congress, and their spouses. Under the proposal, Trump would not be permitted to introduce or support cryptocurrencies like his memecoin.

All this comes on the heels of the $TRUMP memecoin trading at $1.78 on the charts after a drop of almost 80% over the past year.

Remarking on the same, Gillibrand said,

This is a commonsense requirement that should get broad bipartisan support – public officials and their spouses should not be issuing memecoins. We cannot let self-dealing destroy an opportunity to strengthen consumer protections, crack down on illicit finance, and expand economic opportunity for the millions of Americans our financial system has left behind.

She added,

The time to act is now — and that must include ethics reforms that prohibit members of Congress, the president, and their spouses from cashing in on their office.

What’s more?

In addition to digital assets, Gillibrand has backed more general ethics reforms, such as bipartisan attempts to control prediction markets. She has also proposed long-standing plans to prohibit members of Congress and their spouses from trading individual stocks.

The Senator’s goal is to improve public confidence and stop elected officials from abusing their power for personal financial benefits.


Final Summary

  • Trump’s latest financial disclosure revealed that cryptocurrencies accounted for his largest source of income.
  • TRUMP memecoin and World Liberty Financial were among the ventures that produced over $1.4 billion in reported earnings in 2025.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main ethical concern raised by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand regarding President Trump and cryptocurrency?

AThe main ethical concern is that President Trump's largest source of income in 2025 came from cryptocurrency-related activities, specifically from issuing and promoting a memecoin (TRUMP) while holding public office. Gillibrand argues this represents self-dealing and a conflict of interest.

QWhat specific legislative action is Senator Gillibrand proposing in response to this issue?

ASenator Gillibrand is proposing legislation that would make it illegal for elected officials, including the President, Vice President, members of Congress, and their spouses, to issue, promote, or sponsor digital assets while they are in office.

QHow much did President Trump reportedly earn from cryptocurrency activities in 2025 according to his financial disclosure?

AAccording to his 2025 financial disclosure, President Trump reportedly earned over $1.4 billion from cryptocurrency-related activities.

QWhich company associated with Trump contributed the most to his crypto earnings, and what was the amount?

ACIC Digital LLC, the company involved in licensing the Official Trump (TRUMP) memecoin, contributed the most, with $636 million in earnings.

QAccording to the article, what is the broader goal of Senator Gillibrand's proposed ethics reforms?

AThe broader goal is to improve public confidence and prevent elected officials from abusing their positions for personal financial gain, which includes not only banning crypto activities but also prohibiting trading of individual stocks and regulating prediction markets.

Related Reads

The Impact of OUSD on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Landscape

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: A Nuanced Competitive Reshuffle The launch of OUSD, a new stablecoin initiative, has complex implications for the stablecoin market. For Circle (CRCL), the initial 15-20% stock drop reflects legitimate competitive concerns but is not a "death sentence." Circle retains deep liquidity, existing integrations, and first-mover advantages. A potential restructuring or termination of its Coinbase partnership could even double its net revenue in the short term, providing more competitive freedom. However, OUSD, backed by Stripe's engineering and product strengths, could become the default stablecoin within the Stripe ecosystem for new adopters, challenging USDC's position. OUSD does not solve the core barrier for corporate adoption: it remains a credit exposure to its issuer (likely a Bridge-related entity), which, like Circle, is not an investment-grade entity. Large banks and asset managers could still capture the most lucrative enterprise use cases. Circle must accelerate its payment/fintech product development and consider defensive M&A. For Tether, OUSD targets a different market segment. Tether will continue focusing on distribution channels not prioritized by Stripe or Circle. Its market share may decline over time, but within a significantly growing total market. Paxos faces the greatest pressure. OUSD undermines the key selling points of its USDG stablecoin, and Paxos's regulatory advantages may diminish as frameworks mature. This poses a more existential challenge, explaining Paxos's recent shift back to its brokerage-as-a-service business.

marsbit36m ago

The Impact of OUSD on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Landscape

marsbit36m ago

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Reshuffle

This article analyzes the impact of the newly announced stablecoin OUSD, backed by a consortium including Stripe, on major incumbents like Circle (USDC), Tether (USDT), and Paxos (USDG). For Circle, the announcement is not a simple negative. While the initial market reaction was rational, it's not a "death sentence." Circle retains deep liquidity, existing integrations, and first-mover advantage. A potential restructuring or termination of its exclusive revenue-sharing deal with Coinbase could even near-double its net income in the short term, providing more competitive flexibility. However, within the Stripe ecosystem, OUSD, with its strong engineering and product focus, could become the default choice, displacing USDC for new integrations. Circle must accelerate its own fintech product development and consider defensive M&A. OUSD does not directly threaten Tether's core markets, which focus on different distribution channels. Tether's market share may decline over time but within a significantly growing overall market. Paxos faces the greatest pressure. OUSD undermines the primary value proposition of its USDG stablecoin, and Paxos's regulatory advantages may erode as frameworks mature, posing a more existential challenge. This explains Paxos's recent strategic pivot towards brokerage-as-a-service. A fundamental unresolved issue for enterprise adoption remains: if issued by a Bridge-related entity, OUSD, like USDC, still represents a credit exposure to a non-investment-grade issuer, unless a parent company guarantee is provided. Large banks and asset managers entering the space later could still compete for the most lucrative enterprise use cases.

链捕手38m ago

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Reshuffle

链捕手38m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片