多空争夺激烈,比特币再现“黄金坑”?

链捕手Published on 2025-03-05Last updated on 2025-03-05

作者:比推 BitpushNews Mary Liu

 

在经历数日惊心动魄的震荡后,隔夜,风险资产迎来反转。

比推数据显示,过去 24 小时,比特币(BTC)从当日最低点 81,500 美元一度反弹至 88,000 美元以上,日内涨幅近 10%。与此同时,三大股指跌幅收窄,纳指收盘跌幅缩窄至 0.35%。

市场情绪与宏观经济的「拉锯战」

近期行情胶着,比特币从 2 月 21 日的 78,000 美元低点反弹至 95,000 美元后,接着回落至 81,000 美元附近,多空双方力量拉锯,市场方向不明。尽管特朗普的「亲加密」表态一度提振市场信心,但其影响终究短暂,未能扭转整体市场的疲软态势,潜在的宏观经济风险依旧是悬在市场头顶的「达摩克利斯之剑」。

CryptoQuant 首席执行官 Ki Young Ju 认为,比特币市场或将持续在低迷状态徘徊,直至美国市场情绪出现实质性改善,在监管政策不明朗、宏观经济环境复杂多变以及投资者情绪持续波动等多重因素交织影响下,比特币能否长期维持高位运行仍是未知数。在更强劲的市场催化剂出现之前,比特币或将继续在宽幅区间内震荡整理,投资者需密切关注市场动向,捕捉关键信号。

9 万美元关口失守后,多头面临严峻挑战

尽管市场曾多次尝试反弹,但比特币及整个加密货币市场依旧承压,未能有效确立持续上行趋势。不少分析师已发出预警,多头若想扭转颓势,必须尽快采取行动,重新夺回关键点位,否则比特币或将面临进一步下探风险。

不过,Ki Young Ju 却认为,当前断言牛市周期已经结束可能为时尚早。CryptoQuant 的链上数据显示,市场链上活动依然相对平淡,关键指标也呈中性,这表明尽管近期市场表现疲软,但整体牛市格局可能尚未被破坏。此外,比特币基本面依然稳健,更多矿机持续上线,也反映出市场主要参与者对比特币长期前景仍然抱有信心。

Ju 进一步指出,如果本轮牛市周期就此终结,这恐怕并非市场主要利益相关者所乐见的结果,这些利益相关者包括早期入场的「巨鲸」投资者、大型矿业公司、传统金融机构以及公开表示支持加密货币的美国总统特朗普。 散户投资者通常被认为是牛市周期后期的入场者,在当前阶段,其市场行为可能尚不足以主导市场走向。

8.5 万美元成关键流动性考验,历史周期或将重演?

TradingView 分析师认为,BTC 短期内更为关键的支撑位依然是 85,000 美元,这一水平在近几周的市场博弈中扮演着至关重要的角色。

若比特币在未来数日内持续运行于 85,000 美元下方,或将引发更大规模的市场抛售,卖压的集中释放可能导致币价加速下行,并进一步确认市场看跌势头,届时比特币或将面临测试更低支撑位的风险。

Quinten 在 X 平台发文表示:回顾历史,或许能为我们提供一些启示。在上一轮牛市周期中,比特币曾经历过七次幅度较大的回调,回调幅度分别为:-17%, -17%, -32%, -26%, -28%, -51%, -25%。每一次回调都曾引发市场恐慌,让人感觉「熊市」已至,每当价格大幅下跌,市场上总会充斥着「比特币已死」的论调。然而,历史证明,比特币最终都成功突破阻力,并继续向上攀升。诚然,历史不会简单重复,但往往会惊人地相似。

综合来看,85,000 美元和 90,000 美元这两个关键价位将成为短期市场多空双方争夺的焦点,投资者需密切关注这两个点位的得失情况,以研判市场下一步的走向。

根据分析师 MasterAnanda 的说法,当前的市场走势非常「有趣」,并释放出一些值得关注的关键信号:

底部或已探明: 上周比特币自 109,000 美元历史高点大幅回落 28%,最低触及 78,300 美元后迅速强劲反弹,这种「触底反弹」的 V 型反转走势,通常被视为市场阶段性底部形成的信号,预示着短期内进一步大幅下跌的可能性降低。

牛市中的健康回调: 在经历了强劲的牛市上涨之后,市场出现一定幅度的回调实属正常现象。这种回调有助于释放市场前期累积的获利盘,为市场积蓄新的上涨动能,健康的调整方能为更长期的牛市奠定基础。

逢低吸纳的「黄金坑」: 当前的市场回调实际上为场外资金提供了难得的入场机会。如果错过了此前比特币从 85,000 美元快速拉升至 95,000 美元的行情,那么现在或许是相对低位布局的良机。市场永远不乏机会,回调正是牛市周期中重要的「积累阶段」。

长期牛市趋势未变: 比特币长期向上的增长趋势并未发生根本性改变。从历史规律来看,比特币有望在未来数月内重拾升势,逐步震荡上行,按照此前分析师的预测,比特币在下个月仍有潜力冲击 12 万美元的目标价位。

技术指标提供支撑: 从比特币日线图观察, 200 日移动平均线(MA200)正发挥着关键支撑作用,而 MA200 长期以来被视为判断加密货币长期趋势的最重要技术指标之一。当前比特币价格走势正在形成更高的低点,预示着看涨趋势或将得到进一步确认。

市场情绪与资金蓄势: 此轮周期并非单纯由美国政府政策或地缘政治事件驱动,还是遵循市场自身周期性规律的体现。比特币已经为进入新一轮增长阶段做好了准备,并有望在 2025 年再创新高。此外,市场外仍有大量资金在伺机而动,一旦市场企稳回升,这些资金有望加速入场,进一步助推市场上涨。

总结而言, 比特币或已探明阶段性底部,市场正进入震荡蓄势的「积累阶段」。尽管短期市场波动难免,但长期牛市趋势依然稳固。投资者可把握当前回调机会,在相对低位分批布局,耐心持有,静待市场最终选择方向。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Anthropic Creates an AI Jailbreak 'Penal Code': Your Requests, Four Ways to Die

Anthropic has publicly detailed its security measures and a new "Cyber Jailbreak Severity" (CJS) framework following the controversial takedown of its Fable 5 model. The incident, triggered by simple user requests like counting letters or stating a profession, highlighted overzealous safety filters. Anthropic classifies cybersecurity-related prompts into four tiers: malicious activities (blocked), high-risk dual-use (like pentesting, with strict limits), low-risk dual-use (often blocked by "safety margin" errors), and harmless tasks (theoretically allowed but still frequently flagged). The company admits its classifiers are tuned for high sensitivity, leading to many false positives. The newly proposed CJS framework aims to objectively score the severity of AI "jailbreaks" (prompts that bypass safety rules) on a 0-10 scale across four dimensions: Capability Gain (does it grant new attack abilities?), Breadth (does it work across multiple attack types?), Weaponization Ease (how hard is it to turn into a real attack?), and Discoverability (how easy is it to find?). The score determines the response, from no action (CJS-0) to a potential model takedown (CJS-4). The score is context-dependent; for example, discovering a major unknown vulnerability today scores high, while asking about a well-known one scores low. The article raises concerns about Anthropic's dual role: it is both creating powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) and defining the rules (CJS) for judging their misuse, potentially giving it disproportionate influence. This is set against the backdrop of U.S. export controls, which for the first time directly restricted API access to a model (Fable 5), creating a "tiered" system where public models are heavily filtered and advanced ones are limited to vetted partners. The CJS framework is portrayed as potentially providing regulators with a metric to justify future API shutdowns. For users, the advice is to carefully phrase prompts, watch for signs of being downgraded to a weaker model, and wait indefinitely for promised filter improvements.

marsbit24m ago

Anthropic Creates an AI Jailbreak 'Penal Code': Your Requests, Four Ways to Die

marsbit24m ago

$100M Annual Revenue, Two Berkeley Roommates in Their 20s Build the Most Profitable AI Business

Arena, the AI model ranking platform, has become a $100 million annual revenue business just eight months after launching its commercial service. Originally a UC Berkeley open-source research project called Chatbot Arena, it created a "battle arena" where users blind-test and vote on anonymous AI model responses. This has generated a highly trusted, community-driven leaderboard based on over 10 million user evaluations and 82 million votes. Major AI companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic submit their flagship models to be ranked. The core monetization strategy is its AI Evaluations service, where model developers and large enterprises pay for in-depth performance analysis from Arena's massive user community. This provides real-world feedback on model strengths, weaknesses, and hallucinations—a critical service as models become more complex. The company, spun out from Berkeley in early 2025, quickly raised $100 million in seed funding at a $600 million valuation and later secured a $150 million Series A at a $1.7 billion valuation. The founding team includes CEO Anastasios Angelopoulos, a mathematician focused on rigorous model evaluation; CTO Wei-Lin Chiang, creator of the popular Vicuna chatbot; and co-founder Ion Stoica, a renowned Berkeley professor. Arena is now expanding beyond chat benchmarks into "Agent Mode," evaluating AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks like coding and research. The company's success illustrates the growing value and cost of independent, real-world AI model evaluation as the industry intensifies.

marsbit29m ago

$100M Annual Revenue, Two Berkeley Roommates in Their 20s Build the Most Profitable AI Business

marsbit29m ago

Racking Up 24,000 Stars: With One Command, AI Can Now Find Its Own Skills

Vercel, known for its developer tools like Next.js, has launched 'skills', a package manager for AI coding agents, garnering 24,000 GitHub stars. It allows developers to add specialized capabilities, such as React best practices, to AI assistants like Claude Code or Cursor with a single command: `npx skills add <package>`. Skills are shareable, reusable modules that define an AI agent's behavior for specific tasks, moving beyond one-off prompt engineering towards standardized 'capability engineering'. A key innovation is the 'find-skills' skill, which acts as an internal search engine, allowing an agent to autonomously find and install the right skill for a user's request. This lowers the barrier for non-developers to leverage advanced AI coding assistance. However, this 'npm moment' for AI brings significant security risks. Security audits of thousands of skills on platforms like skills.sh and ClawHub found over 30% contained security flaws, with about 13% classified as severe. Threats include malicious scripts that can access local files and credentials, and prompt injection hidden within skill documentation. Unlike traditional code packages, skills blend instructions, code, and system access, posing a direct risk to user machines and data. Experts advise treating skills like code—reviewing them carefully before installation, especially their scripts, and being wary of excessive permissions. Ultimately, Vercel's initiative represents a major shift towards modular, reusable AI capabilities, but its rapid adoption requires developers to bring the same caution used in managing traditional software dependencies.

marsbit30m ago

Racking Up 24,000 Stars: With One Command, AI Can Now Find Its Own Skills

marsbit30m ago

Claude Engineer Finally Unveils Fable 5's Ultimate Strategy, Teaching You How to Bridge the Information Gap with AI Models

This article, titled "Claude Engineer Finally Releases Fable 5 'Skill-Burning' Guide, Teaching How to Bridge the Information Gap with Models," details a blog post by Claude Code engineer Thariq Shihipar. The core concept is the "information gap" or "unknowns"—the disconnect between a user's instructions (the "map") and the actual task requirements (the "territory"). The article argues that with powerful models like Claude Fable 5, work quality depends on the user's ability to identify and clarify these unknowns. Shihipar categorizes unknowns into four types: Known Knowns (explicit instructions), Known Unknowns (awareness of gaps), Unknown Knowns (implicit, unstated knowledge), and Unknown Unknowns (unforeseen issues). The blog provides a framework for addressing these gaps throughout the workflow: * **Before Implementation:** Techniques include "Blindspot Scanning" to uncover Unknown Unknowns, brainstorming/prototyping for visual or complex tasks, having Claude ask clarifying questions, using reference code/examples, and creating implementation plans. * **During Implementation:** Maintaining an "implementation notes" file for Claude to document deviations and decisions made due to encountered edge cases. * **After Implementation:** Creating summary documents for review and having Claude generate quizzes to ensure the user fully understands the completed changes. The article concludes that as models become more capable, the key to success is systematically discovering and defining these unknowns through low-cost methods like prototyping and planning, allowing for more effective collaboration.

marsbit34m ago

Claude Engineer Finally Unveils Fable 5's Ultimate Strategy, Teaching You How to Bridge the Information Gap with AI Models

marsbit34m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

617 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片