损失高达21亿美元!2024年Crypto黑客攻击激增

链得得Published on 2024-09-30Last updated on 2024-09-30

2024年,Crypto资产领域由于黑客攻击造成的损失已经超过了2023年全年的总和,创造了新的记录。网络攻击的增加表明,该领域的危险与日俱增,亟需解决方案。

根据相关行业的一份报告,Cyvers在检测2024年第三季度报告的所有Crypto资产攻击中发挥了关键作用,其中约有一半的攻击被其系统捕获。

通过使用人工智能监控,Cyvers的实时警报帮助阻止了进一步的经济损失,显示了先进工具在保护数字资产方面的重要性。

2024年的前三个季度,Crypto资产黑客攻击造成的损失高达21.14亿美元,超过了2023年全年的总和。这标志着与去年同期相比大幅增长了72%,凸显出中心化和去中心化平台的脆弱性都在不断增加。

下面是一些“关键数字”:

  • 2023年1-9月:损失12.3亿美元
  • 2023年全年:损失16.9亿美元
  • 2024年1-9月:损失21.14亿美元

尤其是中心化金融(CeFi)平台,面临的攻击大幅上升,事件同比增长近1000%。与此同时,去中心化金融(DeFi)平台的损失下降了25%,尽管有着复杂的智能合约和协议,它们仍然面临风险。

2024年,CeFi平台受到的打击最大,Crypto资产黑客攻击事件增加了984%。仅2024年第二季度,五起重大事件就造成了4.01亿美元的损失。

其中最引人注目的是DMMBTC交易所漏洞事件,造成了3.05亿美元的损失。土耳其的BtcTurk以及Lykke和Fixed Float等其他交易所也遭受了5500万美元的攻击。

这一波CeFi攻击事件表明,越来越需要更好的安全控制和监管行动来防止进一步的损失

与2023年同期相比,DeFi平台的损失减少了25%。尽管如此,2024年第二季度的62起事件仍造成了1.713亿美元的损失,其中以太坊和BNBChain因其庞大的生态系统而继续成为攻击的主要目标。

同时,由于门禁控制漏洞和智能合约漏洞,黑客攻击事件总数激增。2023年1月至9月仅发生44起,而2024年1月至9月发生了131起。

报告呼吁需要加强跨链安全和更好的实时威胁检测。随着Crypto资产面临更先进的攻击,包括由人工智能驱动的攻击,更强大的安全措施和更快的监管行动对于保护资产至关重要。

虽然DeFi的损失有所减少,但整个行业仍处于高风险之中。要防止未来的损失,保护不断增长的Crypto资产市场,提高安全性和采取更积极的措施至关重要。

作者:区块链骑士;来自链得得内容开放平台“得得号”,本文仅代表作者观点,不代表链得得官方立场凡“得得号”文章,原创性和内容的真实性由投稿人保证,如果稿件因抄袭、作假等行为导致的法律后果,由投稿人本人负责得得号平台发布文章,如有侵权、违规及其他不当言论内容,请广大读者监督,一经证实,平台会立即下线。如遇文章内容问题,请联系微信:chaindd123

链得得仅提供相关信息展示,不构成任何投资建议

Related Reads

Large Language Models Ace All Exams, Yet Move Farther from AGI: What Does This Paper Reveal?

The article discusses the ongoing challenge of defining and achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). It notes that industry leaders have set vague, often profit- or time-based benchmarks for AGI, while the concept itself lacks a consensus definition—a situation the article compares to a "Rorschach test." It highlights a recent 2025 paper by researcher Michael Timothy Bennett, who proposes a new, measurable definition. Bennett frames AGI not as mimicking human performance on tests, which current large language models (LLMs) have already mastered, but as an "artificial scientist." A true AGI, according to this view, should be able to widely and efficiently adapt to new environments and tasks within real-world constraints (like computational and energy limits), focusing on the *discovery of new knowledge* rather than the replication of existing data. The author contrasts this with the current dominant approach of "scale-maxing"—massively scaling up data, parameters, and compute. While powerful, this method leads to models that fail on out-of-distribution problems and lack core intelligent abilities: they are passive learners, cannot reason causally, and cannot actively experiment or balance exploration with exploitation. The article argues that Bennett's framework offers a crucial shift. It makes AGI a quantifiable engineering problem and proposes new evaluation "adaptation benchmarks" that test an AI's ability to actively learn in novel scenarios. The conclusion is that achieving AGI will require a fundamental reset—a fusion of multiple methodologies beyond simple scaling, moving AI from mimicking patterns to embodying the scientific spirit of inquiry and discovery.

marsbit14m ago

Large Language Models Ace All Exams, Yet Move Farther from AGI: What Does This Paper Reveal?

marsbit14m ago

Pope Issues First AI Encyclical: 40,000 Words, 10 Key Points, Clarifying AI Anxiety

Pope Leo XIV's historic encyclical "Magnifica Humanitas," released in May 2026, marks the Catholic Church's first major document addressing artificial intelligence. The 40,000-word text moves beyond theological abstraction to confront practical AI anxieties affecting society. It argues that AI is no longer a mere tool but an embedded environment influencing daily decisions in areas like employment, healthcare, justice, and information, often without users' awareness. The encyclical presents ten core concerns. It highlights that the central issue isn't just regulation, but who holds the underlying *power*—control over data, compute, and platforms—often concentrated in private entities. It warns that even developers cannot fully explain AI systems, creating accountability gaps. While AI can simulate human interaction and creativity, it cautions against treating it as a moral agent capable of bearing true responsibility or forming genuine relationships. Key risks identified include AI's role in opaque decision-making for jobs or welfare, the amplification of persuasive disinformation, and the potential for education to focus on tool use over critical thinking. The document stresses that work has value beyond efficiency, and AI should enhance human capabilities, not merely replace roles. It firmly states that irreversible decisions, especially involving life and death, must remain under human judgment. Ultimately, the encyclical frames AI's challenge as anthropological, not just technological. As AI simulates uniquely human capacities like judgment and creation, it forces a re-examination of what makes human action meaningful: our capacity for responsibility, vulnerability, and bearing real consequences. The Pope concludes that technology is never neutral; its development and deployment are shaped by human values and choices, making an inclusive, ethically grounded dialogue essential for its future.

marsbit19m ago

Pope Issues First AI Encyclical: 40,000 Words, 10 Key Points, Clarifying AI Anxiety

marsbit19m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片