数读AI市场：TAO市值回升至约25亿美元，投资者兴趣依然强劲

币界网Published on 2024-08-13Last updated on 2024-08-13

币界网报道：

原文作者：OurNetwork

原文编译：深潮TechFlow

加密与人工智能（Crypto x AI）领域是我们行业中的一个新兴领域，对更广泛的科技行业产生了深远的影响。尽管这是一个尚不明确的类别，我们刚开始对此进行更深入的探讨，但过去18个月中，已经涌现出一些令人兴奋的项目，这些项目以多种方式利用人工智能，覆盖了基础设施、消费和去中心化金融（DeFi）等领域。

无论是通过去中心化计算来创建一个将机器学习转化为可交易产品的点对点市场，还是利用人工智能构建第一个去中心化的自我管理艺术家，区块链技术与人工智能的自然交集带来了源源不断的创新。

那么，让我们来探索一些这些新兴项目吧！

数读AI市场：TAO市值回升至约25亿美元，投资者兴趣依然强劲

1.Bittensor

Jack Forlines&Bhavin Vaid|Website|Dashboard

TAO 的市值从历史高点下跌了 10 亿美元

  • Bittensor 协议建立了一个交易市场，通过去中心化的过程将机器学习智能转化为可交易商品，并为资产创建了一个点对点市场。尽管市场波动，趋势并未表明该项目的人工智能热潮明显降温——Bittensor 的代币 TAO 的市值从 5 月份约 35 亿美元的峰值下降到 7 月份约 15 亿美元的低点。然而，尽管最近加密市场整体回调，TAO 的市值在 7 月底回升至约 25 亿美元。这种过山车式的模式表明，尽管回调频繁，但投资者对与人工智能相关的代币的兴趣依然强劲。

数读AI市场：TAO市值回升至约25亿美元，投资者兴趣依然强劲

CoinGecko
  • 对 Bittensor 32 个子网络之一的分析显示，主要收入来源是持有大量股份的验证者。此外，最高收入者在超过 3.5 亿美元的股份下，每天的收入不到 8,000 美元。这引发了关于网络去中心化及其促进开放人工智能市场能力的问题。

数读AI市场：TAO市值回升至约25亿美元，投资者兴趣依然强劲

Taostats.io
  • Bittensor 的经济模型对大多数矿工似乎不太有利。在文本提示子网络中，平均矿工每天的收入约为 50 美元，与其排名无关。排名前 30 的矿工每天的收入几乎都没有超过 58 美元。收入没有显著差异表明，模型表现并未得到适当奖励。

数读AI市场：TAO市值回升至约25亿美元，投资者兴趣依然强劲

Taostats.io
  • 交易级别信息：Bittensor没有将任何代币分配给风险投资公司（VC）。他们表示，如果风险投资公司想在 Bittensor 上建立持仓，必须在市场上购买代币或学习如何挖矿/验证。这与大多数与人工智能相关的加密项目形成鲜明对比。65% 的 TAO 仍未发行；如果 Bittensor 能够实现其去中心化目标，该协议可能为投资提供更具吸引力的案例，相较于其竞争对手。

2.Covalent

Anthony Loya|Website|Dashboard

Covalent 已解锁 8.4812 亿 CXT 代币，价值约 567 万美元

  • Covalent 是一个去中心化金融（DeFi）协议，提供跨多个区块链的统一 API 以访问链上数据。它提供了一系列产品，包括可定制的数据解决方案和由以太坊时光机驱动的可验证人工智能基础设施。该平台已将其原生代币从 CQT 转换为 CXT，用于质押和治理。他们的质押仪表盘允许用户管理质押、监控网络健康并获得奖励。

数读AI市场：TAO市值回升至约25亿美元，投资者兴趣依然强劲

Dune Analytics - @covalent
  • Covalent 的代币解锁计划揭示了利益相关者应注意的重要进展。在 8 月 22 日，将解锁 960 万个代币，为市值贡献约 64,730 美元。9 月和 10 月的后续解锁将分别为 2,178 万和 960 万个待释放的代币。

数读AI市场：TAO市值回升至约25亿美元，投资者兴趣依然强劲

cryptorank.io
  • 在过去一周中，CXT 的价格大幅下降，24 小时内下降了 24.2%，过去七天下降了 42.6%。这种急剧下降可能是由于广泛的市场动态所致。

数读AI市场：TAO市值回升至约25亿美元，投资者兴趣依然强劲

Dune - @covalent
  • 交易级别信息：最近在 Covalent X 代币（CXT）质押社区中，少数关键用户的质押数量显著，表明对该代币未来的强烈信心。特别是在 2024 年 8 月 7 日，记录了一笔重大交易，一位用户质押了价值 91,350.65 美元的 CXT。这一大额质押不仅突显了用户对质押 CXT 潜在回报的信心，也反映出整体的积极情绪。

3.Botto

miguel rubio|Website|Dashboard

Botto 将 23% 的销售收入分配给艺术 AI 贡献者

  • Botto 是一个去中心化的艺术 AI 实验，将每周 1/1 艺术销售的收益分配给训练其品味模型的用户。Botto 的 1/1 销售截至 2024 年达到了 100 ETH 的峰值，现在平均为 6 ETH，此外还通过二级销售、策划的收藏品和合作项目获得额外收入。Botto 在其收入分配模型中表现出色，DAO 实施了 50% 的收入分享，为社区创造了超过 300 ETH，这占总收入的 23%——这是人机协作的蓝图。

数读AI市场：TAO市值回升至约25亿美元，投资者兴趣依然强劲

Dune - @carbano
  • 收入分配与训练努力相关——投票点使用，VP 与质押的 $BOTTO 成比例（直接或作为 Uni-V2 股份）。因此，27% 的 $BOTTO 供应量被锁定，6% 被销毁（通过旧的 BB&B 系统），5.7% 作为流动性提供者（LP）股份被冻结。加上协议拥有的持有量，流通供应量减少了 50%。

数读AI市场：TAO市值回升至约25亿美元，投资者兴趣依然强劲

Etherscan Etherscan
  • Botto 的未来将取决于其文化影响力（苏富比提议举办个展）和吸引人工智能训练人力的能力。该项目融入了 Farcaster 框架，并考虑部分转向 Base，导致地址参与度增长约 4 倍（从 5,000 增加到 19,000）。

数读AI市场：TAO市值回升至约25亿美元，投资者兴趣依然强劲

Dune - @carbono
  • 交易级别信息：Botto 是一个去中心化治理人工智能的实验，通过一种经济设计将价值分配给提供输入的人。用户通过投票来获得训练人工智能的奖励。为了获得投票点，他们需要购买并质押 BOTTO，或将 BOTTO-ETH 添加到 Uniswap 并质押 LP 股份。为了获取奖励，他们必须主动领取。这需要支付大量的 ETH 费用。Botto 努力追求主流文化相关性，无论是链上还是链下。一个 L2 生态系统可能会开启一个全新的篇章。

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
mantra
MantraMANTRA
xvs
VenusXVS
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE

Related Reads

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

The Glamsterdam upgrade, scheduled for late 2026, is a major Ethereum hard fork combining the Amsterdam execution layer and Glasgow consensus layer updates. Its primary goal is not simply increasing throughput but restructuring Ethereum's block production, validation, and resource pricing to enable future scaling. Key technical changes include **EIP-7732 (ePBS)**, which formally enshrines proposer-builder separation into the protocol. This decouples consensus and execution tasks, extending the execution payload propagation window to ~9 seconds. This provides more time for node verification, allowing for safer increases in block capacity (Gas limit) in the future. Another core component is **EIP-7928 (Block-Level Access Lists - BAL)**. It mandates a list of all state accessed within a block, moving this feature from an optional transaction-level (EIP-2930) to a mandatory block-level requirement. This explicit access list enables client optimizations like parallel disk reads and state root computations, paving the way for parallel execution. To manage long-term state growth, **EIP-8037** increases the cost of creating new state (e.g., accounts, storage slots), separating the pricing of permanent database bloat from temporary computation. This allows execution capacity to scale more aggressively without causing state size to explode proportionally. The planned upgrade bundle includes around 10 EIPs categorized into: 1) Core protocol restructuring (ePBS, BAL), 2) Resource pricing adjustments (state costs, calldata costs), and 3) EVM/developer improvements. Several other EIPs, including those potentially improving staker exit liquidity (EIP-8061, EIP-8080), are under consideration. The technical development coincides with significant personnel changes within the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol team. The Foundation's official communications frame this as part of a broader shift towards a "coalition of organizations" working on the Ethereum roadmap, citing new entities like ethlabs and the Ethereum Economic Zone. In summary, Glamsterdam represents a foundational re-engineering of Ethereum's block pipeline and economic model—focusing on ePBS, BAL, and multi-dimensional resource pricing—to prepare the network for sustainable, high-throughput scaling in the years ahead.

Foresight News7m ago

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

Foresight News7m ago

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

"Ethereum Foundation Splits? Understanding Ethlabs and Its 'Bright Future'" Former Ethereum Foundation members Ansgar Dietrichs, Barnabé Monnot, Caspar Schwarz-Schilling, Josh Rudolf, and Julian Ma have announced the launch of Ethlabs, an independent non-profit research and development lab. Announced on June 22nd, the initiative comes amidst discussions about the need for new organizational structures within the Ethereum ecosystem, a point highlighted by Bankless founder David Hoffman. Ethlabs' mission is to establish Ethereum as the foundational settlement layer for the global economy. The organization positions itself as a bridge connecting frontline developers, applications, and user needs with the core protocol. It aims to translate real-world demands into protocol improvements, industry standards, and deployable products. The founding team brings significant expertise: Dietrichs and Monnot are highly cited researchers in areas like Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) and MEV, while Schwarz-Schilling, Rudolf, and Ma contribute backgrounds in economic modeling, consensus research, and applied cryptography. Initial supporters include BitMine, a major corporate ETH treasury; Sharplink, another treasury firm; and Consensys founder Joe Lubin in a personal capacity. Community backers include figures like Uniswap's Hayden Adams and Base's Jesse Pollak. The timing coincides with internal Ethereum Foundation discussions about "spinout" projects. While Ethlabs and the Foundation share research interests like MEV mitigation, Ethlabs frames its role not as a competitor but as part of a shift from a "single-core coordination model" to a "multi-R&D entity collaboration model." It views Ethereum as a public project belonging to all builders, with Ethlabs as one node in a broader governance network. Ultimately, Ethlabs represents an organizational evolution within the maturing Ethereum ecosystem. The key question is whether multiple research bodies can collaborate effectively to advance Ethereum as a competitive global settlement infrastructure.

Odaily星球日报11m ago

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

Odaily星球日报11m ago

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

"A Short Seller's Dire Prediction: AI Boom Fading, US Stocks to Peak by Q3 with 30-50% Decline" Prominent macro investors Jeffrey Gundlach and Felix Zulauf warn that the AI-driven market rally is nearing its end, forecasting a major US stock market correction of 30-50%, potentially beginning as early as Q3. Their analysis points to alarming parallels with historical market tops, citing extreme concentration in the top AI-related stocks within the S&P 500. Zulauf's bearish thesis hinges on unsustainable capital expenditure trends among major cloud companies, negative free cash flow emergence, and soaring semiconductor prices. Gundlach highlights dangerous parallels to the 1999 tech bubble peak. A key divergence from conventional wisdom is Gundlach's view that long-term Treasury yields will not fall meaningfully even during a recession, due to America's structurally out-of-control fiscal deficits and soaring interest costs. He warns this could force the government into yield curve control or even a sovereign debt restructuring. Both investors express severe concerns about the opaque private credit market, drawing parallels to the pre-2008 financial crisis environment. They allege widespread rating inflation, misrepresented credit quality, liquidity illusions, and fraudulent asset valuations within this sector. The analysis links the AI boom and private credit crisis through financing costs. They argue that as AI companies' cash flows weaken and they seek funding, a high and sticky long-term interest rate environment will severely stress lower-rated corporate borrowers, exposing cracks in credit markets. Finally, they predict a regime shift where the US dollar weakens and US equities underperform global markets, marking the end of their long dominance. The stage is set for a significant market reversal.

marsbit19m ago

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

marsbit19m ago

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

**Title: Why Isn't DeFi Insurance Being Bought?** DeFi insurance, which promised automated, unbiased payouts via smart contracts, has failed to gain traction. The core issue is economic: high premiums severely erode the yields that attract users to DeFi in the first place. For example, insuring a USDC deposit on Aave V3 could cost 1.5–2.5% of the annual yield, leaving a net return barely above a savings account. For riskier platforms like Maple Finance or Ethena, premiums can even turn net yields negative. Consequently, users often forgo insurance, as it nullifies their profit motive. The market also suffers from structural flaws. First, DeFi risks are highly correlated (e.g., an oracle failure can impact multiple protocols simultaneously), unlike the independent risks in traditional insurance. This makes large-scale events potentially catastrophic for insurers. Second, the total capital in DeFi insurance pools (e.g., Nexus Mutual's ~$81.5M) is minuscule compared to the hundreds of billions in total value locked (TVL), creating a massive capacity gap. A single major hack could drain the entire industry's reserves. Furthermore, the governance model where tokenholders vote on claims creates a conflict of interest, incentivizing them to deny payouts to protect their own funds. As a result, the sector is shrinking. While pioneers like Nexus Mutual are pivoting to preventative measures (bug bounties) and seeking external capital via reinsurance, the fundamental problems remain. DeFi insurance represents a public good—its stability benefits the entire ecosystem—but without a mechanism to share costs, a "tragedy of the commons" ensues where no one is willing to pay, leaving the system vulnerable.

marsbit33m ago

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

marsbit33m ago

SPCX Pre-Market Dips Below $150 IPO Price, But Don't Rush to Buy Yet

SpaceX's share price (SPCX) has fallen sharply, briefly dropping below its $150 IPO price in pre-market trading. The decline follows a catastrophic explosion during a Starship static fire test and was exacerbated by the company's announcement of a planned $20 billion bond issuance. This move, coming soon after its IPO raised $85.7 billion, raised concerns about SpaceX's cash burn rate and AI infrastructure spending surpassing expectations. The sell-off is also tied to a broader global pullback in AI-related stocks, with investors questioning the return on massive capital expenditures. Analysts note the initial IPO surge was largely driven by retail investor frenzy, which has now waned as sentiment turns cautious. With only about 5% of shares currently floating, the market is bracing for significant potential selling pressure when employee lock-up periods expire later this year. While some, like Cathie Wood's ARK Invest, remain long-term bullish on SpaceX's core ventures, other research firms argue the current stock price is driven by narrative rather than fundamentals and that future growth is already priced in. The next potential catalyst is the stock's possible inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 index in July.

Odaily星球日报33m ago

SPCX Pre-Market Dips Below $150 IPO Price, But Don't Rush to Buy Yet

Odaily星球日报33m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow