以太坊处于关键时刻、出现看涨模式、价格有望上涨 12%

币界网Published on 2024-08-13Last updated on 2024-08-13

币界网报道:
  • 以太坊(ETH)在关键支撑位形成了看涨上升三角形模式。

  • 如果 ETH 在 4 小时时间范围内突破上升三角形形态,则可能飙升至 3,100 美元的水平。

  • 尽管最近市场崩溃,但 66% 的以太坊持有者仍然获利。

1t0QrczGulR1AmHNe2rx7UeCrOp3qDG7MuZqkT6N.jpeg

近几天,包括比特币 (BTC) 、以太坊 (ETH) 和 Solana (SOL)在内的所有主要加密货币的整体市场价格均大幅下跌。在此次市场低迷期间,全球第二大加密货币以太坊 (ETH) 在 4 小时时间范围内形成了看涨价格走势模式。

日线图显示,以太坊正在走高。在经历了上周的下跌和复苏之后,这枚价值第二高的代币较 8 月份的低点上涨了近 25%。如果今天买家占据主导地位,像目前的情况一样,突破并收于 2,600 美元上方,那么它可能会为另一次上涨奠定基础,在买入趋势延续形成中,向 3,300 美元迈进。

上升三角形形态

过去一周,ETH 一直在 2,340 美元至 2,700 美元之间的窄幅区间内盘整。在此期间,ETH 在关键支撑位形成了看涨上升三角形模式。

fS7EW9tiX1UgLoJtFGkznQLQ8ACBSzNGPFMdA5AP.jpeg

66% 的以太坊地址处于盈利状态

这种价格走势很有可能成功。根据 IntoTheBlock 的数据,以太坊正处于一个有趣的阶段,并且令人印象深刻地摆脱了本周前半周的疲软。

IntoTheBlock 数据指出,按现货汇率计算,66% 的以太坊地址为绿色。这一发展意味着,尽管在 2024 年 3 月价格达到峰值后,过去五个月经历了波动和起伏,但许多持有者仍获利。

FFrM4MqHEqqBUxyywJIQB7w27peDFk0Z2gcC2oWY.jpeg

大量持有者获利的事实是利好的,这可能意味着更多的 ETH 持有者愿意持有并观察未来几天的价格走势。

通常,每当较大比例的地址出现赤字并亏损时,他们可能会惊慌地寻求退出,采取自我保护模式,保护他们的底线。

尽管现在价格上涨,这种情况也有可能出现,但现在可能套现的实体可能会错失更大的收益,至少从过去的情况来看是这样。根据 IntoTheBlock 的数据,上一次 66% 的 ETH 地址盈利是在 2023 年 10 月。

ETH 持有者正在囤积,多头准备接管吗?

从历史价格走势来看,2023 年 10 月左右,ETH 反弹走高,随后在接下来的几个月里强势反弹至 2024 年 3 月,达到 4,100 美元。虽然过去这种令人印象深刻的表现并不一定意味着它会在未来几天被复制,但过去几天的复苏和其他市场因素可能会支撑乐观的买家。

截至上周末,CryptoQuant 数据显示,持有 10 至 10,000 ETH 的地址和持有 10,000 至 100,000 ETH 的地址都在忙着买入。他们的活动使这些群体累计增加了 757,000 ETH,极大地提振了市场情绪。

VEAMGHH7kkLvLMX0R2GOURvrkYKZd78qrh0M58e8.jpeg

这些实体的增持表明他们对未来持乐观态度,这对多头来说是有利的。截至 8 月 12 日,以太坊在 2,700 美元左右(即 8 月 5 日的高点)面临阻力。

y5gZcGxGX2VQstxCxV1F04KBe7iIc3Y0ryEXPeCy.jpeg

截至发稿时,ETH 交易价格接近 2800 美元,过去 24 小时内保持稳定。在同一时期,它也达到了 2,700 美元的水平。这种稳定性,加上看涨的价格行动模式,导致交易量大幅增加 95%。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Mid-Year Review of U.S. Crypto Policy: CLARITY Gains Momentum for a Comeback, Who Will Lead the Second Half?

Mid-Point Review of U.S. Crypto Policy: CLARITY Act Gains Momentum, Who Will Lead the Second Half? The U.S. crypto industry is hopeful for a breakthrough as the Senate advances the CLARITY Act, but securing the necessary 60 votes requires bipartisan compromise. With only about 40 legislative days left, the path is tight. The policy agenda is crowded. Alongside CLARITY, multiple crypto tax proposals spun off from the new PARITY Act seek attachment to larger bills. The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act aims to codify developer protections, and key rules under GENUIS remain under negotiation. The CFTC operates with four vacant commissioner seats, creating uncertainty. A major unresolved battle is over which regulator—state authorities, the CFTC, or the SEC—will gain jurisdiction over prediction markets. The sector also faces the impending departure of two key advocates: SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce and Senator Cynthia Lummis. Industry leaders provided cautious perspectives. Sara K. Weed doubts CLARITY will pass this Congress, expecting agencies like the SEC to provide guidance instead. Sulolit "Raj" Mukherjee believes targeted crypto tax provisions have a real chance if attached to must-pass year-end legislation. Rashan Colbert highlights the CFTC's recent efforts to build a regulatory framework for the growing prediction markets sector, warning against an overly broad "gambling" classification that could stifle innovation. The second half of the policy year has begun. The window for action is narrow, but opportunities remain. Sustained bipartisan engagement is crucial for achieving substantive results.

Foresight News8m ago

Mid-Year Review of U.S. Crypto Policy: CLARITY Gains Momentum for a Comeback, Who Will Lead the Second Half?

Foresight News8m ago

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Lead to a Death Spiral?

A "death spiral" concerns surround the "STRC" preferred shares from MicroStrategy, a financial instrument designed by CEO Michael Saylor with significant AI consultation to trade near a $100 face value. Since its July 2025 launch alongside a ~40% Bitcoin (BTC) decline, STRC has traded at a discount, hitting a low of $82.53 and pushing its effective dividend yield above 12.9%. The debate centers on whether STRC's structure—which relies on MicroStrategy issuing more shares to fund Bitcoin purchases and dividends—is sustainable or a "centralized Ponzi scheme," as economist Peter Schiff claims. Skepticism grew after Saylor revealed the product's design involved extensive AI dialogue to create a legally viable, monthly-dividend, price-stable preferred share—a novel concept. MicroStrategy's recent sale of 32 BTC to cover dividends, coupled with a sharp slowdown in its weekly Bitcoin buys (from billions to ~$100 million in June), has intensified fears. The "at-the-market" equity issuance, a key funding mechanism, is paused while STRC trades below par. This raises the "death spiral" risk: a lower STRC price triggers automatic dividend rate hikes, increasing cash obligations and potentially forcing more share sales or Bitcoin divestments. Bullish analysts like Jesse Myers argue the sell-off stems from leveraged positions unwinding, not fundamental failure, noting the company can cover dividends for decades if BTC appreciates modestly. The shift to semi-monthly dividends and the high yield at discounted prices may attract new buyers. Major AI models (ChatGPT, Grok, Claude) suggest a return to $100 is possible but conditional on restored market confidence, sustainable dividend coverage without asset sales, and a Bitcoin price recovery. The critical test arrives as new dividend rules take effect June 30, likely raising rates again with STRC below $95. The central question remains: Can MicroStrategy fulfill its obligations without selling Bitcoin, or will the mechanism accelerate its own decline?

marsbit15m ago

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Lead to a Death Spiral?

marsbit15m ago

Why Did NVIDIA's Bond Issue Go Unnoticed While SpaceX's Caused a Plunge?

The article analyzes the contrasting market reactions to recent bond issuances by SpaceX and NVIDIA. While NVIDIA's $25 billion bond offering was met with strong demand and seen as securing long-term capital for its already profitable AI business, SpaceX's move to raise at least $20 billion in bonds (primarily to refinance bridge loans) triggered a sell-off in its stock (SPCX). The key difference lies in the stage of cash flow validation for their respective core narratives. For NVIDIA, the AI boom is generating substantial, visible revenue and profits, making debt a tool to amplify a proven growth curve. For SpaceX, despite a strong cash position post-IPO and a revenue-generating business in Starlink, its valuation is heavily tied to future, capital-intensive projects like Starship, global satellite networks, and potential AI infrastructure. The bond issuance acted as a trigger, shifting market focus from SpaceX's long-term vision to the pressing question of whether Starlink's profits can fund these ambitious, unproven ventures before they generate their own returns. Thus, the market penalizes not the act of borrowing itself, but the perceived gap between high capital expenditure and the speed of cash flow realization. SpaceX's valuation recovery hinges on demonstrating that Starlink's profitability can outpace the burn rate of its futuristic projects or that those projects (like Starship achieving reliable, low-cost reusability) can soon transition from costly visions to commercial realities.

marsbit20m ago

Why Did NVIDIA's Bond Issue Go Unnoticed While SpaceX's Caused a Plunge?

marsbit20m ago

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Really Fall into a Death Spiral?

"Strategy's" (STRC) preferred share, a financial instrument designed by CEO Michael Saylor in consultation with AI to trade steadily at $100, faces mounting pressure. Since its July 2025 launch alongside a ~40% Bitcoin price drop, STRC has traded at a steep discount, hitting a low of $82.53. This discount pushes its effective dividend yield above 12.9%. The core debate revolves around whether STRC's structure is sustainable or a "centralized Ponzi scheme," as economist Peter Schiff claims. The mechanism relies on issuing new shares ("at-the-market" offerings) to fund Bitcoin purchases and dividend payments. However, the deep discount has paused these ATM offerings, slowing Bitcoin accumulation and forcing a minor sale of 32 BTC to cover obligations. Proponents, like The Smarter Web Company's Jesse Myers, argue the sell-off is a leveraged unwinding, not a fundamental failure. They note Strategy has ample resources to cover dividends for years if Bitcoin appreciates modestly. The deep discount also makes STRC attractive for yield-seeking buyers, as dividends are calculated on the $100 face value. The key test is whether Strategy can maintain dividends without sustained Bitcoin sales. A critical watchpoint is June 30th, when STRC switches to semi-monthly dividends. An automatic rule will likely raise the dividend rate further because the price remains below $95$, potentially creating a "death spiral": lower prices trigger higher yields, increasing the cash burden and forcing more dilution or asset sales. The question of whether this AI-designed "flywheel" is a stable instrument or a flawed accelerator will be answered by its price action and Strategy's funding choices in the coming months.

链捕手20m ago

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Really Fall into a Death Spiral?

链捕手20m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片