除了特朗普，哪些政客也将参加今年的比特币大会？

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-07-26Last updated on 2024-07-26

Abstract

此次比特币 2024 大会邀请到了包括特朗普在内的 10 位美国政界嘉宾，其中 8 位是共和党人，仅有一位是民主党人，还有一位无党派人士（前民主党人）。

原文作者：Shelly、念青，ChainCatcher

Bitcoin Magazine CEO David Bailey 今日证实美国副总统哈里斯不会在比特币 2024 大会发表演讲。尽管哈里斯缺席，但今年的比特币大会并不缺乏美国政客的身影。此次大会邀请到了包括特朗普在内的 10 位美国政界嘉宾，其中 8 位是共和党人，仅有一位是民主党人，还有一位无党派人士（前民主党人）。

除了特朗普，哪些政客也将参加今年的比特币大会？

当然并不令人感到意外。一方面，大会举办地纳什维尔所在的田纳西本身就是传统的「红州」，共和党的大本营，田纳西的两位参议员都将参会。另一方面，相比民主党的保守，共和党派多数人对加密货币持乐观态度，近期 Paradigm 的一项民意调查显示， 28% 的共和党人持有或曾购买过加密货币，超过全国平均水平， 60% 的共和党人倾向于国会明确加密法规。一个比较直观的数据是，今年 5 月，共和党主导并推动通过了 FIT 21 法案，下图比较直观地反映了两党投票结果和对数字资产监管的态度。近期，共和党全国大会还批准了特朗普为共和党提出的新政纲，其中有一条就是支持创新的加密政策。

除了特朗普，哪些政客也将参加今年的比特币大会？

两党关于 FIT 21 法案的投票情况，图源：Bitwise

我们再回过头说说参与比特币大会的政客们以及其对加密的推动——

  • 唐纳德·特朗普（Donald Trump）： 2024 年美国总统选举候选人，曾任第 45 任美国总统，共和党人，以「Crypto President（加密总统）」自居，其在加密领域的涉猎可阅读我们此前曾发表过的《兜售特朗普：前总统的加密政商朋友圈与「生意经」》

  • 维韦克·拉马斯瓦米（Vivek Ganapathy）参加过 2024 年美国总统大选的共和党提名竞选，共和党人，曾在竞选时宣布接受比特币作为竞选捐款。在 2024 年 1 月 15 日，宣布退出总统初选。

  • 威廉·哈格蒂（Bill Hagerty）是田纳西州参议员，共和党人。曾批评民主党对待加密行业的方式过于中心化和限制。

  • 玛莎·布莱克本（Marsha Blackburn）是田纳西州参议员，共和党人。在今年的连任竞选活动宣布接受加密货币捐赠，并赞赏比特币的自由和隐私性。

  • 辛西娅·拉米斯（Cynthia Lummis）是怀俄明州参议员及联邦众议员，共和党人，比特币拥护者，一直在推动比特币相关的立法，曾表示比特币和加密货币将成为未来经济的重要组成部分，她还计划在比特币大会上宣布比特币战略储备立法。

  • 蒂姆·斯科特（Tim Scott）是南卡罗来纳州参议员，共和党人，美国参议院金融创新核心小组成员。多次呼吁对数字资产采取平衡的态度，并推动制定加密货币监管框架。

  • 伯尼·莫雷诺（Bernardo Moreno）是美国共和党参议院候选人，共和党人，是一位区块链企业家兼加密货币爱好者。

  • 萨姆·布朗（Sam Brown）是美国共和党参议院候选人，共和党人，加密货币的早期采用者，于 2017 年投资了比特币。

  • 小罗伯特·弗朗西斯·肯尼迪（Robert F. Kennedy Jr.）是美国总统的独立候选人， 2023 年及之前是民主党人，目前属于其他的独立党派。已购买 14 枚比特币，多次发表支持区块链、比特币和加密货币的言论，例如希望把整个美国的预算放在区块链上、若当选总统将释放丝绸之路平台创始人等。

  • 罗·卡纳（Ro Khanna）是本次参会的唯一一个民主党人，自 2017 年起担任美国众议院议员。这位国会议员是一位进步派民主党人，其代表的选区包括对加密货币持友好态度的硅谷。本月备受关注的加密货币政策圆桌会议就是由 Ro Khanna 主持的，此前一直在联络数字资产行业的高层人士、民主党议员和白宫官员参与圆桌。

P.S.尽管加密选民成为两党的「必争之地」利好整个行业的发展，但从长期来看，两党在推动加密行业的发展和监管层面，更需要合作，这对整个生态系统来说更加健康。

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
mantra
MantraMANTRA
xvs
VenusXVS
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE

Related Reads

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

According to an analysis published by ZeroDrift on June 22, 2026, attackers have stolen approximately $16.9 million over 40 days from five deprecated but still operational smart contracts across various blockchains. The primary issue is not a specific vulnerability but the incomplete decommissioning of legacy contracts. These "zombie contracts" often retain economic value, operational permissions, and callable functions, making them prime targets long after teams cease active development. The most significant loss occurred at DxSale, where an old locker contract lost about $7.3 million due to a forgotten control path becoming accessible again. Other affected projects include TrustedVolumes (~$5.87M), Raydium's legacy AMM pool (~$1.34M), Aztec Connect (~$2.28M), and Huma Finance V1 pool (~$101k). These incidents involved diverse systems—RFQ settlement, credit pools, liquidity lockers, AMMs—demonstrating the widespread nature of the risk. The analysis highlights that automated tools are lowering the cost for attackers to systematically scan for these long-tail targets, which have public code and weaker monitoring. In contrast, defensive practices for contract retirement remain underdeveloped. While the DeFi industry has mature audit processes for new deployments, it lacks strict protocols for securely sunsetting old contracts, which only become truly "retired" after all funds, permissions, authorizations, and trust assumptions are removed.

marsbit7m ago

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

marsbit7m ago

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

"The Old Titans' Valuation Collapse: The Death of an Era's Valuation Framework" Between Alibaba's 2014 NYSE debut at $93.89 and its 2026 price of ~$95, twelve years have passed with zero price appreciation. This stagnation symbolizes a wholesale valuation reset for an entire generation of Chinese internet assets. Companies like Tencent, Pinduoduo, Meituan, Bilibili, and Kuaishou have seen catastrophic declines of 80-98% from their peaks. The core question arises: what framework now prices these companies, or has the framework itself expired? The valuation logic for Chinese internet stocks followed a clear "anchor-setting and anchor-removing" process. From 2014-2017, the dominant narrative was "US comparable discounting" – applying a growth premium and governance discount to US peers' multiples. This anchor loosened with the 2018 US-China trade war and the VIE structure risk, then was violently uprooted by the 2020-2021 regulatory crackdowns (Ant Group, Didi, anti-monopoly fines). The 2022 delisting panic and subsequent 2025-2026 geopolitical shocks (US military lists, AI espionage accusations) completed the demolition. The old "US对标打折" model is dead. However, this is not solely a China story. A structural mirror exists in US "old titan" stocks ("老登股"). In 2026, even Microsoft – with robust fundamentals – saw its PE compress from a 34x median to 22x, its worst performer status among the "Magnificent Seven" driven by a $190 billion annual AI capex crushing free cash flow. The core dilemma is universal: legacy platform giants, whether Alibaba or Microsoft, are spending colossal sums to chase an AI paradigm that may颠覆 their own high-margin, user/subscription-based business models. They have shifted from "companies defining the future" to "companies needing to prove they won't be淘汰ed by the future." This phenomenon of a dying valuation坐标系 has a historical precedent: post-1989 Japan. After its bubble burst, the "Japan premium" narrative ("most efficient manufacturing + perpetual growth") collapsed. A 25-year valuation vacuum ensued until Warren Buffett provided a new language in the 2010s: "low valuation + high dividend + governance reform." China's internet sector is now in a similar vacuum six years into its reset. While different from Japan's deflationary context, the parallel is clear: the old macro assumption of "deep integration with global capital" is falsified, but a new pricing framework is absent. Potential "new languages" for Chinese internet valuations are contradictory. AI transformation requires gutting profitable core businesses (e.g., Alibaba's ad-driven e-commerce) for an unproven consumption-based model, risking a Microsoft-like cash flow crunch. Alternatively, shareholder returns (buybacks/dividends) could build a floor, following Buffett's Japanese playbook, but current scales are insufficient to form a standalone anchor. The current state mirrors mid-1990s Japan: the old framework is dead, the new one unborn. The market waits in a vacuum for a重新定义ing force – a person, event, or proven business model shift – to answer "why buy." This may only be the middle phase of a prolonged re-rating.

marsbit14m ago

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

marsbit14m ago

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Title: STRC Deeply Discounted, mNAV Falls Below Break-even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Redefined The recent volatility in MSTR and STRC highlights the need to reassess the core business model of Bitcoin reserve companies. These entities function more like leveraged, single-asset banks rather than software/tech firms. Consequently, they should be valued using banking metrics, not based on their total Bitcoin holdings. The key valuation metric is mNAV (market net asset value), akin to a price-to-book ratio. It compares the company's market capitalization to the equity value of its Bitcoin holdings after deducting all senior debt and preferred equity (like STRC). As of June 24, Strategy's mNAV was 1.10x. The focus should be on "net Bitcoin per share" (the Bitcoin claim per share after senior claims) and its growth rate, equivalent to a bank's book value and return on assets. Given STRC's 19% discount to its $100 par value (yielding 14.2%), issuing new MSTR equity at the current price to buy more Bitcoin is inefficient. It slightly dilutes the widely watched "total Bitcoin per share" metric while providing minimal improvement to the more critical "net Bitcoin per share." The article analyzes four potential uses for $1 billion in new equity: 1. **Buy Bitcoin:** Least effective. Improves net Bitcoin per share only marginally while diluting total Bitcoin per share. 2. **Repurchase STRC:** Most effective for balance sheet repair. The discount creates immediate value, increasing net Bitcoin per share by 1.0%, reducing debt burden, and lowering future dividend obligations. 3. **Boost Cash Reserves:** Dramatically improves the "cash coverage ratio" for STRC dividends from 9.8 months to 16.8 months, a crucial liquidity metric in a tightening funding environment. 4. **50/50 Split (STRC buyback & cash):** A balanced approach improving all key metrics. Strategy's own Q1 report indicates its internal break-even mNAV for profitable equity issuance to buy Bitcoin is 1.22x. With the current mNAV at 1.10x, such a move would be value-destructive. The core assumptions of its previous expansion model—issuing STRC at par and maintaining ample dividend coverage—have broken down. The recommended path is to use new capital to optimize core financial health: repurchasing discounted STRC and/or bolstering cash reserves. This would repair the balance sheet, signal liquidity strength, support STRC's price, lower its yield, and potentially reopen the par-value issuance channel. The current STRC discount represents a low-cost capital opportunity to restart this positive cycle. Bitcoin reserve companies must be evaluated as banks, focusing on book value, leverage, and liquidity resilience.

Foresight News15m ago

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Foresight News15m ago

Collector Crypt Rises as On-Chain 'Money Printer': Fewer Than 1,000 Daily Active Users, Whales Account for 97% of Revenue

The article discusses the rise of Collector Crypt, a tokenized trading card game (TCG) platform on Solana, which has recently entered the top 10 of the global crypto protocol revenue rankings. Despite having less than 1,000 daily active users, the platform generates significant income, with 97% of its revenue coming from a small group of high-net-worth "whale" users. Key points include the growth of the on-chain TCG sector, where Solana holds over 80% market share, and Collector Crypt's dominance within it. The platform's success is driven by a gacha-style card pack opening mechanism, the popularity of the Pokémon IP, and its CARDS token economic model, which includes buybacks funded by protocol revenue. However, the article notes challenges such as declining profit margins, high dependency on whale spending, and upcoming token unlocks that could increase market selling pressure. While Collector Crypt demonstrates the potential of on-chain TCGs, the sector is still in its early stages with room for growth in user base and infrastructure.

marsbit36m ago

Collector Crypt Rises as On-Chain 'Money Printer': Fewer Than 1,000 Daily Active Users, Whales Account for 97% of Revenue

marsbit36m ago

Dawn Song, The First Lady of Computer Security, Joins Meta

Computer security and AI safety pioneer Dawn Song has joined Meta's Superintelligence Labs as Vice President of AI Research, reporting to MSL head Nat Friedman. Song, a professor at UC Berkeley's EECS department and a MacArthur Fellow, is renowned for her foundational work in dynamic taint analysis and her leadership in adversarial machine learning and AI agent security. Her lab is considered a top training ground in computer security. Song is also a founder of Oasis Labs and Virtue AI, a company focused on enterprise AI safety infrastructure. Virtue AI co-founders Bo Li and Sanmi Koyejo, along with other team members, are also joining Meta, a move seen as strengthening Meta's safety measures for AI agents amid growing industry concerns. Separately, Denny Zhou, founder of Google's Gemini Reasoning Team and a key figure in advancing large language model reasoning techniques like Chain-of-Thought, reportedly joined Meta several months ago. These high-profile hires come as Meta seeks to deploy AI across its products while assuring regulators and the public of its models' robustness against misuse.

marsbit1h ago

Dawn Song, The First Lady of Computer Security, Joins Meta

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

463 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow