Microstrategy创始人：2024是比特币成为主流的第一年

比推Published on 2024-07-26Last updated on 2024-07-26

作者：Gareth Jenkinson，CoinTelegraph；编译：邓通，金色财经

比特币 2024 会议于 7 月 25 日在田纳西州纳什维尔拉开帷幕，唐纳德·特朗普、迈克尔·塞勒、凯茜·伍德、小罗伯特·F·肯尼迪、罗素·布兰德和爱德华·斯诺登等知名演讲者将吸引创纪录的人群。

由于著名政治家加入了纳什维尔活动演讲阵容，此次会议在前几周引起了广泛关注。

EymUNShnN7Yz7FNipQAt2u4zxFl0YerDidN7qLcg.jpeg

唐纳德·特朗普是在纳什维尔四处挥舞广告的头条演讲者。

总统候选人唐纳德·特朗普和小罗伯特·肯尼迪是两大吸引力，其他知名演讲者包括迈克尔·塞勒、凯茜·伍德、参议员玛莎·布莱克本、辛西娅·卢米斯。

比特币和闪电网络仍为零售银行业务带来希望

Lightspark 首席战略官 Christian Catalini 和 Xapo Bank 公共事务、政策和监管总监 Joey Garcia 透露，比特币和闪电网络仍将对零售银行业务产生重大影响。

9jstguX99iaaUktSbV6bL8PLUZtakybMWFm6zjfr.jpeg

Lightspark 的 Chris Catalini、Xapo Bank 的 Joey Garcia 和 Nolan Bauerle 讨论了比特币在零售银行领域的潜力。

Catalini 强调，比特币从一开始就能够让其用户无缝地在“200 多个国家/地区、每天 24/7 全天候地进行深度流动性”的全球价值转移：

“只有一种资产，那就是比特币。它具有监管明确性。它在全球几乎每个国家/地区都有入口和出口。”

贝莱德的客户主要对 BTC、ETH 感兴趣

贝莱德数字资产主管 Michael Mitchnick 在与彭博社的 James Seyffart 对话时，详述了这家全球资产管理公司在 2024 年通过比特币和以太坊交易所交易基金产品进军加密货币领域的举措。

SztYtWYTvEVXdQZDtVtO3zA7lYp6dwU2k7RfVxrP.jpeg

彭博社的詹姆斯·塞法特 (James Seyffart) 与贝莱德的迈克尔·米奇尼克 (Michael Mitchnick) 一起登上了 Nakamoto 主舞台。

“我想说，在今天的客户阶段，他们首先对比特币产生了浓厚的兴趣。当然，他们对以太坊也感兴趣，但除了这两种之外，现在几乎没有人感兴趣。”

Mitchnick 补充说，当 ETF 推出时，直接投资者引领了需求。据这位数字资产主管称，贝莱德财富咨询和机构投资者仍在积聚势头。

摩根士丹利、瑞银和美林等大型财富咨询平台尚未开始以招揽的方式提供比特币 ETF，这意味着他们只会在客户要求的情况下提供 ETF。

Jimmy Song 批评会议，重点关注 TradFi 和 ETF

比特币开发者和倡导者 Jimmy Song 在一场以 MMA 选手 Ben Askren 为主题的小组讨论中表达了坚定立场，该小组恰如其分地将主题定为“让比特币在美国再次伟大”。

作者批评了贝莱德等传统金融机构的存在以及对银行、交易和交易所交易基金的关注。

“比特币的伟大之处在于自由、自主和自主主权。这些正是这个国家建立的基础。不幸的是，由于金钱，由于印钞机的力量，我们得到的是一个统治我们的行政国家，它认为他们比我们更好，”Song 说。

他补充说，这些暗指代表了寻租阶级和行政国家的利益，这与自由、自主和自主主权的理想背道而驰。

“我讨厌比特币会议讨论的就是这些。银行、ETF、贝莱德。这些不是我的价值观，不是比特币的价值观，也不是美国的价值观。”

2024 年：比特币成为主流的第一年 – Michael Saylor

随着第一天的结束，Microstrategy 创始人 Michael Saylor 于 7 月 26 日美国时间 19:00 发表主题演讲，并参加了活动直播。

这位比特币倡导者表示，2024 年将成为“主流机构采用比特币的第一年”。自 2020 年 8 月宣布将比特币作为其主要国库储备资产以来，Saylor 的商业智能公司已拥有超过 200,000 BTC。

0bgbCL0ctz4LrtkRu8G0xCT8bGCXUU1ZRntAooHF.jpeg

MicroStrategy 创始人 Michael Saylor 与 Cointelegraph Accelerator 的 Kyle White 一起出席在纳什维尔举行的比特币 2024 大会。

Saylor表示，他不断接到上市公司首席执行官和机构的电话，他们对 Saylor率先采用的比特币优先投资方式感兴趣。

与此同时，Saylor暗示，两位总统候选人和其他著名美国参议员的出席可能会对比特币产生积极影响。

“我认为无论如何，比特币都会迎来一股顺风。我真的看不到未来有任何政府不接受比特币。”

Saylor 补充说，这不是未来政府是否“支持比特币”的问题，而是他们“会采取多大的积极行动”以及“他们是迅速行动还是更加谨慎地行动”的问题。

MicroStrategy 首席执行官表示，该行业已在 2024 年 1 月度过了一个转折点，当时很明显比特币已成为一种机构级数字资产。

“正如 Larry Fink 所说，它在每个投资组合中都有一席之地。它具有巨大的全球吸引力。它是独一无二的，世界需要更多这样的资产。”

标签
2024比特币大会以太坊比特币贝莱德金色财经
来源链接:https://www.jinse.cn/blockchain/3692735.html
说明:比推所有文章只代表作者观点，不构成投资建议
原文链接:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/6995905

相关新闻

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
mantra
MantraMANTRA
xvs
VenusXVS
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE

Related Reads

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

According to an analysis published by ZeroDrift on June 22, 2026, attackers have stolen approximately $16.9 million over 40 days from five deprecated but still operational smart contracts across various blockchains. The primary issue is not a specific vulnerability but the incomplete decommissioning of legacy contracts. These "zombie contracts" often retain economic value, operational permissions, and callable functions, making them prime targets long after teams cease active development. The most significant loss occurred at DxSale, where an old locker contract lost about $7.3 million due to a forgotten control path becoming accessible again. Other affected projects include TrustedVolumes (~$5.87M), Raydium's legacy AMM pool (~$1.34M), Aztec Connect (~$2.28M), and Huma Finance V1 pool (~$101k). These incidents involved diverse systems—RFQ settlement, credit pools, liquidity lockers, AMMs—demonstrating the widespread nature of the risk. The analysis highlights that automated tools are lowering the cost for attackers to systematically scan for these long-tail targets, which have public code and weaker monitoring. In contrast, defensive practices for contract retirement remain underdeveloped. While the DeFi industry has mature audit processes for new deployments, it lacks strict protocols for securely sunsetting old contracts, which only become truly "retired" after all funds, permissions, authorizations, and trust assumptions are removed.

marsbit7m ago

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

marsbit7m ago

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

"The Old Titans' Valuation Collapse: The Death of an Era's Valuation Framework" Between Alibaba's 2014 NYSE debut at $93.89 and its 2026 price of ~$95, twelve years have passed with zero price appreciation. This stagnation symbolizes a wholesale valuation reset for an entire generation of Chinese internet assets. Companies like Tencent, Pinduoduo, Meituan, Bilibili, and Kuaishou have seen catastrophic declines of 80-98% from their peaks. The core question arises: what framework now prices these companies, or has the framework itself expired? The valuation logic for Chinese internet stocks followed a clear "anchor-setting and anchor-removing" process. From 2014-2017, the dominant narrative was "US comparable discounting" – applying a growth premium and governance discount to US peers' multiples. This anchor loosened with the 2018 US-China trade war and the VIE structure risk, then was violently uprooted by the 2020-2021 regulatory crackdowns (Ant Group, Didi, anti-monopoly fines). The 2022 delisting panic and subsequent 2025-2026 geopolitical shocks (US military lists, AI espionage accusations) completed the demolition. The old "US对标打折" model is dead. However, this is not solely a China story. A structural mirror exists in US "old titan" stocks ("老登股"). In 2026, even Microsoft – with robust fundamentals – saw its PE compress from a 34x median to 22x, its worst performer status among the "Magnificent Seven" driven by a $190 billion annual AI capex crushing free cash flow. The core dilemma is universal: legacy platform giants, whether Alibaba or Microsoft, are spending colossal sums to chase an AI paradigm that may颠覆 their own high-margin, user/subscription-based business models. They have shifted from "companies defining the future" to "companies needing to prove they won't be淘汰ed by the future." This phenomenon of a dying valuation坐标系 has a historical precedent: post-1989 Japan. After its bubble burst, the "Japan premium" narrative ("most efficient manufacturing + perpetual growth") collapsed. A 25-year valuation vacuum ensued until Warren Buffett provided a new language in the 2010s: "low valuation + high dividend + governance reform." China's internet sector is now in a similar vacuum six years into its reset. While different from Japan's deflationary context, the parallel is clear: the old macro assumption of "deep integration with global capital" is falsified, but a new pricing framework is absent. Potential "new languages" for Chinese internet valuations are contradictory. AI transformation requires gutting profitable core businesses (e.g., Alibaba's ad-driven e-commerce) for an unproven consumption-based model, risking a Microsoft-like cash flow crunch. Alternatively, shareholder returns (buybacks/dividends) could build a floor, following Buffett's Japanese playbook, but current scales are insufficient to form a standalone anchor. The current state mirrors mid-1990s Japan: the old framework is dead, the new one unborn. The market waits in a vacuum for a重新定义ing force – a person, event, or proven business model shift – to answer "why buy." This may only be the middle phase of a prolonged re-rating.

marsbit14m ago

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

marsbit14m ago

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Title: STRC Deeply Discounted, mNAV Falls Below Break-even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Redefined The recent volatility in MSTR and STRC highlights the need to reassess the core business model of Bitcoin reserve companies. These entities function more like leveraged, single-asset banks rather than software/tech firms. Consequently, they should be valued using banking metrics, not based on their total Bitcoin holdings. The key valuation metric is mNAV (market net asset value), akin to a price-to-book ratio. It compares the company's market capitalization to the equity value of its Bitcoin holdings after deducting all senior debt and preferred equity (like STRC). As of June 24, Strategy's mNAV was 1.10x. The focus should be on "net Bitcoin per share" (the Bitcoin claim per share after senior claims) and its growth rate, equivalent to a bank's book value and return on assets. Given STRC's 19% discount to its $100 par value (yielding 14.2%), issuing new MSTR equity at the current price to buy more Bitcoin is inefficient. It slightly dilutes the widely watched "total Bitcoin per share" metric while providing minimal improvement to the more critical "net Bitcoin per share." The article analyzes four potential uses for $1 billion in new equity: 1. **Buy Bitcoin:** Least effective. Improves net Bitcoin per share only marginally while diluting total Bitcoin per share. 2. **Repurchase STRC:** Most effective for balance sheet repair. The discount creates immediate value, increasing net Bitcoin per share by 1.0%, reducing debt burden, and lowering future dividend obligations. 3. **Boost Cash Reserves:** Dramatically improves the "cash coverage ratio" for STRC dividends from 9.8 months to 16.8 months, a crucial liquidity metric in a tightening funding environment. 4. **50/50 Split (STRC buyback & cash):** A balanced approach improving all key metrics. Strategy's own Q1 report indicates its internal break-even mNAV for profitable equity issuance to buy Bitcoin is 1.22x. With the current mNAV at 1.10x, such a move would be value-destructive. The core assumptions of its previous expansion model—issuing STRC at par and maintaining ample dividend coverage—have broken down. The recommended path is to use new capital to optimize core financial health: repurchasing discounted STRC and/or bolstering cash reserves. This would repair the balance sheet, signal liquidity strength, support STRC's price, lower its yield, and potentially reopen the par-value issuance channel. The current STRC discount represents a low-cost capital opportunity to restart this positive cycle. Bitcoin reserve companies must be evaluated as banks, focusing on book value, leverage, and liquidity resilience.

Foresight News15m ago

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Foresight News15m ago

Collector Crypt Rises as On-Chain 'Money Printer': Fewer Than 1,000 Daily Active Users, Whales Account for 97% of Revenue

The article discusses the rise of Collector Crypt, a tokenized trading card game (TCG) platform on Solana, which has recently entered the top 10 of the global crypto protocol revenue rankings. Despite having less than 1,000 daily active users, the platform generates significant income, with 97% of its revenue coming from a small group of high-net-worth "whale" users. Key points include the growth of the on-chain TCG sector, where Solana holds over 80% market share, and Collector Crypt's dominance within it. The platform's success is driven by a gacha-style card pack opening mechanism, the popularity of the Pokémon IP, and its CARDS token economic model, which includes buybacks funded by protocol revenue. However, the article notes challenges such as declining profit margins, high dependency on whale spending, and upcoming token unlocks that could increase market selling pressure. While Collector Crypt demonstrates the potential of on-chain TCGs, the sector is still in its early stages with room for growth in user base and infrastructure.

marsbit36m ago

Collector Crypt Rises as On-Chain 'Money Printer': Fewer Than 1,000 Daily Active Users, Whales Account for 97% of Revenue

marsbit36m ago

Dawn Song, The First Lady of Computer Security, Joins Meta

Computer security and AI safety pioneer Dawn Song has joined Meta's Superintelligence Labs as Vice President of AI Research, reporting to MSL head Nat Friedman. Song, a professor at UC Berkeley's EECS department and a MacArthur Fellow, is renowned for her foundational work in dynamic taint analysis and her leadership in adversarial machine learning and AI agent security. Her lab is considered a top training ground in computer security. Song is also a founder of Oasis Labs and Virtue AI, a company focused on enterprise AI safety infrastructure. Virtue AI co-founders Bo Li and Sanmi Koyejo, along with other team members, are also joining Meta, a move seen as strengthening Meta's safety measures for AI agents amid growing industry concerns. Separately, Denny Zhou, founder of Google's Gemini Reasoning Team and a key figure in advancing large language model reasoning techniques like Chain-of-Thought, reportedly joined Meta several months ago. These high-profile hires come as Meta seeks to deploy AI across its products while assuring regulators and the public of its models' robustness against misuse.

marsbit1h ago

Dawn Song, The First Lady of Computer Security, Joins Meta

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

463 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow