Gnosis DAO Faces Massive Treasury Redemption Proposal, "Treasury Raiders" Return

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-08Last updated on 2026-05-08

Abstract

A group of activist investors, often labeled as "treasury raiders," have submitted proposal GIP-150 to Gnosis DAO, calling for a one-time, voluntary, and proportional treasury redemption. The proposal would allow participating GNO holders to claim a share of the over $220 million in DAO reserves. Proponents argue this addresses the persistent and widening discount of GNO's market price relative to the treasury's net asset value. Despite recent DAO funding to Gnosis Ltd., the discount has increased. The current vote, closing May 12th, shows 65% opposition among early votes. The redemption would value each eligible token around $170, a ~30% premium to the current $131 market price. GNO held by Gnosis Ltd. is excluded. DeFi community reactions are mixed. Some commentators acknowledge the "risk-free value" (RFV) arbitrage logic but criticize the proposal as a short-term cash grab lacking legitimacy, as Gnosis never promised treasury backing for the token price. Others oppose it due to Gnosis's contributions to ecosystem infrastructure (Safe, CoW Swap, etc.). Founder Sebastian Bürgel lamented the targeting of respected builders. Aragon's team, previously targeted in similar RFV campaigns, called for better mechanisms to align incentives. This follows a pattern of 2023 RFV-style actions against projects like Rook and Aragon. Recently, Beefy Finance implemented a buyback to preempt such pressure. The proposal's author, Wismerhill, expressed past admiration for Gnosis but now sees...

A group of activist investors (or "treasury raiders") is targeting GNO token holders with a proposal for a treasury redemption plan.

GIP-150 proposes a one-time, voluntary, pro-rata treasury redemption. If passed, participating holders would share proportionally in a portion of Gnosis DAO's treasury reserves, which exceed $220 million.

The proposal comes less than six months after Gnosis DAO voted to remove its former treasury manager, KPK. The proposer, Wismerhill, stated that the market price of GNO has long been trading at a discount to Gnosis DAO's net asset value, and this discount has been widening.

He added that despite the DAO recently allocating $22.5 million to Gnosis Ltd, the discount of the token relative to net assets has only increased further, with GNO capturing minimal value accretion.

Voting on the proposal is now open and will close on May 12. Although support initially led by a significant margin, of the roughly 330,000 votes cast so far, 65% are currently against.

The redemption amount would be calculated pro-rata based on 1.3 million eligible GNO tokens, excluding tokens held by Gnosis Ltd. The proposal justifies this by stating that this entity already receives long-term financial support from the DAO.

Based on this calculation, the redemption value per token would be approximately $170, nearly 30% higher than GNO's current market price of $131.

Reactions from the DeFi Community

DeFi commentator and GNO holder Ignas admitted, "There's some logic to this RFV narrative," but also pointed out that "this is purely an arbitrage play, hardly an ethical one." He has voted against the proposal. (Note: RFV stands for risk-free value.)

Ethereum Foundation DeFi Lead ivangbi holds a similar view. Since Gnosis never marketed its treasury assets as a backstop for the token price, holders have no ethical right to claim a share of the treasury.

Many others, considering Gnosis's contributions to the ecosystem, also disagree with the proposal. Gnosis is the entity behind key infrastructure projects like Safe, CoW Swap, Gnosis Pay, and Gnosis Chain.

Gnosis founder Sebastian Bürgel asked pointedly, when did the ecosystem's most respected builders become targets for hedge fund harvesting? Jito ecosystem lead Nick Almond directly characterized the proposal as a blatant treasury dump-and-run.

Anthony Leutenegger, representing the Aragon team which faced a similar attack in 2023, offered a more nuanced perspective. He called for the industry to improve mechanisms for programmatic token holder rights to better align incentives and resolve such disputes.

Previous RFV Attack Cases

This group launched several similar treasury arbitrage campaigns in 2023, earning them the label "RFV raiders" in the industry, a term the group itself rejects.

Projects targeted that year included Rook, FEI/Tribe, and Aragon. Aragon was ultimately forced to restructure its treasury usage, converting it into an ecosystem grant funding program.

Just recently, when Beefy Finance's token BIFI fell below its treasury net asset value in April, the DAO quickly launched a buyback mechanism precisely to avoid a surprise arbitrage attack by RFV forces.

Regarding the current Gnosis situation, the proposer Wismerhill previously stated that he has always admired Gnosis DAO and predicted that after removing KPK, Gnosis would make more commercially-driven decisions.

This ongoing vote will ultimately test whether GNO holders value short-term commercial arbitrage gains or long-term ecosystem building value more.

Related Questions

QWhat is the primary objective of the GIP-150 proposal for Gnosis DAO, and how does it work?

AThe GIP-150 proposal aims to launch a one-time, voluntary, pro-rata treasury redemption scheme. If passed, participating GNO token holders would receive a proportional share of a portion of the over $220 million in Gnosis DAO's treasury reserves, based on 1.3 million eligible GNO tokens at a calculated value of about $170 per token.

QWhy are the proposal's supporters, like Wismerhill, advocating for this treasury redemption?

ASupporters argue that the GNO token price is trading at a persistent and widening discount to the net asset value (NAV) of the Gnosis DAO treasury. They believe the token captures minimal value from the DAO's assets, and recent funding to Gnosis Ltd has exacerbated this discount, justifying a direct distribution of treasury funds to token holders.

QWhat is the 'RFV' label mentioned in the article, and which other projects have faced similar proposals?

A'RFV' stands for 'risk-free value,' a term used to describe proposals where groups target DAOs to extract treasury value for token holders when tokens trade below NAV. In 2023, similar initiatives targeted projects like Rook, FEI/Tribe, and Aragon. Recently, Beefy Finance implemented a buyback mechanism to preempt such an attack.

QWhat are some of the key counterarguments from the DeFi community against the GIP-150 proposal?

AOpponents argue it is a purely speculative arbitrage trade with no moral justification, as Gnosis never promised to back its token price with treasury assets. Others oppose it due to Gnosis's contributions to the ecosystem (Safe, CoW Swap, etc.), viewing the proposal as a 'treasury dump and run' that harms long-term builders for short-term gain.

QHow does Anthony Leutenegger from Aragon suggest the industry address conflicts like the one at Gnosis DAO?

AAnthony Leutenegger advocates for improving programmatic token holder rights mechanisms. He believes better-designed systems can better align incentives and resolve such disputes, referencing Aragon's own experience where it adapted its treasury into a grants program after a similar challenge.

Related Reads

Smart Money Hoards $40 Billion in Cash, Retail Bets $2.6 Trillion on Calls: The Critical Moment of the US Stock Market's AI Narrative

Title: Smart Money Hoards $40 Billion in Cash, Retail Traders Bet $2.6 Trillion on Call Options: The Tipping Point for the AI Narrative in U.S. Stocks The U.S. stock market is experiencing a striking divergence. While the S&P 500 hits new highs, the financial sector is down 6% year-to-date, underperforming more than during the 2008 and COVID crises. In contrast, a record $2.6 trillion in S&P 500 call options traded in a single day, and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index RSI is at its highest since 1999. This reflects a clear split: "smart money" is retreating while retail traders chase gains. Key data points highlight this critical juncture in the AI-driven rally: 1. SoftBank had to cut its $10 billion loan target against its OpenAI stake to $6 billion, as lenders questioned the valuation of the private AI giant, signaling primary market skepticism. 2. The explosive $2.6 trillion daily options volume, with 60% being calls, is described by a Goldman Sachs partner as a "semi-irrational chase," drawing parallels to the 1999 tech bubble. 3. The financial sector's severe underperformance relative to the S&P 500 is a classic technical warning signal, indicating potential underlying economic stress. 4. Apollo Global Management, despite strong earnings, is building a $40 billion cash buffer in its insurance business, preparing for what its CEO calls a 30-35% probability of an exogenous shock from geopolitics, inflation, and AI's economic disruption. 5. Consumer behavior mirrors this split: while Whirlpool plunged on a worsening macro outlook for big-ticket items, DoorDash rose on strong demand for small, immediate services. Together, these conflicting signals from primary markets, secondary markets, leading sectors, and top institutions suggest market risk premia have compressed to a precarious level. The current price action may be increasingly reliant on speculative sentiment rather than fundamental support, marking a potential tipping point for the AI investment narrative.

marsbit20m ago

Smart Money Hoards $40 Billion in Cash, Retail Bets $2.6 Trillion on Calls: The Critical Moment of the US Stock Market's AI Narrative

marsbit20m ago

Tiger Research: AI Agents Will Now Need Identity Verification

Tiger Research: AI Agents Now Need "ID Verification" AI agents are increasingly capable of autonomously executing contracts, making payments, and conducting trades. However, a critical issue remains unresolved: how to verify the identity of the agent on the other side of a transaction. This article examines the emerging competition to establish a KYA (Know Your Agent) standard and the current state of regulatory progress. **Core Points:** 1. As AI agents operate independently in A2A (agent-to-agent) scenarios, the focus shifts from KYC (Know Your Customer) to KYA for identity verification. 2. KYA is not universally required; it's essential primarily when independently deployed agents interact with open ecosystems like DEXs, engage in A2A payments, or pay merchants, not within centralized platforms. 3. A standards battle is underway, with four key players approaching KYA from different angles: * **ERC-8004:** A blockchain-native approach, creating agent IDs as NFTs with on-chain registries for identity, reputation, and validation. * **Visa TAP:** Leverages Visa's payment network to issue verified "Agent Intent" credentials, bundling agent identity into its payment rails. * **Trulioo:** Adapts the SSL certificate model to issue dynamic "Digital Agent Passports," verifying both developer (KYB) and user (KYC) credentials. * **Sumsub:** Focuses on real-time risk detection and re-verification of the human behind an agent during suspicious transactions, rather than pre-issuing certificates. 4. Regulatory momentum is building. The EU AI Act, the U.S. NIST, and Singapore's national AI governance framework are prioritizing agent identity management. The rollout of KYA standards is likely to follow a pattern similar to the FATF Travel Rule, becoming a watershed moment for the industry. The market is unlikely to have a single winner. Different approaches will dominate specific niches: ERC-8004 for on-chain autonomous transactions, Visa TAP for payment-bound commerce, Trulioo for regulated finance, and Sumsub for fraud-prone scenarios. The key differentiator will be which players successfully integrate their identity infrastructure earliest as adoption scales.

marsbit1h ago

Tiger Research: AI Agents Will Now Need Identity Verification

marsbit1h ago

Perspective: The current AI supercycle will last 15 years, but most are still buying stocks in the first FOMO stage

This article outlines a 15-year AI supercycle, segmented into four investment stages. It argues that while most investors are still focused on the first stage, smart money is already moving to the third. **Stage 1: The Foundation (2023-2025) - Priced In** The semiconductor layer (e.g., NVIDIA, AMD) is complete. While growth continues, the historic entry opportunity is over as risk/reward has compressed. **Stage 2: The Build-Out (2025-2027) - In Progress** This phase involves building the necessary physical infrastructure: power/utilities (CEG), cooling (VRT), networking (ANET), and nuclear SMRs (OKLO, SMR). Significant upside remains, but obvious names have already moved. **Stage 3: The Asymmetric Bet (2026-2028) - Positioning Window** AI moves into the physical world. Key areas include robotics/autonomy (Tesla Optimus), space/defense/drones (Rocket Lab, LUNR), and critical materials. This stage presents the best asymmetric risk/reward and is where positioning should occur now. **Stage 4: The Endgame (2028+) - Software Dominance** The mega-cap cloud platforms (Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta), with their massive capital expenditure, will build the AI software layer and AGI infrastructure, aiming to win the entire cycle. **Core Conclusion:** The cycle is confirmed in Stage 2. Stage 3 (robotics, space, defense, nuclear SMRs) is where capital is currently rotating for maximum opportunity, while the majority of investors are expected to be 12 months behind this shift.

marsbit1h ago

Perspective: The current AI supercycle will last 15 years, but most are still buying stocks in the first FOMO stage

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy DAO

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing DAO Maker (DAO) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy DAO Maker (DAO) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your DAO Maker (DAO)After purchasing your DAO Maker (DAO), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade DAO Maker (DAO)Easily trade DAO Maker (DAO) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

2.1k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2025.03.21

How to Buy DAO

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of DAO (DAO) are presented below.

活动图片