Why is the RWA Boom Failing to Benefit DeFi?

marsbitDipublikasikan tanggal 2026-05-19Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-05-19

Abstrak

The rapid growth of the tokenized real-world assets (RWA) market, now nearing $30 billion on-chain, has largely bypassed the DeFi ecosystem. Only about $2.47 billion is actively locked in DeFi protocols, indicating a penetration rate of just 9%. A major barrier is the "permissioned" architecture of most RWA products, like BlackRock's BUIDL fund, which are designed for institutional compliance. They require whitelisting, off-chain settlement, and strict investor accreditation, making them incompatible with open, permissionless DeFi applications like Aave or Uniswap. This is evident in categories like bonds/money market funds ($16.6B on-chain, $920M in DeFi) and tokenized equities ($2.7B on-chain, $78M in DeFi). Notable exceptions are private credit protocols (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge) and assets like Ondo's USDY, which were designed from inception for DeFi composability, allowing them to be used freely as collateral. Morpho and Aave Horizon also demonstrate successful RWA lending integrations. However, industry reports (IOSCO, ECB) warn that growth may remain confined within traditional financial systems due to fragmented regulations, lack of unified standards, and inherent conflicts between DeFi's open logic and compliance requirements like minimum investments and fixed redemption windows. The RWA sector is effectively split into two markets: a compliant, permissioned on-chain finance market and a smaller DeFi-native market focused on composability. For DeFi penetr...

Author: Gino Matos

Compiler: Chopper, Foresight News

Data from DeFiLlama shows that the on-chain tokenized real-world asset (RWA) scale has approached $30 billion. However, only $2.47 billion is shown as the active DeFi Total Value Locked (TVL), which is the actual amount of funds deposited into third-party DeFi platform liquidity pools and participating in the ecosystem's operation.

The vast majority of other RWA assets remain outside of scenarios such as lending markets and collateral vaults, which enable free combination and interaction of crypto assets. Bonds and money market funds are the largest RWA category by scale, with an on-chain total exceeding $16.6 billion. Yet, the effective TVL flowing into the DeFi ecosystem is only $920 million. The on-chain scale of gold and commodity assets is $5.7 billion, with only $183.6 million effectively circulating in DeFi. Equity assets have an on-chain scale of $2.7 billion, but the funds that have entered the DeFi market are a mere $78.27 million.

Only the private credit sector stands out: its on-chain scale is $3.226 billion, with a DeFi effective TVL of $1.257 billion, achieving an ecosystem penetration rate of 39%. The reason behind this is that projects like Maple Finance and Centrifuge were designed from the outset as lending financial instruments, making them naturally suited for DeFi application scenarios.

In contrast, tokenized products like US Treasury bond funds, gold assets, and stock assets are designed by their issuers to cater more to institutional custody needs, with their overall architecture aligning with the operational models of traditional compliant funds.

Distribution of On-Chain Market Value and DeFi Active TVL Across Four RWA Categories

Permissioned Architecture Becomes the Biggest Barrier to DeFi Composability

DeFiLlama categorizes the money market fund product BUIDL by BlackRock as a permissioned fund. Its effective TVL within the DeFi ecosystem is only $18.9 million.

The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) pointed out in its final report on financial asset tokenization released in November 2025 that BUIDL created a permissioned system on a public blockchain for issuance, custody, secondary trading among qualified investors, dividend distribution, and redemption.

Potential investors must pass the whitelist review on the Securitize platform. Furthermore, on-chain asset transfer actions only attain full legal validity after information verification and confirmation by an offline transfer agent.

This means that BUIDL is essentially a compliant custody infrastructure built atop blockchain channels, primarily serving institutional asset custody and offline account reconciliation needs. Its smart contracts only support interactions from whitelisted addresses. Without using a compliant wrapping layer as an intermediary, they cannot be directly deposited into permissionless, open DeFi protocols like Aave or Uniswap.

In February 2026, BlackRock completed the integration of BUIDL with Uniswap, enabling partial assets to enter trading pools. However, asset access permissions are still controlled by Securitize, limited to qualified investment institutions with a net asset value of no less than $5 million; ordinary market participants still cannot participate.

IOSCO found that the vast majority of tokenized money market funds on the market currently adopt similar operational models. These assets have so far failed to deliver the high secondary market liquidity value previously anticipated by the industry.

RedStone stated bluntly in its tokenization industry report released in March 2026 that the most challenging part of asset tokenization implementation is coordinating a series of complex rules across different jurisdictions and public chain ecosystems, including compliance review, identity verification, trading permission restrictions, risk control sanctions screening, and corporate rights distribution. Looking at the current market, Morpho and Aave Horizon are among the few genuine case studies successfully implementing RWA assets in DeFi applications.

In short, each compliance and access restriction set by project parties further raises the barrier for assets to enter the DeFi ecosystem. Products like US Treasury token bonds and money market funds are themselves designed to meet the regulatory requirements of licensed institutional investors, actively incorporating various permission constraints.

Gold and commodity assets face another practical issue. CoinGecko data shows that in Q1 2026, spot trading volume for tokenized gold reached $90.7 billion, surpassing the total for the entire year of 2025. However, the vast majority of this trading occurs on centralized exchanges. The aforementioned DeFi effective TVL of $183.6 million only represents a tiny fraction circulating within the ecosystem. The enormous trading volume in centralized markets is completely outside the scope of DeFiLlama's data statistics.

Positive Outlook: Highly Compatible Products Have Set Examples

In early 2026, the TVL of Ondo's USDY exceeded $1 billion and has now achieved full coverage across nine public chain ecosystems. The Ondo Global Markets segment, launched in September 2025, focuses on tokenized US stocks and ETF assets for overseas investors. It was designed from the start to support free asset transfer and direct use as DeFi collateral. Currently, the TVL for corresponding assets is $650 million, with cumulative trading volume exceeding $12 billion.

According to RedStone statistics, the RWA deposit scale on the Morpho platform exceeds $620 million, and the total RWA-related asset scale on Aave Horizon is $423.5 million. Both lending protocols have successfully implemented mature RWA collateralized lending models.

These implementation cases fully prove that as long as the design philosophy of permissionless free circulation is upheld from the asset issuance stage, RWA assets can fully achieve composability within the DeFi ecosystem.

During an industry roundtable hosted by DWF Labs in April 2026, projects including Centrifuge, Falcon Finance, and xStocks jointly proposed the view that the RWA sector has now diverged into two major development tracks. The first prioritizes compliance with asset ownership regulations, adhering to a strictly permissioned and controlled path. The second balances compliant issuance standards while enabling secondary market circulation properties, with ecosystem composability as the core design orientation.

Graham Nelson, the person in charge of the Centrifuge project, stated that stringent whitelist access mechanisms mean each participant in a liquidity pool needs to undergo separate qualification reviews, directly blocking the path for assets to enter open DeFi.

The DeRWA solution launched by Centrifuge bypasses this barrier by wrapping the underlying primary issuance assets in a compliant manner while relaxing restrictions on secondary market asset circulation. Artem Tolkachev from Falcon Finance also mentioned that ecosystem composability and flexible exit mechanisms are the key bridges connecting real-world assets with crypto market liquidity.

The industry is optimistic that as the overall on-chain RWA asset scale approaches $50 billion, if most projects within the sector shift towards designs compatible with DeFi, the penetration rate of RWA assets in the DeFi ecosystem is expected to break through the current low level of 9%.

Negative Reality: Industry Growth May Be Confined to the Traditional Financial System

Standard Chartered Bank predicts that the global tokenized asset scale will reach $2 trillion by 2028, but it simultaneously warns that this industry boom is likely to be confined within the traditional banking and financial system, with limited growth benefits for the open crypto market.

IOSCO's research in November 2025 also corroborates this point. Constrained by the inherent access barriers and liquidity shortcomings of distributed ledger technology, the current distribution, circulation, and secondary market trading of tokenized assets still heavily rely on traditional financial infrastructure.

The European Central Bank further pointed out in its tokenization industry research report released in April 2026 that the absence of unified global standards for asset tokenization is highly prone to creating isolated asset silos. Different asset systems have their own compliance rules, settlement layers, and access mechanisms, ultimately leading to high concentration of liquidity within closed circles, making interconnection and circulation difficult.

The DeFi penetration rates of 5.5% for bonds and money funds, 3.2% for gold and commodities, and 2.9% for equities directly reflect this fragmented ecosystem pattern.

Most US Treasury tokens and money fund products on the market commonly set minimum investment thresholds, mandatory identity verification, offline asset reconciliation cycles, and fixed redemption windows tied to net asset value. These underlying rules inherently conflict with the operational logic of decentralized exchanges' real-time pricing and permissionless collateral vaults. These constraints are mandatory requirements from the regulatory level and an inevitable choice for asset issuers to adapt to the compliant environment.

Two Markets, One Industry Label

The total on-chain RWA scale of $30 billion and the effective DeFi circulation scale of $2.47 billion, while seemingly belonging to the same RWA sector, actually correspond to two completely separate markets:

  • Compliant On-Chain Financial Market: Primarily consisting of money market funds, US Treasury funds, and institutionally custodied assets. Asset transfer relies on offline transfer agent reconciliation and confirmation, following traditional financial regulations throughout.
  • DeFi Composability Ecosystem Market: Assets can be freely deposited into lending protocols, used as permissionless collateral, and integrated into various automated yield strategies for free circulation.

The chart above predicts the implied DeFi Active TVL under four scenarios in a $50 billion RWA market, ranging from 5% to 25%

The achievement of over $620 million in RWA deposits on Morpho and the circulation of USDY across 9 blockchains is sufficient proof that the second type of market possesses genuine development potential.

To drive the DeFi penetration rate of RWA assets beyond 9%, asset issuers must abandon the 'compliance-system-first' design approach exemplified by BlackRock's BUIDL. Instead, they should adopt underlying architectures that natively support permissionless free circulation.

Currently, $28.56 billion of on-chain RWA assets belong to the permissioned control track. This also means that most current tokenized real-world assets are, in essence, more akin to compliant on-chain traditional financial products, rather than general-purpose collateral assets suitable for open DeFi ecosystems.

Pertanyaan Terkait

QAccording to the article, what is the main reason why most tokenized real-world assets (RWA) have not been successfully integrated into DeFi ecosystems?

AThe main reason is that the majority of RWA products, such as bond and money market funds, are designed with a permissioned architecture from the outset to comply with institutional custody and traditional regulatory requirements. This includes whitelisting, mandatory identity verification, and reliance on offline settlement processes, which creates significant barriers for these assets to be used in permissionless DeFi applications like Aave or Uniswap.

QWhich RWA sector, according to the article, has shown a high degree of integration with DeFi, and what is the key factor for its success?

AThe private credit sector has shown high integration, with a 39% penetration rate into DeFi. The key factor for its success is that projects like Maple Finance and Centrifuge were designed from the beginning as lending financial tools, making them inherently compatible with DeFi application scenarios.

QWhat is the fundamental difference between the two distinct markets identified in the article under the common label of "RWA"?

AThe two distinct markets are: 1) A compliant on-chain financial market, consisting of assets like money market funds and treasuries. These assets rely on offline registrars for transfer validation and follow traditional financial regulations. 2) A DeFi-composable ecosystem market, where assets can be freely deposited into lending protocols, used as collateral, and integrated into various automated yield strategies for permissionless circulation.

QWhat solution is mentioned in the article for bridging the gap between compliant primary issuance of RWAs and their potential for secondary market circulation in DeFi?

AThe article mentions Centrifuge's "DeRWA" solution as an example. It involves creating a compliant wrapper for the underlying primary issuance asset while relaxing restrictions on the secondary market circulation of that wrapped asset, thereby enabling it to be used in open DeFi protocols.

QBased on the article's analysis, what must RWA issuers do to significantly increase the current low DeFi penetration rate of their assets?

ATo significantly increase DeFi penetration beyond the current ~9%, RWA issuers must move away from design philosophies centered on a closed, permissioned compliance system (like BlackRock's BUIDL). Instead, they need to adopt a native, permissionless architecture from the ground up that supports free and unrestricted circulation of assets within DeFi ecosystems.

Bacaan Terkait

Harga Dogecoin Baru Saja Masuk ke Level Kritis, Tapi Analis Bilang Bukan Waktu untuk Beli

Harga Dogecoin (DOGE) saat ini berada di level kritis pada grafik bulanan, tepat di zona yang sama yang sebelumnya dua kali menjadi titik penolakan besar—yaitu pada 2017 dan 2020. Polanya ditunjukkan dalam saluran penurunan melebar yang telah membentuk pergerakan harga DOGE selama lebih dari satu dekade. Meski analis Trader Tardigrade mencatat pola penolakan ini, grafik yang digunakan ternyata terbalik (inverted chart). Artinya, garis resistensi merah yang tampak sebagai batas atas sebenarnya adalah level dukungan utama dalam pasar normal. Penolakan dari garis ini pada grafik terbalik justru menandakan awal rally naik yang kuat untuk harga DOGE sebenarnya, seperti yang terjadi pada siklus 2017 dan 2021. Dengan harga DOGE saat ini sekitar $0,0937, level $0,09–$0,10 kini berperan sebagai area dukungan kunci. Jika DOGE berhasil memantul dari sini dan bergerak di atas $0,25, itu akan menjadi sinyal kuat bahwa koin ini sedang bangkit dari struktur dukungan jangka panjang. Bahkan, pola pada grafik terbalik ini masih menyisakan ruang untuk kenaikan harga DOGE menuju target dua digit sebelum mencapai garis tren besar berikutnya.

bitcoinist8m yang lalu

Harga Dogecoin Baru Saja Masuk ke Level Kritis, Tapi Analis Bilang Bukan Waktu untuk Beli

bitcoinist8m yang lalu

RLUSD Ripple Masuk ke Dalam Ekspansi Penyelesaian Stablecoin Mastercard

Mastercard memperluas infrastruktur penyelesaian (settlement) pembayarannya dengan menambahkan dukungan untuk stablecoin yang diatur, termasuk RLUSD milik Ripple. Ekspansi ini memungkinkan penerbit dan akuisitor menyelesaikan transaksi kartu menggunakan aset digital di berbagai jaringan blockchain, di samping cara tradisional. Tujuannya adalah memberikan lebih banyak fleksibilitas dalam waktu dan cara penyelesaian, khususnya untuk pembayaran lintas batas. Ripple menyambut baik dimasukkannya RLUSD ke dalam jaringan Mastercard, menyebutnya sebagai validasi atas utilitas stablecoin yang diatur untuk aliran pembayaran institusional. Opsi penyelesaian dengan stablecoin ini dirancang untuk beroperasi di luar jam kerja bank tradisional (intraday, akhir pekan, hari libur) dan akan berdampingan dengan proses yang sudah ada, bukan menggantikannya. Dukungan awal akan difokuskan di Amerika Serikat dan Amerika Latin dengan beberapa mitra perbankan, dengan rencana ekspansi lebih lanjut hingga tahun 2026. Langkah ini dipandang sebagai perkembangan signifikan dalam adopsi teknologi blockchain untuk infrastruktur pembayaran inti.

bitcoinist1j yang lalu

RLUSD Ripple Masuk ke Dalam Ekspansi Penyelesaian Stablecoin Mastercard

bitcoinist1j yang lalu

Tim Fei-Fei Li Memperjelas Konsep 'Model Dunia', Sora Hanya Bisa Disebut Sebagai Renderer

Tim World Labs dan Profesor Stanford Li Fei-Fei menerbitkan analisis konseptual berjudul "Fungsional Taxonomy of World Models". Artikel tersebut menyatakan bahwa istilah "model dunia" telah menjadi salah satu konsep terpenting namun paling disalahgunakan di bidang AI. Pemicu kebingungan ini adalah keberagaman sistem yang disebut "model dunia". OpenAI's Sora disebut "world simulator", tetapi hanya menghasilkan video yang realistis secara visual. Tesla menggunakan "model dunia" untuk memprediksi pergerakan objek di FSD, sementara perusahaan robotika menggunakannya untuk mengevaluasi konsekuensi tindakan. Padahal, ketiganya memiliki tujuan teknis yang sangat berbeda. Berdasarkan kerangka Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP), tim mengusulkan klasifikasi fungsional yang membagi sistem "model dunia" menjadi tiga proyeksi: Renderer, Simulator, dan Planner. * **Renderer (seperti Sora, Genie 3):** Fokus pada generasi piksel yang realistis secara visual. Input adalah representasi keadaan, output adalah gambar/video. Tidak menjamin keakuratan fisik. * **Simulator (seperti NVIDIA Omniverse):** Fokus pada prediksi keadaan fisik selanjutnya secara akurat. Input adalah keadaan saat ini dan tindakan, output adalah keadaan berikutnya yang dapat dihitung untuk analisis teknis. Data 3D berkualitas untuk pelatihannya sangat langka. * **Planner (seperti model VLA):** Fokus pada keputusan tindakan. Input adalah data observasi dan instruksi tujuan, output adalah tindakan selanjutnya yang harus dijalankan. Artikel ini menyimpulkan bahwa Sora, sesuai dengan klasifikasi ini, adalah Renderer, bukan "model dunia" yang utuh karena tidak dapat memprediksi perubahan keadaan berdasarkan input tindakan. Klarifikasi ini penting untuk menghindari kesalahan teknis, memberikan kejelasan bagi investor, dan menetapkan tolok ukur yang jelas di kalangan akademisi.

marsbit1j yang lalu

Tim Fei-Fei Li Memperjelas Konsep 'Model Dunia', Sora Hanya Bisa Disebut Sebagai Renderer

marsbit1j yang lalu

Dari Web3 ke AI Agent, VC Kripto Legendaris Variant Taruhan Transformasi 2 Triliun Rupiah

**Variant Luncurkan Dana Baru Rp 3,55 Triliun, Fokus Beralih dari "Kepemilikan Digital" ke "Otonomi" (Autonomy)** Variant Fund, sebuah venture capital (VC) kripto ternama, mengumumkan peluncuran dana baru senilai USD 222 juta (sekitar Rp 3,55 triliun) bernama Variant 4. Dana ini akan berinvestasi pada tahap awal (early-stage) dan tahap pertumbuhan/likuiditas. Filosofi investasi Variant mengalami evolusi. Dari sebelumnya berfokus pada **"Kepemilikan Digital"** (atas uang, identitas, data, produk), kini berkembang menjadi tema yang lebih luas: **"Otonomi" (Autonomy)**. Inti dari Otonomi adalah **meningkatkan daya pikir dan kendali pengguna** atas hidup, aset, dan identitas mereka sendiri. Variant membedakan ini dengan sekadar **otomatisasi cerdas**. Menurut mereka, teknologi otomatisasi harus meningkatkan kedaulatan pengguna, bukan hanya menguntungkan platform. Kunci utamanya adalah: teknologi itu melayani pengguna atau pihak lain? Variant meyakini bahwa **agen AI (AI Agent)** dan **infrastruktur keuangan global yang terbuka** akan mengubah struktur internet — dari model di mana pengguna adalah produk, menjadi internet di mana pengguna memiliki daya pikir yang belum pernah terjadi sebelumnya. Pergeseran ini tidak hanya untuk konsumen, tetapi juga mencakup pasar, alat, dan layanan baru untuk pengembang dan bisnis. Oleh karena itu, tesis investasi baru mereka adalah: **Variant berinvestasi pada teknologi yang memperluas Otonomi**, dengan fokus pada pasar, infrastruktur, dan aplikasi baru yang memberdayakan pengguna melalui peningkatan akses, pengetahuan, dan kepemilikan. Tesis ini mencakup investasi masa lalu mereka di pemimpin kategori blockchain (Ethereum, Solana), infrastruktur pengembang (Blockaid, Turnkey, Relay), pasar keuangan baru (Uniswap, Morpho, OpenFX), dan produk konsumen (Phantom, World). Ini juga tercermin dalam investasi baru-baru ini seperti: * **Honcho**: Solusi penyimpanan memori agen yang di-host sendiri. * **Octet**: Memungkinkan aplikasi memverifikasi lokasi fisik pengguna secara kriptografis sebagai blok pembangun identitas digital. * **here.now**: "Awan agen" yang memungkinkan kepemilikan dan komposisi konten yang dihasilkan. Variant mengundang para pendiri yang membangun dengan tujuan untuk memperluas otonomi pengguna untuk menghubungi mereka.

marsbit1j yang lalu

Dari Web3 ke AI Agent, VC Kripto Legendaris Variant Taruhan Transformasi 2 Triliun Rupiah

marsbit1j yang lalu

Pertumbuhan Eksplosif Solana Dorong Volume Perps Bulanan Melampaui Rekor Sebelumnya

Di tengah kinerja bearish dan volatilitas yang tinggi, Solana menunjukkan kekuatan luar biasa di pasar derivatif. Meskipun harga SOL baru-baru ini turun tajam, momentum bullish kembali muncul, dan volume futures perpetual bulanan mengalami salah satu pertumbuhan terbesar yang pernah ada. Volume perpetual futures bulanan Solana melonjak melebihi rekor sebelumnya, mencapai lebih dari $76,7 miliar pada Mei 2026. Angka ini meningkat sekitar 34% dari rekor tinggi sebelumnya sebesar $57 miliar pada November 2025. Lonjakan ini mencerminkan peningkatan aktivitas spekulatif dan partisipasi trader di ekosistem Solana, yang menonjolkan pengaruh jaringan yang berkembang di dunia perdagangan kripto. Selain itu, jaringan Solana juga menarik perhatian karena peningkatan signifikan dalam aktivitas stablecoin. Dalam periode satu minggu, jaringan ini memproses volume transaksi stablecoin lebih dari $79,9 miliar, menunjukkan kesehatan jaringan yang kuat dan partisipasi ekonomi yang tinggi. Pengguna semakin beralih ke Solana untuk pembayaran, perdagangan, dan DeFi, menandakan minat yang meningkat terhadap transfer yang cepat dan berbiaya rendah.

bitcoinist1j yang lalu

Pertumbuhan Eksplosif Solana Dorong Volume Perps Bulanan Melampaui Rekor Sebelumnya

bitcoinist1j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片

Kategori Populerright-arrow

Tag Populerright-arrow