Ripple CTO Details How RLUSD Might Trade At $1,200 On Debut

bitcoinistDipublikasikan tanggal 2024-12-16Terakhir diperbarui pada 2024-12-16

Abstrak

Ripple CTO David “JoelKatz” Schwartz has outlined how RLUSD—the upcoming stablecoin on the XRP Ledger—could initially trade at highly inflated...

Ripple CTO David “JoelKatz” Schwartz has outlined how RLUSD—the upcoming stablecoin on the XRP Ledger—could initially trade at highly inflated prices, possibly even $1,200, despite its intended $1 peg. Speaking via X, he highlighted early supply bottlenecks, speculative fervor, and the fundamental market mechanics of stablecoins as factors likely to drive any short-lived spike.

Why The Ripple Stablecoin RLUSD Could Hit $1,200

In a reply to community chatter around a screenshot that showed an RLUSD value of $1,200 on the Xaman wallet, Schwartz confirmed such a price is theoretically possible. He remarked that “as RLUSD goes live, there may be supply shortages in the very early days before the market stabilizes. There actually is someone willing to pay $1,200/RLUSD for a tiny fraction of one RLUSD. Tools will show you the highest price anyone is willing to pay, even if it’s just for a tiny bit. Maybe someone wants the ‘honor’ of buying the first bit of RLUSD on the DEX.”

However, he was quick to stress that “the price will come back to very close to $1 as soon as supply stabilizes,” suggesting that any eye-popping listing would be more of a novelty event than a real market assessment of RLUSD’s long-term value. “But rest assured, the price will come back to very close to $1 as soon as supply stabilizes. […] If you want to spend a lot of money to get a tiny bit of RLUSD before anyone else does, you can. But please don’t expect the price to stay over $1 once things stabilize, which I expect they will do very quickly.”

Part of the reason for these anomalies, according to the Ripple CTO, lies in the basic minting and burning mechanics that underpin stablecoins. Minting the Ripple stablecoin involves creating new units when demand rises, while burning is the process of removing units from circulation when demand falls. Both processes help maintain the $1 peg but can lag behind real-time trading. At launch, an imbalance between the number of tokens available (supply) and those seeking to buy them (demand) could generate extreme initial price distortions.

Schwartz’s remarks on social media echoed points he made at the Emergence conference in Prague. He discussed “weird failure scenarios” that might occur when a stablecoin first goes live, jokingly referring to the possibility that “people might spend extra just to own RLUSD first.”

A scenario he described was someone paying $3—rather than $1—just to say they are an original holder of the stablecoin. While that still pales in comparison to $1,200, the principle remains: such anomalies, he said, could lead some buyers to mistakenly believe that the Ripple stablecoin might be a speculative asset rather than a stablecoin.

“Obviously it’s going to come back down from $3 to $1 as soon as somebody mints enough of it,” the Ripple CTO noted, adding that this is where arbitragers play a pivotal role. When the price of a stablecoin floats significantly above or below its peg, traders seize on the mismatch, either selling at a premium or buying at a discount and redeeming at face value. This process locks the price back to its target.

Schwartz also cautioned, “please don’t FOMO into a stablecoin! This is not an opportunity to get rich.”
Ripple Software Engineer Neil Hartner recalled that GateHub USDC was “regularly over $2 per GateHub USD” during its initial automated market maker (AMM) phase, especially on weekends when GateHub’s own mint-and-burn processes were offline.

A vital takeaway here is that many stablecoins rely on an external entity or protocol for minting and redemption. When those processes aren’t operational 24/7—or when liquidity is restricted outside of business hours—prices can decouple from the $1 peg on specific exchanges or trading venues.

Hartner cited Circle’s USDC depegging incident in March 2023 as another cautionary parallel. “Price distortions can happen if minting and burning aren’t available 24/7. Same thing happened when USDC depegged over a weekend in March 2023 because markets panicked and Circle had limited liquidity operations outside business hours, Hartner wrote.

Community member Khaled Elawadi.XRP, questioned how halting minting or burning could logically distort a stablecoin’s price if redemptions for fiat ultimately remain $1. “Surely, there should be a fixed buy and sell price on the DEX and on the other listed exchanges?” he remarked.

In response, Hartner underscored that the peg is enforced not by a universal algorithmic price fix but by traders themselves. “You don’t cash out stablecoins from exchanges, you trade them for fiat with other traders,” he explained. If more stablecoins are being sold than there are buyers willing to pay $1, the price on that particular exchange can slip until market participants or liquidity providers step in.

At press time, XRP traded at $2.40.

XRP price
XRP price, 1-week chart | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com
Featured image from YouTube, chart from TradingView.com
Jake Simmons

Jake Simmons

Jake Simmons has been a Bitcoin enthusiast since 2016. Ever since he heard about Bitcoin, he has been studying the topic every day and trying to share his knowledge with others. His goal is to contribute to Bitcoin's financial revolution, which will replace the fiat money system. Besides BTC and crypto, Jake studied Business Informatics at a university. After graduation in 2017, he has been working in the blockchain and crypto sector. You can follow Jake on Twitter at @realJakeSimmons.

Bacaan Terkait

Pemerintah AS untuk Pertama Kali Melonggarkan Larangan Kontrak Berjangka Kripto (Perpetual), Apa Artinya bagi Pasar?

**Ringkasan: AS Buka Pasar untuk Kontrak Berjangka Kripto Tanpa Jatuh Tempo (Perpetual Futures)** Pada 29 Mei, Badan Pengawas Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditas AS (CFTC) mengeluarkan pedoman yang secara efektif membuka pasar untuk kontrak berjangka kripto tanpa jatuh tempo (perpetual futures) yang dapat diperdagangkan 24/7 untuk warga dan platform terdaftar di AS. Kebijakan ini menandai perubahan signifikan, karena sebelumnya produk derivatif kripto ini hampir tidak dapat diakses di bawah regulasi AS. Pedoman CFTC menekankan bahwa aset kripto, karena infrastruktur digital dan perdagangan globalnya yang terus-menerus, sangat cocok untuk perdagangan dan penyelesaian 24 jam. Langkah ini dipuji oleh banyak pelaku industri sebagai langkah maju untuk menjadikan AS sebagai pusat kripto, dengan potensi menarik likuiditas kembali ke pasar domestik. **Penerima Manfaat Langsung:** * **Kalshi:** Mendapat persetujuan untuk meluncurkan kontrak perpetual pertamanya (BTCPERP). * **Coinbase:** Menjadi Futures Commission Merchant (FCM) pertama yang diatur CFTC, memungkinkan klien AS mengakses pasar derivatif global. * **CME:** Platform Globex-nya kini menawarkan perdagangan 24/7 untuk futures dan opsi Bitcoin, menutup "celah CME" di akhir pekan. CFTC menyatakan pendekatan ini khusus untuk kripto, mencatat bahwa komoditas tradisional seperti produk pertanian mungkin tidak cocok untuk model 24/7. Semua platform yang ingin menawarkan perdagangan 24/7 harus berkoordinasi dengan CFTC. **Tanggapan Industri:** Pimpinan perusahaan seperti Michael Saylor (MicroStrategy), Brian Armstrong (Coinbase), dan Tarek Mansour (Kalshi) menyambut baik keputusan ini sebagai pengembangan positif untuk pasar modal Bitcoin dan akses bagi investor AS. **Kritik:** Organisasi konsumen Better Markets mengkritik keputusan CFTC, menyatakan bahwa regulator mengabaikan perlindungan investor dengan tidak meminta pengungkapan risiko yang lebih jelas untuk produk kompleks ini, dan menuduh adanya hubungan yang terlalu dekat dengan industri. **Dampak ke Depan:** Pasar derivatif kripto bernilai puluhan triliun dolar kini terbuka untuk pengguna AS. Pertukaran seperti Kraken juga telah mengumumkan rencana untuk meluncurkan produk perpetual futures yang diatur di AS dalam waktu dekat, menandakan potensi periode pertumbuhan yang signifikan untuk perdagangan derivatif kripto di Amerika Serikat.

Odaily星球日报9j yang lalu

Pemerintah AS untuk Pertama Kali Melonggarkan Larangan Kontrak Berjangka Kripto (Perpetual), Apa Artinya bagi Pasar?

Odaily星球日报9j yang lalu

Bagaimana Undang-Undang CLARITY Mengubah Ekonomi Pendapatan Stablecoin

Artikel ini membahas dampak UU CLARITY (2026) terhadap ekonomi pendapatan stablecoin. Dibandingkan UU GENIUS (2025) yang hanya melarang penerbit membayar bunga, Pasal 404 UU CLARITY memperluas larangan ke semua penyedia layanan aset digital dan memperkenalkan pemisahan hukum antara "imbalan pasif" (dilarang) dan "imbalan berbasis aktivitas" (diizinkan). Perubahan ini menggeser paradigma dari "hold-to-earn" menjadi "use-to-earn". Sebagai antisipasi, raksasa manajemen aset seperti Morgan Stanley, BlackRock, dan JPMorgan meluncurkan reksa dana pasar uang ter-tokenisasi (MSNXX, BSTBL/BRSRV, JLTXX) antara 16 April - 12 Mei 2026. Produk ini dirancang sebagai infrastruktur pendapatan yang patut bagi cadangan stablecoin dalam paradigma baru. Artikel menganalisis tiga jalur potensial untuk meneruskan pendapatan kepada pengguna: 1) Imbalan berbasis aktivitas di bursa, 2) Pendapatan melalui protokol DeFi non-kustodial, dan 3) Melalui lapisan aset cadangan (reksa dana ter-tokenisasi). Jalur ketiga dianggap paling stabil secara kepatuhan. Artikel juga menyoroti risiko konsentrasi tinggi (90% cadangan USDtb di BUIDL) dan perdebatan tentang batas OCC 20% untuk aset cadangan ter-tokenisasi. Kemenangan jalur aset cadangan bisa memunculkan risiko sistematis baru. Kesimpulannya, UU CLARITY mendorong pergantian infrastruktur keuangan, di mana penyedia aset cadangan ter-tokenisasi diposisikan sebagai "Visa/Mastercard baru" di ekonomi dolar kripto.

marsbit11j yang lalu

Bagaimana Undang-Undang CLARITY Mengubah Ekonomi Pendapatan Stablecoin

marsbit11j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片