Is Bitcoin’s 4-year cycle finally breaking? This post-halving data says…

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-18Last updated on 2025-12-18

Abstract

Bitcoin's traditional 4-year cycle, historically defined by post-halving rallies followed by sharp corrections, may be breaking. The 2024 halving did not trigger the typical strong upside; instead, BTC is on track to close the first post-halving year down roughly 7%. This deviation is attributed to new fundamentals, including institutional inflows, declining exchange reserves, ETF launches, and broader macroeconomic support. These factors are helping stabilize Bitcoin, potentially avoiding extreme boom-bust swings and suggesting a transition into a prolonged "supercycle" rather than a repeat of past patterns.

The number “four” has always played a major role in crypto cycles.

Historically, Bitcoin has closely followed its halving pattern. Within each four-year cycle, scarcity drove strong post-halving rallies.

As the cycle matured, Bitcoin [BTC] rolled over into a bear phase before finding a bottom.

Notably, the latest halving took place in April 2024, dropping the block reward to 3.125 BTC, which puts us roughly 18 months into the current cycle. That said, this cycle isn’t tracking cleanly with prior ones.

A cycle behaving differently

Historically, the first year after a halving has produced solid upside for BTC.

Looking at the 2020 cycle, the halving set the supply shock in motion, leading to a 60% rally in 2021. That move was followed by a 64% correction in 2022 as BTC found its cycle low, before ripping 153% in 2023.

This time, despite the 2024 halving, Bitcoin is tracking very differently.

Technically, its price is on pace to close the first post-halving year down roughly 7%, with less than two weeks left in Q4.

In that context, it raises a bigger question: Is Bitcoin’s four-year cycle starting to lose its reliability?

New fundamentals are rewriting Bitcoin playbook

Bitcoin might be breaking free from its usual 4-year boom-and-bust cycle.

And that’s good news for the bulls.

For starters, BTC may avoid sharp drops like the 73% pullback in 2018 or the 64% dip in 2022, which were largely hype-driven. Instead, CryptoQuant data showed things may be changing.

Specifically, a mix of four key factors is helping stabilize BTC, keeping it in a loop-like pattern, limiting sudden swings, and sustaining FOMO, as reflected in Exchange Reserves, with 140k BTC accumulated in Q4 alone.

Meanwhile, the launch of ETFs in 2024 is adding another layer of support.

Together, these trends show that Bitcoin is maturing.

In past four-year cycles, hype drove extreme BTC moves. For instance, the 64% drop after 2020’s 300% run or the 125% rally in 2016 that led to a 73% dip in 2018.

This time, the cycle is different.

With stronger fundamentals, BTC is breaking out of its sudden boom-bust pattern, making the current pullback look more like part of a prolonged bull market, or a Bitcoin “supercycle.”


Final Thoughts

  • Bitcoin’s traditional 4-year boom-bust pattern is showing signs of change, with the 2024 halving not triggering the usual sharp rallies or corrections.
  • Institutional inflows, falling exchange reserves, ETF launches, and broader macro support are helping BTC stabilize, creating what many are calling a Bitcoin “supercycle.”

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason Bitcoin's 4-year cycle might be breaking, according to the article?

AThe article suggests that Bitcoin's 4-year cycle is breaking due to a combination of new fundamentals, including institutional inflows, falling exchange reserves, the launch of ETFs, and broader macro support, which are helping to stabilize the price and prevent the extreme boom-bust patterns of the past.

QHow did Bitcoin's price perform in the first year after the 2024 halving compared to historical cycles?

AUnlike historical cycles which saw strong rallies in the first post-halving year, Bitcoin's price is on pace to close the first year down roughly 7% after the 2024 halving.

QWhat are the four key factors mentioned that are helping to stabilize Bitcoin's price?

AThe four key factors are institutional inflows, falling exchange reserves, the launch of ETFs, and broader macro support.

QWhat historical examples of extreme price movements does the article cite from previous cycles?

AThe article cites a 64% drop after the 2020 halving's 300% run and a 73% dip in 2018 that followed a 125% rally in 2016.

QWhat new term does the article use to describe the potential new market phase for Bitcoin?

AThe article uses the term 'Bitcoin supercycle' to describe a prolonged bull market that breaks free from the sudden boom-bust pattern.

Related Reads

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit2h ago

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit2h ago

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit3h ago

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit3h ago

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit4h ago

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片