This Finance CEO Picks Solana Instead Of Bitcoin — Here’s Why

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-05-10Last updated on 2026-05-10

Abstract

Finance CEO Raoul Pal prefers Solana over Bitcoin, citing its high throughput and low transaction costs as better suited for the future crypto-AI era. He believes Solana is ideal for machine-to-machine microtransactions and AI-driven DeFi activity, predicting AI agents will soon dominate DeFi users. While Bitcoin serves as a store of value, Pal sees higher growth in networks built for mass, automated transactions. This view was highlighted at Consensus 2026, where AI integration and crypto infrastructure were key themes.

Finance CEO Raoul Pal has expressed a clear preference for Solana over Bitcoin for reasons deeper than a simple asset comparison. The reasons for his latest crypto call go back to one of the crypto market’s biggest talking points: whether the next phase of the crypto industry will be led by Bitcoin’s store-of-value role or by high-speed networks built for mass activity.

Raoul Pal Picks Solana Over Bitcoin

Raoul Pal has never been short on comments relating to cryptocurrencies. However, his most recent Solana over Bitcoin preference came during one of the most closely watched moments from the recently concluded Consensus 2026 event in Miami. The choice was notable because Pal has always been associated with broad macro crypto commentary, and his market views often focus on liquidity cycles, network adoption, and price peaks.

While at the event, Pal said he would choose Solana if he had to pick between Solana and Bitcoin. This choice is mostly due to his belief of where the higher-growth opportunity sits as the crypto industry moves deeper into the AI era.

Particularly, Pal linked the future of crypto to artificial intelligence and described crypto as the ‘Universal Basic Equity’ of the AI age.

Pal’s preference was attributed to Solana’s high throughput and low transaction costs, which could make it better suited for machine-to-machine microtransactions, AI-based activity, and fast DeFi interactions. Bitcoin, by comparison, functions mostly as a monetary asset, but it was not designed as a high-frequency execution layer for millions of small automated transactions.

SOLUSD currently trading at $93.6. Chart: TradingView

AI Agents Important To Pal’s Solana Preference

Pal also predicted that within five years, AI agents will constitute 60% of DeFi users, surpassing human users. This means that the DeFi niche could have three AI agents for every two human users.

This idea gives more context to why Solana would appeal to Pal in a direct comparison with Bitcoin. AI agents would likely need networks that can process frequent, low-cost transactions, and this is a niche where Solana has been outperforming Ethereum in recent years.

The idea that Solana might one day outpace Bitcoin in terms of growth is highly unlikely at this point, but it fits a wider theme that dominated Consensus 2026. The conference was heavily focused on AI agents, DeFi, tokenization, stablecoins, and institutional crypto infrastructure, with major players from firms such as JPMorgan and Citigroup in attendance.

Arthur Hayes, Chief Investment Officer at Maelstrom, also offered an interesting take from the Consensus main stage. Hayes noted that crypto doesn’t need regulation and that it exists outside of the system, which is in contrast with the regulatory accommodation on display at the event.

Still on the AI front, Kevin O’Leary also noted at the event the importance of AI with the US’s competition with other countries, while Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse also said the company is not thinking about AI as a tool to reduce headcount.

Featured image from Bunq, chart from TradingView

Related Questions

QWhy does Raoul Pal prefer Solana over Bitcoin?

ARaoul Pal prefers Solana over Bitcoin because he believes Solana's high throughput and low transaction costs make it better suited for machine-to-machine microtransactions, AI-based activity, and fast DeFi interactions, which he sees as a higher-growth opportunity as the crypto industry moves into the AI era.

QAccording to Pal, what role does crypto play in the AI age?

AAccording to Pal, crypto is the 'Universal Basic Equity' of the AI age.

QWhat key reason does the article give for AI agents making Solana appealing over Bitcoin?

AAI agents are expected to need networks that can process frequent, low-cost transactions, which is a niche where Solana has been outperforming other networks and where Bitcoin was not designed to excel.

QWhat was Arthur Hayes's contrasting view on crypto regulation, as mentioned in the article?

AArthur Hayes, Chief Investment Officer at Maelstrom, noted that crypto doesn't need regulation and that it exists outside of the system, which contrasts with the theme of regulatory accommodation present at the Consensus 2026 event.

QWhat broader themes dominated the Consensus 2026 conference, as described in the article?

AThe conference was heavily focused on AI agents, DeFi, tokenization, stablecoins, and institutional crypto infrastructure.

Related Reads

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit11h ago

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit11h ago

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit13h ago

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit13h ago

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit13h ago

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit13h ago

In the Age of AI, the Organization Itself Is the Moat

In the AI era, where products, interfaces, and narratives are easily replicated, a company's true moat is its organizational structure. The article argues that exceptional companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Palantir differentiate themselves not merely through technology but by inventing new organizational forms that allow a specific type of talent to thrive and become a version of themselves they couldn't elsewhere. These companies compete on identity, offering ambitious individuals a sense of being special, chosen, close to power, and part of a historic mission. However, this emotional commitment must be matched by structural commitment—real power, ownership, status, and economic participation. For founders, the key question is not how to tell a better story, but what kind of person can only truly realize their potential within their specific company structure. For individuals evaluating opportunities, the distinction between "being chosen" (an emotional feeling) and "being seen" (a structural reality of tangible power and rewards) is crucial. The most dangerous promises are those priced in future time. While AI makes copying visible elements easy, it does not make building a great, novel organization any easier. The next frontier of competition is creating organizational vessels that attract, structure, and compound the judgment of the right people—those whom traditional boxes cannot contain. The company itself becomes the moat.

marsbit14h ago

In the Age of AI, the Organization Itself Is the Moat

marsbit14h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片