BitMart Research Institute Weekly Insights: Fed Hawkish Expectations Heat Up, Crypto Market Continues to Face Pressure, RWA Sector Defies Trend and Breaks Out

marsbitPublicado a 2026-06-23Actualizado a 2026-06-23

Resumen

**BitMart Research Weekly: Fed Hawkishness Weighs on Crypto, RWA Sector Shows Strength** In traditional markets, US equities were mixed as weakening macro data signaled slowing growth. The Federal Reserve held rates at 3.75%, with half of its officials projecting at least one rate hike this year, adopting a more hawkish stance. The crypto market faced sustained pressure. BTC fell 3.7%, underperforming ETH, which dropped 1.2%. Overall market sentiment remained in "Extreme Fear." US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw net outflows of approximately $226.8 million for the week, indicating a lack of sustained institutional buying. Despite the bearish backdrop, the Real World Assets (RWA) narrative gained traction. XLM surged 12.2%, driven by Stellar's RWA tokenization roadmap. Stablecoin market capitalization stabilized near $315.3B, showing structural shifts towards compliant and institutional cash management tools like USDG and BUIDL. A notable stress point emerged as Strategy's STRC traded below its $100 face value for a fifth consecutive week, pressuring its dividend model and raising questions about its Bitcoin treasury management strategy.

I. Macro Economy and Traditional Financial Markets

1. High Divergence in US Stocks: Signals of Slowing Growth Intertwined with Middle East Uncertainties

US stock markets showed high divergence last week. The S&P 500 fell slightly by 0.22%, the Nasdaq rose by 0.27%, and the Dow Jones increased by 0.39%. Macro data continued to weaken: the New York Empire State Manufacturing Index plummeted from 19.6 to 5.7, housing starts dropped sharply to 1.177 million units, and May retail sales grew by 0.4% month-on-month. Overall, this indicates that the high-interest-rate environment is gradually suppressing aggregate demand.

The labor market remains resilient, with initial jobless claims at 226,000. The four-week moving average rose slightly to 223,250, providing some support for overall consumption. The coexistence of consumer resilience with weakening real estate and manufacturing sectors creates a structural divergence, making the Federal Reserve's policy path more complex. The pace of economic cooling is insufficient to drive inflation down rapidly.

2. Fed Holds Rates Steady, Half of Officials Project Rate Hikes This Year, Wash Changes Style

The Federal Reserve maintained the policy rate at 3.75% with a 12:0 vote. Among the 18 officials, 9 project at least one rate hike this year, with 6 projecting more than one hike. Only 1 projects a rate cut this year, and 1 official did not submit Summary of Economic Projections. The Philadelphia Fed's "prices paid" index rose from 47.9 to 53.2, further strengthening the tightening stance.

New Chairman Wash adopted a communication style different from his predecessor, frequently mentioning "first principles," "alternative frameworks," and "mandate range." He was the only official to refuse to submit future interest rate projections in this dot plot, emphasizing that the Fed's core task is achieving price stability. This FOMC statement was almost completely rewritten, significantly shorter in length, increasing market uncertainty about the Fed's future communication and policy path.

II. Crypto Market

1. Market Performance: BTC Underperforms ETH, Market Sentiment Remains in Extreme Fear

Last week, BTC fell 3.7%, fluctuating within the $62,000–$65,000 range; ETH fell 1.2%, remaining around $1,700. As BTC performed significantly weaker than ETH, the BTC/ETH ratio fell 1.6%. The total crypto market cap fell 3.1%; excluding BTC and ETH, the market cap fell 2.3%; the altcoin market excluding the top 10 tokens fell 3.0%, showing a clear broad-based decline pattern.

The top 30 crypto assets fell by an average of 2.5%. Only XLM recorded a significant gain, rising 12.2%, driven by Stellar's roadmap for RWA tokenization, payments, and corporate settlements. Market sentiment remained in the "Extreme Fear" zone, with the Fear & Greed Index at 20. Additionally, jaredfromsubway.eth, one of the largest MEV sandwich bots on Ethereum, suffered a reverse attack, losing approximately $7.5 million, bringing on-chain security risks back into market focus.

2. ETF Flows: BTC Net Outflow of $226.8M, Institutional Buying Has Not Resumed Sustained Inflows

Last week, US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw a net outflow of approximately $226.8 million, while spot Ethereum ETFs had a net outflow of approximately $10 million. Split by trading day, BTC ETFs saw a net outflow of about $64.09 million on June 15, a small net inflow of about $10.06 million on June 16, net outflows of about $82.16 million and $90.66 million on June 17 and 18 respectively. The US market was closed on June 19 for the Juneteenth holiday.

For ETH ETFs, there were small net inflows on June 15 and 16, but flows turned net negative again from June 17 to 18, resulting in a week overall close to a small outflow. Overall, compared to the large outflows of the previous week, pressure eased somewhat, but institutional funds have not resumed sustained buying.

3. On-Chain Data: Stablecoin Total Supply Stabilizes, Structure Shows Divergence

DeFiLlama data shows that as of June 22, the total stablecoin market cap was approximately $315.3 billion, increasing by about $287 million in 7 days, a rise of about 0.09%. USDT's market share is about 59.05%. USDT saw a slight 7-day decrease of about 0.12%, USDC grew slightly by about 0.06%, indicating overall stability in mainstream settlement funds. USDS decreased by about 3.47% over 7 days, continuing the trend where ecosystem-focused stablecoins are more prone to contraction in volatile environments.

USD1 and USDG grew by about 9.27% and 6.74% respectively, reflecting expansion in compliance-oriented stablecoins and channel-based distribution networks. USDe remained largely flat over 7 days, with the expansion pace of yield-generating stablecoins slowing but no significant redemptions. BUIDL and USYC maintained slight growth, indicating continued resilience in institutional on-chain cash management demand. Overall, the stablecoin market shifted from total supply contraction in the previous week to supply stabilization with structural divergence, but funds still favor high-certainty dollar instruments.

4. Industry Narratives: STRC Trades Below Par for Fifth Consecutive Week, Strategy's Funding Flywheel Under Pressure

STRC has traded below its $100 par value for the fifth consecutive week. Its price once fell to around $82 before recovering to about $88, but its weekly trading volume still reached $1.6 billion. The nominal dividend yield has risen to 11.5%, with market discussion on whether to raise it further to 11.75% or 12%. Notably, Strategy, which once claimed it would "never sell Bitcoin," sold 32 BTC for the first time in late May this year, raising approximately $2.5 million to pay for preferred share distributions.

Strategy currently faces three potential response paths: raising the STRC dividend yield (each 0.5% increase would bring about $52.45 million in additional annual dividend costs); selling Bitcoin holdings to pay dividends, which would weaken the core narrative; or issuing new STRC shares below par value, which would structurally increase the long-term dividend burden. Last week, STRC accounted for 76.2% of the total trading volume of Bitcoin Treasury preferred securities, down from 80% the previous week. The second most traded asset was Strive's SATA, accounting for 15.8%.

This article is for market analysis only and does not constitute any investment advice. Investment risks are high. Please fully assess your own risk tolerance and implement strict risk control before trading.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what were the main macroeconomic factors influencing the cryptocurrency market last week?

AThe main factors were a highly divided US stock market with slowing growth signals, a Federal Reserve that maintained interest rates while its 'dot plot' showed a majority of officials expecting at least one rate hike this year, and Fed Chair Warsh's communication shift creating market uncertainty. Weak macroeconomic data, such as a sharp drop in the New York Empire State Manufacturing Index and housing starts, indicated high interest rates are dampening demand.

QHow did the performance of Bitcoin compare to Ethereum last week, and what was the market sentiment?

ABitcoin underperformed Ethereum, falling 3.7% compared to Ethereum's 1.2% decline. Consequently, the BTC/ETH ratio fell by 1.6%. Overall market sentiment remained in the 'Extreme Fear' zone, with the Fear and Greed Index at 20.

QWhat was the trend for US spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF fund flows last week?

AUS spot Bitcoin ETFs saw a net outflow of approximately $226.8 million for the week. US spot Ethereum ETFs experienced a smaller net outflow of around $10 million. While the outflows moderated compared to the previous week, institutional capital had not yet resumed sustained buying.

QWhat is the current situation with STRC, and what challenges does its issuer, Strategy, face according to the article?

ASTRC has traded below its par value for five consecutive weeks, with its price dipping to around $82 before recovering to about $88. Its nominal dividend yield has risen to 11.5%. Strategy faces three main challenges: 1) Raising the STRC dividend rate, which would significantly increase annual costs; 2) Selling Bitcoin holdings to pay dividends, which weakens its core narrative; and 3) Issuing new STRC shares below par value, which would structurally increase long-term dividend burdens.

QWhich cryptocurrency among the top 30 assets posted a significant gain last week, and what was the reported reason?

AXLM (Stellar) recorded a significant gain of 12.2%. The increase was attributed to the positive market reaction to Stellar's recently released roadmap focusing on Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization, payments, and enterprise settlement solutions.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Por qué 2026 podría redefinir a Ethereum, Solana, Base y Avalanche

A medida que avanza 2026, las principales cadenas de bloques como Ethereum, Solana, Base y Avalanche se encuentran en una transformación coordinada para satisfacer la creciente demanda institucional, en lugar de competir por la adopción minorista. Con más de 30.000 millones de dólares en activos del mundo real (RWA) en blockchains públicas, la prioridad se centra en el rendimiento, la velocidad de liquidación, el cumplimiento normativo y la fiabilidad. Ethereum lidera esta transición con su actualización Glamsterdam (prevista para el primer semestre de 2026), que aumentará los límites de gas e introducirá mejoras para ejecuciones paralelas. Solana, por su parte, rediseña su mecanismo de consenso con Alpenglow (lanzamiento previsto en el segundo semestre de 2026) para reducir el tiempo de finalización de 12,8 segundos a unos 100-150 ms y mejorar la fiabilidad. Base desarrolla Beryl (despliegue en Q3 2026), centrándose en la normativa y presentando un estándar de token B20 para activos regulados. Avalanche, tras su mejora Etna, despliega Octane (a lo largo de 2026) para aumentar la velocidad de las transacciones y reducir costes para aplicaciones empresariales. Estas mejoras sincronizadas señalan que la ventaja competitiva clave ya no es solo la velocidad, sino la infraestructura preparada para la actividad financiera institucional a largo plazo. A medida que se implementen en 2026 y 2027, el capital, los desarrolladores y la liquidez favorecerán a las redes que demuestren una ejecución fiable, compatibilidad regulatoria y resistencia operativa.

ambcryptoHace 12 min(s)

Por qué 2026 podría redefinir a Ethereum, Solana, Base y Avalanche

ambcryptoHace 12 min(s)

Tiger Research: Primero, lleve la tokenización de RWA al extranjero

**Tiger Research: Lleva la tokenización de RWA al extranjero primero** El mercado de activos del mundo real tokenizados (RWA) está creciendo rápidamente, pero muchas jurisdicciones carecen de un marco regulatorio adecuado. Las instituciones financieras de estas regiones tienen tres opciones estratégicas: esperar legislación local, usar "sandboxes" regulatorios o ingresar directamente a mercados extranjeros ya regulados. La actividad RWA transfronteriza requiere una preparación meticulosa en seis áreas clave: elección de jurisdicción, licencias, definición del activo, perfil de inversor, y diseño de arreglos de liquidación y operación. El objetivo principal es acumular experiencia operativa real. Existen dos rutas principales: ingresar a jurisdicciones con marcos regulatorios maduros (como Hong Kong, Singapur o EE.UU.) o adoptar la ruta nativa "on-chain", utilizando plataformas con capacidades de cumplimiento integradas (ej. Ondo Global, Plume Nest) para una entrada más rápida y un mayor alcance, aunque con estructuras potencialmente más complejas. El proceso implica evaluar entidades locales existentes, seleccionar una plataforma o socio, diseñar la estructura del producto cumpliendo exenciones como la Regulation S, establecer acuerdos de custodia y operaciones "on-chain", y finalmente ejecutar y verificar la venta. La esencia del negocio no está en la tecnología, sino en completar con éxito todo el proceso de venta. No es necesario esperar a un marco regulatorio completo; la capacidad de trazar un camino viable rápidamente y acumular experiencia es crucial, ya que el mercado no esperará. El momento de actuar es ahora.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Tiger Research: Primero, lleve la tokenización de RWA al extranjero

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

5 años, 15,000 millones de dólares perdidos: el gigante de los juegos blockchain YGG se rinde

El 6 de julio, Yield Guild Games (YGG) anunció el cierre de su división de publicación de juegos, YGG Play, dando por terminada una apuesta lanzada en 2025. La plataforma, enfocada en juegos casuales web3, será desmantelada progresivamente antes del 31 de julio. A pesar de generar más de 9 millones de dólares en ingresos, con un pico en el primer trimestre de 2026 (876.000 dólares), sus fundadores alegaron que el deterioro del entorno macroeconómico, la falta de liquidez y la caída de confianza del usuario hicieron insostenible el negocio. Esta decisión marca un punto de inflexión para YGG, otrora gigante del modelo "play-to-earn" (P2E). Fundada en 2020, YGG alcanzó su cénit en 2021 como el gremio más grande de Axie Infinity, impulsada por la narrativa P2E y el mercado alcista. Sin embargo, el colapso del modelo económico de Axie en 2022, basado en un ciclo financiero especulativo que requería constante entrada de nuevos jugadores, sumió a la industria en una crisis profunda. El cierre de YGG Play refleja el declive estructural del sector de los juegos blockchain. Un informe de abril de 2026 señala que el 93% de unos 3.200 proyectos analizados están "muertos" o inactivos, con tokens del sector depreciados en un 95% desde máximos de 2022. La narrativa P2E, que sustentó la explosión inicial, demostró ser insostenible, llevando a una destrucción de capital estimada en 150.000 millones de dólares en cinco años. Ante esto, YGG anunció un cambio estratégico radical hacia la economía de datos para IA, abandonando efectivamente su núcleo histórico en el gaming.

Foresight NewsHace 41 min(s)

5 años, 15,000 millones de dólares perdidos: el gigante de los juegos blockchain YGG se rinde

Foresight NewsHace 41 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片