CoinDeskPolicyPublicado a 2024-05-15Actualizado a 2024-05-16

Resumen

Alexey Pertsev, a developer of Tornado Cash, was sentenced to 64 months in prison for money laundering.

  • A developer of the anonymizing tool Tornado Cash, Alexey Pertsev, was sentenced to spend 64 months in prison.
  • Many members of the crypto community say the decision is outlandish.

'S-HERTOGENBOSCH, Netherlands — As 31-year old Russian Alexey Pertsev stood outside the courtroom on Tuesday awaiting a verdict from a judge at the s-Hertogenbosch courthouse in the Netherlands, he looked calm. When the judge ruled the Tornado Cash developer was guilty of money laundering, he did not appear to be outraged.

It wasn't until the Dutch police edged toward him that he seemed surprised he wouldn't get to say goodbye to his loved ones – to anyone – and was instead immediately escorted to a cell under the large courthouse while the police found an appropriate jail for him to live out his 64-month sentence. Spectators in the courtroom were dumbfounded.

Shock also rippled across the crypto community. Once the verdict was reached many took to X (formerly Twitter) to express their woes.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"Wow, 64 months for developing software, that's crazy," one user wrote.

"Sad day for privacy, crypto and open-source," Pablo Sabbatella, head of security research at crypto protection company Blockfence said, a view other users echoed.

"This has gone too far," said Alexandre Stachtchenko, the former director of crypto and blockchain at KPMG France.

"Another awful decision that will ultimately harm all of us," another user wrote.

"This is the battlefield for privacy, speech, individualism, and yes, crypto," Ryan Selkis, founder and CEO of market intelligence products provider Messari Crypto said on X.

A necessary step

The response, however, was not unanimous. Zumo founder and CEO Nick Jones saw the decision as a necessary step in crypto's development.

"This is essential for fostering exemplary practices among all industry participants, ensuring a sector that people can trust," Jones said.

Regulators and legal bodies worldwide have been tightening money laundering requirements for crypto. The European Union recently adopted a set of anti-money laundering rules that affect the industry, while the U.K enforced a crime bill to help seize and freeze crypto used for money laundering and other crimes in April. Money laundering is the process of disguising financial assets to make them look legitimate.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Dutch judge argued that Pertsev, who co-developed the anonymizing tool Tornado Cash, helped execute money laundering transactions.

"It was Tornado Cash that executed the concealing and disguising [of] activities," an English translation of the verdict said. "When executing these activities with cryptocurrency derived from crime, Tornado Cash carries out money laundering activities."

To Louise Abbott, a partner at Keystone Law, the decision makes sense given nations' anti-money laundering objectives.

Tornado Cash is "a very popular offering for those with something to hide because it causes massive problems from a compliance and regulatory perspective. Tracing these transactions is almost impossible," Abbott said in an interview over email.

The platform has been a key tool for North Korean hacking group Lazarus, which has been tied to a $625 million hack of Axie Infinity’s Ronin Network and other major crypto thefts.

"In my opinion, the Dutch Courts have rightly found Alexey Pertsev, its developer, guilty of money laundering offenses," she said.

Not every lawyer shares her views.

"It’s a harsh punishment," said David Schreuders, a partner at law firm Simmons and Simmons' Amsterdam office.

Crypto lawyer Fatemeh Fannizadeh told CoinDesk's Daniel Kuhn that the decentralized nature of crypto technology called for a "more nuanced legal approach,” than the traditional one.

Advertisement
Advertisement

What's next?

Pertsev's trial is not the only one related to Tornado Cash. Roman Storm and Roman Semenov, who also helped develop the platform, face allegations of money laundering and sanctions violations in the U.S. Storm is expected to go to trial in September. Semenov has yet to be arrested. Pertsev's verdict could have an impact on those trials.

"The guilty verdict in the Dutch Courts will have persuasive power in the U.S. Presumably the Dutch Court held there was sufficient evidence to link Pertsev’s conduct to akin to money laundering," Abbott said. "If those same links can be made with Storm, then that will undoubtedly help prosecutors in the U.S."

It may not be over yet. Pertsev has applied to appeal the judges verdict. If his appeal is successful and a different verdict is reached, that new verdict could overrule the previous decision.

"Any appeal would require Mr. Pertsev to prove that he as an individual was not responsible for the systems that allowed the anonymity of the Tornado cash programme," Abbott said.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Lecturas Relacionadas

La crónica del fraude grave que envuelve al unicornio cripto Blockstream

A lo largo de 2024, Blockstream, la empresa de cripto del pionero de Bitcoin Adam Back, se ha visto envuelta en varias controversias. Una investigación de NatInfoSec lanzó graves acusaciones sobre su producto de notas mineras, Blockstream Mining Note (BMN). Los principales señalamientos incluyen: una discrepancia entre el poder de cómputo mostrado (15 EH/s) y el necesario para cumplir con las obligaciones de los BMN (20-45 EH/s); una falta de evidencia verificable pública sobre las operaciones mineras a esa escala; rendimientos anuales fijos inusualmente altos, cercanos al 20%; y el descubrimiento de que Christopher William Cook, figura clave de la operación minera de Blockstream a través de Exacore, tiene antecedentes penales por fraude postal, información no revelada a los inversores. Aunque BitMEX Research y otros como Samson Mow han cuestionado algunos puntos por falta de pruebas o por implicar incorrectamente a BSTR, la compañía de tesorería de Bitcoin asociada a Back, las preguntas centrales sobre los BMN persisten. La comunidad y los analistas exigen mayor transparencia y capacidad de verificación sobre: el tamaño real y los límites de responsabilidad de los BMN; la fuente de los altos rendimientos prometidos; la procedencia verificable de los BTC pagados a los inversores; y el papel exacto de Cook. Hasta ahora, Blockstream no ha emitido una respuesta oficial integral a estas acusaciones.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

La crónica del fraude grave que envuelve al unicornio cripto Blockstream

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

La Historia Completa del Fraude Severo en el que está Inmerso el Unicornio Cripto Blockstream

El artículo aborda las graves acusaciones de fraude contra Blockstream, la compañía cofundada por el pionero de Bitcoin, Adam Back. Un informe de investigación de la cuenta NatInfoSec señala múltiples irregularidades en su producto estrella, los Bitcoin Mining Notes (BMN). Las principales acusaciones incluyen: 1) Una discrepancia entre el hashrate necesario para cumplir con las obligaciones de los BMN (estimado en 20-45 EH/s) y el hashrate real reportado por Blockstream (15 EH/s), sin evidencia pública suficiente de infraestructura minera a esa escala. 2) La oferta de rendimientos fijos anormalmente altos (cercanos al 20%) en un sector volátil como la minería de Bitcoin. 3) El antecedente penal por fraude postal de Christopher William Cook, una figura clave en la división minera de Blockstream (Exacore), lo que no fue revelado en los documentos de los BMN. 4) Posibles riesgos de contagio para Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), una empresa relacionada con Back que planea salir a bolsa vía SPAC. BitMEX Research analizó las acusaciones, confirmando la probable veracidad del historial de Cook y la preocupación por los altos rendimientos, pero consideró insuficiente la evidencia sobre otros puntos, destacando la independencia legal entre BMN y BSTR. La comunidad debate intensamente, especialmente sobre la verificabilidad del hashrate y el origen de los pagos a los inversionistas. En conclusión, el artículo subraya que las acusaciones, aunque no son prueba definitiva de fraude, revelan importantes lagunas de transparencia en los BMN respecto al tamaño real de las obligaciones, el origen verificable de los rendimientos, la infraestructura minera subyacente y la divulgación de riesgos clave. Blockstream no había emitido una respuesta oficial sistemática al momento de la publicación.

链捕手Hace 3 hora(s)

La Historia Completa del Fraude Severo en el que está Inmerso el Unicornio Cripto Blockstream

链捕手Hace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片