CoinDeskPolicyPublicado a 2024-05-14Actualizado a 2024-05-15

Resumen

Aiden Pleterski, 25, was reportedly kidnapped, beaten and tortured by five of his alleged victims last summer.

Two Canadian men have been arrested and charged with fraud for allegedly swindling investors out of $40 million CAD – approximately $30 million USD –i n a crypto and foreign exchange investment scheme.

Self-proclaimed “Crypto King” Aiden Pleterski, 25, was charged with fraud and money laundering for his role in the alleged Ponzi scheme. His associate, 27-year-old Colin Murphy, was charged with fraud, the Ontario Securities Commission announced Wednesday.

203
Pepe Hits All-Time High as GameStop Rally Extends

The criminal charges, which are the result of a 16-month investigation Canadian authorities are calling Project Swan, come amid an ongoing bankruptcy case tied to the alleged scheme that has been the subject of much media attention in Canada.

Advertisement
Advertisement

According to court documents and local media reports, between 2021 and 2022, approximately 160 investors gave Pleterski and his company, AP Private Equity Limited, around $40 million in Canadian dollars ($30 million USD) to invest on their behalf in the crypto and foreign exchange markets. Some of those investors, according to reports, took out loans to invest with Pleterski.

The trustee overseeing the bankruptcy case concluded that Pleterski only invested 2% of the money he was given, and spent at least $16 million on himself – buying over 10 luxury cars, traveling internationally, and renting a $8.4 million lakefront mansion for $45,000 per month. Two McLarens, two BMWs and a Lamborghini were seized during the bankruptcy process.

Pleterski, who is also a small-time livestreamer, posted videos of his escapades – including numerous vacations to places like Los Angeles, London and Miami, driving rented Lamborghinis and McLarens, and detailing his expenditures. In one video, in which Pleterski filmed himself assembling a Lego model of the Titanic, he estimated that he’d spent $150,000 on Legos since 2021.

During the bankruptcy process, Pleterski referred to himself as a “20-something-year-old kid” and told creditors that he was unorganized and didn’t keep records of his finances or payments, according to a report from CBC.

Alleged kidnapping

In December 2022, Pleterski was allegedly kidnapped, beaten and tortured by five victims of his alleged Ponzi scheme. According to reports, Pleterski’s alleged abductors held him for three days and subjected him to torture before demanding his landlord-turned-mentor pay a $3 million ransom for his release.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Pleterski was eventually released, but a 12-minute video of him, appearing swollen and bruised while apologizing to investors – which his lawyer later said was coerced – was posted to social media.

Four of the alleged perpetrators have been arrested and charged with kidnapping.

Toronto-born NBA player Shai Gilgeous-Alexander purchased the $8.4 million lakefront mansion Pleterski once called home, but filed suit against the seller to back out of the purchase after he learned of its connection to Pleterski. According to reports, Gilgeous-Alexander and his girlfriend received a “threatening visit” from a man looking for Pleterski and subsequently learned that there had been threats to burn down the home.

Next steps for Pleterski

Pleterski was released on $100,000 bail on Tuesday, signed for by his parents, according to a Wednesday report from CBC. Pleterski’s bail conditions require that he surrender his passport, refrain from posting anything on social media about financial matters, and not buy or trade crypto, the report added.

The Ontario Securities Commission said Wednesday that it will release “further information” on the case on Thursday.

Edited by Nikhilesh De.


Lecturas Relacionadas

La crónica del fraude grave que envuelve al unicornio cripto Blockstream

A lo largo de 2024, Blockstream, la empresa de cripto del pionero de Bitcoin Adam Back, se ha visto envuelta en varias controversias. Una investigación de NatInfoSec lanzó graves acusaciones sobre su producto de notas mineras, Blockstream Mining Note (BMN). Los principales señalamientos incluyen: una discrepancia entre el poder de cómputo mostrado (15 EH/s) y el necesario para cumplir con las obligaciones de los BMN (20-45 EH/s); una falta de evidencia verificable pública sobre las operaciones mineras a esa escala; rendimientos anuales fijos inusualmente altos, cercanos al 20%; y el descubrimiento de que Christopher William Cook, figura clave de la operación minera de Blockstream a través de Exacore, tiene antecedentes penales por fraude postal, información no revelada a los inversores. Aunque BitMEX Research y otros como Samson Mow han cuestionado algunos puntos por falta de pruebas o por implicar incorrectamente a BSTR, la compañía de tesorería de Bitcoin asociada a Back, las preguntas centrales sobre los BMN persisten. La comunidad y los analistas exigen mayor transparencia y capacidad de verificación sobre: el tamaño real y los límites de responsabilidad de los BMN; la fuente de los altos rendimientos prometidos; la procedencia verificable de los BTC pagados a los inversores; y el papel exacto de Cook. Hasta ahora, Blockstream no ha emitido una respuesta oficial integral a estas acusaciones.

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

La crónica del fraude grave que envuelve al unicornio cripto Blockstream

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

La Historia Completa del Fraude Severo en el que está Inmerso el Unicornio Cripto Blockstream

El artículo aborda las graves acusaciones de fraude contra Blockstream, la compañía cofundada por el pionero de Bitcoin, Adam Back. Un informe de investigación de la cuenta NatInfoSec señala múltiples irregularidades en su producto estrella, los Bitcoin Mining Notes (BMN). Las principales acusaciones incluyen: 1) Una discrepancia entre el hashrate necesario para cumplir con las obligaciones de los BMN (estimado en 20-45 EH/s) y el hashrate real reportado por Blockstream (15 EH/s), sin evidencia pública suficiente de infraestructura minera a esa escala. 2) La oferta de rendimientos fijos anormalmente altos (cercanos al 20%) en un sector volátil como la minería de Bitcoin. 3) El antecedente penal por fraude postal de Christopher William Cook, una figura clave en la división minera de Blockstream (Exacore), lo que no fue revelado en los documentos de los BMN. 4) Posibles riesgos de contagio para Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), una empresa relacionada con Back que planea salir a bolsa vía SPAC. BitMEX Research analizó las acusaciones, confirmando la probable veracidad del historial de Cook y la preocupación por los altos rendimientos, pero consideró insuficiente la evidencia sobre otros puntos, destacando la independencia legal entre BMN y BSTR. La comunidad debate intensamente, especialmente sobre la verificabilidad del hashrate y el origen de los pagos a los inversionistas. En conclusión, el artículo subraya que las acusaciones, aunque no son prueba definitiva de fraude, revelan importantes lagunas de transparencia en los BMN respecto al tamaño real de las obligaciones, el origen verificable de los rendimientos, la infraestructura minera subyacente y la divulgación de riesgos clave. Blockstream no había emitido una respuesta oficial sistemática al momento de la publicación.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

La Historia Completa del Fraude Severo en el que está Inmerso el Unicornio Cripto Blockstream

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片