CoinDeskPolicyPublicado a 2024-05-15Actualizado a 2024-05-15

International law firm Cahill Gordon & Reindel has added three crypto-native lawyers to its growing digital assets and emerging technology practice, in hopes it will become a one-stop shop for cryptocurrency companies looking for legal and regulatory advice.

Lewis Cohen, the co-founder of crypto-focused firm DLx Law, will join the firm as a partner and co-chair the expanded practice – which has been renamed CahillNXT – alongside former Southern District of New York (SDNY) prosecutor Samson “Sam” Enzer. Two other lawyers from DLx Law – Delaware-based Gregory Strong and New York-based Sarah Chen – will join Cohen as partners in Cahill’s newly expanded practice.

14.2K

One of Wall Street’s go-to law firms, Cahill’s continued expansion into the crypto sphere is significant, indicating a growing need for crypto legal advice among traditional finance companies.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“When I was a kid, the [Chicago] Bulls were the leading team in the NBA,” Enzer said, “That’s what this is – this is the crypto legal Dream Team.”

Enzer, a former senior member of the SDNY’s Securities and Commodities Fraud Task Force, joined Cahill in November 2021 and subsequently established the firm’s digital assets practice. The practice has a number of high profile clients, including notorious Bitfinex launderer Ilya “Dutch” Lichtenstein, and major crypto companies like Coinbase.

But Enzer said that his expertise is in dispute resolution, including litigation and handling government enforcement actions – but when he needed expert advice on regulatory issues, he found himself regularly turning to Cohen and his team for help.

“We worked together for years,” Enzer said. “With the explosive demand for our services, and the burgeoning demand for the specific advice that Lewis [Cohen] and his team offer, we thought it made sense to combine.”

That combination, Enzer and Cohen hope, will make seeking comprehensive crypto legal advice easier for current and future clients.

“One of the big frustrations for clients is that they don’t really have a one-stop shop that they can go to to find crypto-native lawyers who speak the language, understand the technology,” Enzer said. “What you have is a tax crypto expert here, a crypto litigator there, a securities crypto expert at this place – it makes it very difficult for clients and more expensive, frankly, because they end up having to retain multiple law firms to get what they need.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Crypto-native knowledge

In addition to making things easier on their clients, Cohen and Enzer both stressed the value that having more crypto-native lawyers on Cahill’s staff will bring.

“We just see far too many lawyers struggle with what is a multi-sig, what is a roll-up, how does a bridge work? All of these things that, if you’re going to give legal advice, you have to understand,” Cohen said. “Part of our mission here is educational. We very much believe in the open source blockchain ethos and we really want to bring that DNA into our practice.”

Enzer said that a non-lawyer computer programmer from DLx Law will also join CahillNXT as a consultant, which he said will help Cahill and its clients “bridge the gap between computer code and the law.”

“Many big firms who dabble in this space do not speak the language, do not understand the tech, and therefore miss the opportunities to make the best arguments for their clients,” Enzer said. “If you don’t understand that, then you can’t really help clients navigate the maze of regulations”

Cohen has been a prominent member of the crypto legal community for years. In 2022, Cohen, Strong and Chen contributed to a paper arguing why cryptocurrencies are not securities.

The future of DLx Law

DLx Law will continue to operate after Cohen, Strong and Chen’s departure and, according to a Tuesday press release, “continues to zealously serve its existing clients and is welcoming new clients.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Co-founder Angela Angelovska-Wilson has been named Managing Partner of the firm.

“I absolutely support [her] and am excited to see all that DLX can continue to do in its current format,” Cohen told CoinDesk.

Edited by Nikhilesh De.

Lecturas Relacionadas

La crónica del fraude grave que envuelve al unicornio cripto Blockstream

A lo largo de 2024, Blockstream, la empresa de cripto del pionero de Bitcoin Adam Back, se ha visto envuelta en varias controversias. Una investigación de NatInfoSec lanzó graves acusaciones sobre su producto de notas mineras, Blockstream Mining Note (BMN). Los principales señalamientos incluyen: una discrepancia entre el poder de cómputo mostrado (15 EH/s) y el necesario para cumplir con las obligaciones de los BMN (20-45 EH/s); una falta de evidencia verificable pública sobre las operaciones mineras a esa escala; rendimientos anuales fijos inusualmente altos, cercanos al 20%; y el descubrimiento de que Christopher William Cook, figura clave de la operación minera de Blockstream a través de Exacore, tiene antecedentes penales por fraude postal, información no revelada a los inversores. Aunque BitMEX Research y otros como Samson Mow han cuestionado algunos puntos por falta de pruebas o por implicar incorrectamente a BSTR, la compañía de tesorería de Bitcoin asociada a Back, las preguntas centrales sobre los BMN persisten. La comunidad y los analistas exigen mayor transparencia y capacidad de verificación sobre: el tamaño real y los límites de responsabilidad de los BMN; la fuente de los altos rendimientos prometidos; la procedencia verificable de los BTC pagados a los inversores; y el papel exacto de Cook. Hasta ahora, Blockstream no ha emitido una respuesta oficial integral a estas acusaciones.

marsbitHace 56 min(s)

La crónica del fraude grave que envuelve al unicornio cripto Blockstream

marsbitHace 56 min(s)

La Historia Completa del Fraude Severo en el que está Inmerso el Unicornio Cripto Blockstream

El artículo aborda las graves acusaciones de fraude contra Blockstream, la compañía cofundada por el pionero de Bitcoin, Adam Back. Un informe de investigación de la cuenta NatInfoSec señala múltiples irregularidades en su producto estrella, los Bitcoin Mining Notes (BMN). Las principales acusaciones incluyen: 1) Una discrepancia entre el hashrate necesario para cumplir con las obligaciones de los BMN (estimado en 20-45 EH/s) y el hashrate real reportado por Blockstream (15 EH/s), sin evidencia pública suficiente de infraestructura minera a esa escala. 2) La oferta de rendimientos fijos anormalmente altos (cercanos al 20%) en un sector volátil como la minería de Bitcoin. 3) El antecedente penal por fraude postal de Christopher William Cook, una figura clave en la división minera de Blockstream (Exacore), lo que no fue revelado en los documentos de los BMN. 4) Posibles riesgos de contagio para Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), una empresa relacionada con Back que planea salir a bolsa vía SPAC. BitMEX Research analizó las acusaciones, confirmando la probable veracidad del historial de Cook y la preocupación por los altos rendimientos, pero consideró insuficiente la evidencia sobre otros puntos, destacando la independencia legal entre BMN y BSTR. La comunidad debate intensamente, especialmente sobre la verificabilidad del hashrate y el origen de los pagos a los inversionistas. En conclusión, el artículo subraya que las acusaciones, aunque no son prueba definitiva de fraude, revelan importantes lagunas de transparencia en los BMN respecto al tamaño real de las obligaciones, el origen verificable de los rendimientos, la infraestructura minera subyacente y la divulgación de riesgos clave. Blockstream no había emitido una respuesta oficial sistemática al momento de la publicación.

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

La Historia Completa del Fraude Severo en el que está Inmerso el Unicornio Cripto Blockstream

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片