LIVE: Sam Bankman-Fried Returns to New York Courthouse for Sentencing in FTX Fraud Case

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado a 2024-03-27Actualizado a 2024-03-28

Resumen

Bankman-Fried was convicted on seven different fraud and conspiracy charges last year.

Sam Bankman-Fried is in a Manhattan courthouse again on Thursday to face sentencing after his November conviction on seven different fraud and conspiracy charges tied to the operation and collapse of FTX.

The former CEO faces decades behind bars. The U.S. Department of Justice successfully presented a case holding him responsible for FTX losing billions of customer and investor funds during its operation, saying he personally made decisions that led to the exchange's 2022 bankruptcy. His attorneys requested no more than 6 1/2 years in prison, while prosecutors recommended 40 to 50 years in sentencing memos leading up to Thursday's hearing.

Bankman-Fried, whose current lawyers are not the ones who represented him during the trial held in late 2023, is expected to appeal his conviction in the coming days; procedurally, he can't appeal until after sentencing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

A Presentence Investigation Report, which just tabulates the crimes Bankman-Fried was convicted of and creates a sentencing recommendation based on guidelines, recommended 100 years in prison. Lewis Kaplan, the Southern District of New York judge who has overseen Bankman-Fried's case, isn't bound to this recommendation or any of the others provided.

Still, he will consider supporting materials filed by both the prosecution and the defense.

The DOJ said Bankman-Fried deserved a severe penalty, citing the fact that FTX, which was once valued at $32 billion, lost essentially all its money due to his malfeasance. During the trial, prosecutors said Bankman-Fried stole $8 billion of customer money to fund venture-capital investments, real-estate purchases, political donations and more. Prosecutors submitted dozens of victim impact statements from former FTX customers as evidence, saying the sheer scale of the fraud Bankman-Fried was convicted on supported a harsher penalty – though one that was half what he technically could face.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Defense lawyers argued, on the other hand, that Bankman-Fried didn't intend to defraud customers, had shown remorse and had attempted to resolve FTX's bankruptcy after it began, saying the DOJ's proposal was extreme. Their supporting letters spoke more to Bankman-Fried as a person than to FTX and its collapse, with writers pointing to his veganism and anecdotes from his youth. Several letters said Bankman-Fried appeared to be neurodivergent and thus might not have understood the severity of the situation. Former New York Police Department officer Carmine Simpson, his fellow inmate in a Brooklyn detention facility who pleaded guilty to soliciting a minor, wrote a letter saying Bankman-Fried, a vegan, has been forced to eat poorly in jail.

Bankman-Fried's sentencing hearing kicks off at 9:30 a.m. ET (13:30 UTC).

Edited by Nick Baker.

Lecturas Relacionadas

¿Lápida de 120.000 yuanes o inmortalidad IA de 399? Tú eliges

Resumen: La empresa funeraria china Fushouyuan, conocida como "el Moutai de los funerales", enfrenta una crisis sin precedentes. Sus ganancias se desplomaron un 52,8% en 2024, con su primera pérdida semestral en 2025. El precio promedio de una tumba, que llegó a superar los 12.000 euros, se ha reducido a la mitad. Ante el colapso del negocio tradicional de sepulturas caras, la industria se está volcando en la IA para ofrecer "resurrección digital". Fushouyuan ha lanzado servicios como salas de ceremonias virtuales y "conmemoración con IA" que recrean la imagen y voz de los fallecidos. Paralelamente, ha surgido un mercado masivo y barato en plataformas de comercio electrónico, donde por apenas 50 euros se ofrecen videos de IA de baja calidad "reviviendo" a seres queridos. Este negocio, a menudo fraudulento, explota el dolor de familias en duelo, especialmente padres que han perdido a sus hijos únicos, un grupo que supera el millón en China. Sin embargo, estudios advierten de que estas tecnologías pueden bloquear el proceso natural de duelo, llevando a un "trastorno de duelo prolongado" y a una dependencia emocional de la IA. A pesar de las nuevas leyes que buscan regular este ámbito, la necesidad humana de consuelo sigue impulsando esta industria, planteando profundas cuestiones éticas sobre el amor, la pérdida y si un algoritmo puede realmente reemplazar a una persona.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

¿Lápida de 120.000 yuanes o inmortalidad IA de 399? Tú eliges

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片