Your AI Anxiety Is Being Harvested

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-10Last updated on 2026-03-10

Abstract

The article critiques the excessive hype and anxiety surrounding AI, arguing that much of the online discourse is a form of fear-based marketing designed to harvest attention and engagement. It points out that blindly copying others' AI setups—like popular coding configurations—is ineffective because these are tailored to specific needs and contexts, not universal solutions. The author warns against over-reliance on AI, noting that it can erode independent thinking and core human skills like judgment, creativity, and time management. Citing data from Fortune, Goldman Sachs, and academic studies, the article reveals that many companies report no actual productivity gains from AI adoption; instead, it often intensifies workloads and leads to burnout. The key takeaway is to use AI strategically for repetitive tasks while preserving human strengths for critical thinking and decision-making. True success lies not in using AI everywhere, but in knowing when not to use it.

Author: jiayi Jiayi

AI is exploding with traffic on X, and my X feed sends me a new type of content every day—

Someone posts a screenshot of an AI tool setup, captioning it "This system increased my efficiency 10x." The comments immediately flood with "Installed," "So powerful," "Will be left behind if I don't learn this."

Others share their AI workflows, telling you that copying their method will earn you X amount per month.

And then? After you install it, you're still you.

For someone who doesn't know how to trade, AI effectively increases your efficiency at losing money. Your problem was never a lack of tools.

I don't deny that AI is the biggest variable of our era. But I want to state a few facts that people aren't keen to hear.

1. 80% of AI content on X is essentially fear-mongering

"You're finished if you don't use AI"—this statement itself is a harvesting tactic.

Create anxiety → Provide a solution → Gain traffic.

This is a very mature monetization chain.

If you look closely, those shouting the loudest about the "AI revolution" aren't selling AI capability,they are selling your panic. What they need most is not for you to actually learn AI, but for you to remain perpetually anxious, keep following them, and keep sharing their content.

It's the same logic as the crypto world yelling "get on board now or it's too late," just with a new skin.

Recently, an AI post on X saying "Something Big Is Happening" got70 million impressions. However, this post deliberately omitted crucial context, keeping only the parts most likely to induce panic.

Panic sells attention, not truth.

2. Copying someone else's AI strategy with one click is the dumbest way to learn

Tailoring AI ultimately depends on individual cognition.

Recently, a 50K star Claude Code configuration repository went viral. Many reposted saying "install it now."

I studied it carefully—

It's a development workflow configuration designed for professional programmers: TDD test-driven, code review Agent, security scanning, 17 dedicated sub-Agents. Very impressive.

But it's designed for people who write code.

For example, if I, someone in marketing, install this setup, it would literally interfere with the operation of my own smart skills.

Everyone's work scenario, pain points, and thinking patterns are different. Someone else's AI configuration is the result of them stumbling through countless pitfalls to create something tailored for themselves.

With one click, you're not copying their ability, but a bunch of files you can't use.

More ironically, Claude Code's creator, Boris Cherny, said himself: his configuration is actually "surprisingly vanilla"—the default settings are sufficient, not much customization is needed.

But that kind of talk isn't exciting enough, so no one shares it.

3. AI's biggest trap: Not "you can't use it," but "you use it for everything"

I've seen people ask AI to plan their day: what to do, the priority of each task, the time allocation for each task.

This shocked me.

The allocation of one's own time and energy is a person's core competency.

What you need to do, what to do first, what's worth investing in, what should be abandoned—these judgments are based on your self-awareness, clarity of goals, and sense of opportunity cost.

This is not a decision an AI can make for you.

Because AI doesn't know you had insomnia last night so you're not in good form today, doesn't know you have an intuitive confidence in a certain project, doesn't know your relationship with a certain partner is微妙 (delicate) and needs priority handling recently.

Handing this over to AI is like letting someone who just met you 5 minutes ago plan your life.

The key distinction is whether AI enhances your thinking, or AI replaces your thinking. It's essentially my criterion for judging whether AI or the human is the fuel. After all, living brain cells can now run operational AI.

4. The data tells a brutal truth

Most companies that use AI see no productivity improvement.

This isn't me saying it.

Fortune reported in February this year: Thousands of CEOs admit AI has had no practical impact on employment and productivity.

Goldman Sachs latest research: No significant correlation between AI and productivity.

Tom's Hardware citing a survey of 6000 executives:Over 80% of companies report no productivity gains from AI.

Nobel laureate in economics Daron Acemoglu stated bluntly: AI is not improving productivity.

Harvard Business Review's headline in February was even more direct:

"AI Doesn't Reduce Work — It Intensifies It"

UC Berkeley research also warns: The effect AI is producing in the workplace is the opposite of what was expected—employees did become more productive, but the workload also skyrocketed, ultimately leading to burnout.

5. What you should truly be anxious about is not "I haven't learned to use AI yet"

But rather "I've already forgotten how to think for myself."

Independent thinking is the scarcest asset of this era.

AI can help you write 80-point content, but the leap from 80 to 100, only the human brain can accomplish. AI can help you gather information, but judging which information is important and how to combine it into unique insights—that's human work.

Research shows that in SAT writing tests, the group using AI assistance had the lowest brain activity, and their content was evaluated as "lacking originality and warmth."

Over-reliance on AI, especially among young people, can negatively impact brain development.

While you're training AI, you're also letting your own brain atrophy.

This isn't science fiction. It's a悲哀 (tragic) thing happening right now.

6. The right posture

Embrace change, learn to enhance cognition, and stay清醒 (clear-headed).

Know what things AI does better than you—

Repetitive tasks, data organization, format conversion, first draft generation. Hand these over to AI, no problem.

Also know what things you do better than AI—

Strategic judgment, relationship maintenance, creative intuition, value trade-offs, time management. These abilities require you to practice repeatedly, not outsource to a model.

Not every problem needs an AI solution.

Sometimes turning off all tools and thinking quietly for 10 minutes is more effective than opening 10 AI windows.

Don't let "AI anxiety" become your new shackles.

Those selling AI panic on X are profiting from your anxiety. Every time you share "you're finished if you don't learn AI," you're working for them for free.

The real winners of this AI wave are not those who use AI the most, but those who know when NOT to use AI.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main argument the author makes about AI content on social media platforms like X?

AThe author argues that 80% of AI content on platforms like X is essentially 'fear-mongering marketing,' a mature monetization chain that manufactures anxiety to capture attention and traffic, rather than providing genuine value or truth.

QAccording to the article, why is copying someone else's AI strategy or workflow a flawed approach?

AIt is flawed because AI strategies are highly personalized. Copying a configuration designed for a specific professional (e.g., a programmer) is ineffective for someone with a different role (e.g., a marketer), as it doesn't transfer the original user's cognitive framework and context, resulting in a collection of unusable files.

QWhat data and sources does the author cite to support the claim that AI has not improved productivity?

AThe author cites multiple sources: Fortune's report on CEOs admitting no real impact on jobs or productivity, a Goldman Sachs study finding no significant correlation, a Tom's Hardware survey of 6,000 executives where over 80% reported no productivity gains, and statements from Nobel laureate Daron Acemoglu and a Harvard Business Review article titled 'AI Doesn't Reduce Work — It Intensifies It'.

QWhat is identified as the 'biggest trap' of using AI?

AThe biggest trap is not that 'you don't know how to use AI,' but that 'you use it for everything.' This leads to outsourcing core human competencies like strategic judgment, relationship management, creative intuition, and, most critically, the ability to manage one's own time and priorities, which AI cannot effectively do as it lacks personal context.

QWhat does the author propose as the 'correct posture' for engaging with AI?

AThe correct posture is to embrace change and learn to use AI for tasks it excels at (repetitive work, data sorting, draft generation) while maintaining清醒 (clarity) and consciously practicing and preserving the human capabilities that AI cannot replicate (strategic judgment, creativity, value-based decision-making). The true winners are those who know when NOT to use AI.

Related Reads

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

The author built a custom monitoring dashboard for Polymarket, a prediction market platform, and tested it with $1,600, achieving over 30% returns. However, the core argument is that Polymarket is not a good venue for traditional arbitrage. The dashboard has two main sections: a "Portfolio Dashboard" for tracking active positions with key metrics like total capital, P&L, and a risk-control module using a tier system (T1, T2, T3), and an "Opportunity Watchlist" for monitoring markets. The article details a critical structural trap in binary markets: a bet with a high perceived probability of success still carries a 100% loss risk if wrong. The author's T1/T2/T3 system is designed to manage this by limiting position sizes based on conviction and time horizon, emphasizing that high confidence should not equal high concentration. A key insight is the danger of "pseudo-diversification"—betting on different markets driven by the same underlying variable. The author concludes that Polymarket offers few true low-risk, arbitrage opportunities. It is instead a high-risk environment where wins can create a false sense of mastery, leading to large losses. The platform is better viewed as a training ground for honing judgment through disciplined, framework-driven betting rather than a reliable income source. The tools help transform intuition into structured, rule-based decisions to mitigate the risk of catastrophic errors.

marsbit1h ago

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

marsbit1h ago

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

**"WeChat AI Card" Practical Test Guide: Has the Era of AI Shopping Arrived?** WeChat has officially launched the "AI Exclusive Card," a feature integrated into its Workbuddy AI assistant. This card is designed to handle payments for AI-initiated purchases. Our hands-on test reveals it's not yet a tool for fully autonomous AI shopping, but rather a controlled payment layer for AI agents. The AI Card functions as an isolated sub-wallet within WeChat Pay. Users must bind the card and transfer funds into it from their main wallet. Crucially, every transaction requires explicit user confirmation via smartphone scan; AI cannot spend autonomously. Currently accessible through the Workbuddy agent, the card targets specific digital consumption scenarios: purchasing paid content (reports, data), calling paid APIs/tools, and subscribing to services. Its design prioritizes security and control by separating funds and mandating approval for each payment. We tested a real-world scenario: ordering bubble tea via Workbuddy using a "Meituan Life Assistant" skill. The process encountered multiple hurdles: high "skill" usage costs (exceeding daily free credits), and most importantly, while a payment was successfully initiated, the AI purchased an incorrect product (a mismatched group-buy coupon instead of the desired drink). This highlights the current limitation: the **AI Card only solves the payment step**. The broader challenge lies in the **AI agent's execution chain**—accurately understanding intent, navigating third-party platforms, selecting the right product, and ensuring proper fulfillment. The payment succeeded, but the purchase failed to meet the user's need. In conclusion, the WeChat AI Exclusive Card is a cautious, early-step experiment in AI commerce. It provides a secure, user-controlled payment method for agent interactions but is not yet capable of reliable, end-to-end complex purchases. For now, it's best used for low-value, low-risk digital services with careful user verification at each step. The vision of AI handling complete shopping tasks remains a work in progress.

marsbit3h ago

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

marsbit3h ago

Deconstructing Notion's Growth: From a Note-taking Tool to 100 Million Users—How Notion Built a Triple Growth Flywheel Through Product, Templates, and Community

Notion's growth from a niche note-taking tool to a platform with 100 million users is powered by three interconnected flywheels: Product-Led Growth (PLG), a Template Economy, and Community-Driven Growth. First, Notion's PLG strategy relies on a highly flexible, "plastic" product that users can adapt to countless personal and team workflows. Its freemium model lowers the barrier to entry, while features like page sharing and collaboration drive organic, usage-based viral growth as users naturally invite others. Second, the Template Economy solves the "blank page" problem. Templates, created by both Notion and its community, transform abstract product capabilities into concrete, copyable solutions for specific scenarios (e.g., project management, content calendars). This dramatically lowers activation costs for new users and fuels SEO-driven discovery. Third, a vibrant Community acts as a distributed growth engine. Users and official Ambassadors create tutorials, share use cases, and host local events. This community not only educates users but also fosters a sense of identity around pursuing "better ways of working," strengthening loyalty and enabling global, low-cost expansion. Together, these flywheels create a self-reinforcing ecosystem: a great product attracts users who create templates and community content, which in turn attracts more users and deepens engagement. This system allowed Notion to scale from individuals to teams and enterprises through a bottom-up adoption path. Looking ahead, AI integration promises to accelerate these flywheels further by making templates smarter and the platform a potential AI-native work operating system. Ultimately, Notion's defensible advantage is not just its features, but this deeply entrenched network of user assets, creators, and community trust.

marsbit3h ago

Deconstructing Notion's Growth: From a Note-taking Tool to 100 Million Users—How Notion Built a Triple Growth Flywheel Through Product, Templates, and Community

marsbit3h ago

$10 Billion, Qualcomm to Acquire Chip Legend Jim Keller's Company

Global mobile chip giant Qualcomm is in advanced talks to acquire AI chip startup Tenstorrent in a deal valued between $8-10 billion, according to media reports. This potential acquisition would be one of the largest in the AI chip sector in recent years. Tenstorrent, led by legendary chip architect Jim Keller, has gained prominence for its RISC-V architecture and AI accelerator designs. The move highlights Qualcomm's strategic push to diversify beyond its core smartphone chip business. As the smartphone market matures, Qualcomm is aggressively targeting growth in automotive, data center, and cloud AI. Acquiring Tenstorrent would allow Qualcomm to rapidly enter the high-end AI computing market, bypassing lengthy in-house development cycles. Tenstorrent's cost-effective system architecture, which avoids expensive HBM memory and relies on standard Ethernet for clustering, offers a potential alternative to Nvidia's costly solutions. Furthermore, Tenstorrent's high-performance RISC-V CPU technology and its focus on the automotive and edge computing segments align with Qualcomm's strategic goals, including its "Snapdragon Digital Chassis" platform. Despite the strategic rationale, the high valuation has sparked some investor caution. The successful integration of Tenstorrent's open-source culture and independent team into Qualcomm's organization, along with the commercialization of its technology, remains a key challenge.

marsbit4h ago

$10 Billion, Qualcomm to Acquire Chip Legend Jim Keller's Company

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片