Vitalik: What We Need to Do Is Not Fight AI, But Create Sanctuaries

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-18Last updated on 2026-05-18

Abstract

Vitalik Buterin, in an a16z podcast, addresses the core challenge of the AI era: not to fight AI, but to build "sanctuary technologies" that protect humans without stripping away privacy and agency. He argues the greatest risk is not super-intelligent AI, but humans becoming passive passengers who outsource decisions to centralized systems and AI, leading to a disempowering safety. He redefines Ethereum/crypto's mission as creating such a sanctuary—a parallel, optional space for free coordination, not a fix for the existing system. This becomes crucial as AI and corporate power centralize. Reflecting on his journey from a 19-year-old on "autopilot" to an active "pilot," Vitalik emphasizes that the world reinvents itself every 5-10 years, demanding proactive adaptation. He stresses that active learning is 10x more effective than passive learning, even with equal time. His key advice is to intentionally maintain "manual mode" amidst powerful AI: do tasks yourself, engage in active learning, and avoid total cognitive outsourcing to prevent mental atrophy. For builders, the focus should be on creating tools that preserve human sovereignty, foster serendipity, and keep strategic control. In summary, the AI era demands greater human initiative. True value lies not in computational power, but in active, sovereign individuals who use technology as a tool for agency, not a replacement for it.

Author: Saito

Just finished listening to this episode of Vitalik's podcast on a16z, and it's absolutely packed with insights.

He founded Ethereum at 19, and now in his early 30s, he has shifted from living on "autopilot" to being an "active pilot."

The core topic of this episode is the question we're most anxious about right now: As AI grows increasingly powerful, what should humanity do?

Vitalik's answer is not to "fight AI," but to create sanctuary technologies. These technologies protect us without stripping away our privacy and agency.

Today, I'll break down the hardest counterintuitive points, practical advice, and Ethereum's new positioning from this episode.

The Greatest Risk in the AI Era Is Not AI Being Too Smart, But Humans Being Too Passive

Vitalik states bluntly that the world is less safe and less peaceful now than it was 10 to 15 years ago.

Many people are chasing a kind of "safety": handing everything over to "uncles in the sky"—big companies, super AIs, centralized systems—letting them make decisions, manage risks, and provide protection for us.

But the cost of this safety is the loss of our privacy and agency.

Vitalik calls this safety "disempowering safety"—safety that makes people increasingly powerless.

This is also where he reinterprets the mission of crypto/Ethereum. The significance of Ethereum is not to "fix the dollar" or repair the existing financial system, but to create a new option. You can freely choose to use it or not.

This is what a true sanctuary is: both safe and allowing you to retain sovereignty.

Sanctuary Technologies: Small Spaces That Preserve Human Freedom

Sanctuary Technologies is a term coined by Vitalik himself, and "sanctuary technologies" is a fitting translation.

It's not about turning the entire world into a safe house, nor is it about ruling everyone with a larger system. What it truly aims to do is: give you a safe, small space where you can think, coordinate, and create freely, without being completely controlled by external forces.

It has several core characteristics: not totalizing, not attempting to rule the world; preserving privacy and agency; everyone can freely enter and exit, no coercion.

Ethereum is a typical sanctuary tech. It doesn't try to fix the existing financial system; it gives you a parallel option. Use it if you want, don't if you don't.

This will become increasingly important in the AI era. Because as big companies and super AIs grow stronger, what humanity truly needs is not another system that "arranges everything for you," but spaces that allow you to retain choice.

From Autopilot to Active Pilot: Vitalik's Personal Growth

Reflecting on founding Ethereum at 19, Vitalik says he was largely on autopilot back then.

Many decisions were made by going with the flow: dropping out, writing the whitepaper, getting his visa denied by Ripple, which ironically became a life turning point. He was more like being pushed along by the world then.

But now he increasingly realizes: the world is changing too fast, no one is coming to save you, you must be the pilot yourself.

He gives several relatable examples. Ten years ago, people could go days without contacting friends; now, not replying to a message for a day causes anxiety. Ten years ago, you could genuinely get lost while walking; now, with phone navigation, cities have become a series of "teleportation points."

These changes remind us: the world "dies and is reborn" every 5 to 10 years. If you keep living by the old script, you'll quickly fall behind.

So what's truly important in the AI era is not passively waiting for technology to take you somewhere, but actively deciding how you want to use technology.

The Stronger the AI, the More Humans Need to Stay in "Manual Mode"

Vitalik emphasizes: active learning is 10 times more effective than passive learning, even with the same amount of time spent.

Since childhood, he has forced himself to do many things manually, like doing chemistry without a calculator, walking without navigation. The goal isn't to oppose technology, but to keep the brain engaged.

The stronger the AI, the more we must deliberately preserve some "manual mode."

Sometimes intentionally not using AI to write code, sometimes intentionally walking without navigation, sometimes intentionally not using a chatbot to think through problems for you.

This isn't nostalgia or rejecting efficiency; it's to prevent brain atrophy and maintain one's own agency.

AI can help us with many things, but if all thinking, judgment, and exploration are outsourced, people will gradually become passengers in the system. Vitalik's reminder is: you can use AI, but don't let yourself become utterly dependent on it.

Practical Advice for Builders

The insights Vitalik gives for ordinary builders in this episode are very direct.

First, force yourself to do things manually. Even if AI can help you, do it yourself from time to time to ensure your brain doesn't get rusty.

Second, active learning. Don't just let AI give you answers; derive, verify, and do things yourself.

Third, build sanctuary technologies. Whether you're working on open-source tools, decentralized protocols, or personal knowledge bases, prioritize one thing: does it help people retain sovereignty?

Fourth, don't outsource all brainpower. AI can handle execution, but strategy, direction, and values must be controlled by you.

Fifth, maintain serendipity. Attend more offline events, talk to real people more, don't leave all discoveries to algorithmic recommendations.

These points all point to the same core: the AI era isn't about using fewer tools, but about using tools more actively.

Ethereum's New Positioning: Not Fixing the Old World, But Creating New Options

Vitalik's positioning of crypto is also clear.

Crypto can't solve all the problems of the dollar, nor does it need to pretend it can solve all problems. But it can create something new that doesn't have those flaws.

Everyone can freely choose to use it or not.

This is crypto's greatest strength: it doesn't force you; it gives you a choice.

In an era of increasingly concentrated AI power, this will become increasingly precious. Because as more and more systems try to make decisions for you, filter information for you, and assess risk for you, a parallel, non-coercive option that allows free entry and exit becomes very important in itself.

The value of Ethereum/crypto is not "beating the old world," but giving you a new world you can freely choose.

The Most Counterintuitive Lines from This Episode

The greatest risk in the AI era is not AI replacing humans, but humans willingly turning themselves into passengers.

A sanctuary isn't about making the whole world safe, but giving you a safe, small space where you can still retain freedom.

Active learning is 10 times more effective than passive learning, even with the same time spent.

The world dies and is reborn every 5 to 10 years, and we must be the pilots ourselves.

Inspiration for Ordinary People

The stronger the AI, the more proactive people must be.

Don't outsource all thinking to models. Do more manual things to keep your brain engaged. Participate in building tools that preserve human sovereignty, whether open-source, decentralized, or personal knowledge management systems.

Remember: technology ultimately serves humanity; it doesn't replace it.

Vitalik concludes by saying that we humans are the brightest stars. AI can be strong, but what truly drives the world forward are active, agentic people.

One-Sentence Summary

Vitalik, drawing on his 10 years of personal experience, tells us: the AI era is not an era to lie back, but an era that requires humans to be even more proactive pilots.

Don't outsource your brain to models. Do more manual things, build sanctuary technologies, and preserve your privacy and agency.

My biggest takeaway from this episode is: we used to fear AI taking our jobs, but now it seems AI is actually upgrading humans from "executors" to "designers."

What's truly scarce has never been computing power, but people willing to think actively and retain sovereignty.

Related Questions

QAccording to Vitalik, what is the core purpose of 'Sanctuary Technologies'?

AThe core purpose of 'Sanctuary Technologies' is to provide safe spaces where people can freely think, coordinate, and create while preserving their privacy and agency. They are not designed to dominate or fix the entire world, but to offer a voluntary, non-compulsory alternative, giving people a choice in an era of increasingly centralized power from large corporations and super-AI.

QWhat is the main risk of the 'disempowering safety' that Vitalik warns against in the AI era?

AThe main risk of 'disempowering safety' is that it makes humans increasingly passive and powerless. By handing over decisions, risk management, and protection to centralized entities like big companies or super-AI, individuals lose their privacy and agency. The article argues the biggest danger is not AI being too smart, but humans willingly turning themselves into passive passengers.

QHow does Vitalik's view of Ethereum's mission differ from simply 'fixing' the existing financial system?

AVitalik's view is that Ethereum's mission is not to 'fix' the existing financial system (like the US dollar), but to create a new, parallel option. Its power lies in giving people the freedom to choose whether to use it or not, offering an alternative without the flaws of the old system. This approach of providing voluntary choice, rather than enforced replacement, is its key strength.

QWhat practical advice does Vitalik offer for builders and individuals to maintain agency in the AI age?

AVitalik offers several practical pieces of advice: 1) Force yourself to do things manually at times to keep your mind sharp. 2) Engage in active learning (self-driven exploration) rather than just passively accepting AI answers. 3) Build tools that prioritize preserving human sovereignty. 4) Do not outsource all strategic and creative thinking to AI. 5) Maintain serendipity through real-world interactions.

QWhat does Vitalik mean by saying 'the world dies and gets reborn every 5 to 10 years' and its implication for individuals?

AVitalik means that the world undergoes fundamental transformations every 5-10 years, making old patterns of living obsolete. The implication for individuals is that they cannot rely on an old 'script' or be passive. To keep up and thrive, people must actively 'pilot' their own lives, make conscious choices about how to use technology, and continuously adapt, rather than being passively carried along by change.

Related Reads

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

"World Models" has become a widely used yet confusing term in AI. To address this, a team led by Fei-Fei Li and World Labs proposed a functional taxonomy based on the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process framework. This taxonomy categorizes systems called "world models" into three distinct projections: Renderers, Simulators, and Planners. Renderers, like OpenAI's Sora and other video generation models, focus on producing photorealistic visual outputs for human perception. They prioritize visual fidelity over physical accuracy. Simulators, such as NVIDIA Omniverse, aim to compute precise future environmental states for computational tasks like engineering analysis or digital twins. Planners, like Vision-Language-Action models, take in observations and goals to output executable actions for robots or agents. The article clarifies that most current "world models," including Sora, are primarily Renderers. They generate convincing visuals but lack the core ability to simulate state transitions based on actions, a key requirement for a true world model in classic reinforcement learning definitions. This conceptual confusion has practical implications, leading to potential misalignment in technology selection, investment, and public understanding of AI capabilities. Clear categorization is crucial. It helps enterprises avoid costly mistakes (e.g., using a renderer for robot training), allows investors to accurately assess markets, and enables researchers to build comparable benchmarks. While future systems may integrate these functions, recognizing current boundaries is essential for honest assessment and progress.

marsbit7m ago

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

marsbit7m ago

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbit27m ago

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbit27m ago

Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: As Everyone Is Bearish, the Circulating Supply Is Disappearing

"Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: Circulation Shrinks Amid Bearish Sentiment" Amid widespread bearish sentiment, with prominent figures like Bankless founder David Hoffman selling ETH and young developers flocking to Solana, some argue Ethereum is entering its "Ballmer era"—akin to Microsoft's perceived stagnation under Steve Ballmer. While surface-level criticisms about slow protocol development, cautious leadership, and competitive pressure are valid, underlying fundamentals tell a different story. Approximately 30% of ETH is staked, major holders like BitMine are accumulating, and spot ETFs continue to absorb supply. Regulatory clarity, including the SEC/CFTC's March ruling on staking rewards and the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, is transforming crypto from a regulatory threat into a legitimized framework. This institutionalization, alongside a shrinking circulating supply (with net issuance around 0.23% annually), creates significant buy-side pressure independent of fee-based value capture. The broader crypto total addressable market is expanding through regulated stablecoins, tokenized assets, and institutional adoption. While public chains face competition from permissioned alternatives, the winning model appears to be permissioned assets settling on public chains like Ethereum and Solana. The author advocates a non-maximalist, barbell strategy: holding ETH for its institutional role and supply squeeze, SOL for consumer/throughput trends, BTC as a macro hedge, and a basket of next-gen L1s. Key bullish drivers for ETH include rapid circulation shrinkage, potential Q2 staked ETF approvals, regulatory tailwinds solidifying its role as a default settlement layer, and the optionality of an eventual "Satya moment" leadership shift. Despite bearish consensus, the current setup—where crypto is "not hot" and regulatory groundwork is being laid—presents a compelling investment opportunity. The crypto cycle's focus may have shifted to AI, but blockchain infrastructure is gaining a legal and institutional foothold precisely while attention is elsewhere.

marsbit27m ago

Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: As Everyone Is Bearish, the Circulating Supply Is Disappearing

marsbit27m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片