Vitalik: We Need to Create Sanctuaries, Not Fight AI

链捕手Published on 2026-05-17Last updated on 2026-05-17

Abstract

In a recent interview, Vitalik Buterin, founder of Ethereum, addresses the central anxiety of the AI era. He argues the primary risk isn't AI's intelligence, but human passivity—ceding decisions, privacy, and agency to centralized systems or "super AIs" for a sense of "disempowering safety." His solution is not to fight AI, but to build "sanctuary technologies." These are optional, non-totalizing spaces that protect users while preserving their sovereignty and privacy. Ethereum is presented as a prime example, offering a parallel financial system one can freely choose, not a fix for the old one. Reflecting on his journey from a 19-year-old on "autopilot" to an active "pilot," Vitalik notes the world reinvents itself every 5-10 years. To keep up, individuals must actively pilot their lives, not be passive passengers. He stresses that active learning vastly outperforms passive learning, even with equal time invested. His practical advice for builders and individuals in the AI age includes: periodically forcing oneself to do tasks manually to keep the mind engaged; prioritizing active learning and verification over outsourcing answers; building tools that help retain human agency; not outsourcing all strategic thinking to AI; and preserving serendipity through real-world interactions. Ultimately, Buterin redefines Ethereum/crypto's role: not to win against or fix the old world, but to provide a free, optional alternative. The core message is that as AI grows more powerful, t...

Author: Saito

Just finished listening to this a16z podcast episode with Vitalik. The amount of information was mind-blowing.

He founded Ethereum at 19, now in his early 30s, he's transitioned from living on "autopilot" to being an "active pilot."

The core topic of this episode is the issue we're most anxious about right now: As AI gets stronger, what should humans do?

Vitalik's answer is not "fighting AI," but creating "sanctuary technologies." These technologies protect us without stripping away our privacy and agency.

Today, I'm breaking down the most counterintuitive ideas, practical advice, and Ethereum's new positioning from this episode.

The Biggest Risk in the AI Era Isn't AI Being Too Smart, It's Humans Being Too Passive

Vitalik states directly that the world today is less safe and less peaceful than it was 10 to 15 years ago.

Many people are pursuing a kind of "safety": handing everything over to "Uncle in the sky"—big companies, super AIs, centralized systems—letting them make decisions, manage risks, and provide protection for us.

But the price of this safety is losing our privacy and agency.

Vitalik calls this safety "disempowering safety," safety that makes people increasingly powerless.

This is also where he reinterprets the mission of crypto/Ethereum. Ethereum's significance isn't to "fix the dollar," not to repair the existing financial system, but to create a new option. You are free to choose whether to use it or not.

This is the real sanctuary: both safe, and allowing you to retain sovereignty.

Sanctuary Technologies: Small Spaces Preserving Human Freedom

"Sanctuary Technologies" is a term coined by Vitalik, and "sanctuary technologies" is a fitting translation.

It's not about turning the whole world into a safe house, nor is it about using a bigger system to rule everyone. What it truly aims to do is: give you a safe small space where you can think freely, coordinate, create, without being completely controlled by external forces.

It has several core features: it is not totalizing, does not attempt to rule the world; preserves privacy and agency; everyone can freely enter and exit, it's not mandatory.

Ethereum is a typical sanctuary tech. It doesn't try to fix the existing financial system, but gives you a parallel option. Use it if you want, don't if you don't.

This will become increasingly important in the AI era. Because as big companies and super AIs become more powerful, what humans truly need is not another system that "arranges everything for you," but a space that allows you to retain the power of choice.

From Autopilot to Active Pilot: Vitalik's Personal Growth

Looking back on founding Ethereum at 19, Vitalik says he was largely in an autopilot state back then.

Many decisions were made by going with the flow: dropping out of school, writing the whitepaper, getting his visa denied by Ripple, which ironically became turning points in his life. He was more like being pushed along by the world.

But now he increasingly realizes: the world changes too fast, no one is coming to save you, you have to be the pilot yourself.

He gives a few very relatable examples. Ten years ago, people wouldn't worry about not contacting friends for days; now you get anxious if you don't reply to a message for a day. Ten years ago, you could actually get "lost" while walking; now with phone navigation, cities have become clusters of "teleportation points."

These changes remind us: the world "dies once and is reborn again" every 5 to 10 years. If you keep living by the old script, you'll fall behind quickly.

So what's truly important in the AI era is not passively waiting for technology to take you somewhere, but actively deciding how you want to use technology.

The Stronger the AI, the More Humans Must Maintain "Manual Mode"

Vitalik emphasizes this: active learning is 10 times more effective than passive learning, even if the time spent is the same.

Since childhood, he has forced himself to do many things manually, like not using a calculator in chemistry class, walking without navigation. The goal isn't to be anti-technology, but to keep the brain engaged.

The stronger AI becomes, the more we must intentionally preserve some "manual mode."

Sometimes deliberately not using AI to write code, sometimes deliberately walking without navigation, sometimes deliberately not letting a chatbot think through problems for you.

This isn't nostalgia, nor rejecting efficiency. It's to prevent brain atrophy and maintain one's own agency.

AI can help us do many things, but if all thinking, judgment, and exploration are outsourced, humans will gradually become passengers in the system. Vitalik's reminder is: you can use AI, but don't let yourself become completely dependent on it.

Practical Advice for Builders

Vitalik's inspiration for ordinary builders in this episode is very direct.

First, force yourself to do things manually. Even if AI can help you, do it yourself from time to time to ensure your brain doesn't get rusty.

Second, active learning. Don't just let AI give you answers. Derive, verify, and do things yourself.

Third, build sanctuary technologies. Whether you're building open-source tools, decentralized protocols, or a personal knowledge base, prioritize one thing: does it help people retain sovereignty?

Fourth, don't outsource all brainpower. AI can help with execution, but strategy, direction, and values must be controlled by you.

Fifth, maintain serendipity. Attend offline events more, talk to real people more, don't leave all discovery to algorithm recommendations.

These points all point to the same core: the AI era isn't about using tools less, but about using them more proactively.

Ethereum's New Positioning: Not Fixing the Old World, But Creating a New Option

Vitalik is also clear about crypto's positioning.

Crypto can't solve all of the dollar's problems, nor does it need to pretend it can solve all problems. But it can create something new that doesn't have those drawbacks.

Everyone is free to choose whether to use it or not.

This is crypto's greatest strength: it doesn't force you, it gives you a choice.

In an era where AI is becoming increasingly centralized, this will become increasingly precious. Because as more and more systems try to make decisions for you, filter information for you, and judge risks for you, a parallel, non-coercive option that allows free entry and exit becomes very important in itself.

The value of Ethereum/crypto is not "winning against the old world," but giving you a new world you can freely choose.

The Most Counterintuitive Quotes from This Episode

The biggest risk in the AI era isn't AI replacing humans, it's humans willingly turning themselves into passengers.

Sanctuary isn't about making the whole world safe, but giving you a safe small space where you can still retain freedom.

Active learning is 10 times more effective than passive learning, even with the same time.

The world dies and is reborn every 5 to 10 years; we must be the pilot ourselves.

Inspiration for Ordinary People

The stronger the AI, the more proactive humans need to be.

Don't outsource all thinking to models. Do more manual things to keep your brain engaged. Participate in building tools that preserve human sovereignty, whether open-source, decentralized, or personal knowledge management systems.

Remember: technology ultimately serves humanity, it doesn't replace it.

Vitalik concludes by saying we humans are the brightest stars. AI can be strong, but what truly drives the world forward are still active, agential humans.

One-Sentence Summary

Using his 10-year personal experience, Vitalik tells us: the AI era is not an era to lie back, but an era where humans need to actively steer more than ever.

Don't outsource your brain to models. Do more manual things, build sanctuary technologies, preserve your own privacy and agency.

My biggest takeaway after listening to this episode is: we used to fear AI taking our jobs; now it seems AI is actually upgrading humans from "executors" to "designers."

What's truly scarce has never been computing power, but people willing to think actively and preserve their sovereignty.

Related Questions

QWhat is the core argument Vitalik makes regarding humanity's approach to increasingly powerful AI?

AVitalik argues that we should not aim to 'fight AI,' but instead focus on creating 'sanctuary technologies.' These are technologies that protect us without stripping away our privacy and personal agency (sovereignty). They provide a safe, optional space for human freedom, thought, and coordination without seeking total control.

QHow does Vitalik define the term 'sanctuary technologies' and what are its key characteristics?

A'Sanctuary technologies' is a term coined by Vitalik. It refers to technologies designed to create small, safe spaces where individuals can retain their freedom and sovereignty. Key characteristics are: they are not totalizing (do not seek to rule everything), they preserve privacy and agency, and they are optional—people can freely choose to enter or exit them, like Ethereum.

QAccording to the article, what is Vitalik's personal evolution from his early days to the present?

AVitalik describes his evolution from being on 'autopilot' at age 19 when he co-founded Ethereum—making decisions reactively as events unfolded—to becoming an 'active pilot.' He now consciously takes charge, recognizing that the world changes drastically every 5-10 years and that one must actively navigate these shifts rather than passively relying on old scripts or external saviors.

QWhat practical advice does Vitalik offer for individuals and builders in the AI era?

AVitalik's advice includes: 1) Force yourself to do things manually sometimes to keep your mind sharp. 2) Engage in active learning (self-directed, hands-on) over passive learning. 3) Build or support sanctuary technologies that help preserve human sovereignty. 4) Do not outsource all strategic thinking and values to AI. 5) Maintain serendipity through in-person interactions, not just algorithmic discoveries.

QHow does Vitalik reframe the role and value of Ethereum/crypto in the context of AI and modern systems?

AVitalik reframes Ethereum/crypto not as a tool to 'fix' the existing system (like the dollar or traditional finance), but as a creator of a new, parallel option. Its core value is offering freedom of choice—you can use it or not. In an age where centralized systems and powerful AI may seek to make decisions for people, the ability to opt into a non-coercive, sovereign alternative becomes increasingly vital.

Related Reads

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbit15m ago

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbit15m ago

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit45m ago

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit45m ago

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit1h ago

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit1h ago

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn1h ago

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片