Vitalik: We Need to Create Sanctuaries, Not Fight AI

链捕手Published on 2026-05-17Last updated on 2026-05-17

Abstract

In a recent interview, Vitalik Buterin, founder of Ethereum, addresses the central anxiety of the AI era. He argues the primary risk isn't AI's intelligence, but human passivity—ceding decisions, privacy, and agency to centralized systems or "super AIs" for a sense of "disempowering safety." His solution is not to fight AI, but to build "sanctuary technologies." These are optional, non-totalizing spaces that protect users while preserving their sovereignty and privacy. Ethereum is presented as a prime example, offering a parallel financial system one can freely choose, not a fix for the old one. Reflecting on his journey from a 19-year-old on "autopilot" to an active "pilot," Vitalik notes the world reinvents itself every 5-10 years. To keep up, individuals must actively pilot their lives, not be passive passengers. He stresses that active learning vastly outperforms passive learning, even with equal time invested. His practical advice for builders and individuals in the AI age includes: periodically forcing oneself to do tasks manually to keep the mind engaged; prioritizing active learning and verification over outsourcing answers; building tools that help retain human agency; not outsourcing all strategic thinking to AI; and preserving serendipity through real-world interactions. Ultimately, Buterin redefines Ethereum/crypto's role: not to win against or fix the old world, but to provide a free, optional alternative. The core message is that as AI grows more powerful, t...

Author: Saito

Just finished listening to this a16z podcast episode with Vitalik. The amount of information was mind-blowing.

He founded Ethereum at 19, now in his early 30s, he's transitioned from living on "autopilot" to being an "active pilot."

The core topic of this episode is the issue we're most anxious about right now: As AI gets stronger, what should humans do?

Vitalik's answer is not "fighting AI," but creating "sanctuary technologies." These technologies protect us without stripping away our privacy and agency.

Today, I'm breaking down the most counterintuitive ideas, practical advice, and Ethereum's new positioning from this episode.

The Biggest Risk in the AI Era Isn't AI Being Too Smart, It's Humans Being Too Passive

Vitalik states directly that the world today is less safe and less peaceful than it was 10 to 15 years ago.

Many people are pursuing a kind of "safety": handing everything over to "Uncle in the sky"—big companies, super AIs, centralized systems—letting them make decisions, manage risks, and provide protection for us.

But the price of this safety is losing our privacy and agency.

Vitalik calls this safety "disempowering safety," safety that makes people increasingly powerless.

This is also where he reinterprets the mission of crypto/Ethereum. Ethereum's significance isn't to "fix the dollar," not to repair the existing financial system, but to create a new option. You are free to choose whether to use it or not.

This is the real sanctuary: both safe, and allowing you to retain sovereignty.

Sanctuary Technologies: Small Spaces Preserving Human Freedom

"Sanctuary Technologies" is a term coined by Vitalik, and "sanctuary technologies" is a fitting translation.

It's not about turning the whole world into a safe house, nor is it about using a bigger system to rule everyone. What it truly aims to do is: give you a safe small space where you can think freely, coordinate, create, without being completely controlled by external forces.

It has several core features: it is not totalizing, does not attempt to rule the world; preserves privacy and agency; everyone can freely enter and exit, it's not mandatory.

Ethereum is a typical sanctuary tech. It doesn't try to fix the existing financial system, but gives you a parallel option. Use it if you want, don't if you don't.

This will become increasingly important in the AI era. Because as big companies and super AIs become more powerful, what humans truly need is not another system that "arranges everything for you," but a space that allows you to retain the power of choice.

From Autopilot to Active Pilot: Vitalik's Personal Growth

Looking back on founding Ethereum at 19, Vitalik says he was largely in an autopilot state back then.

Many decisions were made by going with the flow: dropping out of school, writing the whitepaper, getting his visa denied by Ripple, which ironically became turning points in his life. He was more like being pushed along by the world.

But now he increasingly realizes: the world changes too fast, no one is coming to save you, you have to be the pilot yourself.

He gives a few very relatable examples. Ten years ago, people wouldn't worry about not contacting friends for days; now you get anxious if you don't reply to a message for a day. Ten years ago, you could actually get "lost" while walking; now with phone navigation, cities have become clusters of "teleportation points."

These changes remind us: the world "dies once and is reborn again" every 5 to 10 years. If you keep living by the old script, you'll fall behind quickly.

So what's truly important in the AI era is not passively waiting for technology to take you somewhere, but actively deciding how you want to use technology.

The Stronger the AI, the More Humans Must Maintain "Manual Mode"

Vitalik emphasizes this: active learning is 10 times more effective than passive learning, even if the time spent is the same.

Since childhood, he has forced himself to do many things manually, like not using a calculator in chemistry class, walking without navigation. The goal isn't to be anti-technology, but to keep the brain engaged.

The stronger AI becomes, the more we must intentionally preserve some "manual mode."

Sometimes deliberately not using AI to write code, sometimes deliberately walking without navigation, sometimes deliberately not letting a chatbot think through problems for you.

This isn't nostalgia, nor rejecting efficiency. It's to prevent brain atrophy and maintain one's own agency.

AI can help us do many things, but if all thinking, judgment, and exploration are outsourced, humans will gradually become passengers in the system. Vitalik's reminder is: you can use AI, but don't let yourself become completely dependent on it.

Practical Advice for Builders

Vitalik's inspiration for ordinary builders in this episode is very direct.

First, force yourself to do things manually. Even if AI can help you, do it yourself from time to time to ensure your brain doesn't get rusty.

Second, active learning. Don't just let AI give you answers. Derive, verify, and do things yourself.

Third, build sanctuary technologies. Whether you're building open-source tools, decentralized protocols, or a personal knowledge base, prioritize one thing: does it help people retain sovereignty?

Fourth, don't outsource all brainpower. AI can help with execution, but strategy, direction, and values must be controlled by you.

Fifth, maintain serendipity. Attend offline events more, talk to real people more, don't leave all discovery to algorithm recommendations.

These points all point to the same core: the AI era isn't about using tools less, but about using them more proactively.

Ethereum's New Positioning: Not Fixing the Old World, But Creating a New Option

Vitalik is also clear about crypto's positioning.

Crypto can't solve all of the dollar's problems, nor does it need to pretend it can solve all problems. But it can create something new that doesn't have those drawbacks.

Everyone is free to choose whether to use it or not.

This is crypto's greatest strength: it doesn't force you, it gives you a choice.

In an era where AI is becoming increasingly centralized, this will become increasingly precious. Because as more and more systems try to make decisions for you, filter information for you, and judge risks for you, a parallel, non-coercive option that allows free entry and exit becomes very important in itself.

The value of Ethereum/crypto is not "winning against the old world," but giving you a new world you can freely choose.

The Most Counterintuitive Quotes from This Episode

The biggest risk in the AI era isn't AI replacing humans, it's humans willingly turning themselves into passengers.

Sanctuary isn't about making the whole world safe, but giving you a safe small space where you can still retain freedom.

Active learning is 10 times more effective than passive learning, even with the same time.

The world dies and is reborn every 5 to 10 years; we must be the pilot ourselves.

Inspiration for Ordinary People

The stronger the AI, the more proactive humans need to be.

Don't outsource all thinking to models. Do more manual things to keep your brain engaged. Participate in building tools that preserve human sovereignty, whether open-source, decentralized, or personal knowledge management systems.

Remember: technology ultimately serves humanity, it doesn't replace it.

Vitalik concludes by saying we humans are the brightest stars. AI can be strong, but what truly drives the world forward are still active, agential humans.

One-Sentence Summary

Using his 10-year personal experience, Vitalik tells us: the AI era is not an era to lie back, but an era where humans need to actively steer more than ever.

Don't outsource your brain to models. Do more manual things, build sanctuary technologies, preserve your own privacy and agency.

My biggest takeaway after listening to this episode is: we used to fear AI taking our jobs; now it seems AI is actually upgrading humans from "executors" to "designers."

What's truly scarce has never been computing power, but people willing to think actively and preserve their sovereignty.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the core argument Vitalik makes regarding humanity's approach to increasingly powerful AI?

AVitalik argues that we should not aim to 'fight AI,' but instead focus on creating 'sanctuary technologies.' These are technologies that protect us without stripping away our privacy and personal agency (sovereignty). They provide a safe, optional space for human freedom, thought, and coordination without seeking total control.

QHow does Vitalik define the term 'sanctuary technologies' and what are its key characteristics?

A'Sanctuary technologies' is a term coined by Vitalik. It refers to technologies designed to create small, safe spaces where individuals can retain their freedom and sovereignty. Key characteristics are: they are not totalizing (do not seek to rule everything), they preserve privacy and agency, and they are optional—people can freely choose to enter or exit them, like Ethereum.

QAccording to the article, what is Vitalik's personal evolution from his early days to the present?

AVitalik describes his evolution from being on 'autopilot' at age 19 when he co-founded Ethereum—making decisions reactively as events unfolded—to becoming an 'active pilot.' He now consciously takes charge, recognizing that the world changes drastically every 5-10 years and that one must actively navigate these shifts rather than passively relying on old scripts or external saviors.

QWhat practical advice does Vitalik offer for individuals and builders in the AI era?

AVitalik's advice includes: 1) Force yourself to do things manually sometimes to keep your mind sharp. 2) Engage in active learning (self-directed, hands-on) over passive learning. 3) Build or support sanctuary technologies that help preserve human sovereignty. 4) Do not outsource all strategic thinking and values to AI. 5) Maintain serendipity through in-person interactions, not just algorithmic discoveries.

QHow does Vitalik reframe the role and value of Ethereum/crypto in the context of AI and modern systems?

AVitalik reframes Ethereum/crypto not as a tool to 'fix' the existing system (like the dollar or traditional finance), but as a creator of a new, parallel option. Its core value is offering freedom of choice—you can use it or not. In an age where centralized systems and powerful AI may seek to make decisions for people, the ability to opt into a non-coercive, sovereign alternative becomes increasingly vital.

Related Reads

From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

"From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply and Institutional Frenzy May Lead to 'Explosive' Price Rally Analysts suggest Bitcoin's price action could mirror gold's over the past two decades, following the launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs. Gold ETFs, introduced in 2004, drove gold's price surge to a current market cap near $28 trillion. Both gold and Bitcoin are non-yielding stores of value, with prices driven purely by investor sentiment rather than cash flows or credit. Gold ETFs experienced dramatic cycles: explosive growth, painful drawdowns, and slow recoveries, with each cycle reaching higher peaks. Bitcoin ETFs, approved in early 2024, saw rapid institutional adoption but are now facing similar volatility. Recent warnings highlight the risk of significant ETF outflows disrupting the current rebound. BlackRock's IBIT, a leading Bitcoin ETF, has sold nearly 100,000 BTC to meet redemptions while still holding over 733,000. The core parallel is fixed supply: when demand surges, prices explode, but demand is often volatile and wave-like, not steady. Institutional interest, through ETFs and corporate adoption, remains a key support pillar, helping to cushion sell-offs. If Bitcoin captures even a fraction of gold's role as a store of value, its upside potential is immense, though the path will be marked by high volatility. For investors, focusing on long-term trends and managing risk is crucial as this 'price explosion' narrative unfolds."

Foresight News14m ago

From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

Foresight News14m ago

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

The article argues that the popular narrative of "AI agent shopping" – equipping AI with a wallet to autonomously handle purchases – is fundamentally flawed and oversimplifies the complexity of shopping. It deconstructs shopping into two core actions: **information retrieval** (standardized, easily automated) and **value judgment** (deeply subjective and human-centric). The narrative mistakenly assumes AI can fully handle both. Value judgment itself has two layers: **evaluation** (assessing options against criteria) and **demand definition** (setting the criteria, weights, and values). The latter is inherently human and dynamic, as preferences are not fixed but constructed during the decision-making process ("constructive preferences"). The real dividing line for automation is not product standardization, but whether the **act of choosing** itself holds experiential value. For mundane purchases (e.g., printer paper), full AI delegation works. For experiential goods (e.g., wine, furniture), the joy of selection is core to consumption, so AI should act as an assistant that narrows options, leaving the final choice to humans. The "AI wallet" concept confuses three separate elements: decision-making, execution, and fund custody. Current payment industry solutions (e.g., from Stripe, Mastercard, Google, Visa) show that limited, scoped payment authorization tokens are sufficient for most consumer scenarios, not full fund custody. The true use case for autonomous AI wallets is in **B2B procurement** and **machine-to-machine (M2M) settlements** for standardized, high-frequency, low-value transactions. The real bottlenecks for AI shopping are not payment technology, but **1) the lack of trusted data sources** (e.g., fake reviews, counterfeit goods) and **2) the impossibility of automating human demand definition**. The conclusion is that the focus should be on safely automating the assessment and filtering process while reserving for humans the rights to define their criteria and enjoy the final act of choice. For experiential goods, the platform's competitive advantage shifts to providing a superior selection experience.

Foresight News1h ago

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

Foresight News1h ago

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

After nine months of being short, prominent crypto trader Doctor Profit has closed all his bearish positions and started buying Bitcoin near $64,000, signaling a complete bullish reversal. He argues that structural market changes—such as impending U.S. regulation (CLARITY Act) and institutional adoption via securities tokenization—are rewriting the traditional four-year cycle script, potentially bringing the market bottom forward from the widely expected September/October timeframe. This view finds some technical support from on-chain analyst gumsays, who notes a bullish divergence on Bitcoin's weekly chart has persisted for 147 days, nearing the 161-day duration seen before the 2022 cycle low. However, cycle researcher Jake Pahor presents a counter-argument based on historical data. Analyzing patterns since 2014, he identifies three common features of past bear market bottoms: a ~12-month duration from peak to trough, a sustained period of extreme fear (with a proprietary risk score below 20), and the price falling below Bitcoin's realized price (~$53,000 currently). The current cycle, only nine months from its October 2025 peak, meets none of these conditions. The debate highlights a market torn between "front-running" a potential early bottom driven by new fundamentals and waiting for confirmation through traditional on-chain and sentiment metrics. While Doctor Profit opts for aggressive buying, Pahor maintains a disciplined, tiered accumulation strategy, continuing weekly buys at current risk levels but reserving larger orders for if more extreme fear emerges.

marsbit1h ago

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

marsbit1h ago

Senior Trader's Confession: How to Trade Market's False Expectations?

Veteran trader's case study: trading the market's "wrong expectations". This trade centered on a textbook "expectation error" after a weak CPI report. While the market initially priced in broad monetary easing (sending Nasdaq to 30,060), the crucial 30-year real yield hit a 20-year high. This signaled a fractured transmission mechanism: short-term rates eased, but long-term funding costs (vital for tech valuations) refused to fall. The trader executed five short positions on the Nasdaq (NQ) as it fell from 30,060 to 28,768. The core methodology: don't just trade the data, but analyze the market's implied causal chain and identify where it breaks. In this case, the chain was: Weak CPI → Policy Easing → Lower Long-Term Funding Costs → NQ Valuation Expansion. The break occurred between policy easing and long-term rates. The "veto variable" – long-term real yields – refused to confirm the bullish narrative. Trades were structured around "fast variables" (price) temporarily repairing while "slow variables" (funding conditions) remained broken. The article outlines a repeatable framework: 1) Map the market's implied causal chain. 2) Identify the veto variable. 3) Observe if it rejects the narrative. 4) Enter when price still follows the old script. 5) Choose the cleanest asset expression (e.g., short NQ, not broad S&P). 6) Define both invalidation and fulfillment exit conditions. The key insight: Alpha often comes not from an information edge, but from a "reaction function edge" – recognizing when the market is applying an outdated causal logic to new data. The critical question: What causal chain is the market's first reaction relying on, and is that chain still valid today?

marsbit2h ago

Senior Trader's Confession: How to Trade Market's False Expectations?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片