Missed the AI Stock Surge, What to Do Now?

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-03Last updated on 2026-06-03

Abstract

The article addresses investor anxiety over having missed the explosive, multi-year rally in AI stocks (e.g., NVIDIA, Micron, SK Hynix) across global markets. It notes that despite the broad bull run, data shows most retail investors lost money in 2025, and even major institutions like Bridgewater and Berkshire Hathaway significantly reduced holdings or held excessive cash, thereby missing substantial gains. The piece highlights common pitfalls: panic selling during corrections, misdirected investments into underperforming AI verticals, and premature profit-taking. It argues that AI represents a foundational, long-term technological shift comparable to electricity or the internet, implying the opportunity is not over. Citing figures like Jack Ma and Ma Huateng, the article suggests the AI wave is just beginning, with vast potential across the entire产业链, from infrastructure to applications. The conclusion advises against chasing trends blindly. Instead, it recommends a disciplined, long-term approach—focusing on one's own strengths within the expansive AI ecosystem to prepare for the next structural opportunities.

Author: Think AI, Aaron

The surge in artificial intelligence stocks has been going on for three and a half years now, with no signs of stopping;

Those who started predicting a US stock market crash and an AI bubble last year have fallen into deep thought.

South Korea's stock index has triggered circuit breakers 19 times this year. The main board index has quadrupled since last year. SK Hynix is up 260% year-to-date, either hitting new highs or on the way to new highs;

US memory giant Micron broke the trillion-dollar market cap, joining the top 10 US companies by market value, with gains of over 200% year-to-date and more than 10x in a year;

In Japan, SoftBank, which previously invested in Alibaba, is seeing its stock price rise continuously due to its heavy bets on AI, and it has already become Japan's highest-valued company.

Domestically, Yushu and ChangXin have already passed listing reviews. ChangXin's market cap starts at 1.5-2 trillion yuan, directly placing it in the top 5 of A-shares;

Meanwhile, AI companies like Nvidia and Google are always rising amidst fear; there's even news that housing prices in Shenzhen and other Chinese cities are warming up, as executives from semiconductor and AI companies, buoyed by超预期收益, are starting a batch property-buying spree.

But there is another scene: those who took out loans to buy gold at the beginning of the year are still underwater, domestic consumer stocks continue to slide quietly, and many netizens say they have completely missed this AI bull market, feeling anxious every day. What should they do now?

Profits Are Always for the Minority

First, look at the data. In 2025, only about 18.9% of A-share retail investors made a profit, while a staggering 81.1% incurred losses, with an average loss of about 21,000 yuan. For small散户 with less than 100,000 yuan, the loss ratio was close to 98.7%.

This happened in 2025 when the大盘指数 closed up nearly 20%, the STAR 50 index saw a maximum intra-year gain of 80%, and the market overall rose last year. Wind data shows 500 stocks doubled in 2025, with over 120 rising more than threefold.

When the大盘 corrected from January to April 2026, faith in AI collapsed, and institutions cut their losses at the lows.

During the decline, AI stocks saw a wave of减持. Ingenic's (optical module) controlling shareholder and executives减持 4.914 billion yuan, after which the stock price rose another 35%; Kunlun Tech's major shareholder Li Qiong planned to减持 35.86 million shares. After the减持 announcement, the stock price fell 20%, but then rebounded 40% within a month, with some减持 shareholders "selling at the bottom."

A专题报告 by Securities Times on the AI sector减持 pointed out that in the AI computing power板块 in 2026, potential收益损失 caused by institutions减持ing too early exceeded 200 billion yuan (calculated based on average gains post-减持).

Meanwhile, institutions that firmly held onto AI often bet on the wrong方向.

At the end of 2025, institutions bet on vertical applications like AI education and AI healthcare. These vertical applications failed to爆发, and in 2026, these板块平均跌幅 over 20%, while the computing power板块 rose over 50%;

Looking abroad, missed opportunities and premature selling are everywhere.

The globally renowned fund Bridgewater大幅减持ed Nvidia (nearly two-thirds), Alphabet (over half), Amazon (9.6%), and Microsoft (35%) in Q3 2025. Subsequently, from Q4 2025 to Q1 2026, these stocks平均涨幅 over 80%;

There are even many short sellers. Short interest in the US stock market recently hit its highest level since 2012.

Data shows hedge fund total leverage has risen to about 293%. Short exposure and the Days-to-Cover indicator for the S&P 500 both hit records.

Even the mighty Warren Buffett started减仓 early. His cash reserves reached a record $397.38 billion in Q1 2026, completely missing the AI行情 and the surge in US tech stocks.

Multiple Waves Rising Simultaneously

But it's undeniable that AI remains the most certain and revolutionary opportunity in the current market.

AI is not a short-term concept, but a底层基础设施革命 akin to electricity and the internet. Historical experience shows that many who missed the first wave of tech stocks found opportunities in the application layer or the next round of infrastructure upgrades.

China also has unique空间 in AI self-research, application落地, and补短板ing the industrial chain.

When we feel迷茫 and anxious, perhaps we should look at how the best in the industry see it. This might give us some guidance and启示.

Ma Huateng of Tencent, long considered lagging in the AI era, has been catching up fiercely since last year. His remarks at this year's May shareholders' meeting sparked heated讨论.

Regarding AI, he said, "A year ago, we thought we had boarded the ship, but later found it was leaking. Now it feels like we're standing on it, but can't sit down yet. We still hope the ship can go faster."

Regarding "how to proceed next," he pointed out, "We can't just跨过去 and抢 others'地盘 because we see them doing it there. We've抢ed before but mostly failed later."

Indeed, the AI era offers vast opportunities. Combining one's own strengths and characteristics to find the most suitable opportunity is the best choice.

Now retired from the front lines but having had deep洞见 into AI 10 years ago, Jack Ma said AI is a once-in-centuries, industrial revolution-level opportunity comparable to the invention of electricity. The AI era has just begun, and now is the time to布局; there's no such thing as missing out;

From computing power infrastructure and large model platforms to industry-specific AI applications, the entire产业链持续释放s long-term investment opportunities.

From this perspective, the entire产业链 offers无限 opportunities. Whether in work, investment, or entrepreneurship, digging deep along the产业链, coupled with段永平's long-termism and本分思想, will eventually yield results.

Large models are now smart enough, but only Claude has率先 achieved profitability in the coding agent赛道. AI+ is still on the way.

The next round of structural opportunities will definitely be留给 those who are well-prepared and maintain a stable心态.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what was the profitability situation for retail investors in the A-share market in 2025?

AAccording to the article, in 2025, the profit ratio for retail investors in the A-share market was only about 18.9%, with a loss ratio as high as 81.1%. The average loss per person was about 21,000 yuan. For small retail investors with less than 100,000 yuan, the loss ratio was close to 98.7%.

QWhat is the core argument made about the nature of AI's opportunity compared to previous technological shifts?

AThe core argument is that AI is not a short-term concept but a foundational infrastructure revolution comparable to electricity or the internet. Historical experience suggests that those who missed the first wave of a technology can often find opportunities in the application layer or the next round of infrastructure upgrades.

QWhat key point did Pony Ma (Ma Huateng) make about how companies should approach the AI era?

APony Ma emphasized that companies should not simply jump into areas where others are already active or try to take over others' territory. He noted past failures from such attempts. The best approach is to combine one's own strengths and characteristics to find the most suitable opportunities within the vast AI landscape.

QHow did Jack Ma (Ma Yun) characterize the AI opportunity and the current timing for involvement?

AJack Ma characterized AI as a once-in-centuries, industrial revolution-level opportunity comparable to the invention of electricity. He stated that the AI era has just begun, making the present the right time for布局 (layout/positioning), and therefore the concept of 'having missed it' does not exist.

QWhat contrasting outcomes are presented regarding institutional investors' actions in the AI sector during market volatility?

AThe article presents two contrasting outcomes for institutional investors. First, some institutions sold ('cut meat') at lows during the early 2026 market correction, missing subsequent rebounds (e.g., stocks rebounding 35%-40% after减持/sell-offs). Second, other institutions that held firm nevertheless押错了方向/bet on the wrong direction, such as focusing on AI vertical applications (education, healthcare) which underperformed compared to the算力/computing power板块/sector.

Related Reads

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit2m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit2m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit18m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit18m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片