From SpaceX to Galaxy Digital: A Detailed Look at 37 New AI Companies and 7 Crypto Dark Horses Added to the Russell Indexes

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-06-29Last updated on 2026-06-29

Abstract

On June 26th, following its annual reconstitution, the Russell US Indexes finalized their new components, with changes taking effect for market trading on June 29th. The Russell 3000 Index, representing approximately 98% of the investable US equity market, saw significant turnover. A record $334 billion was traded during Nasdaq's closing cross on reconstitution day, highlighting the massive passive fund flows tied to these benchmarks. Companies newly added to the index are set to benefit from mandatory buying by these funds. The reconstitution raised the market cap threshold between the large-cap Russell 1000 and small-cap Russell 2000 by 24% to $5.7 billion. Overall, 224 new companies entered the Russell 3000. Of these, 19 joined the Russell 1000, and 205 joined the Russell 2000, while 118 firms were removed. Notably, among the newcomers, approximately 37 are companies operating in the AI and semiconductor ecosystem, accounting for roughly 17% of new additions. The most prominent is SpaceX, which, following its recent IPO and soaring valuation, was fast-tracked directly into the Russell 1000 and Top 200 indexes. Additionally, about 7 cryptocurrency-related companies were newly included, representing about 3% of new entrants. These include Galaxy Digital, Bitmine, and Tron, among others. The inclusion of several Decentralized Autonomous Trust (DAT) entities signals the model's sustained market presence. For these smaller AI and crypto firms, index inclusion boosts visibil...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Golem (@web 3_golem)

After the market closed on June 26th, the Russell US Indexes completed their latest reconstitution, finalizing all component stocks and their weights. The market will officially begin trading according to the new indexes as of the market open today (June 29th).

The Russell US Indexes are among the most important US equity benchmark indices globally. They track the price performance of the top 3000 US-listed companies by market capitalization(Odaily note: The actual number fluctuates slightly due to listings/delistings, e.g., the 2025-2026 figure was around 2900+), representing approximately 98% of the investable US stock market. They are the broadest combined large-cap and small-cap US indices.

If the Russell US Index is likened to a pyramid, the Russell 1000 forms the top, containing the top 1000 large-cap stocks by market cap. The Russell 2000 forms the middle to lower parts, containing small-cap stocks ranked from 1001 to 3000 by market cap. Together, they constitute the complete Russell US Index, also known as the Russell 3000 Index.

According to official sources, over $12 trillion in global assets are currently benchmarked against the Russell US Indexes (including passive ETFs, mutual funds, pension funds, etc.). Therefore, during the annual reconstitution, a massive number of ETFs, index funds, and institutional accounts must simultaneously adjust their holdings. According to data released by Nasdaq, on June 26th, the reconstitution day, its Closing Cross system processed a trading volume of $334.027 billion, setting a single-day record for Russell 3000 reconstitution in Nasdaq's Closing Cross history, far exceeding 2025's data.

The total number of stocks listed on Nasdaq and the NYSE is approximately 5650. While the Russell 3000 Index covers 97% of the investable US market from a float-adjusted market cap perspective, in terms of the number of constituent companies, it represents only 53%. Therefore, the constituent stocks of the Russell 3000 Index post-reconstitution are highly scrutinized by the market, especially those newly added to the index, as it signifies these stocks will attract trillions of dollars in passive fund buying for the first time, potentially leading to better future performance and warranting attention.

224 New Companies Added to the Russell 3000 Index

According to official disclosures, following this reconstitution, the market cap threshold dividing the Russell 1000 and Russell 2000 soared by 24% to $5.7 billion. This means many companies with market caps around $5 billion were demoted from the Russell 1000 Index to the Russell 2000 Index. The minimum market cap threshold for the smallest constituent in the Russell 2000 Index rose to $146.4 million (an increase of nearly 23% compared to 2025).

This time, 61 companies were newly added to the Russell 1000 Index. Of these, 42 were promoted from the Russell 2000 Index. These new constituents are mainly concentrated in the Technology (18 companies) and Industrials (17 companies) sectors. Only 19 are truly new companies joining the Russell 1000 Index.

This time, 244 companies were newly added to the Russell 2000 Index. Of these, 39 were demoted from the Russell 1000, 83 came from the Russell Microcap Index, 17 joined via IPO, and the remaining new companies came from outside the previous Russell US Index universe. Among these 244 new additions, 88 belong to the Healthcare sector, 36 to Technology, 31 to Consumer Discretionary, and 28 to Industrials.

Therefore, in this reconstitution, a total of 224 new companies were added to the Russell 3000 Index: 19 to the Russell 1000 and 205 to the Russell 2000. Simultaneously, 118 companies were completely deleted from the Russell 3000 Index.

List of New Companies Added to the Russell 3000 Index (Click to view full list)

Approximately 37 AI and Semiconductor Companies Added to the Russell 3000 Index

Compared to the Russell 2000, the weighting of Technology companies in the Russell 1000 Index is much higher than other sectors. Thanks to its rapid market cap expansion, Nvidia has officially replaced Apple as the constituent with the largest weight in the Russell 1000 Index. With this year's explosion in the AI and semiconductor industry, semiconductor stocks saw the largest increase in weight within the Russell 1000 Growth Index(Odaily note: The Russell 1000 Index can also be subdivided into Growth, Value, Top 200, and Mega Cap).

By weight, the companies with the largest new additions to the Russell 1000 Growth Index are Micron Technology and SanDisk, both of which shifted from being 100% Value stocks to 100% Growth stocks.

Sector Weightings of Companies in the Russell 1000 Index vs. Russell 2000 Index

Meanwhile, according to Odaily's statistics, among the 224 new companies added to the Russell 3000 Index, approximately 37 are engaged in AI industry upstream/downstream business, accounting for about 17% of new additions.

AI-Related Companies Among New Additions to the Russell 3000 Index (Generated by AI)

Among these 37 companies, the most eye-catching is SpaceX. After its IPO on June 12, 2026, SpaceX's market capitalization soared to over $2 trillion, triggering Russell's "Fast-track" inclusion mechanism. Consequently, it landed directly in the Russell 1000 Index and also entered the Russell Top 200 Index. SpaceX stock will be classified as approximately 90.4% Growth and 9.6% Value, meaning it will become a significant component of Growth investments linked to the Russell 1000 Index.

In addition to the Russell 1000 Index, SpaceX is also set to be included in the Nasdaq-100 Index and begin trading there on July 6th.

For other AI-related stocks newly joining the Russell 3000 Index, this is not just an honorary title but a tangible benefit that can directly translate into secondary market liquidity and stock price support.

Previously, these small and mid-sized AI and semiconductor enterprises (especially those with market caps below $5.7 billion placed in the Russell 2000) could not enter the stock pools of large Wall Street mutual funds or hedge funds due to market cap constraints before being included in the index. After inclusion, Wall Street analysts may be compelled to start covering the company. With increased "visibility" to institutional investors and the advantage of being in the hot AI sector, they might attract some active funds or momentum-driven capital, potentially boosting their stock prices.

Approximately 7 Crypto-Related Companies Added to the Russell 3000 Index

Following this Russell 3000 Index reconstitution, some crypto enterprises were also included for the first time. According to Odaily's statistics, among the 224 new companies added to the Russell 3000 Index, approximately 7 are related to the crypto industry, accounting for about 3% of new additions. They are: Galaxy Digital, SharpLink, Bitmine, Forward Industries, Hyperliquid Strategies, Tron, and IREN.

Crypto-Related Companies Among New Additions to the Russell 3000 Index (Generated by AI)

The successful inclusion of these 7 companies in the Russell 3000 Index means these stocks will also become part of the passive allocations for numerous funds in the future, possessing certain upside potential. Notably, 5 of these 7 companies selected for the Russell 3000 Index are engaged in DAT business, corresponding to different ecosystems like ETH, SOL, HYPE, TRON, etc. It's important to remember that the Russell 3000 Index is essentially an impartial machine driven solely by market capitalization, indifferent to subjective preferences. The fact that these 5 companies were selected proves that, although the DAT frenzy has subsided, its business model has withstood the test of the market and time.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the Russell US Index and what significance does its annual reconstitution hold?

AThe Russell US Index (or Russell 3000 Index) is one of the most important U.S. stock market benchmark indices, tracking the performance of the top 3,000 publicly traded companies in the U.S. by market capitalization, representing approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. Its annual reconstitution is crucial because over $12 trillion in global assets are benchmarked to it. This forces passive funds, ETFs, and institutional accounts to adjust their holdings accordingly, often leading to significant trading volume and impacting the future performance of newly added stocks as they attract massive passive fund inflows for the first time.

QHow many new companies were added to the Russell 3000 Index in the latest reconstitution, and into which sub-indices were they primarily categorized?

AA total of 224 new companies were added to the Russell 3000 Index in the latest reconstitution. Among these, 19 were added directly to the large-cap Russell 1000 Index, while 205 were added to the small-cap Russell 2000 Index.

QWhich prominent AI/space company was rapidly included in the Russell 1000 Index and what was the mechanism behind its fast inclusion?

ASpaceX was the most prominent AI/space company rapidly included in the Russell 1000 Index. Its inclusion was triggered by a 'Fast-track' mechanism after its June 12, 2026, IPO, which propelled its market capitalization to over $2 trillion. This allowed it to be directly added to the Russell 1000 and Russell Top 200 indices.

QAccording to the article, approximately how many AI and Crypto-related companies were among the new additions to the Russell 3000 Index?

AAmong the 224 new additions to the Russell 3000 Index, approximately 37 companies are involved in the AI industry supply chain, and approximately 7 companies are related to the Crypto industry.

QName the seven crypto-related companies mentioned in the article that were newly added to the Russell 3000 Index.

AThe seven crypto-related companies newly added to the Russell 3000 Index are: Galaxy Digital, SharpLink, Bitmine, Forward Industries, Hyperliquid Strategies, Tron, and IREN.

Related Reads

MSTR Discloses Sale of 3,588 Bitcoins, Stock Price Drops Over 5% at One Point During Trading

MicroStrategy, the world's largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, has significantly shifted its business model. Between June 29 and July 5, the company sold 3,588 bitcoins for approximately $216 million to fund quarterly dividends for its preferred stock. This marks its largest-ever Bitcoin sale and signals a strategic pivot: Bitcoin is transitioning from a "buy-and-hold" reserve asset to a liquidity management tool for the company. This move follows a recent authorization allowing Bitcoin sales when equity fundraising is less attractive. The announcement contributed to a more than 5% intraday drop in MicroStrategy's stock price, while Bitcoin fell to around $61,800—below the company's average holding cost of roughly $75,700. The sale represents a major departure from MicroStrategy's long-standing "never sell" commitment, which saw its first minor breach in May with a $2.5 million sale. The latest, hundred-times-larger transaction underscores growing financial pressures. Analysts note the company faces about $1.5 billion in annual preferred dividend obligations, far exceeding cash flow from its software business. As of July 5, MicroStrategy holds 843,775 bitcoins. Its current operational logic involves buying Bitcoin during favorable financing conditions and selling portions to cover dividends when needed, creating a flexible capital management cycle amidst a challenging market environment.

华尔街日报4h ago

MSTR Discloses Sale of 3,588 Bitcoins, Stock Price Drops Over 5% at One Point During Trading

华尔街日报4h ago

Q-Day Countdown: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

Quantum Computing's Threat to Cryptocurrency: A Countdown to Q-Day Quantum computing, specifically Shor's algorithm, poses a fundamental threat to the public-key cryptography (e.g., ECDSA, RSA) that secures blockchain networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum. This critical juncture, known as Q-Day, is estimated to occur potentially within the next 5-15 years. The core vulnerability stems from the public and immutable nature of blockchains. Assets in addresses where the public key is already exposed on-chain (e.g., spent outputs) are at direct risk, as a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could derive the private key. This threatens the very trust model of cryptocurrencies. The response lies in Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)—algorithms like lattice-based ML-DSA and hash-based SLH-DSA, which are resistant to quantum attacks. NIST has standardized key PQC algorithms (FIPS 203, 204, 205), providing a migration path. However, the primary challenge is not technical but socio-economic and involves complex governance: * **Bitcoin's** path is constrained by its conservative ethos. Migrating requires a soft-fork to new address types, facing hurdles like significantly larger signature sizes and, most critically, the divisive governance question of how to handle at-risk legacy UTXOs without violating core principles. * **Ethereum** is pursuing a "cryptographic agility" strategy, with a multi-layered roadmap. It leverages account abstraction for user accounts and is developing compressed hash-based signatures (e.g., leanXMSS) for its consensus layer, aiming for a full-stack upgrade over time. In conclusion, quantum computing does not spell an instant end for cryptocurrency but initiates a critical countdown. The industry has a limited "engineering comfort window" to orchestrate a coordinated, ecosystem-wide migration to PQC. The ultimate bottlenecks are the immense coordination efforts and governance decisions required for this foundational transition.

marsbit4h ago

Q-Day Countdown: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

marsbit4h ago

Trump, the President Who Knows Best How to 'Trade Stocks'

Former US President Donald Trump reported a record-breaking $2.2 billion in personal income for 2025, the highest annual income ever disclosed by a sitting president. This figure, from a 927-page government ethics filing, represented a 3.5-fold increase from his $600 million income in 2024 and boosted his net worth to $6.5 billion. The primary drivers were cryptocurrency (64% of income, approximately $1.4 billion) and real estate (26%, approximately $575 million). His crypto earnings stemmed largely from the launch of his personal meme coin, $TRUMP, generating over $600 million in licensing fees, and substantial profits from the WLFI token and its parent company. Despite a sluggish property market, his Mar-a-Lago resort and associated golf clubs saw revenue surges of 50% and 27%, respectively, attributed to their use as venues for presidential events. Trump's financial disclosure also revealed an unprecedented level of stock market activity, with over 22,000 trades executed in 2025, averaging 87 trades per market day. Media analyses noted several instances where significant trading coincided with major policy announcements, such as proposed tariffs, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest. While the White House stated these trades were handled by a family-managed trust fund and not Trump directly, critics highlighted this as a departure from the blind trusts traditionally used by presidents post-Watergate. The report has intensified debate over the commercialization of the presidency. Supporters view it as a success story of a businessman-president, while critics argue it demonstrates an unprecedented conversion of public influence into private wealth, with policy decisions potentially linked to personal financial gains. The controversy centers on whether Trump's earnings represent innovative entrepreneurship or a fundamental conflict of interest, sparking renewed calls for stricter ethics reforms in US governance.

marsbit5h ago

Trump, the President Who Knows Best How to 'Trade Stocks'

marsbit5h ago

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

The article explores the existential threat quantum computing poses to cryptocurrencies and the urgent need for "post-quantum" migration. It outlines that quantum computers, through Shor's algorithm, could break the elliptic-curve cryptography (ECC) underlying blockchain security, potentially allowing private keys to be derived from public keys. The core challenge is not a lack of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) standards—like NIST's ML-KEM and ML-DSA—but the immense complexity of upgrading entire ecosystems before "Q-Day" (when quantum computers become capable of such attacks, estimated around 2035-2045). Key points include: * **Bitcoin's** risk is concentrated in legacy UTXOs with exposed public keys (e.g., early P2PK outputs). Migration faces massive hurdles: PQC signatures are much larger, increasing transaction size and cost, and the governance dilemma of handling un-migrated assets threatens its "code is law" ethos. * **Ethereum's** strategy focuses on "cryptographic agility," using Account Abstraction for user accounts and developing compressed hash-based signatures (like leanXMSS with SNARK aggregation) for consensus. Its migration is a complex, full-stack overhaul of execution, consensus, and data layers. * The "security debt" is enormous. The comfortable engineering window for a coordinated, ecosystem-wide upgrade is only 5-8 years. High-value infrastructure (exchanges, bridges) may face pressure before mainnet protocols. In conclusion, quantum computing is not an instant "doomsday" event but a forcing function for systemic change. Bitcoin's ultimate test is social consensus and property rights governance, while Ethereum's is technical complexity. Failure to migrate in time could lead to a fundamental re-pricing of crypto assets.

链捕手5h ago

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

链捕手5h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片