Doubao and Qwen Will Discontinue Agent Functionality on July 15

marsbitPublished on 2026-07-05Last updated on 2026-07-05

Abstract

On July 4th, Doubao and Tongyi Qianwen announced the impending shutdown of their user-created "AI Agent" features. Doubao confirmed its agent feature will be taken offline on July 15, directing users to ByteDance's CatBox app for similar needs. On the same day, Tongyi Qianwen notified users, specifying that personalized interactive agents and user-built agent functions will cease on July 10, with all agent features and services completely deactivated by July 15. After this date, access to agent configurations and historical chat records will be lost. This adjustment impacts core user scenarios like role-playing, personal assistants, and vertical tool agents. The shutdown date coincides with the official implementation of China's "Interim Measures for the Administration of Artificial Intelligence Human-like Interactive Services" on July 15. The new regulations impose strict rules on "human-like emotional interaction services," requiring platforms to implement measures like anti-addiction systems, minor verification, and content moderation. This move is widely seen as a proactive step by the platforms to align with regulatory timelines and mitigate compliance risks. Additionally, commercial challenges are a key driver. Analysis suggests that casual, human-like chat agents generate high-frequency, low-value interactions, leading to high computational costs with poor monetization. As the AI application market shifts from user growth to proving value, sustaining such "high-cost...

On July 4, Doubao and Tongyi Qwen announced the upcoming discontinuation of their agent functionality.

Doubao issued the "Notice on Discontinuation of Doubao Agent Functionality," confirming that the agent functionality will be discontinued on July 15, and will redirect users to ByteDance's Mao Xiang App to meet related needs.

On the same day, Tongyi Qwen pushed a discontinuation reminder to users, stating that personified interaction agents and user-created agent functionality will be discontinued on July 10, and that after the complete discontinuation of Qwen agent functionality and services on July 15, users will no longer be able to access related agent configurations and historical conversation records.

This adjustment affects the most core personalized usage scenarios for C-end users of AI platforms — including role-playing, exclusive assistants, and vertical tool-type agents.

For Doubao and Qwen, user-created agents were previously a key means to gather C-end users and accumulate UGC content. The comprehensive discontinuation of this functionality signifies a directional shift in the platforms' traffic strategies.

New Regulations Force Action, Discontinuation Date Not a Coincidence

The discontinuation date chosen by Doubao and Qwen, July 15, coincides with the official implementation date of the "Interim Measures for the Administration of AI Personified Interaction Services."

These measures strictly regulate "personified emotional interaction services," requiring platforms to implement mechanisms to prevent addiction, verify the identities of minors, conduct content reviews, and fulfill other primary responsibilities.

Regulatory rectification actions have already begun. On June 26, the Cyberspace Administration of Shanghai Municipal Committee announced the results of the first phase of the "Clear and Bright: Rectifying Irregularities in AI Applications" special campaign, having removed over 14,000 non-compliant agents. Among them, agents from Xuanyu (MiniMax) involving functions like "one-click undressing" and soccer betting/gambling were key targets of the crackdown.

Currently, the Cyberspace Administration of Shanghai Municipal Committee has completed regulatory briefings for nearly a hundred key platforms, urging enterprises to fulfill their compliance obligations.

Against this backdrop, Doubao and Qwen proactively aligning with the regulatory timeline, choosing to complete the functionality discontinuation on the day the new regulations take effect, is widely interpreted by the industry as a proactive move to mitigate compliance risks in advance and fulfill platform responsibilities.

User Transition Arrangements and Data Processing Timeline

Both platforms have provided a transition window for existing users to save their data.

For Doubao, after the functionality is discontinued, users will still be able to view and manually save their agent information and historical conversation data for a period of time; after October 15, Doubao will process the relevant data according to its privacy policy, at which point the data will no longer be viewable or recoverable.

Doubao recommends users back up their data in advance by taking screenshots or exporting text, and migrate agent creation and conversation functionality to the Mao Xiang App.

Tongyi Qwen similarly advises users to save important content before the discontinuation by copying, taking screenshots, or exporting conversations. After discontinuation, access to related agent configuration information and historical conversation records will no longer be possible.

As leading platforms successively scale back their C-end agent layouts, the competitive logic of the AI application market is undergoing a fundamental shift.

Compliance capabilities and sustainable business models will replace user scale and feature richness as the core dimensions of platform competition in the next phase.

High Consumption, Low Efficiency, Business Logic Also Unsustainable

In addition to regulatory pressure, difficulties in commercial monetization are also an intrinsic motive driving this adjustment.

Analysis suggests that personified chit-chat and niche role-playing agents typically generate scattered, high-frequency, lightweight conversation calls, resulting in high computing power consumption and low per-unit commercial value, representing a typical "high consumption, low efficiency" business model.

In the phase where AI applications are shifting from "land grabbing" to "value verification," while such UGC agents may bring short-term traffic and user engagement metrics, they are difficult to convert into direct commercial revenue. Their economic rationale for continued existence is being questioned.

Tongyi Qwen's pivot to the B-end has already shown signs. On June 3, Qwen officially announced the comprehensive opening of Agent and Skill access permissions to third-party enterprises and developers across all industries. Leading brands like Luckin Coffee, KFC, Mixue Ice Cream & Tea, and China Eastern Airlines have already initiated service testing.

This strategic shift indicates that platforms are concentrating resources from low-value C-end UGC ecosystems towards high-value B-end enterprise service scenarios.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, on what date are Doubao and Tongyi Qianwen scheduled to take their 'Intelligent Agent' functions offline?

ABoth platforms have scheduled the full shutdown of their Intelligent Agent functions for July 15.

QWhat is the main regulatory reason mentioned for the shutdown of the Intelligent Agent functions?

AThe shutdown coincides with the formal implementation on July 15 of the 'Interim Measures for the Management of Artificial Intelligence Anthropomorphic Interaction Services', which strictly regulates services involving simulated human emotional interaction.

QWhat alternative platform does Doubao recommend for users who wish to continue using Intelligent Agent features?

ADoubao is directing users to migrate their Intelligent Agent creation and conversation functions to the ByteDance-owned app, Cat Box (猫箱 App).

QBeyond regulatory pressure, what internal business challenge contributed to the decision to shut down these C-end Intelligent Agent functions?

AThe article cites commercialization difficulties, describing these UGC agents (especially for casual chat and niche roles) as 'high-consumption, low-efficiency'—they require significant computing power but generate little direct revenue, making them economically unsustainable.

QHow is Tongyi Qianwen's strategic focus shifting according to the article?

ATongyi Qianwen is shifting its resources from low-value C-end UGC ecosystems towards high-value B-end enterprise service scenarios, having opened its Agent and Skill access to third-party businesses and developers.

Related Reads

The U.S. Treasury Department Doubles Treasury Repurchases to Stabilize the Market, But U.S. Stocks Only Edge Up Slightly — Is the Real Signal Hidden in Bitcoin?

The US Treasury significantly boosted its long-term bond repurchase program to curb surging yields, sparking a notable rally in Bitcoin while leaving the stock market with only modest gains. Facing high long-term bond yields that pressured equities, especially tech stocks, the Treasury announced it would double the maximum size of its repurchases for 10- to 30-year bonds. This move, seen as the government stepping in to provide liquidity and stabilize confidence, initially pushed bond yields lower. However, the market reaction was unusual. While liquidity-sensitive Bitcoin surged from around $64,000 toward $70,000, major US stock indices posted only minor gains. Previously high-flying AI-related sectors like semiconductors continued to weaken, largely ignoring the news. The article interprets Bitcoin's sharp rise as the key signal, reflecting its role as a gauge for dollar liquidity. The Treasury's action is seen as injecting fresh money into the system. While stocks remain preoccupied with sector-specific concerns, Bitcoin immediately priced in this loosening of financial conditions. This shift suggests the market's underlying dynamic may be transitioning from a fight for existing capital to an expectation of new inflows, potentially broadening the rally beyond the concentrated AI trade that dominated recent months.

marsbit6m ago

The U.S. Treasury Department Doubles Treasury Repurchases to Stabilize the Market, But U.S. Stocks Only Edge Up Slightly — Is the Real Signal Hidden in Bitcoin?

marsbit6m ago

Jameson Lopp's BIP-110 Postmortem: Bitcoin Is Driven by Game Theory, Not Morality

Jameson Lopp's analysis concludes that BIP-110, a proposal to restrict arbitrary data (like inscriptions) on Bitcoin, failed due to economic and technical realities, not moral arguments. The proposal, championed by Luke Dashjr and others, aimed to "cleanse" the chain but never reached its 55% miner activation threshold. Upon its forced signaling deadline in August, only the OCEAN pool (with ~1% hash rate) supported it, creating a short-lived fork that quickly died as miners faced unredeemable block rewards. Lopp's earlier predictions about its economic infeasibility were proven correct. Technically, BIP-110 was flawed; workarounds to embed data compliant with its rules were demonstrated almost immediately, proving it couldn't achieve its stated goal. The debate often devolved into moralistic rhetoric, with supporters accusing opponents of supporting child exploitation material—a tactic Lopp criticizes as ineffective for building consensus. Lopp argues Bitcoin is driven by incentives and game theory, not morality. Past forks like Bitcoin Cash promised economic benefits, while BIP-110 offered only restrictions and reduced miner fees, gaining no substantial support from major economic players. He predicts the "puritans" behind the failed fork will continue complaining but their new chain will remain insignificant. The episode reaffirms that attempting to censor data on a permissionless, anti-censorship network like Bitcoin is a futile battle.

marsbit58m ago

Jameson Lopp's BIP-110 Postmortem: Bitcoin Is Driven by Game Theory, Not Morality

marsbit58m ago

Tokenization Scale Soars to $4.3 Billion, But Why Did Securitize Incur a $5.5 Million Loss?

Securitize's first quarterly report post-IPO reveals a paradox: while its tokenized assets under management hit a record $4.3 billion (up 16% YoY) and platform trading volume surged 147% to $5.3 billion, total revenue fell 5% to $14.4 million. Tokenization revenue specifically dropped ~12% to $7.8 million, leading to an adjusted EBITDA loss of $5.5 million. CFO Francisco Flores explained that most trading volume is not yet monetized, with the majority of tokenization revenue still coming from one-time projects like new protocol integrations. In contrast, asset servicing revenue, a more recurring stream, grew slightly to $6.6 million. The company has lowered its full-year revenue guidance to $70-$80 million from an initial projection of $110 million. Industry experts note this highlights a structural challenge for the tokenization sector. Scaling assets on-chain doesn't automatically scale a profitable business model. Current implementations often rely on costly, customized projects for each new asset or jurisdiction. The future, they argue, lies in building standardized infrastructure that generates recurring "infrastructure revenue" from post-issuance activities like compliance, distributions, and secondary trading—similar to enterprise software. Analysts caution against misinterpreting high trading volumes as indicative of a mature fee-based model, as Securitize's broad volume metric includes many non-monetized actions. The key test for the industry is whether adding billions in new assets can generate sustainable revenue without constant new custom projects.

marsbit1h ago

Tokenization Scale Soars to $4.3 Billion, But Why Did Securitize Incur a $5.5 Million Loss?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy 4

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing 4 (4) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy 4 (4) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your 4 (4)After purchasing your 4 (4), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade 4 (4)Easily trade 4 (4) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.3k Total ViewsPublished 2025.10.20Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy 4

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of 4 (4) are presented below.

活动图片