Crypto Agents Get Advanced AI for $87 Per Month as DeepSeek Priced Lower Than Grok 4.6

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-13Last updated on 2026-08-13

Abstract

On August 12th, DeepSeek launched its V4 Pro model at $0.87 per million output tokens, while SpaceXAI's Grok 4.6 was released the same day priced at $6 per million. Both models are designed for long-running agentic tasks. DeepSeek V4 Pro, an expert-mix system, offers significantly lower costs, with input processing as low as $0.003625 per million tokens when cached. Performance benchmarks show V4 Pro scoring 83.3 in CyberGym Agent tests, slightly ahead of competitors, and 87.9 in Terminal-Bench 2.1. Grok 4.6 showed strong performance in specific benchmarks like GDPVal-AA v2. A key advantage highlighted is cost efficiency for continuous operations. A DeFi agent generating 100 million tokens monthly would cost approximately $87 using V4 Pro, compared to $2500-$3000 on competing models like Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.5. This enables profitable strategies that might be loss-making on more expensive Western AI systems. While DeepSeek warned of future API price increases, the current pricing undercuts the market substantially. Elon Musk projected that SpaceXAI revenues would soon surpass all other company divisions.

On August 12, DeepSeek released V4 Pro priced at $0.87 per million output tokens. On the same day, SpaceXAI released Grok 4.6 priced at $6 per million output tokens.

DeepSeek V4 Pro and Grok 4.6 Smartphones Launched on the Same Day

Both releases were just hours apart.

Yesterday, the company's founder, Liang Wenfeng, released the working version of V4 Pro. The preview version lasted about four months.

SpaceXAI, the AI division led by Elon Musk, released Grok 4.6 on the same day.

Both companies targeted their models for long-term work as agents. The model continues to utilize tools, modify code, analyze results, and deliver the finished product.

The performance of V4 Pro is approximately one-seventh that of Grok 4.6, one thirty-fifth of OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol, and one fifty-seventh of Claude Fable 5.

SpaceXAI prices Grok 4.6 at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens. The fast version costs twice as much, and requests with long contexts exceeding 200,000 tokens cost $4 and $12 respectively.

DeepSeek surpasses this by indicating a cost of $0.435 per million for input processing on a cache miss and only $0.003625 on a cache hit.

V4 Pro is a mixture of experts system, with a total parameter count of 1.6 trillion, 49 billion active tokens per token, trained on over 32 trillion tokens.

The context window contains a million tokens, and the output ceiling is 384,000 tokens. In a month, the open weights were downloaded from Hugging Face over 1.4 million times.

V4 Pro leads in security and automation. In the CyberGym Agent test, it scored 83.3 points, compared to 83.1 for Fable 5 and 78.3 for Claude Opus 4.8. In the AutomationBench test, V4 Pro scored 31.8, outperforming both others.

V4 Pro scored 87.9 points in the Terminal-Bench 2.1 test. This result is higher than Opus 4.8 (85.0) but 0.1 point less than Fable 5.

SpaceXAI tests show that Grok 4.6 outperforms GDPVal-AA v2 with an Elo score of 1753, which is higher than Grok 4.5 (1526), and scored 15.8% in the Harvey benchmark, where GPT-5.6 Sol scored 2.5%.

Grok 4.6 shares 61st place with GPT-5.6 Sol in the AI Index, trailing Fable 5 by one point.

In building a Flappy Bird game, the V4 Pro version used over 20,000 tokens for $0.019 and provided higher detail. Grok 4.6 used about 5,000 tokens but cost $0.03.

The V4 Pro version also failed to reproduce the pelican animation. The bird seemed to move backwards.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is live on OpenRouter.@deepseek_ai reports significant performance gains for agents vs the V4 Pro preview: DeepSWE 62.7 (+49.9), CyberGym 83.3 (+30.6), NL2Repo 61.5 (+23.0), and Terminal Bench 2.1 87.9 (+15.8).

New providers joining the network soon

Try it out now: https://t.co/1PYoEFbvyK

— OpenRouter (@OpenRouter) August 12, 2026

DeFi Agents Can Operate Uninterrupted for $87 Per Month

Agents constantly executing multi-step transactions or monitoring DeFi position movements.

Cryptopolitan reported that an application generating 100 million tokens per month costs approximately $87 on the V4 Pro version compared to roughly $2,500 on Claude Opus 4.7 or $3,000 on GPT-5.5.

The service cost of V4 Pro allows making money on strategies that are loss-making in Western AI systems.

In May, DeepSeek reached the $0.87 mark, then permanently lowered the price by 75%, dropping from $3.48 to below-market levels, as Cryptopolitan reported at the time.

DeepSeek stated a "significant increase" in overall API prices is coming, so the current rock-bottom price level may be unsustainable.

In a message to employees on August 12, Musk stated that AI revenues in September will surpass all other SpaceX business lines combined and will account for 99% of the company's value in five years.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat are the key pricing differences between DeepSeek V4 Pro and Grok 4.6 as reported in the article?

ADeepSeek V4 Pro costs $0.87 per million output tokens, with a significant discount for cached queries at $0.003625 per million input tokens. In contrast, SpaceXAI's Grok 4.6 costs $6 per million output tokens, $2 per million input tokens, with fast and long-context versions costing even more.

QHow does the agent performance of DeepSeek V4 Pro compare to Claude Fable 5 and Claude Opus 4.8 based on specific benchmark tests mentioned?

AIn the CyberGym Agent test, DeepSeek V4 Pro scored 83.3, slightly outperforming Claude Fable 5 (83.1) and significantly ahead of Claude Opus 4.8 (78.3). In the AutomationBench, V4 Pro scored 31.8, leading both competitors. In Terminal-Bench 2.1, V4 Pro scored 87.9, higher than Opus 4.8 (85.0) but 0.1 points lower than Fable 5.

QAccording to the article, what potential monthly cost savings can a DeFi application achieve by using DeepSeek V4 Pro instead of Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.5?

AFor an application generating 100 million tokens per month, the estimated monthly cost would be about $87 on DeepSeek V4 Pro, compared to roughly $2,500 on Claude Opus 4.7 or $3,000 on GPT-5.5, representing a substantial cost saving.

QWhat future pricing warnings or expectations does the article mention for DeepSeek's API?

AThe article states that DeepSeek has announced a coming 'significant increase' in API prices overall, indicating that the current low price level may be unsustainable in the long term.

QWhat did Elon Musk reportedly say about the future of AI revenue for SpaceX in the employee address on August 12th?

AIn the address to employees, Elon Musk reportedly stated that AI revenue in September would surpass all other SpaceX business lines combined and would account for 99% of the company's value in five years.

Related Reads

Grayscale: Zcash, Financial Privacy in the Age of AI

Grayscale Research suggests a third wave of public focus on financial privacy is approaching, driven by stablecoin/blockchain adoption and new AI-powered surveillance tools. In this context, Zcash emerges as a decentralized digital currency, similar to Bitcoin but with built-in, robust privacy mechanisms via its "shielded" transactions that conceal sender, receiver, and amount using zero-knowledge proofs. While privacy is often seen as a niche feature, it is argued to be a core requirement for functional money, needed by individuals and businesses alike. Zcash's optional privacy is distinct from mixers or default-private chains like Monero. After years of development (Sapling, Orchard/NU5, Ironwood upgrades) to improve usability, key metrics show growing adoption: shielded transactions comprise ~90% of network activity, and ~25% of circulating ZEC is in shielded pools—a historical high. Despite this, ZEC's market valuation remains low (~0.6% of the "digital currency" sector), implying the market prices privacy as a marginal concern. The investment thesis hinges on a potential re-rating if the value of financial privacy is recognized more broadly. Risks include regulatory challenges around shielded transactions, legacy trusted setup pools, quantum computing threats, and execution risks for upcoming upgrades like Tachyon for scaling. In summary, Zcash represents a significant, technologically mature option in the privacy currency space, with current valuation offering potential upside if privacy demand grows.

marsbit12m ago

Grayscale: Zcash, Financial Privacy in the Age of AI

marsbit12m ago

The Bear Market Has Ended, A New Bull Cycle Has Begun

**Title: Bear Market Over, New Bull Cycle Begins** Bitcoin surged over 20% in just three days, from a low of $64,100 on August 19th to a high of $79,500 by August 21st, marking a dramatic shift in market sentiment. This rapid rise triggered massive liquidations exceeding $4 billion, with short positions accounting for $3.7 billion—the largest short squeeze since 2021. The rally was fueled by several key factors. Macroeconomic conditions improved as the US Treasury doubled its long-term bond buyback size, easing pressure. Significant regulatory developments included a White House meeting where former President Trump urged Senate action on the CLARITY Act and hinted at potential US Bitcoin reserves, followed by the CFTC Chairman stating the agency would establish crypto market rules if the bill stalls. On-chain data revealed a fierce battle: large whales faced substantial liquidations on short positions, while others took profits or doubled down on longs. Major altcoins like ETH and XRP also saw impressive gains. Analysts are divided but increasingly bullish. Many, including CryptoQuant's founder, declare the bear market over and a new bull cycle begun. Price targets range from $100k by year-end to ambitious long-term projections of $200k. However, some caution against immediate chasing, noting overbought conditions and viewing the move as a potential "trap" ahead of the crucial September 15th Senate vote on the CLARITY Act. The market's next test is sustaining the momentum with real buying pressure, holding above key resistance near $78k-$80k, and watching ETF inflows and the upcoming regulatory vote.

marsbit16m ago

The Bear Market Has Ended, A New Bull Cycle Has Begun

marsbit16m ago

Xiaomi Defended Its Smartphone Gross Margin, Yet to Find a Profit Successor

Xiaomi's Q2 2026 financial report reveals a company navigating a complex transition. While smartphone gross margin held steady at 8.5% through strategic product mix and a record-high average selling price (ASP), this came at the cost of a 26.5% year-over-year decline in global shipments, pressuring its core user acquisition engine. This illustrates Xiaomi's central challenge: managing the "timing gap" between its established and emerging growth engines. Its smartphone business is pivoting from scale to premiumization, but it's unclear if high-end models can fully offset the volume loss from more price-sensitive segments, especially in markets like India and Africa. Meanwhile, the electric vehicle segment has become a significant revenue contributor, delivering 104,200 units and generating ¥23.9 billion. However, its profit contribution remains unclear as it, along with AI investments, is still in a scaling and investment phase. The AI and humanoid robot initiatives, though strategically prioritized and tested in Xiaomi's own factories, are in early-stage validation with no near-term commercialization timeline. Financially, the company remains stable, supported by a robust cash position and its high-margin internet services business, which hit a new high in monthly active users. Management emphasized continued heavy investment in AI, chips, and robotics to fuel the next growth cycle. The key question is whether these new engines—cars, AI, robotics—can achieve commercial scale and profitability before the smartphone engine's growth slows further.

marsbit17m ago

Xiaomi Defended Its Smartphone Gross Margin, Yet to Find a Profit Successor

marsbit17m ago

Is RWA Still Meaningful Without DeFi?

The article "Would RWA Still Matter Without DeFi?" argues that tokenizing real-world assets (RWA) alone, like putting a barcode on a container, is not transformative. True value emerges when these tokenized assets are integrated into decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystems, enabling valuation, financing, hedging, trading, and loss management in a programmable, automated manner. Tokenization provides digital representation, but DeFi provides utility through leverage, liquidity, and composability. The core challenge lies in aligning the different "time clocks" of blockchain (fast, 24/7), traditional markets (limited hours), and asset redemption (slow processes), which creates liquidation risks and gaps. Effective RWA integration requires more than a token; it needs a full stack: legally enforceable rights, reliable data oracles, clear transfer rules, executable secondary liquidity, appropriate collateral parameters, and credible loss resolution paths. Liquidity is defined not by total value locked (TVL) but by the ability to exit a position under stress within a required timeframe. Risk management for RWAs must be modeled as a dependency graph, monitoring interconnected nodes like issuers, custodians, oracles, and liquidity pools for early warning signs beyond just price data. While tokenized government bonds serve as an initial "ping test," the future lies in more complex assets like computing power and energy, which require bespoke risk models. Tokenized stocks paired with perpetual futures present a major test, combining global equity ownership with crypto-native leverage, necessitating robust architectural safeguards like isolation and dynamic collateral rules. The conclusion is that without DeFi, RWA tokenization offers limited value—improving distribution and transparency. The significant opportunity arises when tokenized assets become functional components within open, programmable capital markets, where they can be used as collateral and facilitate complex financial strategies. The token is merely the barcode; the market operating system is the real machine.

marsbit38m ago

Is RWA Still Meaningful Without DeFi?

marsbit38m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片