Covenant AI accuses Bittensor of ‘centralized control with decentralized branding’ amid exit

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-04-10Last updated on 2026-04-10

Abstract

Covenant AI, a major subnet on the Bittensor network, has exited, citing concerns over centralization. In a statement on X, the team accused Bittensor’s leadership of exercising centralized control while maintaining a decentralized brand. They claimed key decisions, such as suspending subnet emissions and removing community control, were influenced by a centralized authority. Additionally, they alleged the network deprecated infrastructure and applied economic pressure through token sales. This exit has generated uncertainty, highlighting ongoing tensions between decentralization ideals and operational realities in AI-driven crypto networks.

OkThe AI-driven momentum across crypto reflects how far decentralization has evolved.

What started as an attempt to decentralize financial infrastructure, allowing peer-to-peer transactions without intermediaries, has now expanded into blockchain networks integrating AI to speed up systems.

In this context, the recent FUD around Bittensor [TAO] seems largely sentiment-driven. For context, Covenant AI, one of the largest and most active subnets on Bittensor, recently exited the network, sparking uncertainty.

However, the bigger concern isn’t just the exit itself, but the reasoning behind it. In a post on X, Covenant AI said that Bittensor no longer functions as a truly decentralized network.

Source: X

The team argued that key decisions remain influenced by centralized authority. They claimed network leadership suspended subnet emissions and removed community control. The team also said leadership deprecated infrastructure and applied economic pressure through token sales.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main accusation that Covenant AI has made against Bittensor?

ACovenant AI accused Bittensor of 'centralized control with decentralized branding', claiming that key decisions are influenced by a centralized authority rather than being truly decentralized.

QWhy did Covenant AI exit the Bittensor network?

ACovenant AI exited due to concerns that Bittensor no longer functions as a truly decentralized network, citing centralized control over key decisions and network operations.

QWhat specific actions did Covenant AI claim Bittensor's leadership took?

AThey claimed leadership suspended subnet emissions, removed community control, deprecated infrastructure, and applied economic pressure through token sales.

QHow does the article describe the broader trend of AI integration in crypto?

AThe article describes it as an evolution of decentralization, expanding from decentralizing financial infrastructure to blockchain networks integrating AI to speed up systems.

QWhat does the article suggest is the primary driver behind the recent FUD around Bittensor?

AThe article suggests the recent FUD is largely sentiment-driven, sparked by Covenant AI's exit and their accusations against Bittensor.

Related Reads

Anthropic's IPO Launch: Commercial Miracle or Valuation Bubble?

Anthropic has confidentially filed for an IPO, led by Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, potentially going public by October. Following its latest $650 billion funding round, its pre-IPO valuation stands at $965 billion, with projections reaching up to $2 trillion at listing, which would make it the highest-valued private company ever. The article, written by Fu Sheng, addresses skepticism that this represents an AI bubble akin to the 2000 dot-com crash. It argues the current situation differs fundamentally. Unlike the internet bubble era, which relied on speculative narratives with little revenue, Anthropic's valuation is backed by unprecedented, measurable financial performance. Key data points include: * **Revenue Growth:** ARR skyrocketed from $10 billion in early 2025 to $470 billion by May 2026, targeting $100 billion by year-end—a growth curve unmatched in business history. * **Profitability:** It achieved operating profitability in Q2 2026 with an estimated $5.6 billion profit. * **Efficiency:** With ~3,000 employees and ~$470 billion ARR, its revenue per employee exceeds $10 million. Products like Claude Code, launched less than a year ago, already generate $25 billion in annualized revenue. * **Enterprise Adoption:** It boasts a strong enterprise client base, with 8 of the Fortune 10 and over 1,000 large firms spending over $1 million annually on Claude. The valuation is framed using a traditional SaaS model (e.g., a 10x Price-to-Sales multiple on $100 billion revenue). The author contends the core question for analysts has shifted from "How big could this be?" to "How much is it earning and will earn next quarter?" The discussion extends beyond Anthropic to a broader paradigm shift: the transition from a "carbon-based" to a "silicon-based" economy. Companies are increasingly prioritizing investment in compute and AI capabilities over human resources, as these directly scale productivity and competitive advantage. Anthropic's IPO is thus positioned not just as a corporate milestone, but as a price anchor for this new economic era.

链捕手1h ago

Anthropic's IPO Launch: Commercial Miracle or Valuation Bubble?

链捕手1h ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit4h ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片