Bitfarms Dumps Bitcoin, Rebrands As Keel Infrastructure In Full AI Shift

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-04-01Last updated on 2026-04-01

Abstract

Bitfarms, a former Bitcoin mining company, is fully exiting the cryptocurrency business and rebranding as Keel Infrastructure. The company is relocating from Canada to the US and shifting its focus entirely to building data centers for high-performance computing and artificial intelligence. This strategic pivot follows a fiscal year 2025 net loss of $284.5 million, driven by falling Bitcoin prices and increased mining difficulty. Despite the loss, investors reacted positively, with shares rising 6.6%. The company still holds approximately $161 million in debt-free Bitcoin, providing financial flexibility during its transition. This move aligns with a broader industry trend of crypto miners seeking higher margins in AI and computing.

A company that built its name on cryptocurrency mining is walking away from the business entirely. Bitfarms announced plans Tuesday to rebrand as Keel Infrastructure and move its legal base from Canada to the US, capping a five-month exit from Bitcoin that management described as a deliberate break from the past.

No Half-Measures In The Company’s New Direction

CEO Ben Gagnon made the company’s position plain during an earnings call. “No half-measures, no compromises, and in time, no Bitcoin,” he said. “We built a new company.” Bitfarms is now focused on building and operating data centers that power high-performance computing and artificial intelligence platforms.

According to company filings, it is developing a 2.2-gigawatt infrastructure pipeline across North America, targeting what it calls hyperscalers and next-generation cloud providers.

The rebrand and the relocation have both received shareholder approval. The move to the US signals a deliberate repositioning — one aimed at tapping a market where AI infrastructure spending has been climbing steadily.

Bitfarms Fiscal Year 2025 Results. Source: Bitfarms

A Year Of Heavy Losses Tied To Falling Bitcoin Prices

The company’s 2025 financial results, also released Tuesday, showed a net loss of $284.5 million — wider than the year before. Revenue rose 70% year-on-year to close to $230 million, but the cost of generating that revenue came in at $248 million, producing a gross loss before other expenses were counted.

General and administrative costs also increased. A swing in the fair value of digital assets cost the company almost $51 million last year, compared to a $26 million gain in 2024. A $28 million gain from selling digital assets partially offset those figures.

Bitfarms Fiscal Year 2025 Results. Source: Bitfarms

Bitcoin mining has become a harder business to run. Data shows the leading cryptocurrency has dropped 45% from its October high. Mining difficulty — a measure of how hard it is to earn new coins — has risen 58% since the last halving in May 2024. Those conditions squeezed margins across the industry, not just at Bitfarms.

Despite the losses, investors responded positively. Shares closed Tuesday up 6.60%, trading at 2.73 Canadian dollars, or roughly $1.96 US.

BTCUSD trading at $68,780 on the 24-hour chart: TradingView

Bitcoin Holdings Still On The Books For Now

Reports indicate the company still holds about $161 million in Bitcoin that carries no debt against it. That reserve provides some financial flexibility as the transition continues.

Bitfarms is not alone in making this kind of shift. Iris Energy has been scaling AI cloud services using Nvidia graphics processors. Cipher Mining locked in a long-term hosting deal with AI cloud firm Fluidstack.

Riot Platforms and MARA Holdings have both expanded into AI and high-performance computing as well. The pattern reflects a broader move by mining companies seeking higher margins in a different corner of the tech sector.

For Bitfarms, the message from leadership is that the old business is done. What comes next is being built from the ground up — under a new name, in a new country, chasing a different market entirely.

Featured image from Akos Stiller/Bloomberg via Getty Images, chart from TradingView

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the new name and focus of Bitfarms after its rebranding?

AThe company has rebranded as Keel Infrastructure and is now focused on building and operating data centers that power high-performance computing and artificial intelligence platforms.

QWhat was the key financial result that contributed to Bitfarms' net loss in fiscal year 2025?

AThe company reported a net loss of $284.5 million, which was influenced by a $51 million loss from the change in fair value of its digital assets, despite a 70% increase in revenue.

QHow did the market conditions for Bitcoin mining affect Bitfarms' decision to shift its business?

ABitcoin's price dropped 45% from its October high, and mining difficulty increased by 58% since the last halving in May 2024, squeezing industry margins and prompting the shift to a more profitable sector.

QWhat strategic move did Bitfarms make alongside its rebrand to position itself in the AI infrastructure market?

AThe company received shareholder approval to relocate its legal base from Canada to the United States, aiming to tap into a market where AI infrastructure spending has been steadily climbing.

QWhich other cryptocurrency mining companies have similarly expanded into AI and high-performance computing?

AIris Energy, Cipher Mining, Riot Platforms, and MARA Holdings have all expanded into AI and high-performance computing, reflecting a broader industry trend towards higher-margin tech sectors.

Related Reads

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

NVIDIA is set to launch its new Vera AI data center CPU in China as early as August, with high pricing. While this move offers a new option, it highlights China's continued dependence on foreign-controlled Arm architecture. In response, the Chinese semiconductor industry is increasingly turning to RISC-V as a strategic alternative for achieving high-performance computing autonomy. The article explores the concept of the "impossible triangle" in CPU development—balancing prosperity, control, and autonomy—and posits that RISC-V's open-source, modular nature offers a unique path to achieving all three. While RISC-V is already dominant in embedded systems, the focus is now shifting to data centers and AI workloads. China has become a global hotspot for RISC-V development, driven by AI-driven compute demand, supply chain concerns from export controls, cost benefits of open-source, and strong policy support. Multiple Chinese companies have reportedly crossed the key performance threshold of 15 SPECint per GHz, a benchmark for entering the high-performance CPU club. Progress extends beyond single-core benchmarks. Companies are developing complete computing subsystems, including commercial-grade coherent network-on-chip (NoC) technology and server processors with up to 40 cores that strictly adhere to the RVA23 standard to ensure software compatibility. Real-world applications are emerging in areas like video transcoding and edge AI. However, significant challenges remain. The RISC-V ecosystem faces fragmentation, immature toolchains and verification processes, and gaps in single-core performance and energy efficiency compared to mature x86 and Arm architectures. The formidable software moat, epitomized by NVIDIA's CUDA, is a long-term hurdle. In conclusion, while RISC-V cannot immediately replace offerings like NVIDIA's Vera, it represents a viable long-term path for China to develop a self-sufficient, high-performance CPU ecosystem. The journey is acknowledged to be long and arduous, requiring sustained effort to overcome technical and ecosystem challenges.

marsbit5h ago

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

marsbit5h ago

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

The author built a custom monitoring dashboard for Polymarket, a prediction market platform, and tested it with $1,600, achieving over 30% returns. However, the core argument is that Polymarket is not a good venue for traditional arbitrage. The dashboard has two main sections: a "Portfolio Dashboard" for tracking active positions with key metrics like total capital, P&L, and a risk-control module using a tier system (T1, T2, T3), and an "Opportunity Watchlist" for monitoring markets. The article details a critical structural trap in binary markets: a bet with a high perceived probability of success still carries a 100% loss risk if wrong. The author's T1/T2/T3 system is designed to manage this by limiting position sizes based on conviction and time horizon, emphasizing that high confidence should not equal high concentration. A key insight is the danger of "pseudo-diversification"—betting on different markets driven by the same underlying variable. The author concludes that Polymarket offers few true low-risk, arbitrage opportunities. It is instead a high-risk environment where wins can create a false sense of mastery, leading to large losses. The platform is better viewed as a training ground for honing judgment through disciplined, framework-driven betting rather than a reliable income source. The tools help transform intuition into structured, rule-based decisions to mitigate the risk of catastrophic errors.

marsbit8h ago

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

marsbit8h ago

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

**"WeChat AI Card" Practical Test Guide: Has the Era of AI Shopping Arrived?** WeChat has officially launched the "AI Exclusive Card," a feature integrated into its Workbuddy AI assistant. This card is designed to handle payments for AI-initiated purchases. Our hands-on test reveals it's not yet a tool for fully autonomous AI shopping, but rather a controlled payment layer for AI agents. The AI Card functions as an isolated sub-wallet within WeChat Pay. Users must bind the card and transfer funds into it from their main wallet. Crucially, every transaction requires explicit user confirmation via smartphone scan; AI cannot spend autonomously. Currently accessible through the Workbuddy agent, the card targets specific digital consumption scenarios: purchasing paid content (reports, data), calling paid APIs/tools, and subscribing to services. Its design prioritizes security and control by separating funds and mandating approval for each payment. We tested a real-world scenario: ordering bubble tea via Workbuddy using a "Meituan Life Assistant" skill. The process encountered multiple hurdles: high "skill" usage costs (exceeding daily free credits), and most importantly, while a payment was successfully initiated, the AI purchased an incorrect product (a mismatched group-buy coupon instead of the desired drink). This highlights the current limitation: the **AI Card only solves the payment step**. The broader challenge lies in the **AI agent's execution chain**—accurately understanding intent, navigating third-party platforms, selecting the right product, and ensuring proper fulfillment. The payment succeeded, but the purchase failed to meet the user's need. In conclusion, the WeChat AI Exclusive Card is a cautious, early-step experiment in AI commerce. It provides a secure, user-controlled payment method for agent interactions but is not yet capable of reliable, end-to-end complex purchases. For now, it's best used for low-value, low-risk digital services with careful user verification at each step. The vision of AI handling complete shopping tasks remains a work in progress.

marsbit11h ago

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

marsbit11h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片