AI大战彻底打响,马斯克与OpenAI今日将对簿公堂,彻底闹崩

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-27Last updated on 2026-04-27

4月27日消息,日前马斯克和人工智能初创公司OpenAI上演对簿公堂。

一边是特斯拉、SpaceX、xAI、X平台老板马斯克;另一边是手握ChatGPT、背后站着微软的AI巨头OpenAI,CEO是萨姆·奥特曼。

小雷认为,这妥妥的是一场关于AI控制权的终极对决。

令人唏嘘的是,十年前他俩还是并肩创业的合伙人,十年后直接法庭相见,这剧情比好莱坞还刺激。

马斯克这次起诉不是为了钱。虽然他之前曾提出高达1340亿美元的天价赔偿,但现在已经放弃个人赔偿,但要求是法院把胜诉所得资金全部返还给OpenAI的公益部门。

图源:微博

他真正想要的,是撤销OpenAI这些年的营利化重组,让它彻底变回2015年创立时那个纯粹的非营利机构,还要把奥特曼从管理层位置上拉下来。

而OpenAI这边呢,觉得没钱根本搞不出顶尖AI,商业化是活下去的唯一出路。

说到这儿,有很多网友吐槽马斯克“双标”,因为马斯克现在手里的公司基本都是营利性的。

比如特斯拉,全球市值最高的汽车公司,卖车、卖FSD自动驾驶,妥妥商业巨头。SpaceX,发射火箭搞星链,也是奔着上市大赚一笔去的。还有他2023年新创立的xAI,推出Grok模型直接对标ChatGPT,目的就是在AI市场分一杯羹。

结果现在马斯克反而站出来起诉OpenAI过度商业化。自这波操作别说网友了,小雷都看懵了。

马斯克和OpenAI闹到今天这个地步,其实不是一两天的矛盾。

2015年,马斯克、奥特曼、布罗克曼这帮人凑到一起创立了OpenAI。当时的定位是非营利机构,开源共享不为赚钱。马斯克当时一口气捐了3800万美元,占早期融资的60%,可以说没有马斯克就没有今天的OpenAI。

但搞AI太烧钱了,每年几十亿美元往里砸,非营利组织根本扛不住。马斯克当时提了个方案:我来继续投钱,但OpenAI得并入特斯拉由我说了算。这个要求被奥特曼团队直接拒绝了。他们觉得这违背了当初非营利的初心。

谈崩后,马斯克一气之下退出了OpenAI董事会,彻底切断资金支持,双方正式决裂。

而OpenAI为了活下去,2019年做出了那个改变命运的决定:重组为“有限营利”公司,引入微软10亿美元投资,后来又追加到130亿美元。从此OpenAI走上商业化,ChatGPT一出火遍全球,估值一路飙到8500亿美元,离上市只差一步。

马斯克一看这情况,彻底坐不住了。你跟微软绑在一起赚得盆满钵满,把当初的初心忘得一干二净。于是2023年马斯克亲自下场创立xAI,推出Grok模型直接跟OpenAI硬刚。

图源:微博

2024年,他正式起诉OpenAI,矛盾彻底摆上台面,小雷认为结局有两种。

如果马斯克胜诉: OpenAI的营利化重组被撤销,变回非营利机构,微软的投资和控制权直接打水漂,刚要推进的IPO计划彻底泡汤。奥特曼和布罗克曼被罢免,OpenAI管理层大换血,未来发展充满不确定性。

如果OpenAI胜诉:马斯克诉求被驳回,OpenAI商业化之路彻底走通,微软的地位更加稳固,IPO顺利推进,估值可能进一步暴涨。

值得一提的是,马斯克与OpenAI的诉讼案已经开庭审理,谁会赢目前还不得而知。不妨先让子弹飞一会儿。

话说回来,马斯克到底是真的在乎AI的公益初心,还是单纯眼红OpenAI的巨大成功,目前还不得而知。

说到最后,你觉得马斯克能赢得这次诉讼吗?欢迎在评论区留言说说你的想法。

本文来自微信公众号 “价值研究所”(ID:jiazhiyanjiusuo),作者:雷科技互联网组

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit1h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit1h ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit1h ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片