A Quick Look at the Latest Portfolio of the 24-Year-Old 'AI Stock God': 60% Allocation Hedges Against Semiconductor Downturn

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-05-18Last updated on 2026-05-18

Abstract

Summary: The article analyzes the latest 13F filing from "AI stock prodigy" Leopold Aschenbrenner's fund, Situational Awareness LP, for Q1 2026. The fund's holdings surged to $13.7 billion, with a significant 32.5% net inflow. Key portfolio adjustments reveal a dual strategy: * **Hedging Semiconductor Downturn:** Over 60% of the fund's *notional value* is allocated to massive put options on major AI semiconductor and hardware stocks (e.g., NVDA, AVGO, AMD, SMH ETF). This acts as a high-leverage hedge against potential short-term volatility or correction in the chip sector. * **Long-term Bullishness on AI Infrastructure:** Alongside the hedges, the fund maintains and increases core long positions in companies providing critical AI infrastructure. This includes substantial equity stakes in CoreWeave (GPU cloud services), Bloom Energy (on-site power), and various power/electrical/data center firms (KEEL, IREN, etc.). Other notable moves include switching Intel exposure from high-leverage calls to minimal stock, exiting optical networking stocks (LITE, COHR), and taking profits in some positions like Bloom Energy and CoreWeave calls. The analysis concludes that Aschenbrenner is not simply turning bearish on AI. Instead, the strategy reflects a nuanced view: extreme caution toward near-term "chip maker" valuations deemed potentially frothy, coupled with strong conviction in the long-term scarcity and value of the underlying *infrastructure* (power, data centers, cloud capac...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Azuma (@azuma_eth)

No confidentiality request! No complete liquidation! The newly crowned "AI Stock God," Leopold Aschenbrenner, and his fund Situational Awareness LP officially released their 13F filing this evening.

  • Odaily Note: For details on Leopold Aschenbrenner's personal story, please refer to "SBF's Junior, Turned $225 Million into $5.5 Billion in One Year."

This means our first hypothesis from this morning's article, "Could Be Revealed Today, the Internet is Awaiting the Version Answer from the 24-Year-Old 'AI Stock God'," is confirmed. Situational Awareness LP submitted its filing quite late on the May 15th deadline, preventing the SEC from publishing it on its website that day. As a result, the market had to endure another weekend, finally seeing the fund's holdings disclosure after the SEC resumed work on Monday.

According to this latest 13F filing, as of March 31, 2026, the nominal total value of Situational Awareness LP's holdings has increased to $13.7 billion, more than doubling (up 148%) from $5.52 billion on December 31 of last year.

  • Odaily Note: It's important to note that in the statistical methodology of US stock 13F filings, the market value displayed for option assets is typically the "notional value" of the underlying stocks, not the actual premium cost paid by the fund. This means that although the fund has built a "semiconductor hedge wall" with nominal assets of hundreds of billions of dollars, the actual cash cost (maximum potential loss) consumed is much smaller, representing a typical high-leverage macro hedge.

Additionally, this quarter, net capital inflows accounted for 32.51% of the fund's total holding value, indicating that the fund's explosive growth is not only due to portfolio appreciation but also involves substantial external new capital subscriptions (i.e., fresh capital injections).

Frenetic Portfolio Adjustment in Progress

The filing also shows that Situational Awareness LP executed substantial portfolio adjustments in the first quarter of this year.

  • New Purchases: 23 stocks (including options);
  • Added To: 9 stocks;
  • Sold Out Of: 10 stocks (including options);
  • Reduced Holdings In: 4 stocks (including options).

New Purchases: 60% Allocation Hedges Semiconductor Downturn

  • Odaily Note: The chart above only covers new stock purchases with values exceeding $100 million. For the complete list of all 23 new purchases, click the "Portal."

First, looking at the new purchase actions, this is the most shocking information in Situational Awareness LP's entire 13F report — in the first quarter, the fund systematically hedged risks for the AI semiconductor and computing hardware sector through large-scale put option positions.

Looking directly at the data:

  • SMH PUT (VanEck Semiconductor Core ETF Put Options): 14.94% of portfolio (market value $2.04 billion) — Largest new position;
  • NVDA PUT (NVIDIA Put Options): 11.47% (market value $1.56 billion) — Second largest new position;
  • ORCL PUT (Oracle Put Options): 7.84%;
  • AVGO PUT (Broadcom Put Options): 7.36%;
  • AMD PUT (AMD Put Options): 7.09%;

Just these top five put option holdings account for 48.7% of Situational Awareness LP's $13.7 billion nominal total holding value. Adding subsequent put options on Micron (MU), TSMC (TSM), ASML (ASML), and Intel (INTC), the fund has over 60% of its nominal portfolio betting on or hedging against declines or severe volatility in core AI hardware stocks.

It's also notable that Situational Awareness LP purchased both call and put options on the same stock, such as buying Micron put options (MU PUT, 4.27%) while also buying MU CALL (3.09%), and buying TSMC put options (TSM PUT, 3.91%) while also buying TSM CALL (2.59%).

This is a two-way bet strategy commonly used by hedge funds. It suggests the fund believes that Micron (memory chips) and TSMC (foundry) could experience stock price volatility far exceeding market expectations in upcoming 2026 earnings or industry cycles, possibly due to geopolitics or extreme supply-demand imbalances — profits can be made on both sides as long as the unidirectional move is large enough.

Increased Holdings: Common Stock Still Favors SanDisk, CRWV

Regarding increased holdings, Situational Awareness LP chose not to use options but rather added to 9 stocks via common shares.

In Q1, Situational Awareness LP slightly increased its position in SanDisk (SNDK) by 85,000 shares, bringing its total holdings to 1.14 million shares, with a holding value of $724 million, accounting for 5.30% of the entire investment portfolio. This is one of the very few super-heavyweight holdings in Situational Awareness LP's portfolio that exists entirely in common stock form.

Another noteworthy move is that Situational Awareness LP significantly increased its position in CoreWeave (CRWV) by over 1.07 million shares in Q1, pushing the holding value to $556 million, representing 4.07% of the portfolio. CoreWeave is one of the most closely watched infrastructure companies in the current AI GPU cloud services field and a key partner in the NVIDIA ecosystem. Shortly after its IPO, Situational Awareness LP swiftly incorporated it into its core portfolio and aggressively increased its position. This indicates that while the fund is short-term bearish on NVIDIA's valuation (via PUTs), it remains wildly optimistic about cloud giants that directly convert GPUs into computing power for leasing to large models.

Furthermore, Situational Awareness LP also increased holdings in KEEL, IREN, APLD, RIOT, CLSK, BTDR, and other computing or power infrastructure companies, continuing the logic advocated by Leopold Aschenbrenner that "electricity is the new oil."

Liquidated Holdings: Unloading Intel Call Leverage, Exiting Optical Communications

Regarding liquidated holdings, Situational Awareness LP's most significant move was completely unwinding the leverage on Intel call options (INTC CALL). In the previous disclosure period, Situational Awareness LP had allocated over 13% of its portfolio to Intel call options (a staggering 2.023 million option contracts), representing an extremely high-leverage directional bet. This quarter, it liquidated this position entirely, shifting to holding a minimal common stock position in Intel (0.07%).

Additionally, Situational Awareness LP completely liquidated its positions in LITE (previous weight 8.68%) and COHR (previous quarter weight 1.61%) in Q1. LITE and COHR are among the world's leading optical communication chip and optical transceiver module giants. This liquidation suggests Situational Awareness LP is exiting the AI optical module/network hardware sector.

Situational Awareness LP also liquidated its positions in CIFR (previous weight 2.80%) and HUT (previous weight 0.72%) in Q1. Both are cryptocurrency mining companies (including CORZ, which was reduced in the next section). Considering the increased holdings in similar companies like RIOT, CLSK, and BTDR, this might just be a routine portfolio adjustment.

Reduced Holdings: Significant Profit-Taking on BE

Finally, looking at the reduced holdings, Bloom Energy (BE) was the top holding disclosed in Situational Awareness LP's previous 13F filing. In Q1, the fund reduced its position by 3.59 million shares, with the portfolio weight plummeting from 15.87% last quarter to 6.42%.

Bloom Energy focuses on solid oxide fuel cell technology and is a key player in providing "on-site power" for data centers, bypassing traditional power grids for direct supply. Considering the retained position is still substantial, the reduction likely does not mean Situational Awareness LP is no longer bullish on the company, but rather appears to be a routine profit-taking move.

CoreWeave call options (CRWV CALL) were Situational Awareness LP's second-largest reduction (portfolio weight plummeted from 14.04% to 1.03%). As mentioned earlier, the fund has shifted to holding CRWV via common stock, so this is more of a de-leveraging operation.

Situational Awareness LP also reduced its position in Core Scientific (CORZ) by 2.74 million shares, lowering the portfolio weight from 7.59% to 2.84%. CORZ is a leading Bitcoin mining company transitioning to AI computing power hosting. However, given that Situational Awareness LP increased holdings in other mining companies still in the transition phase with more attractive valuations this quarter, reducing CORZ seems more like partial profit-taking.

What Exactly Is the 'AI Stock God' Thinking?

Looking only at the surface data of this 13F, many might draw a simple, crude conclusion — Leopold Aschenbrenner, who once proclaimed "AGI by 2027," has turned bearish on AI.

But the reality is clearly not that simple. Within Situational Awareness LP's portfolio structure, there simultaneously exist two seemingly contradictory yet highly unified main themes.

  • On one side, there is extreme vigilance toward short-term valuation bubbles in the "chip sector." Situational Awareness LP has used a shockingly large nominal allocation of PUTs (put options) to essentially "buy crash insurance" for nearly the entire AI semiconductor industry chain, including NVIDIA, Broadcom, and others;
  • On the other side, there is an almost obsessive optimism about the long-term demand for AI infrastructure. Whether it's CoreWeave, Bloom Energy, or a series of companies related to electricity, transformers, and data centers, they all essentially point to the same deterministic logic — the war for AI computing power has entered a deep-water phase.

This is perhaps Situational Awareness LP's most core judgment at present. What will truly be scarce in the future may not necessarily be GPU chips themselves, but rather the energy, power systems, and data center infrastructure required to sustain these GPUs' continuous operation. GPU production can scale, and advanced process technology will eventually ramp up, but megawatt-level power supply capacity, transformers, transmission systems, and large-scale data center construction cycles are difficult to replicate simultaneously in a short time. Compared to the "selling shovels" logic already fully priced in by the market, Leopold Aschenbrenner seems more focused on where the real potential bottlenecks might emerge in the next stage of the AI industry.

This also explains why Situational Awareness LP would simultaneously buy large-scale semiconductor put options to hedge against severe volatility risks in the AI hardware sector while continuing to heavily invest in GPU cloud services, power, and computing infrastructure assets.

In a sense, this 13F is less a simple holdings disclosure and more like Leopold Aschenbrenner's directional roadmap judgment for the next stage of evolution in the AI industry chain.

When a genius investor who rose to fame by going all-in on AI begins to deploy multi-billion-dollar nominal positions to buy insurance for the AI sector, it at least indicates one thing — even the most steadfast AI bulls of this era have begun to take volatility itself seriously.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the total nominal value of Situational Awareness LP's holdings as of March 31, 2026, and how does it compare to the previous quarter?

AAs of March 31, 2026, Situational Awareness LP's total nominal holdings value was $13.7 billion. This represents an increase of 148% from the $5.52 billion reported on December 31, 2025.

QWhat is the most significant new position taken by Situational Awareness LP in Q1, and what does it consist of?

AThe most significant new position was a large-scale hedge against the AI semiconductor and computing hardware sector using put options. Notably, the top five put option holdings (on SMH, NVDA, ORCL, AVGO, and AMD) alone accounted for 48.7% of the fund's total nominal value.

QHow did Situational Awareness LP adjust its holdings in CoreWeave (CRWV) during Q1?

ASituational Awareness LP significantly increased its holdings in CoreWeave by over 1.07 million shares, bringing the position's value to $556 million (4.07% of the portfolio). It also drastically reduced its position in CRWV call options, lowering their weight from 14.04% to 1.03%, suggesting a move away from leverage into direct stock ownership.

QWhat major sector did Situational Awareness LP exit from in Q1, and which stocks were sold?

AThe fund exited from the AI optical module/network hardware sector. It completely sold out of its positions in LITE (which had an 8.68% weight previously) and COHR (which had a 1.61% weight previously).

QAccording to the article's analysis, what is the seemingly contradictory but unified core investment thesis behind Situational Awareness LP's Q1 portfolio adjustments?

AThe fund's strategy reflects two unified lines of thought: 1) Extreme caution towards short-term valuation bubbles in the 'chip' end of the AI sector, hedging with massive put options. 2) Persistent, almost obsessive optimism about the long-term demand for AI infrastructure, particularly the underlying energy, power systems, and data center facilities needed to power GPUs, which are seen as the next potential bottleneck.

Related Reads

From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

"From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply and Institutional Frenzy May Lead to 'Explosive' Price Rally Analysts suggest Bitcoin's price action could mirror gold's over the past two decades, following the launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs. Gold ETFs, introduced in 2004, drove gold's price surge to a current market cap near $28 trillion. Both gold and Bitcoin are non-yielding stores of value, with prices driven purely by investor sentiment rather than cash flows or credit. Gold ETFs experienced dramatic cycles: explosive growth, painful drawdowns, and slow recoveries, with each cycle reaching higher peaks. Bitcoin ETFs, approved in early 2024, saw rapid institutional adoption but are now facing similar volatility. Recent warnings highlight the risk of significant ETF outflows disrupting the current rebound. BlackRock's IBIT, a leading Bitcoin ETF, has sold nearly 100,000 BTC to meet redemptions while still holding over 733,000. The core parallel is fixed supply: when demand surges, prices explode, but demand is often volatile and wave-like, not steady. Institutional interest, through ETFs and corporate adoption, remains a key support pillar, helping to cushion sell-offs. If Bitcoin captures even a fraction of gold's role as a store of value, its upside potential is immense, though the path will be marked by high volatility. For investors, focusing on long-term trends and managing risk is crucial as this 'price explosion' narrative unfolds."

Foresight News29m ago

From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

Foresight News29m ago

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

The article argues that the popular narrative of "AI agent shopping" – equipping AI with a wallet to autonomously handle purchases – is fundamentally flawed and oversimplifies the complexity of shopping. It deconstructs shopping into two core actions: **information retrieval** (standardized, easily automated) and **value judgment** (deeply subjective and human-centric). The narrative mistakenly assumes AI can fully handle both. Value judgment itself has two layers: **evaluation** (assessing options against criteria) and **demand definition** (setting the criteria, weights, and values). The latter is inherently human and dynamic, as preferences are not fixed but constructed during the decision-making process ("constructive preferences"). The real dividing line for automation is not product standardization, but whether the **act of choosing** itself holds experiential value. For mundane purchases (e.g., printer paper), full AI delegation works. For experiential goods (e.g., wine, furniture), the joy of selection is core to consumption, so AI should act as an assistant that narrows options, leaving the final choice to humans. The "AI wallet" concept confuses three separate elements: decision-making, execution, and fund custody. Current payment industry solutions (e.g., from Stripe, Mastercard, Google, Visa) show that limited, scoped payment authorization tokens are sufficient for most consumer scenarios, not full fund custody. The true use case for autonomous AI wallets is in **B2B procurement** and **machine-to-machine (M2M) settlements** for standardized, high-frequency, low-value transactions. The real bottlenecks for AI shopping are not payment technology, but **1) the lack of trusted data sources** (e.g., fake reviews, counterfeit goods) and **2) the impossibility of automating human demand definition**. The conclusion is that the focus should be on safely automating the assessment and filtering process while reserving for humans the rights to define their criteria and enjoy the final act of choice. For experiential goods, the platform's competitive advantage shifts to providing a superior selection experience.

Foresight News1h ago

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

Foresight News1h ago

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

After nine months of being short, prominent crypto trader Doctor Profit has closed all his bearish positions and started buying Bitcoin near $64,000, signaling a complete bullish reversal. He argues that structural market changes—such as impending U.S. regulation (CLARITY Act) and institutional adoption via securities tokenization—are rewriting the traditional four-year cycle script, potentially bringing the market bottom forward from the widely expected September/October timeframe. This view finds some technical support from on-chain analyst gumsays, who notes a bullish divergence on Bitcoin's weekly chart has persisted for 147 days, nearing the 161-day duration seen before the 2022 cycle low. However, cycle researcher Jake Pahor presents a counter-argument based on historical data. Analyzing patterns since 2014, he identifies three common features of past bear market bottoms: a ~12-month duration from peak to trough, a sustained period of extreme fear (with a proprietary risk score below 20), and the price falling below Bitcoin's realized price (~$53,000 currently). The current cycle, only nine months from its October 2025 peak, meets none of these conditions. The debate highlights a market torn between "front-running" a potential early bottom driven by new fundamentals and waiting for confirmation through traditional on-chain and sentiment metrics. While Doctor Profit opts for aggressive buying, Pahor maintains a disciplined, tiered accumulation strategy, continuing weekly buys at current risk levels but reserving larger orders for if more extreme fear emerges.

marsbit1h ago

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片