Not Chasing AI or Buying Back Shares, Can 'Stingy' Jingdong Still Succeed?

marsbitPublished on 2026-08-17Last updated on 2026-08-17

Abstract

On August 13th, JD.com (JD.US) released its Q2 2026 earnings, delivering a mixed and generally "flat" performance that met low expectations but offered few positives. Overall revenue declined by approximately 3% year-over-year (YoY) to ~¥346.4 billion, aligning with weakened domestic consumption trends. While group operating profit saw a YoY improvement, this was primarily due to reduced losses in the food delivery segment compared to the high-cost "delivery war" period of the previous year. Key details reveal deeper concerns: revenue from JD's core domestic retail segment fell 4.7% YoY. While electronics sales declined less than feared (~12% YoY), growth in daily necessities and advertising services plummeted by about 10 percentage points each, raising doubts about the segment's mid-term growth momentum post-subsidy adjustments. Logistics revenue growth also slowed to 5.9% as the delivery boom faded. Profitability presented a nuanced picture. The retail segment's operating margin edged up slightly YoY but failed to deliver the significant beats seen in past quarters, suggesting efficiency gains may be nearing limits. Losses from the New Businesses segment (including food delivery and overseas ventures) remained elevated at ~¥9.9 billion, as increased overseas investment partially offset reductions in delivery subsidies. Notably, JD's shareholder returns weakened significantly, with share buybacks in H1 2026 annualizing to only about 5% of market cap. The company opted to ...

Perhaps currently the 'most grounded' e-commerce platform in China—Jingdong (JD.US)—announced its Q2 2026 results on the evening of August 13. Overall, they could be described as 'steady' or perhaps 'flat.' In terms of variance from expectations, both revenue and overall profit slightly exceeded Bloomberg's estimates, but only matched or slightly fell short of some major banks' expectations.

In terms of trends, due to the overall weakening of domestic consumption in Q2, total revenue for the quarter declined. However, soft retail sales figures had already set expectations, so this was not a surprise. Although profits from the Mall segment declined year-over-year, compared to last year when profits were nearly exhausted due to the food delivery war, the group's overall profit showed a significant recovery on a year-over-year basis.

Looking at the specifics:

1. Both revenue and profit declined, but without major shocks: Jingdong's total revenue this quarter was approximately 346.4 billion yuan, a year-over-year decrease of 3%, a significant slowdown compared to the 5% growth last quarter, but largely in line with market expectations and not a shock, consistent with the overall retail sales trend this quarter.

The group's overall operating profit was 4.55 billion yuan, or 5.48 billion yuan on an adjusted basis. On an adjusted basis, this was slightly better than Bloomberg's expectations but weaker than some major banks' forecasts. Specifically, the main drag was higher-than-expected losses from new business initiatives.

2. Sharp slowdown in daily essentials and advertising growth: For the most important domestic Mall segment, revenue this quarter fell by about 4.7% year-over-year, continuing the expected deceleration. The decline was lower than some market expectations but broadly in line with top-tier bank forecasts.

Looking closer, the actual deterioration in electronics & home appliance sales was limited, with sales falling by less than 12% YoY this quarter vs. an 8.4% decline last quarter. This might be due to a marginal rebound from national subsidy benefits, which previously mainly favored offline channels but recently began flowing back online.

In contrast, daily essentials & general merchandise sales and service & advertising revenue—businesses theoretically not directly impacted by the subsidy phase-out—saw a more pronounced slowdown. Daily essentials sales growth dropped from 15% to 5.6%, while advertising service growth fell from nearly 19% to about 8%. The slowdown for both was around 10 percentage points.

While the market had anticipated this, and the slowdown has its reasons (reduced traffic diversion to the platform from electronics and food delivery), these two segments are the primary drivers for Jingdong's medium-term growth. This may lead the market to question whether, even after the negative impact of the subsidy phase-out passes, the Mall segment's core growth rate can reaccelerate (e.g., back above 10%).

3. Food delivery war cools, logistics and new business growth also slows: As the period of high comparables from the food delivery war has begun, and this year's food delivery order volume has not increased but rather decreased, growth in logistics revenue and new business also slowed this quarter.

Logistics & other services revenue growth slowed to 5.9%, essentially returning to the mid-to-high single-digit growth rate seen before 2025 after the boost from food delivery subsided.

However, looking at new business revenue alone, it increased sequentially by about 15%, suggesting overseas business contributed to the growth.

4. Mall segment profitability still improved, new business losses slightly higher: Overall, the group's profit this quarter was largely in line with expectations.

Breaking it down by segment, the Jingdong Mall segment's operating profit this quarter was nearly 13.5 billion yuan, slightly beating Bloomberg's expectation of about 13.0 billion. Trend-wise, unable to withstand the revenue contraction, profit also declined by about 3% year-over-year, failing to deliver another significantly better-than-expected result.

However, the operating margin still improved slightly year-over-year by less than 0.1 percentage point. Optimists might say that Jingdong managed to improve profitability while revenue shrank; pessimists might argue that there seems limited room for further margin expansion in the Mall segment.

Based on the company's explanation, the continued margin improvement is still mainly attributed to a revenue mix shift toward higher-margin businesses and supply chain optimization.

The New Business segment, which includes food delivery, reported a loss of nearly 9.9 billion yuan this quarter. As Dolphin Research expected, the loss narrowed little compared to last quarter and was also slightly higher than Bloomberg's consensus estimate.

According to common market expectations, Jingdong's food delivery losses this quarter should have decreased sequentially by about 1 billion yuan, implying that investments in overseas and other new businesses likely increased sequentially by about 500 million yuan (which doesn't seem like a huge amount).

5. Cost and expense perspective: First, on gross margin, the group's overall gross margin continued to improve sequentially, from 16.8% to 17.1%. Consequently, gross profit still achieved about 5% year-over-year growth.

Specifically, this was mainly due to improved gross margins in both the New Business and Logistics segments after food delivery subsidies decreased, with the New Business segment contributing more significantly, seeing a sequential gross margin increase of 3 percentage points. In contrast, the Mall segment's gross margin declined slightly by about 0.1 percentage point sequentially (though it was still up 1.2 percentage points year-over-year), suggesting limited room left for squeezing gross margin from the upstream supply chain.

From an expense perspective, the company's total operating expenses decreased by 4.4% year-over-year this quarter, a larger drop than the revenue decline, helping profit release. Specifically, marketing expenses decreased by a predictable 25% year-over-year. Another notable point is that R&D expenses maintained rapid growth of 38%. It appears that while not investing heavily in large AI model development, Jingdong is still putting money into some internal AI applications.

By segment, the Mall segment's total expense ratio increased both year-over-year and sequentially by about 1 percentage point. This indicates greater pressure on the company to subsidize users itself after the national subsidy phase-out, which is the main reason the Mall segment's profitability couldn't improve more significantly.

The group's overall expense reduction was also mainly due to decreased investment in new businesses, down about 1.8 billion yuan year-over-year.

6. Shareholder returns decline, investing overseas instead of in AI: Another previous strength for Jingdong was its shareholder returns, among the best in the US-listed Chinese internet sector. However, in the entire first half of 2026, the company repurchased only about $1 billion worth of shares. Annualized against the current market cap, the return rate is only around 5%, a clear decline.

Unlike Alibaba or Tencent, Jingdong does not have massive AI-related capital expenditures, so its cash flow pressure isn't particularly high. On the cash flow statement this quarter, Jingdong's cash outflow for investments was about 29.5 billion yuan, but the vast majority of this was for purchasing short-term investments and wealth management products, not truly strategic investments. The perception of preferring to buy financial products rather than returning cash to shareholders is obviously poor.

Dolphin Research Viewpoint:

1. As seen above, Jingdong's results this time were unremarkable in terms of variance from expectations, with no highlights. In terms of trends, growth slowed due to macroeconomic headwinds. While overall profit seemingly improved due to reduced food delivery losses, core Mall segment profit declined. So, the overall results are certainly not good.

The core shortcomings can be summarized as follows: a. The Mall revenue decline was expected, but past Mall segment profits typically far exceeded expectations and guidance. This time was quite flat, suggesting the trend of improving Mall profitability may have hit a bottleneck; b. While food delivery losses narrowed, due to overseas investments, overall new business losses barely decreased; c. Daily essentials and advertising revenue growth slowed significantly. While understandable, this is bad news for medium-term revenue growth prospects; d. Preferring to buy financial products rather than pay dividends.

2. Outlook & Logical Assessment

This quarter's results weren't good, so what about the outlook? Dolphin Research believes the decisive factors influencing future performance and stock price are essentially two points:

1) Whether a significant inflection point in domestic e-commerce business sentiment can emerge in the second half of the year. Looking at macro retail sales data, both overall and online consumption in Q2 were indeed at their weakest in recent years. However, the latest June retail sales growth rate showed some recovery compared to May. Overall growth improved from -0.6% to +1%, and online physical goods sales growth increased from 2.6% to 3.9%.

For categories particularly important to Jingdong, like electronics & appliances, statistics bureau data showed clear improvement (narrowing declines) in sales growth for household appliances, furniture, and communication equipment in June. This quarter's decline in electronics & appliance sales wasn't very large either.

According to research by an overseas bank, national subsidy allocation in the second half will shift marginally back from offline to online channels. Also, comparables will become increasingly easier. Therefore, Jingdong's medium-term performance trend will likely show signs of stabilization and recovery.

2) The other key factor is the attitude toward investment in new businesses & how losses will change, thereby impacting the group's overall profit.

Currently, as all participants in the food delivery war are scaling back investments and improving unit economics, losses from Jingdong's food delivery business will likely continue to narrow. However, since Jingdong's food delivery order volume has now fallen below 20 million daily orders, and it will likely be difficult to significantly increase volume without heavy subsidies again, unless Jingdong completely abandons the food delivery business, losses from this segment could be perpetual, reaching a "minimum loss level" that is difficult to reduce further.

But because the domestic main platform business has a clear ceiling, the company will likely not stop its diversified "tinkering." Therefore, one source of profit elasticity is the level of investment in "Jingxi" and its overseas businesses. In the near to medium term, Jingdong's overseas investments are unlikely to decline significantly, as JoyBuy is still in the early stages of business expansion, reportedly already operating in about 30 cities across 7 countries.

Thus, in the near term, overall new business losses will likely only trend down slowly, with a low probability of a sharp drop, which was indeed the case this quarter.

3) However, the Mall segment's profitability, which had consistently exceeded expectations for several quarters, failed to improve further this time. For investors hoping Jingdong could rely on internal efficiency gains to offset external pressures, this is undoubtedly disappointing.

Fortunately, Jingdong is not embroiled in the "AI model war," so it will not see its future profits and cash flow significantly impacted by "crazy" AI-related capital expenditures. Although this quarter's results were flat, they were largely as expected. If domestic e-commerce sentiment warms in the second half, Jingdong, with its relatively focused and domestic-centric business, can still be considered one of the companies in China's e-commerce sector with relatively high earnings certainty and defensive value.

3. On valuation, since this quarter's results were largely as expected, we haven't made major changes to our full-year forecasts. We still expect full-year 2026 operating profit for the Mall segment to be around 56 billion yuan, representing high single-digit year-over-year growth.

For new business losses (including food delivery, Jingxi, and overseas businesses), as mentioned above, due to continued overseas investment, a significant decline is unlikely. Therefore, we expect full-year new business losses of 36.5 billion yuan, resulting in group consolidated operating profit of about 19.5 billion yuan (no additional tax deduction).

In the near to medium term, Jingdong's performance fluctuations, both upward and downward, are unlikely to be very large, prioritizing stability. If it maintains good shareholder returns, it holds some allocation value for investors seeking safety and certainty. However, given the poor attitude toward shareholder returns this time, Dolphin Research finds it difficult to identify a compelling reason to invest in the company at present. While one could speculate on improved e-commerce sentiment in the second half, Jingdong may not be the stock with the highest potential upside.

This article is from the WeChat public account "Dolphin Investment Research" (ID: haituntouyan), author: Dolphin Research.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QBased on the article's analysis, what are the key concerns regarding JD.com's core e-commerce business following its Q2 2026 results?

AThe key concerns are: 1) The core JD Retail (shangcheng) segment's profit growth appears to have hit a bottleneck, failing to significantly exceed expectations this quarter. 2) The growth rates for General Merchandise sales and Advertising service revenue, which are key mid-term growth drivers, decelerated sharply by around 10 percentage points. This raises doubts about whether the segment's growth can re-accelerate beyond 10% even after the impact of government subsidy adjustments fades.

QHow did JD.com's cost and expense structure change in Q2 2026, and what drove these changes?

AOverall expenses decreased by 4.4% year-over-year, a larger drop than the revenue decline, which helped boost profits. This was primarily driven by a 25% reduction in marketing expenses. However, R&D expenses grew rapidly at 38%, indicating ongoing investment in AI applications internally. For the core JD Retail segment, the total expense ratio increased by about 1 percentage point, indicating greater pressure for user subsidies post-government support.

QWhat is the article's outlook for JD.com's new business segment, particularly regarding losses and investment strategy?

AThe article expects new business losses to decline only gradually. While losses from the food delivery war are narrowing, the business likely has a 'minimum loss level' that is hard to reduce further unless JD exits. Meanwhile, JD is shifting investment focus, with overseas expansion (e.g., JoyBuy) still in its early stages. Therefore, the overall new business segment's losses are not expected to drop significantly in the near term as overseas investments offset gains from reduced food delivery subsidies.

QAccording to the article, why is JD.com's approach to shareholder returns described negatively, and how does it compare to its peers?

AJD's shareholder returns have weakened significantly. In H1 2026, it repurchased only about $1 billion worth of shares, translating to an annualized return rate of only ~5% of its market cap. Unlike peers like Alibaba or Tencent, JD does not face massive AI-related capital expenditure pressures, implying strong cash flow. The article criticizes that JD is choosing to invest cash in short-term investments and wealth management products instead of returning more to shareholders, creating a poor perception.

QWhat factors does the article suggest could lead to a potential recovery or stabilization in JD.com's performance in the second half of 2026?

ATwo main factors are highlighted: 1) A potential recovery in China's domestic e-commerce sentiment in H2. Positive signs include improved retail sales and home appliance/communication device sales growth in June, and expectations that government subsidies will shift marginally back to online channels. 2) A continued, albeit slow, reduction in losses from the new business segment as food delivery subsidies wind down. However, the article notes that due to ongoing overseas investments, a sharp drop in new business losses is unlikely.

Related Reads

Yield Leverage and Liquidity Leverage: The STONKBROKER Mechanism is Very Suitable for the RWA Scenario

The article argues that the STONKBROKER mechanism is highly suitable for Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization scenarios due to its two key leverages: **Profit Leverage** and **Liquidity Leverage**. **Profit Leverage:** Traditional RWA models simply tie tokens to real-world asset yields. STONKBROKER's model is more engaging by allowing NFT holders to earn not only the underlying real-world cash flows but also additional yields generated from the on-chain system's own operations and transaction activity (like fees and slippage). This creates a dual income stream. **Liquidity Leverage:** Standard RWA asset bundles often suffer from poor liquidity. STONKBROKER's mechanism, which allows fixed-ratio swapping between NFTs and a platform's fungible token (and vice versa), solves this. It provides real-time market pricing and flexible exit options for each "RWA asset" NFT by unifying NFT liquidity with ERC-20 token liquidity via an AMM pool. This enhances capital efficiency and attracts more trading activity. The article further speculates on applying this model to broader RWAs (e.g., real estate, bonds). The core idea is to create a more dynamic, liquid, and profitable ecosystem where ordinary users can participate, combining real-world yields with the speculative and transactional energy of a crypto-native system. The author mentions being inspired by the launch of a project called @TheCardWall, which tokenizes high-grade physical trading cards.

marsbit3m ago

Yield Leverage and Liquidity Leverage: The STONKBROKER Mechanism is Very Suitable for the RWA Scenario

marsbit3m ago

Deciphering TapeOut: A Child Built a CPU On-Chain

**Title: Understanding TapeOut: A Kid Built a CPU On-Chain** **Summary:** The article explores a remarkable experiment where a young developer named Blonskr has used blockchain technology to build a functional, on-chain CPU. Named "Behemoth," this CPU is based on the 1971 Intel 4004 processor specification. It runs on the BNB Chain, uses block production as its clock (running at a glacial 2.22 Hz), and is perhaps the slowest CPU in existence, yet it represents a novel and intriguing concept in the on-chain space. The core concept is the TapeOut protocol, named after the final "tape out" stage in semiconductor manufacturing. It treats the blockchain as a silicon wafer, with tokens representing fundamental logic components. The protocol's atomic unit is an ERC-1155 token representing a single NAND gate, the fundamental building block of digital logic. Users can visually design circuits on a "canvas," connecting these logic tokens. Once a design is finalized, the underlying tokens are burned, and an ERC-721 NFT representing the permanent, immutable circuit is minted. Blonskr used 2,300 such tokenized NAND gates to construct the Behemoth CPU. Key features of this and any TapeOut circuit include **permanent operation** (running as long as the chain exists), **free, permissionless evaluation** (anyone can query it without gas), and **safe composability** (circuits cannot call external contracts or modify state, making them inherently safe to use). This enables a new form of open, collaborative hardware design, where anyone can build upon and integrate components created by others. While highly niche, TapeOut reimagines the foundations of computation using blockchain's properties of permanence and openness. It pushes the boundaries of what can be built on-chain, potentially enabling future applications like custom mining circuits or decentralized, specialized processors. The experiment demonstrates an exciting combination of extreme technical vision and creative curiosity.

marsbit37m ago

Deciphering TapeOut: A Child Built a CPU On-Chain

marsbit37m ago

Novig Sues Wisconsin as Sports Prediction Market Dispute Heats Up

Novig, a sports event prediction market operator, has filed a lawsuit against Wisconsin's attorney general. The legal dispute centers on whether prediction markets fall under federal derivatives regulations or state gambling laws. The lawsuit, filed in a U.S. district court, seeks a declaratory judgment after Novig began offering event contracts to Wisconsin residents. This case is part of a broader conflict. In April, Wisconsin sued other prediction market platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket, alleging their sports-related contracts violate state gambling laws. Novig argues its contracts are "swaps" regulated exclusively by the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), under the Commodity Exchange Act. Wisconsin contends they are sports betting. Federal courts have issued conflicting rulings on similar cases, creating legal uncertainty. The outcome is significant as prediction markets are a fast-growing sector, with trading volume reaching $9.5 billion on a single day in August. These markets are also increasingly intertwined with cryptocurrency infrastructure. Simultaneously, Novig is pursuing a nationwide legal strategy, having filed similar lawsuits in four other states. The company also recently secured a marketing partnership with the New York Mets, marking the first such deal with an MLB team. The Wisconsin case's resolution will influence whether prediction markets can operate as national financial products or remain constrained by individual state laws.

cryptonews.ru43m ago

Novig Sues Wisconsin as Sports Prediction Market Dispute Heats Up

cryptonews.ru43m ago

Держатели XRP могут торговать опционами на платформе Derive, используя FXRP в качестве залога

XRP holders can now trade options on the Derive platform using FXRP as collateral, as announced by Flare on August 12. This integration allows users to open positions from self-custody wallets while the underlying XRP backing the FXRP remains on the XRP Ledger. According to DeFi analyst Will Procheska, this provides XRP's dedicated holder base with a permissionless options market for generating yield or hedging. Derive's platform combines protocol-level settlements with an order book managed by Derive Trading Co., enabling users to retain asset control while professional market-makers provide liquidity. XRP options on Derive are cash-settled in USDC, so profits or obligations adjust the trader's USDC balance without transferring XRP or FXRP. The platform's portfolio margin system assesses overall account risk but may still trigger liquidations if margin levels fall below requirements. The launch expands Flare's XRPFi ecosystem. FXRP, introduced via the FAssets system in September 2025, creates an on-chain representation of XRP for use in smart contracts. It has since been integrated into spot trading and, more recently, permissionless lending markets on Morpho. This addition of options on Derive offers XRP holders hedging and premium-earning capabilities comparable to other major assets. While regulated XRP options debuted on CME Group in October 2025, Derive provides a decentralized alternative with USDC settlement and direct wallet access. The platform also supports perpetual futures, offering further trading strategies. Flare and Derive are exploring automated "strategy vaults" to simplify yield-generating options approaches for users.

cryptonews.ru44m ago

Держатели XRP могут торговать опционами на платформе Derive, используя FXRP в качестве залога

cryptonews.ru44m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片