Dalio Warns: AI Boom Shows Signs of a Bubble, Day of Reckoning Will Be the Time of Burst

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-05Last updated on 2026-06-05

Abstract

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns that the current artificial intelligence investment boom shows classic signs of a bubble, which he expects will eventually burst. In a Bloomberg Television interview, he noted that great technological revolutions often lead to capital inflows that create bubbles, making it difficult for investors and companies to calibrate their spending accurately—either overspending to capture market share or underspending and losing their competitive position. This caution comes amid significant rallies in AI-related assets, particularly chipmakers, driven by soaring demand for data centers and high-bandwidth chips, raising debates about overheating valuations. In contrast, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently asserted that investors embracing the AI wave would see "crazy" returns and dismissed concerns over return on investment for data center spending as outdated. Dalio, however, focuses on the risks in the profit realization phase. He argues that bubbles tend to show signs of破裂 when markets transition from investment to the need for tangible returns, describing the burst as a process of converting paper wealth into cash. While acknowledging AI's intrinsic value, he expressed concern over the future profitability of some AI companies, suggesting the market is repeating a familiar pattern. The 76-year-old billionaire, who fully exited Bridgewater in 2025, has a net worth estimated at $21.5 billion according to the Bloomberg Billionaires I...

Source: Jinshi Data

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, has issued a warning about market risks surrounding the capital frenzy driven by artificial intelligence, believing the current situation already shows typical bubble characteristics and anticipates that this phase will ultimately end.

In an interview with Bloomberg Television on Wednesday, Dalio pointed out that waves of technological change are often accompanied by excessive capital inflows. "All great technological revolutions create bubbles," he said, while emphasizing that it is difficult for investors to precisely gauge the scale of investment; companies either invest heavily regardless of cost to capture the market or lose their competitive position due to insufficient investment.

This judgment comes against the backdrop of a significant surge in AI-related assets. Driven by demand for data center construction, especially for high-bandwidth chips, chip companies have become a core target for Wall Street capital, propelling the overall market to new highs repeatedly. Alongside this rally, there has been intense internal market debate over whether valuations have become overheated.

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang recently expressed a different stance publicly. In his remarks this week, he stated that investors willing to bet on the AI wave will receive "crazy" returns.

In a speech the previous day, he also responded to concerns about valuations. Addressing voices worried that massive investments in data centers might fail to yield returns, he mentioned: "Remember last year when we gathered, the talk and narrative around this investment were all asking: What's the return on investment (ROI)?" He then countered: "Now give me an example, find me a crazy person who's still saying that. They would sound crazy."

In contrast, Dalio is more focused on the risks at the stage when profits need to be realized. He believes that once the market enters the stage where investments must translate into actual earnings, bubbles often show signs of bursting. "The process of popping the bubble is essentially the process of converting paper wealth into cash," he said, expressing concerns about the future profitability of some AI companies. Although he acknowledges that AI itself holds significant value, he also bluntly stated that the current market trend "is going down that same path."

Dalio, 76, is the founder of Bridgewater Associates, one of the world's largest hedge funds. He completed his full exit from the company in 2025, including selling all remaining shares and resigning from the board. According to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, his personal net worth is approximately $21.5 billion.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat warning about the AI investment boom does Ray Dalio issue in the article?

ARay Dalio warns that the current AI-driven capital boom is showing typical bubble characteristics, and he expects this phase will eventually come to an end.

QAccording to Dalio, what is a common outcome of great technological transformations in terms of investment?

AAccording to Dalio, all great technological transformations tend to create investment bubbles due to excessive capital pouring in.

QWhat does Nvidia's CEO Jensen Huang predict for investors who commit to the AI wave?

ANvidia's CEO Jensen Huang predicts that investors who commit to the AI wave will receive 'crazy' returns.

QWhat specific stage does Dalio identify as the point where an investment bubble often shows signs of bursting?

ADalio identifies the stage when the market needs to translate investments into actual profits as the point where a bubble often shows signs of bursting.

QWhat action did Ray Dalio take regarding Bridgewater Associates in 2025?

AIn 2025, Ray Dalio fully exited Bridgewater Associates by selling all his remaining shares and resigning from the board of directors.

Related Reads

Take a Calm Look at Domestic Lithography Machines: 5 Units Delivered, How Far Are We from Challenging ASML?

This article analyzes recent news about China's domestic DUV lithography machines, advising a measured perspective. A state-backed enterprise plans to deliver about 5 immersion DUV systems this year, with a 2027 target of 20 units, aimed at 28nm processes. While this marks a step from R&D into initial customer validation, the author cautions against over-optimism. The piece clarifies this is DUV, not EUV technology. DUV is crucial but cannot economically solve challenges for advanced nodes like 5nm or below, where EUV is key. The 5-unit volume is minimal compared to ASML's annual output of over 130 such machines. The author highlights unverified claims regarding specs like 90% yield and warns against conflating this news with unconfirmed reports about Shanghai Micro Electronics' production. China's EUV efforts, while progressing with a prototype, remain in early testing, facing significant hurdles in core components like high-precision optics. The analogy of a "DeepSeek moment" is deemed misleading, as lithography involves slow, iterative precision engineering, not rapid software-like breakthroughs. Current progress represents establishing a potential second supply source and gaining vital engineering experience rather than an imminent industry disruption. For investors, the key indicators to watch are formal customer acceptance, stable operational performance, repeat orders, and growth in production volume and component localization. The conclusion is that this is a positive but early-stage development, far from altering the global competitive landscape.

marsbit45m ago

Take a Calm Look at Domestic Lithography Machines: 5 Units Delivered, How Far Are We from Challenging ASML?

marsbit45m ago

The 800x Golden Dog, "Gacha" Saves NFT Trading

Title: 800x Golden Dog: How 'Gacha' Mechanics Are Rescuing NFT Trading In the past month, the on-chain TCG (Trading Card Game) narrative, centered around "gacha" or loot box mechanics, has emerged as a major crypto-native revenue generator, second only to platforms like Hyperliquid and pump.fun. Recently, this trend hit Ethereum with Fake World Assets (FWA). Within just over a week, FWA generated approximately $1.3 million in revenue, ranking 15th in the past week's crypto app earnings. Its token, $FWA, surged from an initial market cap of ~$47,550 to a peak of ~$38.8 million—an 800x gain. Meanwhile, Collector Cards' token $CARDS declined significantly from its previous highs. FWA, developed by the team behind "PunkStrategy," operates as an NFT gacha system with a built-in token flywheel. Users deposit NFTs paired with ETH as liquidity into pools. Each deposit creates a personal pool; more ETH deposited lowers the chance of the NFT being "won" in a draw. Players spend ETH to "draw" (gacha). If they get an undesirable NFT, they can instantly sell it back to the original depositor at an 85% discount, generating income for the depositor. A 1% fee is taken on each draw and on depositor earnings when an NFT is kept. The key to FWA's momentum is its token $FWA. It cannot be bought directly externally. The primary way to acquire it is by playing the gacha and choosing to receive $FWA (instead of ETH) when selling back an unwanted NFT. This mechanism creates constant buy pressure for $FWA as players engage, especially during its price ascent. Early participants who held $FWA benefited massively from subsequent inflows. This contrasts with projects like Collector Cards, which, despite strong revenues, suffer from perceived low token utility beyond buybacks. In conclusion, while FWA's flywheel design—linking speculative token gains directly to NFT trading activity—has driven rapid growth, its sustainability is questionable. The model relies heavily on continuous $FWA price appreciation to offset the inherent negative expectancy of each draw. When price momentum stalls, activity will likely decline. The case highlights that in crypto markets, pure profitability narratives can be fleeting; understanding the relationship between attention, token buy pressure, and sustainable mechanics is crucial to avoid speculative pitfalls.

marsbit1h ago

The 800x Golden Dog, "Gacha" Saves NFT Trading

marsbit1h ago

The Quantum Computing Threat Approaches, Cryptocurrency May Be Exposed to Risks Before Banks

Quantum computing poses a significant threat to all cryptographic systems, including banks and governments, but decentralized cryptocurrencies with public ledgers like Bitcoin are likely the first practical target. Experts warn that a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC), capable of running Shor's algorithm to break the elliptic curve cryptography securing most crypto wallets, could emerge around 2029. Recent research shows the required quantum resources for such attacks are shrinking dramatically, potentially enabling key extraction in minutes. The core vulnerability for cryptocurrencies is not the cryptography itself—post-quantum standards are being developed—but the slow, decentralized governance required to implement upgrades. Unlike centralized banks that can swiftly transition, Bitcoin needs near-unanimous consensus among its global network, a historically difficult process as seen in past upgrades. Estimates suggest migrating all vulnerable Bitcoin funds could take at least 76 days of dedicated network time, and it must be completed before a CRQC exists to prevent "now-or-never" attacks on exposed keys. The threat is not binary; it begins when a quantum computer can decrypt data before it loses value, not necessarily in real-time. A significant portion of Bitcoin (estimated at millions of coins) already has public keys permanently exposed on-chain, making them vulnerable to eventual "static attacks." While technical solutions exist, the race is against time for decentralized networks to coordinate a defensive transition, serving as an early warning for the broader financial system.

marsbit1h ago

The Quantum Computing Threat Approaches, Cryptocurrency May Be Exposed to Risks Before Banks

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片