Mining Companies' High-Stakes Bet on AI: Valuations Enter a Phase of Divergence, Uphill Battle Ahead

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-20Last updated on 2026-06-20

Abstract

Crypto miners are facing increasing pressure amid weak digital asset markets, pushing many to pivot towards AI infrastructure as a new growth avenue. Leveraging existing assets like power resources, land, and cooling systems, miners can convert facilities for AI compute at lower costs. This transition narrative has fueled significant stock rallies, with some miners' shares outperforming Bitcoin year-to-date. Market valuations have diverged, with pioneers like CoreWeave reaching a multi-billion dollar valuation, while others lag. The shift is driven by AI's explosive demand for data centers and compute, with clients willing to pay premiums for power and space. However, the transformation is capital-intensive, requiring massive funding for GPU procurement and facility upgrades, with an estimated short-term funding gap of $50 billion. Miners are raising capital through convertible bonds, Bitcoin sales, and securing long-term AI contracts to finance the build-out. While AI offers greater long-term potential than mining, success hinges on execution, timely project delivery, and securing quality tenants, moving the valuation focus from power capacity to cash flow and return metrics.

Author: Nancy, PANews

As crypto assets continue to experience weakness and decline, crypto mining companies are facing increasingly severe survival pressures. In search of new growth avenues, more and more mining companies are accelerating their shift into the AI arena. This transformation narrative has quickly gained favor in the capital markets, leading to significant stock price increases for many mining firms, with some even reaching new all-time highs.

However, while the AI business injects new growth potential into mining companies, the massive capital expenditures, ongoing funding requirements, and lengthy return cycles behind it are pushing these firms into another battle of capital consumption. At a time when the profitability of mining operations remains under pressure, this high-stakes gamble of transitioning to AI is testing the financial strength and execution capabilities of mining enterprises.

Stock Prices Outperform Bitcoin Significantly, Mining Companies' Valuations Enter a Divergence Phase

Mining companies are transforming into landlords of computing power in the AI era.

With the profit margins for Bitcoin mining continuously narrowing and some mining companies even falling into losses, the AI boom has fueled a sharp surge in global demand for data centers, power resources, and GPU computing power. An increasing number of mining companies are accelerating their pivot towards AI infrastructure, seeking new growth curves.

For mining companies, this transition offers inherent advantages. Over the years, to meet the demands of large-scale mining, they have amassed critical assets such as abundant power resources, land reserves, substation access capabilities, and mature cooling and heat dissipation systems. Compared to data center operators starting from scratch, mining companies only need to upgrade and retrofit their existing facilities to quickly enter the AI infrastructure market, catering to AI computing power demands at a lower cost and with a shorter cycle.

Since last year, the pace of mining companies transitioning to AI has noticeably accelerated. Some miners have decisively scaled back or even exited traditional mining operations, fully shifting to AI computing and data center operations; others have retained part of their mining business but are gradually reallocating resources and capital expenditure focus towards the AI sector. Today, several mining companies have grown into significant players in AI infrastructure construction.

Looking at the timing of transition, CoreWeave, Applied Digital, and Bitdeer began laying out AI computing and data center businesses as early as 2022-2023, among the earlier movers in the industry; while mining firms like Iris Energy, Terawulf, Hut 8, Riot Platforms, and Bitfarms began to fully ramp up AI infrastructure construction in 2025, coinciding with the AI industry's rapid expansion cycle.

In terms of stock performance, the market has shown considerable recognition for the AI transition narrative of mining companies. The 11 mining companies have seen an average year-to-date gain of 75.97%, significantly outperforming Bitcoin over the same period, with most hitting new highs after their transition. Among them, Bitfarms (129.62%), Hut 8 (131.87%), Terawulf (118.68%), and Riot Platforms (93.71%) have been particularly standout performers, benefiting from this wave of AI infrastructure revaluation.

In terms of market capitalization, mining companies have shown clear divergence. As a representative of successful transition, CoreWeave's market cap has reached $62.855 billion, far exceeding other miners and setting a new valuation benchmark for the industry; Iris Energy, Terawulf, Hut 8, Applied Digital, and Riot Platforms form a tier with market caps between $10 billion and $20 billion; companies like MARA Holdings, Core Scientific, Bitdeer, CleanSpark, and Bitfarms remain in the sub-$5 billion range. This divergence stems not only from first-mover advantages but also reflects the market's differentiated pricing based on each mining company's AI strategy execution capabilities, client resources, and data center deployment progress.

However, from a fundamental perspective, most mining companies are still in the heavy investment phase of their AI transition. Although the latest quarterly earnings reports of many miners show revenue growth, overall profitability remains under pressure. On one hand, volatility in the value of crypto asset portfolios weighs on profit performance; on the other hand, the construction of AI data centers requires massive capital expenditures, with costs for power expansion, infrastructure development, and procurement of equipment like GPUs continuously increasing, driving up operating costs and leaving most mining companies yet to escape a loss-making state.

It is noteworthy that despite generally pressured earnings performance, the stock prices of related mining companies have still risen significantly, indicating that the current market focus is not on short-term profitability but rather on the growth potential of mining companies as operators of next-generation computing power infrastructure.

Mining Companies' Survival Battle Escalates, AI Transition Requires Overcoming Multiple Hurdles

The downturn in the Bitcoin market is making the survival environment for mining companies increasingly severe.

Data from Capriole Investments shows that as of June 18, the average production cost for Bitcoin is approximately $63,707, with power costs around $50,965, resulting in a miner profit margin of only 17.45%. Over the past 30 days, miner profit margins have contracted by 47.8%. Meanwhile, data from the Luxor Hashrate Index also shows that as of June 18, the daily revenue per 1 TH/s of hashrate has dropped to $0.032, a significant decline from $0.053 during the same period last year.

As mining revenues continue to shrink, many mining companies have had to sell Bitcoin to maintain cash flow, further increasing survival pressure on small and medium-sized miners, and mining resources are accelerating their concentration towards top players. Currently, the three major mining pools—Foundry USA, AntPool, and F2Pool—collectively account for 59% of the global network's hashrate share. In comparison, in 2022, the top three Bitcoin mining pools collectively accounted for only 44% of the hashrate share.

Although traditional mining operations are struggling, the explosive growth in demand for AI data centers is also driving a market re-evaluation of mining companies' value. VanEck points out in its latest research report that the most valuable assets of mining companies are not their mining rigs, but rather their power resources, substation access capabilities, land reserves, and data center infrastructure—precisely the scarce core resources most needed by the current AI industry. Because AI clients are willing to pay electricity and rental rates far higher than those of traditional mining operations, AI infrastructure is expected to become the primary growth engine for mining companies over the next decade.

According to a report from research firm Bernstein, hyperscale cloud providers, AI cloud service providers, and chip companies have announced over $90 billion in AI infrastructure partnerships, involving approximately 3.7 GW of power capacity. Currently, the pursuit of power resources has become the core of AI infrastructure competition, with Bitcoin mining companies collectively controlling over 27 GW of planned power capacity. In some parts of the United States, the cycle for securing new 1 GW power connections can be as long as 50 months, making existing mining sites important landing spots for AI data center expansion.

However, the transition to AI is far from an easy path. VanEck states that the market is still in the early stages of the AI transition, with enterprise valuations primarily measured based on Gross Energized Power. Mining companies that have signed AI leases generally receive higher valuation premiums, while projects still in the planning stage struggle to gain market recognition. Future industry valuation logic will gradually shift from "power capacity" to "project delivery capability," eventually returning to core metrics such as cash flow, return on capital, and tenant quality. Currently, the industry has only delivered about 25% of its signed capacity. The ability to complete AI data center construction on time and within budget will become a key factor determining enterprise valuation.

VanEck also emphasizes that AI tenant quality will directly impact the valuation levels of mining companies. Clients like Microsoft, Amazon, and Google—hyperscale cloud providers—can bring more stable cash flows and lower financing costs, while smaller GPU cloud service providers correspond to higher operational risks and capital costs.

Meanwhile, the enormous funding required for the transition is testing the financial strength of mining companies. VanEck estimates that mining companies transitioning to AI infrastructure still face massive capital expenditure needs, with a short-term funding gap of approximately $50 billion and long-term capital requirements potentially reaching $221 billion.

Under immense financial pressure, many mining companies have begun raising funds through various methods. For instance, miners like Iris Energy, TeraWulf, Bitfarms, and CleanSpark have raised capital through issuing convertible bonds, attracting investors with low coupon rates and future conversion potential; while companies like Core Scientific, Terawulf, MARA, Bitdeer, and Riot Platforms have chosen to sell off or even liquidate part of their Bitcoin reserves to continually fuel their AI transitions.

Additionally, many mining companies are beginning to secure future revenue by signing long-term AI or high-performance computing (HPC) contracts, thereby obtaining project financing support and reducing overall operational risks. For example, CoreWeave reached a $6 billion AI cloud services cooperation agreement with Jane Street; IREN secured a $9.7 billion AI cloud computing contract with Microsoft; Hut 8 signed data center leasing agreements totaling $9.8 billion; and Bitdeer is collaborating with Norway's DCI to build the country's largest AI data center project.

For mining companies, AI currently offers a development path with far greater imagination space than traditional mining operations. However, this transition is not a simple switch from mining to selling computing power; it is essentially a long-term competition centered on capital, resources, and execution capabilities.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat are the main challenges cryptocurrency mining companies face when transitioning to the AI infrastructure sector?

AThe main challenges include significant capital expenditures, continuous financial investment, prolonged return periods, intense competition for capital, resources, and execution capabilities, and the need to transition from a valuation based on 'power capacity' to 'project delivery capability' and ultimately to core financial metrics such as cash flow and capital returns.

QWhy are cryptocurrency mining companies considered to have natural advantages in transitioning to AI infrastructure?

AMining companies possess key assets like extensive power resources, land reserves, substation access capabilities, and mature cooling systems built for large-scale mining operations. This allows them to upgrade existing facilities to enter the AI infrastructure market more quickly and at a lower cost compared to starting from scratch.

QHow has the stock market performance of mining companies transitioning to AI compared to Bitcoin's performance?

AThe stock prices of mining companies transitioning to AI have significantly outperformed Bitcoin. The average year-to-date increase for 11 such companies was 75.97%, far exceeding Bitcoin's performance during the same period. Many saw their stock prices reach new highs following their AI transition announcements.

QAccording to the article, what is the new basis for valuing mining companies that are pivoting to AI, and how might this evolve?

ACurrently, valuation is primarily based on 'Gross Energized Power.' However, it is expected to shift towards 'project delivery capability' and eventually return to core financial indicators like cash flow, return on capital, and the quality of AI tenants or clients secured by the company.

QWhat methods are mining companies using to finance their expensive transition into AI infrastructure?

AMining companies are raising funds through various methods, including issuing convertible bonds (e.g., Iris Energy, TeraWulf), selling or liquidating part of their Bitcoin reserves (e.g., Core Scientific, Riot Platforms), and securing large, long-term contracts with AI or HPC clients (e.g., CoreWeave, Hut 8) to lock in future revenue and facilitate project financing.

Related Reads

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit52m ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit52m ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手2h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手2h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit3h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit3h ago

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Down, Users & Transactions Hit New Highs Token Terminal's Q1 2026 report on Ethereum presents a pivotal development: the network achieved record highs in monthly active users (13.2M, +85.9% YoY), total transactions (200.4M, +81.5% YoY), and throughput (25.78 TPS), while transaction fees on the mainnet plummeted by 47.9% quarter-over-quarter. This shift is attributed to the network's strategic move into a "low fees for scale" phase, exemplified by the Fusaka upgrade which increased data capacity and lowered block space costs, releasing pent-up demand (a manifestation of Jevons's Paradox). The report highlights a core narrative shift for Ethereum: from a DeFi-centric blockchain to a global financial settlement layer. It maintains a dominant position in tokenized assets, holding majority market shares among top chains in stablecoins (61.8%), tokenized funds (73.0%), and tokenized commodities (84.0%). Growth in tokenized funds (+73.1% YoY) and commodities (+325.9% YoY) was particularly strong, driven by institutions like BlackRock and JPMorgan entering the space. Contrasting these usage gains, several USD-denominated value metrics declined in Q1: fully diluted market cap fell 30.3% QoQ, total value locked (TVL) dropped 11.0%, and ecosystem transaction volume decreased 24.0%. The report interprets this as Ethereum prioritizing long-term network expansion and cementing its role as the default settlement layer for finance over short-term fee capture. The commentary from Etherealize argues that, much like the early internet, Ethereum's open, permissionless model is poised to win over closed alternatives as institutional tokenization accelerates.

marsbit4h ago

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片