谷歌巨变:AI 支付,稳定币先行

深潮Published on 2025-09-16Last updated on 2025-09-17

AI 与加密金融的融合正在提速。

撰文:ChandlerZ,Foresight News

当人工智能成为我们生活和工作不可或缺的一部分,它将如何进行价值交换?谷歌给出了答案:通过稳定币。

9 月 16 日,谷歌宣布推出一项全新的开源支付协议,旨在为不同人工智能应用之间的价值传递建立统一标准。该协议不仅支持传统支付方式如信用卡和借记卡,还首次将稳定币纳入体系之中。

与 Coinbase、以太坊基金会等加密公司合作,谷歌在此次协议中强化了对稳定币的支持,试图解决 AI 代理(AI Agents)在未来广泛应用中可能遇到的跨境支付、价值传输和结算效率等难题。谷歌云 Web3 负责人 James Tromans 在接受《财富》采访时表示:「我们从零开始构建这个系统时,就同时考虑了传统和现有的支付通道能力,以及像稳定币这样的未来支付能力。」

这一动作意味着,谷歌不再只是通过广告政策或云节点托管等间接方式与加密行业保持距离,而是首次直接将稳定币纳入产品架构,探索其在 AI 生态下的真实应用场景。

谷歌推出 AI 支付协议,稳定币成核心元素

根据官方披露,此次支付协议的制定有超过 60 家机构参与,覆盖科技、金融、电商以及加密原生组织。与 Coinbase 的合作被视为关键环节:作为合规程度最高的美国加密交易所之一,Coinbase 在稳定币领域深耕多年,其与 Circle 推动的 USDC 已成为主流稳定币代表。

协议设计的逻辑在于同时兼容传统支付网络和下一代支付能力。换句话说,未来 AI 代理既可以通过信用卡完成交易,也能直接调用稳定币实现即时结算。这种双轨并行的模式,为谷歌打造一个可持续的 AI-to-AI 支付体系提供了基础。

稳定币的引入将尤其受到关注。相比比特币等波动性强的加密资产,稳定币与美元等法币挂钩,能够在自动化支付场景下提供稳定的价值锚,减少交易风险。在 AI 代理频繁触发的跨境支付或微服务调用中,稳定币的低成本、快速结算优势尤为突出。

然而,将稳定币作为核心支付工具也面临着不小的挑战。首先是监管碎片化。尽管一些主要经济体(如美国)对稳定币的监管框架日渐明朗,但全球范围内的法律和合规要求仍高度复杂且不统一。不同国家对稳定币的发行、流通、清算都有不同规定,这无疑会给 AI 代理进行全球化、自动化支付带来合规障碍。

此外,技术安全与风险控制亦是重中之重。AI 代理的自主支付能力要求极高的链上安全性和智能合约审计,任何漏洞都可能导致不可逆转的资金损失。如何构建一个既能保障支付效率又能有效防范洗钱、欺诈等风险的系统,也将是谷歌及其合作伙伴需要长期攻克的难题。

与此同时,用户对这种新型支付方式的接受度与教育成本,以及如何在 AI 代理拥有直接支付能力时进行权限管理与风险审计,也是不容忽视的挑战。

合纵连横,标准化与多方协作的必然选择

这一支付协议是谷歌在 AI Agent 生态布局的延伸。

今年 4 月,谷歌曾推出统一通信协议,让不同公司的 AI Agent 能够「对话」。如今,支付功能的加入则意味着 AI 交互从信息交换走向价值交换。

为确保协议的互操作性和合规性,谷歌不仅联合 Coinbase,还与包括 Salesforce、American Express 在内的机构合作。以太坊基金会等加密原生组织的参与,则保证了稳定币和链上支付部分的安全性与技术可扩展性。

此外,Sui 与 EigenCloud 也成为该协议的首批合作伙伴。前者由 Mysten Labs 开发,提供亚秒级的可编程支付能力,并通过 Walrus 去中心化存储、Move 智能合约和 zkLogin 隐私身份,构建起一个高效且注重隐私保护的基础设施,使得 AI 代理能够以接近实时的速度完成价值交换,并确保交互的安全与合规。而 EigenCloud 则将重点放在「可验证性」上,其理念在于让 AI 代理的所有行为不仅能被记录,还能被证明和追责。

这种跨界协作反映了一个现实:AI 与支付的未来并不能由单一公司主导,必须通过标准化协议实现不同主体的互联互通。谷歌方面也在强调,该协议的目标并非替代现有支付网络,而是通过兼容和扩展,让 AI Agent 在未来能够灵活调用不同支付手段。

行业前景与小结

从更宏观的角度来看,谷歌与 Coinbase 的合作释放出一个信号:AI 与加密金融的融合正在提速。

随着 AI Agent 在购物、理财、内容生产等领域的应用逐渐增多,其支付需求也从单次交易转向持续、自动化、跨地域的小额支付。

在这一背景下,稳定币的价值凸显出来。其全球通用性、实时性、可编程性和成本优势,使其成为 AI-to-AI 交易的天然工具。无论是跨境支付还是自动执行的智能合约场景,稳定币都能提供比传统支付体系更高效的解决方案。

这也是为什么 Shopify、Meta、Apple 等大型科技公司近年来纷纷探索稳定币的应用。随着美国等市场在监管上逐步放松,稳定币正在从加密市场的利基工具,演变为全球支付与 AI 经济中的重要桥梁。

总体而言,谷歌此次发布的支付协议不仅是一次产品更新,更像是全球支付体系演进的前奏。它表明:如果 AI-to-AI 交易场景快速普及,稳定币可能成为支撑其运行的核心货币形态。对于加密行业而言,这既是新的落地机会,也意味着未来十年可能迎来一次支付逻辑的重构。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

South Korean Retail Investors 'Move from Seoul to Wall Street': Buying SK Hynix ADR, Betting on Triple-Leverage ETF

A surge of Korean retail investors is shifting funds from the volatile Seoul market to Wall Street, intensifying their bets on the AI theme through unconventional and high-risk instruments. Data shows Korean investors were net buyers of about $4.5 billion in US stocks in July, nearing a yearly peak. A notable trend is their purchase of approximately $840 million worth of SK Hynix American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), despite a significant 10% premium over the company's domestic shares, leading analysts to label the move as speculative and irrational. Simultaneously, Korean traders are heavily favoring leveraged ETFs. The triple-leveraged semiconductor ETF SOXL was the most-bought US product in July, with leveraged products occupying four of the top ten spots. Experts note that this shift in geography does not represent a diversification of risk; instead, investors are merely expressing the same concentrated bet on AI hardware through different, often riskier, US-listed vehicles. Analysts warn that while this capital inflow is unlikely to systemically impact the vast US institutional market, it risks creating localized distortions and amplifying volatility, particularly in the targeted sectors and instruments. The move follows a sharp correction in the Korean market, where high leverage in semiconductor stocks and related ETFs had previously led to significant losses, prompting this search for alternative avenues to chase the AI narrative.

marsbit22m ago

South Korean Retail Investors 'Move from Seoul to Wall Street': Buying SK Hynix ADR, Betting on Triple-Leverage ETF

marsbit22m ago

Bithumb's First Half Report: Net Loss Exceeds $76 Million, Where Did the Profits Go?

**Title: Bithumb H1 2026 Report: Net Loss Exceeds $76M – Where Did the Profits Go?** Despite a headline net loss of approximately 108.7 billion KRW (~$76.44 million) for the first half of 2026, a detailed breakdown reveals Bithumb's core exchange business remained profitable. The significant loss was primarily driven by two major non-operating items: substantial losses on the disposal and valuation of the company's own cryptocurrency holdings (net loss ~$48.21 million) and a sharp increase in litigation provisions (~$25.93 million), largely linked to a regulatory fine. Operating revenue fell 48.7% year-on-year to ~$119 million, almost entirely from transaction fees, as market activity cooled. While the company drastically cut marketing and subsidy expenses by ~70% to protect margins, more rigid costs like payment processing and salaries declined only modestly. This highlights the vulnerability of its highly fee-dependent revenue model in a down market. Total assets decreased by ~$584 million, but this was largely attributable to an ~86% drop in client KRW deposits. The market value of client crypto assets under custody also fell (~32.7%), partly influenced by declining cryptocurrency prices rather than solely client withdrawals. In summary, the report indicates underlying exchange profitability was eroded by significant crypto asset losses and mounting regulatory/legal costs, against a backdrop of declining trading revenue. Future focus should be on revenue recovery, managing crypto-related损益, and the ongoing impact of regulatory challenges.

marsbit42m ago

Bithumb's First Half Report: Net Loss Exceeds $76 Million, Where Did the Profits Go?

marsbit42m ago

BitMart's Final 9 Days: A True Exchange Crisis Is Never About Shutting Down

BitMart's Final 9 Days: A True Exchange Crisis Is Not About Shutting Down On August 17, 2026, with just 9 days until BitMart's scheduled cessation of trading, the focus shifted from the platform's orderly closure to serious questions about user withdrawals, platform solvency, employee payments, and reserve transparency. Stakeholders, claiming to represent users and staff, publicly demanded asset/liability disclosures, explanations for withdrawal delays, a user repayment plan, and an independent audit, setting an August 19 deadline. While BitMart CEO Sheldon Lee denied allegations of insolvency or wrongdoing, the controversy highlighted a core vulnerability of centralized exchanges (CEXs). When an exchange announces its shutdown, normal user behavior changes dramatically, triggering a mass withdrawal event—the ultimate stress test for its liquidity and custodial integrity. The key question becomes not whether the platform has assets, but whether it holds sufficient *liquid* assets to cover all user liabilities on demand. The article argues that the trust placed in CEXs is based on the convenience they provide, abstracting users from direct control of their private keys. This trust is rarely questioned during normal operations but becomes critically exposed during a wind-down. The situation underscores the limitations of simple Proof of Reserves, which shows "what we have" but not the crucial "what we owe." True financial credibility requires transparent, auditable data on assets, liabilities, and segregated user funds. BitMart's situation reflects a broader, often overlooked issue in the crypto industry: while there is extensive focus on growth mechanisms for exchanges, there is little discussion or established protocol for a safe and transparent "exit mechanism." The final measure of an exchange's integrity, the article concludes, is not its user count or trading volume during a bull market, but its ability to ensure every last user can successfully withdraw their assets when the doors are closing. The outcome will be determined not by statements, but by whether the final user's funds securely leave the platform.

marsbit1h ago

BitMart's Final 9 Days: A True Exchange Crisis Is Never About Shutting Down

marsbit1h ago

Don't Speculate on 100x Coins, Just Bet on 'Cash Cows': Which Projects Are Worth Dollar-Cost Averaging in the Bear Market?

In a bearish crypto market, finding sustainable investments is more prudent than chasing speculative meme coins. This article analyzes projects generating consistent revenue, highlighting them as potential "cash cows" for long-term dollar-cost averaging (DCA). The top performers are "picks-and-shovels" plays. **Pump.fun**, a Solana-based meme coin launchpad, leads with $415.3M in monthly revenue, profiting from a 1.25% fee on token transactions. Despite market volatility, it has averaged tens of millions in monthly income in 2024. Perpetual DEX **Hyperliquid** stands out as a "bear market star," accumulating ~$352M in revenue over seven months. Its model funnels ~99% of fees into buying back and permanently burning its HYPE token. Established giants are also adapting. **Uniswap**, after enabling its fee switch, now earns protocol revenue (e.g., $5.6M recently), which is used to buy back and burn UNI, giving the token direct value accrual. Similarly, oracle provider **Chainlink** generates stable monthly revenue (~$4.57M recently) from its essential data, cross-chain, and automation services. Its new Payment Abstraction feature automatically converts service fees into LINK, accruing value in its treasury. The core thesis is clear: in a downturn, focus on projects with proven, resilient business models—those acting as essential infrastructure or capturing consistent transaction fees—rather than speculative narratives.

marsbit1h ago

Don't Speculate on 100x Coins, Just Bet on 'Cash Cows': Which Projects Are Worth Dollar-Cost Averaging in the Bear Market?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片