a16z Crypto 加码 Story 生态,1500 万美元领投去中心化数据层 Poseidon 破解 AI 数据瓶颈

深潮Published on 2025-07-22Last updated on 2025-07-23

Poseidon 是一个为 AI 训练流程量身打造的去中心化全栈数据层。

由链上 IP 协议 Story 孵化的去中心化 AI 数据基础设施项目 Poseidon 今日宣布完成 1500 万美元种子轮融资,由 a16z crypto 领投。本轮资金将用于加速构建一个面向机器人、多模态模型和下一代物理 AI 的全栈数据基础设施层,以破解当前 AI 发展中最关键但被忽视的瓶颈:高质量、IP 安全、可追溯的数据获取。

“在模型和算力逐渐商品化的今天,真正的竞争壁垒是数据。”
——Sandeep Chinchali,Story 首席 AI官兼 Poseidon 首席科学家
Poseidon 的使命,是将 Story 构建的可编程 IP 层拓展至现实世界数据和 AI 训练场景中。Story 旨在打造支持创意与 AI 资产可编程所有权、许可与归属的底层协议,而 Poseidon 则进一步将这些能力用于支持 AI 的数据流通与合规使用。

AI 从数字走向物理,数据瓶颈加剧

过去两年,AI 在文本和图像领域取得显著突破。但随着 AI 向机器人、自动驾驶、智能设备等物理世界场景延伸,对真实世界数据的需求陡然上升。

然而,现有数据采集模式面临三大结构性难题:

  1. 长尾数据稀缺:高价值数据(如 POV 视频、3D 模拟、边缘传感器)采集成本高、来源分散

  2. 许可与合规风险:传统数据链条复杂、版权不清晰,企业难以安全调用

  3. 激励机制缺失:数据贡献者缺乏归属保护与收益分配,缺乏参与意愿

正如 Meta CTO Andrew Bosworth 所言:“互联网上再多的内容,也无法模拟人们拿起咖啡杯时的直觉判断。”下一代 AI 模型不仅需要“看懂世界”,更要“理解并行动于世界”。

Poseidon:为 AI 打造的数据操作系统

为解决上述挑战,Poseidon 提供一个覆盖采集、标注、许可、流通、追溯与激励的全流程操作系统,将数据从“资源”转变为真正具备法律效力和经济激励机制的“资产”。

Story 首席执行官兼联合创始人、Poseidon 总裁 S.Y. Lee 表示,“依托 Story 可编程的 IP 层和不可篡改的 IP 注册系统,我们确保每个数据集都经过 IP 许可、可追溯且可执行。结合我们的集成许可模块,团队能够无缝完成数据授权、变现及使用,无需担心法律风险。这不仅仅是基础设施建设,更是赋能真正能部署到现实世界的 AI 系统。”

Poseidon 是一个为 AI 训练流程打造的数据操作系统,从采集到标注、从许可到流通,每一个环节都原生具备 IP 追踪与可编程激励能力。其核心能力包括:

  • 全栈数据 pipeline:支持多源数据(POV 视频、传感器、语音、合成模拟)的标准化采集与清洗

  • 链上 IP 注册与追溯:所有数据以 IP 资产形式登记在 Story Protocol 上,确保出处清晰、授权合法

  • 激励与许可模块:贡献者、标注者、合成模型可通过智能合约获得收益分配,实现数据网络的可持续增长

  • 可组合的数据市场:开发者可按许可证筛选、调用、集成数据,自动触发许可与分润,减少版权风险

Poseidon 为 AI 模型训练提供一个真正合规、可组合、可持续的数据网络,成为 AI 从模型驱动走向数据驱动的重要基建。

打造 AI 时代的数据经济基础

“AI 基础模型已经耗尽了最易获得的训练数据。Poseidon 的去中心化数据层正试图为互联网建立一个新的经济基础,奖励为下一代智能系统提供多样输入的创作者和数据提供者。我们很高兴支持 Poseidon 去解决 AI 发展中最关键的瓶颈之一。”

——Chris Dixon,a16z crypto 创始人兼管理合伙人

Poseidon 已与多家头部 AI 公司达成合作,并将本轮融资用于扩展技术栈,包括 SDK 工具包、数据贡献者工作台、许可与分润管理模块。早期接入通道将于今夏开放,面向 AI 开发者与数据贡献者启动注册。

关于 Poseidon

Poseidon 是一个为 AI 训练流程量身打造的去中心化全栈数据层。由 Story Protocol 团队孵化,旨在连接高质量数据供给与 AI 模型需求。平台支持从数据贡献、授权许可到验证与集成的全链路流程,确保数据具备安全性、合规性与经济激励机制。

访问官网了解更多:www.poseidonai.io

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Goldman Sachs' Summary After Silicon Valley Investigation: Agents Enter the Execution Era, AI Competition Shifts to Workflows, World Models Rise

Based on a recent field research in Silicon Valley, Goldman Sachs highlights a key shift in the AI industry: moving from systems that "answer questions" to autonomous AI agents that "execute tasks." Commercial models are transitioning from per-seat subscriptions to usage- and outcome-based pricing. The competition is shifting from raw model capability to mastery over specific business workflows, with value accruing to proprietary data, domain context, and operational expertise. A major hurdle for enterprise Agent deployment is not technical ability but "controllability"—issues of accountability, auditability, and error correction, especially in regulated fields. Workflows with clear rules, verifiable outcomes, and reversible actions (e.g., invoice processing) are being automated first. The model landscape is evolving toward a division of labor. Frontier models (like GPT-4) are expected to handle high-value, high-reliability core tasks, while improving open-source models will likely capture the majority (~90%) of inference tokens for standardized, high-volume tasks due to cost advantages. Finally, attention is moving from Large Language Models (LLMs) to "World Models," which understand physical environments, causality, and dynamic interactions. This shift elevates the importance of proprietary, real-world data (from industrial, scientific, and robotic systems) and could drive a second wave of compute demand. Goldman Sachs projects compute needs could grow ~24x over five years, benefiting cloud and infrastructure providers.

marsbit41m ago

Goldman Sachs' Summary After Silicon Valley Investigation: Agents Enter the Execution Era, AI Competition Shifts to Workflows, World Models Rise

marsbit41m ago

Fidelity Warns: The Boom in AI Agents May Not Be a Feast for Public Blockchains

Fidelity Digital Assets cautions that the anticipated boom in AI agents does not automatically guarantee a corresponding surge in public blockchain adoption or token value. While AI agents that can autonomously perform tasks like payments and data calls could theoretically utilize blockchain for settlement, a significant gap exists between "can use" and "must use." The analysis highlights six key risks. First, many AI agents, especially in corporate settings, may prefer closed, permissioned systems over public blockchains due to needs for speed, cost, compliance, and control. Second, increased on-chain transactions from AI-driven micropayments may not benefit native tokens if fees remain low or if value is captured by stablecoins and payment service providers instead. Third, while AI lowers development costs and increases the number of projects, more code does not equal more economic value and can lead to market oversaturation. Fourth, AI commoditizes coding, making pure technological advantage less of a sustainable moat; competition may shift to brand, liquidity, and user networks. Fifth, AI can also lower the cost of attacks by making vulnerability discovery easier, potentially outpacing security auditing and increasing ecosystem risk. Sixth, institutions may require "controlled blockchain" systems with robust identity, permissioning, and audit trails, conflicting with the permissionless nature of public chains. Ultimately, Fidelity argues against simply equating AI growth with blockchain prosperity. The narrative requires moving from speculation to a concrete analysis of which infrastructures can convert real AI agent needs into sustainable economic value, critically examining each step of the assumed value chain.

marsbit41m ago

Fidelity Warns: The Boom in AI Agents May Not Be a Feast for Public Blockchains

marsbit41m ago

Telegram Introduces WEB-Proxy Technology: Masks Traffic as Regular Website Visits

Telegram has introduced a new experimental WEB-Proxy technology designed to circumvent blocking by disguising messenger traffic as regular, secure website visits. Announced on August 21, 2026, the technology routes MTProxy data through an in-app WebView using HTTPS or WebSocket transport, making the data stream indistinguishable from legitimate web surfing. The core innovation is a multiplexed stream sent through a single WebView session. It uses special frame formats to pack multiple logical Telegram connections into one encrypted channel that externally resembles loading a web page. A server-side relay receives this stream, separates it into individual connections for the standard MTProxy, without decrypting content or knowing final destinations, thus preserving privacy. The WEB-Proxy operates on a standard HTTPS domain that also hosts a public website. The proxy bridge page is only activated by a specific URL parameter derived via HMAC-SHA256 from the proxy configuration; all other requests receive the normal site homepage. This provides reliable cover against automated detection systems. Currently a proof-of-concept, the system includes a desktop implementation, an experimental Android client, and plans for iOS support. The technology represents a shift towards more sophisticated integration with legitimate web infrastructure, complicating filtering systems that must choose between blocking HTTPS traffic entirely or allowing service access. Its long-term value will depend on resilience to adaptive traffic analysis and scalability without performance loss.

cryptonews.ru56m ago

Telegram Introduces WEB-Proxy Technology: Masks Traffic as Regular Website Visits

cryptonews.ru56m ago

MiCA is coming for DeFi vaults, but regulation will be difficult

The European Commission is exploring whether to extend the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation to cover decentralized finance (DeFi) lending and borrowing, including lending vaults. These vaults, which channel billions into on-chain credit markets, present significant regulatory challenges because their decentralized structure doesn't map neatly onto existing financial frameworks. Their legal status is currently based on non-binding interpretations that they fall outside MiCA and EU fund rules. The article uses Morpho's decentralized lending protocol as an example, illustrating how responsibilities are divided among various participants (owner, curator, allocator, sentinel), making it difficult to identify a single "provider" to regulate. Experts warn that broadly categorizing "DeFi lending" could inadvertently capture vastly different structures. They argue that any regulatory approach should focus on the specific structure and control mechanisms of a vault, rather than using decentralization as a simple dividing line, and that DeFi lending may require a dedicated, carefully crafted framework distinct from traditional finance. The Commission's consultation closes on September 30, 2026. The core challenge for regulators is not just whether to regulate DeFi lending, but how to design rules that distinguish between different forms of on-chain lending and the entities that control them.

cointelegraph2h ago

MiCA is coming for DeFi vaults, but regulation will be difficult

cointelegraph2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片