2025 AI 落地实战指南:从战略构建到规模化运营的五大关键洞察

深潮Published on 2025-06-30Last updated on 2025-06-30

提供一份战术路线图,旨在将生成式人工智能的智能优势转化为可持续的商业竞争力。

作者:ICONIQ

编译:Tim,PANews

人工智能发展步入新篇章:从热议话题走向落地实践。打造规模化AI产品正成为竞争的关键战场。2025年度AI现状报告《建设者手册》将视角从技术采用转向落地实践,深度解析从构思、落地到规模化运营AI产品的全套方案。

基于2025年4月对300位软件公司高管的独家调研结果,并结合ICONIQ社区内人工智能领袖的深度访谈,本报告提供了一份战术路线图,旨在将生成式人工智能的智能优势转化为可持续的商业竞争力。

该报告提炼出五大关键章节,以及它们将如何助力团队积极构建AI应用。

1.人工智能产品战略已迈入新的成熟阶段

相较于那些仅在现有产品中集成人工智能的企业,以人工智能为主导的公司正更快地将产品推向市场。数据显示,近半数(47%)人工智能原生企业已达成关键规模并被证实具有市场契合度,而集成人工智能产品的公司中仅有13%达到该阶段。

他们在做什么:智能体工作流与垂直应用成为主流。近八成AI原生开发者正布局智能体工作流(即能代表用户自主执行多步骤操作的AI系统)。

他们是如何做的:各公司正趋同选择多模型架构,以优化性能、控制成本并匹配特定应用场景,在面向客户的产品中,每位受访者平均使用2.8个模型。

2025 AI落地实战指南:从战略构建到规模化运营的五大关键洞察

2.不断演进的AI定价模式反映独特经济特性

人工智能正在改变企业为产品及服务定价的方式。根据我们的调查,许多公司正采用混合定价模式,在基础订阅费之上加上按用量计费的模式。也有公司正探索完全基于实际用量或客户使用效果的定价模式。

目前许多公司仍免费提供AI功能,但有超过三分之一(37%)的企业计划在未来一年调整定价策略,使价格更符合客户获得的价值及其对AI功能的使用量。

2025 AI落地实战指南:从战略构建到规模化运营的五大关键洞察

3.人才战略作为差异化优势

人工智能不仅是一个技术问题,更是一个组织问题。当前大多数顶尖团队都在组建由人工智能工程师、机器学习工程师、数据科学家和AI产品经理组成的跨职能团队。

展望未来,大多数企业预计其工程团队中将有20-30%的人员专注于人工智能,而高增长企业的这一比例预计将高达37%。但调查结果显示,找到合适的人才仍然是一个瓶颈。在所有人工智能特定岗位中,AI、机器学习工程师的招聘耗时最长,平均填补时间超过70天。

在招聘进度方面,人们存在意见分歧。尽管部分招聘者认为进展顺利,但54%的受访者表示进度落后,其中最普遍的原因在于符合条件的人才资源储备不足。

2025 AI落地实战指南:从战略构建到规模化运营的五大关键洞察

4.人工智能预算激增,体现在公司损益表中

采用人工智能技术的企业正将10%-20%的研发预算投入AI领域,且2025年各营收区间的企业都呈现持续增长趋势。这一战略转向愈发凸显出:AI技术已成为产品战略规划的核心驱动力。

随着人工智能产品规模的扩大,成本结构往往会发生显著变化。在产品开发的早期阶段,人力资源成本通常是最大的支出项目,包括人员招聘、培训及技能提升费用。然而当产品走向成熟时,云服务成本、模型推理费用和合规监管成本将占据主要支出比例。

2025 AI落地实战指南:从战略构建到规模化运营的五大关键洞察

5.企业内部人工智能应用规模正在扩大,但分布并不均衡

虽然多数受调查企业为约70%的员工提供了使用内部AI工具的权限,但实际定期使用这些工具的却仅占半数左右。在规模较大、体制较成熟的企业中,推动员工使用人工智能的难度尤为突出。

高采用率企业(即半数以上员工使用AI工具)平均在七个及以上内部应用场景部署人工智能,包括编程助手(使用率为77%)、内容生成(65%)和文档搜索(57%)。这些领域的工作效率提升幅度达15%至30%。

2025 AI落地实战指南:从战略构建到规模化运营的五大关键洞察

AI工具生态虽仍旧分散,但正逐渐走向成熟

我们调查了数百家企业,以了解目前在生产环境中实际运行的技术框架、库和平台。这份报告并非简单排名,而是开发者跨不同领域所采用工具的真实写照。

以下是按字母顺序排列的最常用工具简要概览:

2025 AI落地实战指南:从战略构建到规模化运营的五大关键洞察

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

Standard Chartered Bank has issued an optimistic research report predicting that the AAVE token could surge 50-fold to $3,500 by 2030. This forecast is based on the projection that the total value locked (TVL) in DeFi will grow 37x to approximately $2.7 trillion, driven by stablecoin expansion and the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA). The bank's model links Aave's potential valuation directly to its protocol revenue, which is primarily driven by net interest margins. The report highlights Aave's current dominant position, noting it captures over 80% of the net earnings ("protocol retained earnings") in the lending sector while holding only about half of its TVL. It also points to the recent launch of the Aave V4 architecture and a healthy revenue stream of $142 million in 2025 as positive fundamentals. Grayscale's separate analysis, applying traditional valuation metrics like DCF, concluded AAVE is currently undervalued. However, the article notes significant challenges. Aave's peer-to-pool lending model suffers from inherent capital inefficiency, with an estimated $52 million annual "deadweight loss" due to idle funds needed for liquidity buffers. This structural flaw was exposed during the April KelpDAO exploit, which locked a WETH pool at 100% utilization for days. Emerging protocols like Morpho, with more efficient point-to-point models, are cited as growing competitive threats. In summary, while institutional forecasts paint a macro picture of massive growth fueled by RWA adoption, Aave's path forward hinges on addressing its core structural limitations and competitive pressures within the evolving DeFi lending landscape.

链捕手33m ago

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

链捕手33m ago

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

Tidal Investment remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market narrative has changed. While recent large-scale IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and major fundraising plans by tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have caused some nervousness, this isn't a sign of an AI peak. The focus has moved from the initial question of AI's viability to the sustainability of massive investment cycles. The key players—primarily the major cloud providers—are not slowing down; their capital expenditure (Capex) guidance for 2026 has been increased across the board (e.g., Alphabet to $180B, Amazon to $200B). This investment cycle is proving resilient and difficult to stop. Unlike traditional hardware cycles, current AI Capex is distributed across multiple physical layers—computing, memory, networking, and critically, power infrastructure. Bottlenecks are shifting from chips to elements like electricity, transformers, and cooling systems, which have much longer lead times and cannot be easily pre-built like fiber optics during the dot-com bubble. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's 240% YoY data center orders) confirms this broad-based, project-driven expansion. Market concerns are acknowledged but viewed differently. First, while Capex growth currently outpaces revenue growth, raising ROI questions, this mirrors the early scaling phase of cloud computing itself. A change in view would require concrete signals like downward Capex revisions or missed AI product targets, which haven't materialized by mid-2026. Second, comparisons to the 2000 dot-com bust are flawed. That crash was driven by a massive, parallel oversupply of cheap capacity (fiber). The current cycle faces *supply constraints* in critical, capital-intensive physical infrastructure that cannot be overbuilt as easily. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the next, more complex act of the AI story. Physical bottlenecks and sustained high Capex plans suggest this is not the finale but an ongoing, capital-intensive build-out phase. The script has changed, but the play is far from over.

marsbit1h ago

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

marsbit1h ago

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

Tidal Investments remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market is concerned about massive concurrent fundraising by tech giants like SpaceX, OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta, fearing an AI peak. However, the authors argue this signals the next act of AI development, not its end. Capital expenditure (Capex) from major cloud providers (Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle) continues to surge aggressively into 2026. This investment cycle is more resilient than past hardware cycles due to its scale and complexity. Bottlenecks have shifted from chips to critical physical infrastructure like power grids, transformers, cooling, and data center construction—areas with long lead times and limited capacity for rapid expansion. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's orders) confirms substantial, tangible progress. Key market concerns are addressed: 1. **ROI vs. Capex Growth**: While Capex growth outpaces revenue, the authors note cloud giants have historically overcome similar phases through scale. The cycle will only be in danger if Capex guidance is cut, orders are canceled, or AI product demand falters—none of which are currently observed. 2. **Comparison to the 2000 Dot-com Bubble**: Unlike the telecom bubble, where cheap, oversupplied fiber crashed prices, AI infrastructure (especially power) is constrained, customized, and subject to lengthy approvals, making a similar supply glut and crash unlikely. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the immense, ongoing capital needs for AI's next phase, constrained by slow-moving physical bottlenecks. The AI cycle is not over; the script has simply changed.

链捕手1h ago

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

链捕手1h ago

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

Grayscale Research identifies 15 top-revenue crypto protocols trading at significant valuation discounts, with many at single-digit or even 1x revenue multiples. Protocols like Pump.fun, PancakeSwap, and Meteora have market capitalizations roughly equal to their annual revenue. The report argues these financially-focused protocols (DEXs, lending, staking) are fundamentally undervalued and could benefit from the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, expected as soon as next month. This legislation aims to clarify digital asset regulation, potentially reducing institutional barriers and driving on-chain activity. The analysis breaks down the protocols into three groups: the "1x Club" (market cap ≈ revenue), mid-tier protocols with 3-9x multiples (e.g., Aave, Lido, Jupiter), and high-multiple protocols like Hyperliquid (15x) and Uniswap (37x), where valuation reflects future potential rather than current cash flows. Grayscale applies a traditional DCF model to Aave, suggesting a one-year price target of ~$175, representing ~130% upside from current levels. The report notes a risk-off macro environment since the Iran conflict has further compressed valuations, creating a potential entry window. The conclusion highlights that while the valuation data presents an intriguing opportunity, the investment thesis is contingent on the CLARITY Act's passage and subsequent institutional capital flows. Investors are cautioned to consider Grayscale's inherent conflict of interest as a crypto asset manager with products tied to these assets.

marsbit2h ago

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片