地狱级难度牛市,破局之处在哪?

链捕手Published on 2025-02-25Last updated on 2025-02-25

AI Agent 乏力、名人发币等同诈骗,各大叙事暂缓

自今年以来,币圈最大的特色便是涨幅持续性欠佳,不只反应在交易所山寨币,连在 2024 Q4 表现良好的链上币种也面临大幅下跌窘境。

以下是 AI Agent 主要币种在 2025 年涨跌幅:

  • Virtual :-79.2%
  • Ai16 z :-85.5%
  • AIXBT :-68%
  • Griffain :-80.3%
  • Buzz :-72.4%
  • Fartcoin :-67.5%
  • ARC :-62%
  • Swarms :-45%

可以发现在不到三个月的时间内,当红叙事的头部项目下跌八成,当前虽不能直接判断该赛道为伪,但注意力的丢失为客观事实,且非一时半刻能够寻回。

再来看看名人币叙事,由川普开第一枪,随后其他名人,甚至是国家纷纷跟上。

以下是名人币主要币种,自高点回落情形:

  • Trump :-77.1%
  • Melania :-91%
  • Vine :-92.7%
  • jailstool :-93.5%
  • Jellyjelly :-98%
  • CAR :-98.5%
  • Libra :-94.3%

在币圈有一句话叫做炒新不炒旧,代表资金愿意选择较新的叙事进行炒作,但相较起 AI Agent ,显然名人币赛道更加嗜血凶残,究竟这两个赛道当前问题为何?在币圈新叙事匮乏的当下,还有破局之处吗?

参考: dexscreener

当前叙事困境:纯概念炒作风气盛行

在 AI Agent 赛道方面,许多项目都还停留在「概念展示」与「未来蓝图」的阶段,缺乏实际可用、且能够大规模推广的产品。就算市面上真的推出了若干可操作的服务,依然存在介面复杂、用户体验不佳等问题,导致普通投资者无法对其真正产生黏性。更糟糕的是,项目方为了迎合投资者对「 AI + 区块链」的期待,往往先透过夸大的叙事来拉抬价格,实质落地应用却一再跳票。久而久之,资金失去耐心,注意力便开始转移,导致相关代币价格大幅回落。

在名人币的部分,虽然川普是个话题十足的开端,但当代币圈遇到「名人结束效应」时,问题也相当明显:世上恐怕再也没有哪个公众人物能在话题与影响力上超越川普。后续各国政要、网红与明星虽试图跟进,但都无法复制最初的资金热度与市场情绪。当市场追随度越来越弱,名人币赛道也呈现出来得快、去得也快的「昙花一现」现象,投资人信心迅速流失,价格自然跟着下探。

然而这些赛道之所以会陷入大幅波动,背后更深层的问题在于,很多项目都停留在「炒概念」层面,欠缺真实且可持续的收益模式。无论是 AI Agent 还是名人币,其核心叙事都仰赖资本与热度迅速进场,却缺乏让用户长期参与的诱因。当热度退烧,价格就难以支撑,更无法吸引新资金再度进入。

寻找真实收益项目

要在当前叙事疲乏的市场中脱颖而出,关键在于找到拥有「真实收益」的产品,并且能够「愿意分享给用户」。所谓「真实收益」,不仅仅是赚取交易所上市时的上涨泡沫,而是能透过实际的业务模式与交易行为,持续不断地产生回馈,并且反馈给代币持有人或生态系参与者。

当中 Hype rliquid 便符合规模式,在业务上与中心化交易所相同,收益来源多为合约交易手续费,但 Hype rliquid 将手续费 100% 回购 Hype 代币,而交易手续费由交易量决定,因此 Hype rliquid 将币价与产品牢牢捆绑。

根据 DefiLlama 的数据, Hype rliquid 处理所有 Perps DEX 的 24 小时总交易量的约 45%,目前每天 $3. 78B ,每日收入约落在 100 万美元,在当前市场低迷的情形下仍保持极高的活跃度,也因此在近一个月山寨币寒冬时, Hype 币价仍保持强劲。

再热的叙事都会过去,能够长久留存在加密市场当中还是具有 PMF ,用户黏性高具有真实收益的项目。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

MSTR Discloses Sale of 3,588 Bitcoins, Stock Price Drops Over 5% at One Point During Trading

MicroStrategy, the world's largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, has significantly shifted its business model. Between June 29 and July 5, the company sold 3,588 bitcoins for approximately $216 million to fund quarterly dividends for its preferred stock. This marks its largest-ever Bitcoin sale and signals a strategic pivot: Bitcoin is transitioning from a "buy-and-hold" reserve asset to a liquidity management tool for the company. This move follows a recent authorization allowing Bitcoin sales when equity fundraising is less attractive. The announcement contributed to a more than 5% intraday drop in MicroStrategy's stock price, while Bitcoin fell to around $61,800—below the company's average holding cost of roughly $75,700. The sale represents a major departure from MicroStrategy's long-standing "never sell" commitment, which saw its first minor breach in May with a $2.5 million sale. The latest, hundred-times-larger transaction underscores growing financial pressures. Analysts note the company faces about $1.5 billion in annual preferred dividend obligations, far exceeding cash flow from its software business. As of July 5, MicroStrategy holds 843,775 bitcoins. Its current operational logic involves buying Bitcoin during favorable financing conditions and selling portions to cover dividends when needed, creating a flexible capital management cycle amidst a challenging market environment.

华尔街日报41m ago

MSTR Discloses Sale of 3,588 Bitcoins, Stock Price Drops Over 5% at One Point During Trading

华尔街日报41m ago

Q-Day Countdown: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

Quantum Computing's Threat to Cryptocurrency: A Countdown to Q-Day Quantum computing, specifically Shor's algorithm, poses a fundamental threat to the public-key cryptography (e.g., ECDSA, RSA) that secures blockchain networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum. This critical juncture, known as Q-Day, is estimated to occur potentially within the next 5-15 years. The core vulnerability stems from the public and immutable nature of blockchains. Assets in addresses where the public key is already exposed on-chain (e.g., spent outputs) are at direct risk, as a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could derive the private key. This threatens the very trust model of cryptocurrencies. The response lies in Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)—algorithms like lattice-based ML-DSA and hash-based SLH-DSA, which are resistant to quantum attacks. NIST has standardized key PQC algorithms (FIPS 203, 204, 205), providing a migration path. However, the primary challenge is not technical but socio-economic and involves complex governance: * **Bitcoin's** path is constrained by its conservative ethos. Migrating requires a soft-fork to new address types, facing hurdles like significantly larger signature sizes and, most critically, the divisive governance question of how to handle at-risk legacy UTXOs without violating core principles. * **Ethereum** is pursuing a "cryptographic agility" strategy, with a multi-layered roadmap. It leverages account abstraction for user accounts and is developing compressed hash-based signatures (e.g., leanXMSS) for its consensus layer, aiming for a full-stack upgrade over time. In conclusion, quantum computing does not spell an instant end for cryptocurrency but initiates a critical countdown. The industry has a limited "engineering comfort window" to orchestrate a coordinated, ecosystem-wide migration to PQC. The ultimate bottlenecks are the immense coordination efforts and governance decisions required for this foundational transition.

marsbit1h ago

Q-Day Countdown: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

marsbit1h ago

Trump, the President Who Knows Best How to 'Trade Stocks'

Former US President Donald Trump reported a record-breaking $2.2 billion in personal income for 2025, the highest annual income ever disclosed by a sitting president. This figure, from a 927-page government ethics filing, represented a 3.5-fold increase from his $600 million income in 2024 and boosted his net worth to $6.5 billion. The primary drivers were cryptocurrency (64% of income, approximately $1.4 billion) and real estate (26%, approximately $575 million). His crypto earnings stemmed largely from the launch of his personal meme coin, $TRUMP, generating over $600 million in licensing fees, and substantial profits from the WLFI token and its parent company. Despite a sluggish property market, his Mar-a-Lago resort and associated golf clubs saw revenue surges of 50% and 27%, respectively, attributed to their use as venues for presidential events. Trump's financial disclosure also revealed an unprecedented level of stock market activity, with over 22,000 trades executed in 2025, averaging 87 trades per market day. Media analyses noted several instances where significant trading coincided with major policy announcements, such as proposed tariffs, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest. While the White House stated these trades were handled by a family-managed trust fund and not Trump directly, critics highlighted this as a departure from the blind trusts traditionally used by presidents post-Watergate. The report has intensified debate over the commercialization of the presidency. Supporters view it as a success story of a businessman-president, while critics argue it demonstrates an unprecedented conversion of public influence into private wealth, with policy decisions potentially linked to personal financial gains. The controversy centers on whether Trump's earnings represent innovative entrepreneurship or a fundamental conflict of interest, sparking renewed calls for stricter ethics reforms in US governance.

marsbit1h ago

Trump, the President Who Knows Best How to 'Trade Stocks'

marsbit1h ago

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

The article explores the existential threat quantum computing poses to cryptocurrencies and the urgent need for "post-quantum" migration. It outlines that quantum computers, through Shor's algorithm, could break the elliptic-curve cryptography (ECC) underlying blockchain security, potentially allowing private keys to be derived from public keys. The core challenge is not a lack of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) standards—like NIST's ML-KEM and ML-DSA—but the immense complexity of upgrading entire ecosystems before "Q-Day" (when quantum computers become capable of such attacks, estimated around 2035-2045). Key points include: * **Bitcoin's** risk is concentrated in legacy UTXOs with exposed public keys (e.g., early P2PK outputs). Migration faces massive hurdles: PQC signatures are much larger, increasing transaction size and cost, and the governance dilemma of handling un-migrated assets threatens its "code is law" ethos. * **Ethereum's** strategy focuses on "cryptographic agility," using Account Abstraction for user accounts and developing compressed hash-based signatures (like leanXMSS with SNARK aggregation) for consensus. Its migration is a complex, full-stack overhaul of execution, consensus, and data layers. * The "security debt" is enormous. The comfortable engineering window for a coordinated, ecosystem-wide upgrade is only 5-8 years. High-value infrastructure (exchanges, bridges) may face pressure before mainnet protocols. In conclusion, quantum computing is not an instant "doomsday" event but a forcing function for systemic change. Bitcoin's ultimate test is social consensus and property rights governance, while Ethereum's is technical complexity. Failure to migrate in time could lead to a fundamental re-pricing of crypto assets.

链捕手1h ago

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片