Meta在Nvidia和云合作伙伴的帮助下推出了最新的Llama AI模型

币界网Published on 2024-07-23Last updated on 2024-07-23

币界网报道:
Meta周二宣布了其Llama人工智能模型的最新版本。这是Meta迄今为止最大、最强大的AI模型,并且仍然是开源的,这意味着它可以免费访问。新的大型语言模型(LLM)突显了该社交网络为跟上与其他人工智能领导者的竞争而进行的大规模投资,例如OpenAI和Anthropic等高飞的初创公司以及谷歌和亚马逊等其他科技巨头。该公告还突显了Meta和Nvidia之间密切且不断发展的合作关系。英伟达是Meta的关键合作伙伴,为这家社交网络巨头提供名为GPU的计算芯片,以帮助训练其人工智能模型,包括最新版本的Llama。Meta发言人在媒体吹风会上表示,虽然OpenAI等公司的目标是通过销售其专有LLM或提供服务来帮助客户使用该技术来赚钱,但Meta没有计划推出自己的竞争企业技术业务。相反,与Meta去年夏天发布《Llama 2》时类似,该公司正在与少数科技公司合作,这些公司将通过各自的云计算平台为客户提供对Llama 3.1的访问,并销售与新软件兼容的安全和管理工具。Meta的25家与Llama相关的企业合作伙伴包括亚马逊网络服务、谷歌云、微软Azure、copula和戴尔。尽管Meta首席执行官马克·扎克伯格在之前的公司财报电话会议上告诉分析师,Meta从其公司Llama合作伙伴关系中获得了一些收入,但Meta发言人表示,任何经济利益都只是增量。相反,Meta认为,通过投资Llama和相关的人工智能技术,并通过开源免费提供,它可以在竞争激烈的市场中吸引高质量的人才,降低整体计算基础设施成本,以及其他好处。Meta推出《Llama 3》1的时间安排在扎克伯格和英伟达首席执行官黄仁勋计划在一场专注于高级计算机图形的会议上共同发言的那一周。这家社交网络巨头是英伟达的高端客户之一,它没有运行自己的面向业务的云,Meta需要最新的芯片来训练其人工智能模型,该模型在内部用于定位和其他产品。例如,Meta表示,周二宣布的Llama型号在Nvidia的16000个H100图形处理器上进行了训练。但这种关系对两家公司来说也很重要,因为它代表了什么。对于Nvidia来说,Meta正在培训其他公司可以使用和适应其业务的开源模型,而无需支付许可费或请求许可,这一事实可能会扩大Nvidia自己芯片的使用,并保持高需求。但是开源模型的创建可能需要数亿或数十亿美元。没有多少公司在财务上能够以类似的投资额开发和发布开源模型。谷歌和OpenAI虽然是英伟达的客户,但对其最先进的模型保密。另一方面,Meta需要可靠的最新GPU来训练越来越强大的模型。与Nvidia一样,Meta正试图培养一个以该公司的开源软件为中心构建人工智能应用程序的开发人员生态系统,即使Meta基本上不得不放弃构建成本高昂的代码和所谓的人工智能权重。Meta的人工智能合作伙伴副总裁Ash Jhaveri告诉CNBC,开源方法通过让开发人员接触其内部工具并邀请他们在此基础上进行构建,使Meta受益。他说,这也有助于Meta,因为它在内部使用其人工智能模型,从而使该公司能够获得开源社区的改进。扎克伯格周二在一篇博客文章中写道,本周将对《Llama》的上映采取“不同的方式”,并补充道Jhaveri表示:“我们正在积极建立合作伙伴关系,以便生态系统中的更多公司也能为客户提供独特的功能。”由于Meta不是企业供应商,这家社交网络巨头可以将询问Llama的公司推荐给其企业合作伙伴之一,如Nvidia。Meta还表示,该公司在美国的WhatsApp用户及其Meta的访问者。人工智能网站将能够通过与该公司的数字助理互动来见证Llama 3.1的功能。Meta的一位发言人解释说,据推测,Meta的数字助理将运行在最新版本的Llama上,能够回答复杂的数学问题或解决软件编码问题。WhatsApp和Meta。Meta发言人表示,美国的人工智能用户将能够在新的、巨大的Llama 3.1 LLM或功能较弱但速度更快、体积更小的版本之间切换,以回答他们的问题
立即观看视频2:4002:40克莱默的疯狂冲刺:街上的元广场

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Without It, There Would Be No ImageNet... Now It's Gone

Amazon is shutting down its crowdsourcing platform, Mechanical Turk (MTurk), on September 30th, ending a 21-year run. Launched in 2005, MTurk connected businesses with a global online workforce to perform small, repetitive tasks—known as Human Intelligence Tasks (HITs)—that were easy for humans but difficult for computers at the time. At its peak, it hosted over 500,000 workers worldwide. MTurk played a pivotal, though often unseen, role in the rise of modern AI. Its most famous contribution was to the creation of the ImageNet dataset. In the late 2000s, researcher Fei-Fei Li and her team faced the monumental challenge of manually sorting and labeling millions of internet images to build a large-scale visual database for training AI. They turned to MTurk, distributing the work to nearly 50,000 workers from 167 countries. This "human-in-the-loop" effort made the massive ImageNet project feasible. ImageNet, in turn, became the foundational benchmark for the 2012 ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge. The victory of Geoffrey Hinton and his students' deep convolutional neural network, AlexNet, on this dataset dramatically demonstrated the power of deep learning, catalyzing the AI revolution that followed. Now, MTurk is closing. The platform has declined as the very AI it helped build has become capable of automating the simple tasks it once provided. Furthermore, the AI industry's data needs have evolved, shifting towards more specialized expertise for model tuning and evaluation, served by newer platforms. Ironically, some studies suggest MTurk workers themselves began using AI tools like ChatGPT to complete tasks, adding a layer of automation to the "artificial artificial intelligence" service. The shutdown marks the end of an era where human effort, distributed globally via the internet, laid the crucial groundwork for the intelligent machines of today.

marsbit13m ago

Without It, There Would Be No ImageNet... Now It's Gone

marsbit13m ago

Bill Gates' Latest Long-Form Article: The Real Trouble with AI is That We Aren't Ready

Bill Gates' latest essay, "The turbulent AI era is here. The choices we make now are critical," warns that society is unprepared for the profound social and economic transition AI will bring. While optimistic about AI's long-term potential in healthcare, education, and other fields, Gates focuses on the "transition period" over the next 10-20 years. He argues this transition differs from past technological shifts like the Industrial Revolution because AI automates cognitive labor itself, potentially reducing the total number of future jobs. Risks like enhanced cyber-attacks and social disruption are already emerging, not distant future threats. A key concern is "low-cost intelligence substitution," where AI performs defined tasks cheaper than humans, gradually thinning workforces. Gates introduces the concept of "Human Reserved" jobs—roles like nursing or delivering serious medical news—where human judgment and empathy should remain central, even if AI is technically capable. To manage the transition, he calls for new governance, stronger social safety nets, retraining, and international cooperation, especially between the US and China. Crucially, he proposes taxing AI usage and robots to slow displacement and fund social programs. The core dilemma Gates presents is that AI could become humanity's "greatest equalizer" or its "worst source of injustice," depending on whether its immense productivity gains are broadly shared or concentrate wealth and power. The fundamental challenge is not just advancing the technology, but adapting our social and economic systems to it.

marsbit29m ago

Bill Gates' Latest Long-Form Article: The Real Trouble with AI is That We Aren't Ready

marsbit29m ago

Just Now, Anthropic Unveils Physical MCP: Claude Begins Controlling the Real World

Anthropic has announced the Model Hardware Standard (MHS), a new standard enabling AI agents like Claude to safely control physical devices. Building on the Model Context Protocol (MCP), MHS standardizes communication between AI agents and hardware such as microscopes, robotic arms, and lasers, marking a significant step for AI from the digital into the physical world. Developed in collaboration with HHMI Janelia Research Campus, MHS uses standardized drivers to translate basic commands (e.g., read, write) into a format any programmable device can understand. This drastically reduces integration time from weeks to hours or minutes and allows agents to discover and operate new devices using natural language tags that describe machine properties and safety limits. Agents can control devices via MCP, command-line interfaces, or APIs. They can sequence operations, monitor results, adjust parameters in real-time, and generate deterministic scripts for long-running tasks. Early tests show Claude interacting with hardware exploratively, like a scientist, learning to calibrate a laser and scripting the process. Early adopters and partners include AWS, Automata, Danaher, Doosan Robotics, and Tecan, who are integrating MHS support into their platforms. While promising, challenges remain: Claude's physical reasoning is limited, requiring expert oversight, and MHS currently only works with programmable hardware. Anthropic plans further refinements and broader device support before open-sourcing the standard.

marsbit1h ago

Just Now, Anthropic Unveils Physical MCP: Claude Begins Controlling the Real World

marsbit1h ago

History's Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate After 4 Years of Holding

**Title: The Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate Over Any 4-Year Holding Period** This article analyzes which major, freely-tradable assets have historically never produced a nominal loss over any rolling 4-year holding window. It concludes that only two distinct categories achieve this: ultra-low-risk contractual assets and Bitcoin. Among traditional risk assets, none maintain a perfect 4-year record. The S&P 500 had negative 4-year periods (e.g., 1929-1932: -64.8%). The Nasdaq 100 fell roughly 60% from 2000-2003. Gold saw a ~47.7% loss from 1981-1984. US real estate declined about 23.3% from 2007-2010. Even long-term US Treasury bonds (e.g., 2021-2024: -19.8%) and corporate bonds can produce 4-year losses due to interest rate and market price risks. In contrast, the first category achieving 100% nominal success includes assets like rolling 3-month US Treasury Bills, 4-year certificates of deposit (CDs), and US Treasuries held to maturity within 4 years. Their "guarantee" stems from contractual obligations and credit backing (e.g., FDIC insurance, US sovereign promise), not price appreciation. The sole exception in the high-risk category is Bitcoin. Analysis of daily data from 2010-2026 across 4,419 rolling 4-year windows shows a 100% positive return rate. The worst 4-year period (April 2021 to April 2025) still yielded a +32.6% total return (~7.3% CAGR). This record is unique because Bitcoin has no issuer, promises no cash flows, and has endured severe drawdowns (70-90%), yet its market price has always recovered within a 4-year span. The key distinction is the source of the "100%": contractual assets offer known, low nominal returns, while Bitcoin's record stems purely from historical price appreciation despite extreme volatility. The article suggests that for Bitcoin, the ability to hold for 4+ years is more critical than active trading strategies.

marsbit1h ago

History's Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate After 4 Years of Holding

marsbit1h ago

How One Article Moved 45 Billion: The Collapse of a 25-Year-Old 'AI Stock Guru'

This article details the dramatic rise and near-collapse of a hedge fund built by Leopold Aschenbrenner, a 24-year-old former OpenAI researcher. The fund, named Situational Awareness, amassed $45 billion in assets within two years. Its explosive growth stemmed from Aschenbrenner's influential 165-page manifesto predicting AGI's arrival by 2027 and his high-profile Silicon Valley connections. The fund employed an extremely aggressive strategy: high concentration and 400% leverage to bet long on AI infrastructure stocks while shorting legacy software firms. In July, this structure backfired when both sides of the trade reversed simultaneously—AI stocks plunged while shorted stocks rallied—triggering massive losses that nearly wiped out all equity. Major player Jane Street reportedly lost billions. The fund's leveraged public portfolio was ultimately sold at a discount to Citadel. The SEC is now investigating banks like Goldman Sachs for their role in facilitating the fund's high-leverage trades. The article compares this to past blow-ups like Archegos, highlighting systemic failures in risk management where the pursuit of short-term profits overrode due diligence. It questions whether such risky leverage concentrated in the AI sector, currently at record highs, poses a broader systemic threat. Ironically, Aschenbrenner, who studied AI safety at OpenAI, designed a fund structure prone to uncontrolled failure. Days after the crisis, he reportedly raised another $400 million for new investments.

marsbit1h ago

How One Article Moved 45 Billion: The Collapse of a 25-Year-Old 'AI Stock Guru'

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片