加密×AI 周报：近月最干净 TGE 窗口开启，Agent 经济链上数据开始爆发

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-29Last updated on 2026-04-29

作者:0xsammy

编译:深潮 TechFlow

深潮导读:过去几个月加密 AI 项目发币普遍破发,但 4 月 21 日 OPG 和 CHIP 同日上线,都有 a16z/Coinbase 等顶级机构背书、12 个月投资者锁仓期,并且表现稳健。这标志着加密 AI 正在回归基本面——未来 12 个月,绑定真实收入(如 GPU 融资)的代币将成为主流。对投资者来说,这意味着要关注有真实业务支撑的项目,而不是纯粹的代币游戏。

本期加密 AI 与机器人通讯包含三个部分:

  • 片段合作伙伴(SURF AI)
  • 加密 AI 与机器人市场概览
  • 新兴进展

如有任何问题,欢迎在 X 上联系我或给我的商业账号"Khala Research"发消息。

1. 加密 AI 与机器人市场概览

本周数据的三个主题:

加密 AI 刚刚经历了数月来最干净的 TGE 窗口:OPG 和 CHIP 都在 4 月 21 日上线,都有一线机构背书、结构化归属和实际产品指标。两者表现都相当稳健,为即将推出的代币带来乐观情绪。

子网收入正在区分赢家和排放农民:Lium 7 天涨 10%,而其他前 10 子网都在流血。真实 GPU 租赁收入是催化剂。

x402 活动爆发:4 月 24 日日交易量达到 15.1 万次,是之前基线的 2 倍多。4 月 20 日上线的"Agentic.market"是催化剂,数据即服务是领先类别。

加密 AI 数月来最干净的 TGE 窗口

OPG 和 CHIP 都在 4 月 21 日上线:

OpenGradient(OPG):从 a16z+Coinbase Ventures 融资 950 万美元。TGE 时流通 19%,投资者锁定期 12 个月,上线前通过 MiCAR 合规。200 多万次可验证推理。

USD.AI(CHIP):8 家交易所同步首发。披露管线超 15 亿美元,包括 5 亿美元 Sharon AI+5 亿美元 QumulusAI 设施,OBEX 首批成员。80%锁定,交易量与市值比 7-8 倍。

这里有个更大的叙事在发酵,它倾向于回归基本面。

拥有由实际创收产品(本例中是 GPU 融资)支撑的代币,假设收入回流,将对代币长期有利。

我们在未来 12 个月可能看到的更广泛叙事是代币化股权或通过 SPV 与股权挂钩的代币:

未来一个月值得关注的是 XMAQUINA,他们将在一个月后进行 DEUS 代币的 TGE。

我们将在未来几周发布关于"机器人资本市场"的报告,届时个体私人机器人股权(Apptronik、Figure 等)可以在链上交易,由 SPV 支持。

A)DeAI 市值分析

LINK($9.24,7 天 -0.9%):BridgeTower 于 4 月 23 日采用完整 Chainlink 技术栈,将 DOM X 亚利桑那铜金证券的 110 亿美元代币化,背后有 250 亿美元以上的自然资源管线。Chainlink 还于 4 月 21 日获得 Deloitte SOC 2 Type 2 认证,成为唯一同时持有 SOC 2 Type 2、Type 1 和 ISO 27001 认证的预言机平台。

TAO($247.15,7 天 +0.5%):Covenant 后的平静恢复周。70%的供应量已质押。BIT-0011(信念机制)投票待定,Teutonic 1T 训练运行目标是 5 月中下旬。

NEAR($1.35,7 天 -0.6%):Near 加倍押注 ironClaw,因为代理编排框架成为他们的重点:

ICP($2.41,7 天 -2.3%):本周表现最差的大市值币。基本面在改善(4 月推出 Caffeine v3.0 AI 升级,部署 28 万个容器,Mission 70 将通胀从 9.72%降至年底的 2.92%),但图表正在接近历史低点。ICP Cloud 引擎即将推出:

RENDER($1.77,7 天 -1.1%):RNP-023 在 RenderCon 2026(4 月 16-17 日)通过,将 Salad Network 作为独家子网集成,为网络增加约 6 万个 GPU。销毁-铸造平衡机制通过 RENDER 销毁路由支付。

FET($0.2027,7 天 -3.9%):DeAI 中 7 天表现最差。4 月 28 日代币解锁释放 266 万 FET(56.9 万美元)用于 AGIX 迁移。ASI:Chain 测试网仍在等待中,主网推迟至 2026 年底/2027 年初。

VIRTUAL($0.6877,7 天持平):3 月与以太坊基金会共同撰写 ERC-8183(跨链代理商业的开放标准)。2026 年第一季度数据:代理 GDP 超 4 亿美元,协议收入超 6000 万美元(年化约 3 亿美元),部署 1.7 万多个代理+本周多个 virtuals 生态更新。

相关推文:

https://x.com/virtuals_io/status/2048430150619201982?s=20

VVV($8.87,7 天 -5.7%):急剧反转但结构性故事仍完好。Venice AI 于 4 月 21 日突破 200 万用户。4 月销毁率(1.66 万代币,12.3 万美元)已超过整个 3 月。69%的流通供应量现已质押,sVVV 承诺用于 DIEM 铸造,围绕 DIEM 代币构建的第三方协议用于推理积分收益:

相关推文:

https://x.com/AntSeedAI/status/2047686551509880895?s=20

Bittensor 子网生态系统

Targon(SN4)($14.57,7 天 +2.8%):前 10 子网中两个上涨之一。Manifold 的 1050 万美元 A 轮融资和 Dippy 的 400 万用户支撑可验证计算论点。

Lium 和子网收入分化

Lium (SN51) 是本周唯一大幅上涨的大型 Bittensor 子网。7 日涨幅 9.6%由收入增长驱动:

每月约 43.2 万美元的 GPU 租赁费,所有子网中最高

占 TAO 总排放量的 6.2%

每日矿工排放的 60%被销毁

支持多链支付,并通过 Coinbase 支持法币

Covenant 升级后,Lium 的定位更加重要。网络正被迫证明,无论运营方如何变化,有真实需求的子网都能保持影响力。

向收入型算力和存储的轮动看起来是真实的——Hippius(兼容 S3 的存储,约 448 万美元利润)和 Targon 是明显的同类项目,其他几个项目也显示出商业可行性的迹象。

B) 机器人市场市值分析

GEOD 表现突出,24 小时涨 6.8%(市值 5550 万美元),再次证明有收入的 DePIN 项目能在疲软行情中存活。Hyfix 的 1500 万美元融资(与 GEODNET 同一创始人)是相关利好。

推文链接:

https://x.com/mikeahorton/status/2044500450389725251?s=20

peaq 也宣布支持零人类公司,导致本周中期价格飙升。

推文链接:

https://x.com/peaq/status/2047284505614926072?s=20

2. x402 分析

x402 交易量本周爆发。4 月 24 日日交易量达到 15.13 万笔,是 4 月上旬至中旬约 7.5 万笔基线的两倍多。

数据即服务单日飙升至 7.61 万笔,此前几乎为零;代理间服务在激增期间保持了可观份额。催化剂是 Coinbase 在 4 月 20 日推出的 Agentic.market。

本周代理市场的三个具体更新:

规模:x402 目前已有超 1.65 亿笔交易,累计交易量约 5000 万美元,超 48 万个交易代理。Agentic.market 被定位为其上的发现层。

推文链接:

https://x.com/base/status/2046325766091116897?s=20

这取代了 API 密钥和凭证模式,为人类和代理提供了无需许可的服务访问。

推文链接:

https://x.com/0xSammy/status/2046482548075671561?s=20

初始服务商列表:上线了七个类别(推理、数据、媒体、搜索、社交、基础设施、交易),OpenAI、Bloomberg、CoinGecko、AWS Lambda、LinkedIn、Alchemy 和 Venice 等参与了首批发布。多步骤代理工作流(数据→推理→交易执行→日志记录)现在有了统一的发现界面。

定价模式:大多数服务采用按使用量计费,部分服务商为自动化机器人访问增加了"代理溢价"。Bazaar 的 CDP Facilitator 会自动索引任何启用了发现扩展的 x402 端点,无需单独注册。

Artemis 图表是发现层正在发挥作用的最清晰证据:

数据即服务在代理间交易之前激增,表明代理在彼此交易之前先将结构化数据输入工作流;这个顺序合理。

ACP 在某些周仍运行 99%以上的 x402 交易量,Agentic.market 拓宽了其上层漏斗而非取代它。4 月 20 日起的 30 日基线是值得跟踪的指标。

3. AI 代理发展:创新和市场动态

以下是本周加密 AI 和机器人相关发展:

推文链接:

https://x.com/0xSammy/status/2048761483270479968?s=20

第 174 期 Sammy's Snippets 到此结束。希望你喜欢。

请在此留下任何问题或想法——我会回复每一位!

如果你觉得有趣,请考虑订阅这个 Substack 并在 X 上关注我以获取更多相关见解。

如果你对加密 AI 和机器人的正式报告感兴趣,Khala 是我的研究产品。

免责声明:本通讯内容仅供参考。本通讯中的任何内容均不构成财务建议或买卖任何资产的推荐。在做出任何投资决策之前,请务必自行研究。

我持有本通讯中讨论的许多资产的头寸。完整披露列表请参阅 Khala Research 网站。

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
mantra
MantraMANTRA
xvs
VenusXVS
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE

Related Reads

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit1m ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit1m ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit41m ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit41m ago

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

A social media claim has brought attention to Hyperliquid (HYPE) and the growth of its related ETF products. According to a June 20 post on X by AlphaOnChain, three Hyperliquid ETFs launched in May 2026 have collectively amassed $158 million in assets under management, led by a Bitwise fund with $88 million and a 21Shares fund with $66 million. The article notes this claim is from social media and not verified by official issuer data, advising caution. Nonetheless, the report highlights that HYPE is gaining traction as a notable altcoin narrative. Its focus on on-chain perpetual trading and exchange infrastructure places it at the intersection of DeFi and derivatives, attracting traders looking for high-conviction plays beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. The key takeaway is that while social momentum can influence short-term markets, sustainable growth for HYPE would require confirmed demand, liquidity, and continued ecosystem development.

bitcoinist2h ago

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

bitcoinist2h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit2h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit2h ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit2h ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions