# RegulatoryArbitrage的所有文章

在 HTX 新聞中心流覽與「RegulatoryArbitrage」相關的最新資訊與深度分析。潘蓋市場趨勢、專案動態、技術進展及監管政策，提供權威的加密行業洞察。

WSJ: Unveiling the Secret Jury That Controls Disputes on Polymarket

Last month, Garrick Wilhelm lost a $567 bet on the Polymarket prediction platform about whether a ceasefire would be reached with Hezbollah. When a truce was announced, some traders argued it counted, but Wilhelm disagreed. The dispute was settled not by Polymarket, but by a decentralized group of UMA token holders who vote on such disagreements. As trading surges, resolving ambiguous outcomes is a growing challenge for prediction markets. Unlike competitors like Kalshi that decide internally, Polymarket outsources dispute resolution to UMA. Its token holders, mostly anonymous and with voting power weighted by holdings, arbitrate cases. Critics argue this system is prone to manipulation, as voters can also bet on the same markets they judge. A Wall Street Journal analysis found that over the past year, at least 60% of active UMA voters had corresponding Polymarket accounts and held positions in disputes they voted on. Voting power is also concentrated among a few large holders. Polymarket says only 0.2% of bets go to UMA and that the system disperses authority. Its founder has acknowledged flaws and promised fixes. UMA's backers deny any proven manipulation, dismissing critics as sore losers. The platform penalizes voters in the minority to incentivize "correct" outcomes. Disputes are rising, covering topics from a streamer's pregnancy announcement to Iran. This model also helps Polymarket argue it's an offshore platform outside U.S. regulation, a shift made after a 2022 settlement with the CFTC. Some losing traders have formed groups to protest, targeting entities like UMA.rocks, which aggregates votes. Its founder says traders often blame UMA for their own mistakes. A recently ousted committee member, Scout, admitted to both betting and voting but argued involved voters research more thoroughly. He highlighted the dilemma: "Either you have conflicted traders deciding, or you have uninformed outsiders voting. There is no perfect answer right now."

marsbit05/18 11:07

WSJ: Unveiling the Secret Jury That Controls Disputes on Polymarket

marsbit05/18 11:07

The Trump Family's Crypto Banking Dream: A New Experiment in Power and Capital

Trump's family is pursuing a national trust bank charter instead of meme coins or NFTs, aiming to become part of the financial system itself. If approved by the OCC, their entity, WLTC, would gain direct access to national payment systems and a rare license to provide crypto custody services—a high-demand, tightly regulated market. The permanent, transferable banking charter is a lasting institutional asset, unlike temporary political influence. The move aligns with favorable 2025 legislation, partly influenced by millions in crypto industry donations to Trump’s camp. While benefiting the whole industry, Trump’s family also gains privately through WLFI, which takes 75% of profits—creating a closed loop where political power directly enables private profit. The approval process relies on regulatory discretion, allowing political influence to shape outcomes without overt rule-breaking. WLTC’s potential approval could disrupt the institutional crypto custody market, currently valued in the hundreds of billions, by leveraging its federal bank status to attract risk-averse institutional clients. It may also challenge the USDT-USDC duopoly in stablecoins by offering integrated issuance, custody, and exchange services under one roof. This model prioritizes regulatory arbitrage and political connections over innovation, potentially reshaping competition in crypto around privilege and access rather than market efficiency. The case illustrates a new era of seamless power-capital integration, where policy-making and business operations occur simultaneously, raising both efficiency and corruption risks.

marsbit01/14 05:03

The Trump Family's Crypto Banking Dream: A New Experiment in Power and Capital

marsbit01/14 05:03

活动图片

熱門分類right-arrow

熱門標籤right-arrow

Regulatory Policyright-arrow

Indepth Researchright-arrow