Hoskinson Blasts Ripple CEO Garlinghouse In Fresh Public Rant

bitcoinist發佈於 2026-01-19更新於 2026-01-19

文章摘要

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson criticized Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse in a video on January 18, 2026, for supporting the US Clarity Act, which Hoskinson argues would expand the SEC's authority and harm the crypto industry. He claimed the bill, with 137 amendments, would treat all new projects as securities by default, forcing them to seek regulatory relief. Hoskinson called this worse than the current regulatory uncertainty, accusing Garlinghouse and others of compromising too easily. He warned that passing a flawed bill would make meaningful change nearly impossible, citing the long-standing Securities Exchange Act of 1933. Hoskinson also expressed concerns about the industry moving toward custodial wallets, KYC, and reversible transactions, which he believes betray crypto's original revolutionary ethos. At the time of reporting, XRP was trading at $1.95.

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson took aim at Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse in a January 18, 2026 video, criticizing what he framed as an industry push to accept the US Clarity Act on terms that would expand the Securities and Exchange Commission’s authority over new projects.

Speaking on Jan 18, Hoskinson used a wide-ranging monologue on market fatigue, industry morale, and the mission behind Cardano and Midnight to zero in on a regulatory flashpoint: a bill he described as swollen by “137 amendments” and tilted toward the SEC. In his telling, the proposal would force crypto projects to “go beg and plead” for relief, with “all new projects” treated as securities by default.

Why Hoskinson Blasted Ripple CEO Garlinghouse

Hoskinson argued that the outcome would be a strategic own-goal, worse, in his view, than the policy uncertainty the industry has been trying to escape. “How is that any better than what Scary Gary [Gensler] gave us under Biden?” he said, referring to the SEC’s enforcement action against the crypto industry under former US President Joe Biden, before extending the critique to lobbying and political dealmaking more broadly.

Hoskinson’s sharpest remarks came when he cited unnamed industry figures he suggested are urging compromise, then called out Garlinghouse directly. “Still got people like Brad [Garlinghouse] saying well it’s not perfect but we just got to get something,” he said. “You know, it’s better than no clarity. Hand it to the same people who sued us. Hand it to the same people who put us out of business, who subpoenaed us, who put us in jail. That’s better. That’s what we fought for.”

He then framed the decision as effectively irreversible once legislated, invoking the long life of US securities law to argue that a flawed framework would calcify. “And tell me, how do we change it? Like we changed the Securities Exchange Act of 1933,” Hoskinson said. “93 years later, have we been able to change it? No. You pass it, you own it forever. Sorry, Brad. It’s not better than chaos. Take the chaos and fight for what’s right. Fight for integrity.”

While the Garlinghouse jab was the most explicit, Hoskinson placed it inside a larger narrative: that crypto’s purpose is being reduced to a lobbying-driven contest for acceptable market access rather than an attempt to redesign how value and identity are handled online.

He argued that the industry is at risk of normalizing a world of “custodial wallet” defaults, pervasive KYC, and reversible transactions, outcomes he associated with legacy power structures rather than the original “revolution” ethos.

“I didn’t sign up to hand the revolution to 15 banks,” he said, describing a future where transactions can be “frozen at a whim.” Hoskinson linked those concerns to a broader critique of technological surveillance and what he called the loss of individual “agency,” suggesting the industry’s incentive structure is pulling leaders toward comfort and access rather than confrontation.

The remarks landed amid a separate thread in his talk: a rebuke of what he called “toxic learned hopelessness” in crypto discourse. Hoskinson said he had stopped using X/Twitter, still broadcasting, but not reading or engaging—arguing that constant outrage and demands for instant announcements distort how long negotiations and product development actually work.

At press time, XRP traded at $1.95.

XRP falls into the red support zone again, 1-week chart | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com

相關問答

QWhat was the main criticism Charles Hoskinson directed at Brad Garlinghouse in his January 18, 2026 video?

AHoskinson criticized Garlinghouse for advocating to accept the US Clarity Act despite its flaws, arguing that compromising with a bill that expands SEC authority and treats all new projects as securities by default is worse than regulatory chaos.

QAccording to Hoskinson, what negative outcomes would the proposed regulatory framework lead to for the crypto industry?

AHoskinson argued it would force crypto projects to beg for relief, treat all new projects as securities by default, normalize custodial wallets, pervasive KYC, and reversible transactions, ultimately handing control to traditional banks and allowing transactions to be frozen at a whim.

QWhy does Hoskinson believe that passing a flawed regulatory framework would be effectively irreversible?

AHe invoked the long life of US securities law, specifically referencing the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 which hasn't been changed in over 93 years, arguing that once such a framework is passed, the industry would be stuck with it forever.

QBeyond criticizing Garlinghouse, what broader concern did Hoskinson express about the crypto industry's direction?

AHe expressed concern that the industry's purpose is being reduced to a lobbying-driven contest for acceptable market access rather than a revolution to redesign how value and identity are handled online, and that leaders are being pulled toward comfort and access rather than confrontation.

QWhat did Hoskinson say about his own engagement with social media platform X/Twitter?

AHoskinson stated that he had stopped using X/Twitter in terms of reading or engaging with content, though he still broadcasts, due to what he called 'toxic learned hopelessness' and the distortion that constant outrage and demands for instant announcements create.

你可能也喜歡

TradeXYZ脱离Hyperliquid单飞的可能性有多高

**TradeXYZ脱离Hyperliquid单飞的可能性分析** 随着TradeXYZ业务规模持续扩大,并长期占据Hyperliquid HIP-3市场超过90%的份额,近期社区对其是否可能脱离Hyperliquid并独立搭建交易平台的讨论升温。 **自立门户的驱动力** TradeXYZ已借助Hyperliquid成长为RWA永续合约市场的巨擘,其贡献的交易量占Hyperliquid总交易量70%以上。若选择自立门户,核心商业驱动力可能是为了**捕获全部底层交易手续费**。目前,TradeXYZ与Hyperliquid的交易费用分成固定为50/50,这意味着近一半收入归属于Hyperliquid。对于一个创造超4000亿美元交易量的项目而言,调整分成比例或独立运营以获取全部收益,具有显著吸引力。行业历史上也存在类似案例,如Uniswap、dYdX等项目在壮大后选择构建自有基础设施。 **制约与风险** 然而,TradeXYZ独立面临多重制约: 1. **性能挑战**:Hyperliquid提供了强大的底层技术(HyperCore),管理着撮合、清算等核心功能。自建同等性能的基础设施短期内难以实现,可能影响产品体验和市场叙事。 2. **渠道依赖**:尽管TradeXYZ拥有自己的交易前端,但大部分用户仍习惯通过Hyperliquid前端访问其流动性市场。Hyperliquid是其主要的分发渠道,失去渠道支持的价值难以估量。 3. **合作关系与信任**:TradeXYZ创始人Shoku是Hyperliquid的早期支持者,双方团队关系密切,存在深厚的信任基础。“背刺”合作方可能引发舆论争议,损害信誉。 **双输的潜在结局** 分析指出,若TradeXYZ真的选择分裂,很可能导致**双输局面**: * 对Hyperliquid而言,将失去最大的增长点和叙事基础(RWA合约龙头地位),总交易量可能骤降超50%,其代币HYPE估值或受重创。 * 对TradeXYZ而言,将面临从零开始构建基础设施和培养用户习惯的挑战,同时可能因竞争关系失去原有渠道优势,并在激烈的市场中被其他竞争者趁虚而入。 **结论** 综合来看,虽然TradeXYZ市场影响力日益增强,拥有议价能力,但考虑到技术依赖、渠道价值、双方信任关系以及可能引发的双输竞争,**其脱离Hyperliquid自立门户的可能性较低,也并非理智选择**。更可能的发展路径是在维持现有合作集成优势的基础上,协商更有利的条款,并逐步将发展重点向自身品牌和用户生态建设倾斜。

marsbit30 分鐘前

TradeXYZ脱离Hyperliquid单飞的可能性有多高

marsbit30 分鐘前

从韩国到美国:多亏了AI,蓝领越来越吃香了

人工智能正在重塑劳动力市场,传统四年制大学学位的吸引力下降,而电工、焊工等技术型蓝领职业的需求和薪酬显著上升。数据显示,美国职业学校收入大幅增长,同时AI导致的白领裁员创下新高。供需两端变化推动年轻人重新规划职业路径,调查显示多数Z世代认为蓝领工作在AI时代更具就业保障。 职业教育热度近半年急剧攀升,年轻人主动寻求不易被AI替代且有实际用工需求的职业,技术岗位招聘甚至比程序员更困难。专家指出,这既是经济计算,也源于对高额学位债务和纯屏幕工作的反思。技术职业薪资中位数已追平或超越许多需要学位的工作,且提供边学边赚的学徒路径及创业可能。韩国半导体高中毕业生就业率极高,进入三星等企业可获得丰厚薪酬。 美国面临结构性技术工人短缺:大量婴儿潮一代即将退休,而新一代劳动力数量不足,缺口达数百万。同时,数据中心等基建扩张推高了相关技术工种需求。为此,摩根大通、Meta等企业正投资巨额资金开展培训项目。 尽管市场信号明确,但社会对职业教育的传统偏见仍构成“认知差距”。产业界需主动推广,让公众认识到技术职业不仅收入稳定,还是通向创业的快速路径,以真正缓解人才短缺。

marsbit1 小時前

从韩国到美国:多亏了AI,蓝领越来越吃香了

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片