Wall Street Banks Seen as Unlikely Saviors as Crypto Firms Struggle

CoinDesk發佈於 2022-11-21更新於 2022-11-21

文章摘要

Blockchain true believers say the nascent industry represents an existential threat to traditional finance. But now's probably not the time for Wall Street to gobble up ailing crypto firms, analysts say.

It took years for the crypto industry to gain trust – and capital – from the major institutional players on Wall Street. And just as more big traditional players seemed on the cusp of making a move into fast-growing blockchain markets, the messy collapse of Sam Bankman-Fried’s crypto empire has renewed comparisons of the digital-asset industry to the Wild West.

As the Welsh poet Robert Williams said, “Trust is the easiest thing in the world to lose, and the hardest thing in the world to get back.”

But one question now is whether big banks might see the crypto industry’s latest troubles as an attractive opportunity to nose into blockchain-based markets.

In May this year, U.S. banking giant JPMorgan Chase signed two popular crypto exchanges as clients, as sign that Wall Street is starting to accept cryptocurrencies to the extent that it sees value in them for their own future.

Might some major banks be looking to step in as savior in times when the industry is struggling, just as John Pierpont Morgan himself once rescued the banking industry in the early 20th century, prior to the creation of the Federal Reserve? (The Fed, which famously saved Wall Street from collapsing during the financial crisis of 2008, does not stand behind the less-regulated crypto industry.)

Experts say it’s unlikely.

“Banks are the natural enemy of the crypto industry because they both sell purportedly the same product line, so it’s unlikely that they would be willing to step in to assist the industry,” Odeon Capital Group chief financial strategist Dick Bove said.

In a press statement following the collapse of crypto exchange FTX, the Bank Policy Institute, which represents big banks, said in a statement that “as FTX files for bankruptcy after failing to secure a bailout, policymakers should ensure they do not embed crypto firms in the heart of the financial system by giving them Fed accounts."

If they did, "the next crisis in the cryptoverse could threaten financial stability,” according to the statement.

Not a problem

Banks, however, have gotten increasingly interested and tried to get a foothold in the industry. Besides JPMorgan, crypto-friendly banking institution Silvergate Bank signed over 850 digital currency customers, including 61 exchanges, 541 institutional investors and 248 other customers.

“The banks that are in this business are going to say, ‘It’s not going to cause a problem for us,’ and the ones who aren’t in it will say, ‘We told you so,’ but they’re not going to be of any help,” Bove said.

Silvergate’s stock is down 10% in November, after it announced that it had exposure to failed crypto exchange FTX. As of Sept. 30, the bank had a total of $11.9 billion in deposits from all digital asset customers, of which FTX's was less than 10%.

U.S. exchanges also might be out of the game.

“For heavily U.S.-regulated exchanges, I doubt that Wall Street would be interested,” said Jim Bianco, president and macro strategist at Bianco Research. “For off-shore exchanges, their regulator would probably force them to resign if they touched any of them.”

He says traditional banks don’t understand the crypto business well enough to take the risk of jumping in.

It goes without saying that regulators might be reluctant to even let big Wall Street firms swallow a big crypto firm, with so many officials quite vocal about the risks from the digital-asset industry. They’ve been slow to create a broad regulatory framework that would embrace crypto as part of the existing financial system.

Wall Street banks probably don't mind too much watching the crypto industry flounder, Bove said.

“Banks aren’t worried about the crypto industry breaking away” right now, he said. “Just about every major bank knows how to create its own tokens. If it wants into the industry it is not hard to get there. What the banks want is to avoid their core business from being cannibalized.”

你可能也喜歡

特朗普总统2031年后量子安全指令引发加密技术紧急升级

美国总统唐纳德·特朗普发布行政命令,旨在提升美国对未来量子计算发展的应对能力。命令为联邦机构设定了严格的时间表,要求其将加密技术升级至抗量子技术。 根据第14409号行政令,联邦机构需在2030年12月前完成对重要信息系统(安全通信、密钥管理等)的升级。此外,政府要求所有联邦数字签名基础设施在2031年12月前迁移至后量子标准。白宫对“现在窃取,未来解密”的攻击模式表示担忧,即外国行为体现在收集加密数据,待未来量子计算机成熟后再进行解密。 为加速准备工作,特朗普总统下令商务部与国家标准技术研究院启动后量子迁移试点计划。另一项行政令则旨在增强国内量子计算能力、加强供应链韧性,并计划在2028年前更新国家量子战略与技术基准。 这一联邦指令也引发了加密货币行业的广泛关注,因为所有区块链网络都严重依赖椭圆曲线密码学。行业参与者已将量子计算视为即将到来的威胁,并开始计划必要的基础设施升级。谷歌量子AI的最新进展显示,攻击密码系统所需的资源已大幅减少,专家发现有效利用肖尔算法可攻击多数常用区块链的签名方案。 以太坊团队已提出经NIST批准的低成本账户保护方案;Algorand基金会计划在2027年前引入Falcon后量子签名方案与混合账户;Ripple则推出了在2028年前实现抗量子性的四阶段计划。比特币也面临额外压力,因其有数百万代币存放在公钥已暴露的旧式地址中。 行业注意力正集中在长期安全上,各大区块链网络持续观察并计划在量子计算能力成熟前调整其安全架构。白宫的指导方针进一步强调了向后量子架构迁移的紧迫性。

TheNewsCrypto1 小時前

特朗普总统2031年后量子安全指令引发加密技术紧急升级

TheNewsCrypto1 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片