Bitcoin's 'Never-Setting Sun' and Altcoins' 'Twilight of the Gods': Has the Four-Year Cycle Really Ended?

marsbit發佈於 2025-12-25更新於 2025-12-25

文章摘要

The crypto market in 2025 is experiencing an unprecedented divergence: Bitcoin (BTC) reached new highs of $125,000 driven by institutional inflows via ETFs, while Ethereum (ETH) struggled around $2,800, and most altcoins fell 80-95% from their 2021 peaks. The traditional four-year cycle—where BTC leads, ETH follows, and altcoins surge—has broken down. This "great divergence" is fueled by institutionalization. BTC has become a "digital tech stock," correlated with Nasdaq, as traditional asset managers like BlackRock channel hundreds of billions solely into Bitcoin, creating a "one-way siphon" that leaves altcoins behind. ETH faces a "midlife crisis" due to Layer 2 solutions diverting value away from the mainnet and a lack of compelling new narratives. Altcoins are in a "liquidity black hole," plagued by high FDV/low float VC tokens, meme coin fatigue, and collapsing exchange liquidity. Major 2026 forecasts from Grayscale and CoinShares predict this structural shift is permanent. They expect BTC dominance to rise further, with BTC potentially reaching $150,000, while ETH undergoes a painful transformation. Most altcoins will be wiped out in a "Darwinian cleansing," with only projects offering real utility, sustainable revenue, and a clear regulatory path surviving. The four-year cycle isn't dead but has transformed. Future cycles may be "lame bull markets" where BTC rallies alone or with minimal spillover, signaling a permanent shift from a speculative, retail-driven market ...

As 2025 draws to a close, the crypto market is exhibiting an unprecedented "split" landscape: Bitcoin (BTC) is repeatedly hitting new all-time highs, driven by institutional capital, having once touched $125,000; Ethereum (ETH) is struggling around $2,800, still significantly below its historical peak; and the once "rising tide that lifted all boats" altcoins have plunged into an abyss, with most projects down 80-95% from their 2021 highs, failing to recover even as BTC reaches new heights.

This completely deviates from the classic narrative of the crypto market over the past decade. The traditional "four-year cycle" script—"BTC rises first → ETH catches up → altcoins surge in rotation—seems to have completely failed in 2025. The familiar "carving the mark on the moving boat" strategy of veteran players has now become a joke of "carving the mark to find fish".

Meanwhile, outlook reports for 2026 from institutions like Grayscale and CoinShares further reinforce a harsh reality: the "class solidification" of the crypto market is accelerating—BTC is becoming the "digital gold" for institutional asset allocation, while altcoins are relegated to a "twilight of the gods" with dried-up liquidity.

Is this a temporary failure of the cycle, or a permanent change in market structure? This article will deconstruct this ongoing "crypto paradigm shift" from four dimensions: phenomenon observation, underlying mechanisms, institutional behavior, and liquidity structure.

I. Phenomenon Observation: The "Great Divergence" Between BTC and Altcoins

1.1 Data Doesn't Lie: Unprecedented Performance Divergence

The crypto market in 2025 can be aptly described as "a tale of two extremes".

Chart: ETH/BTC Exchange Rate

1. Bitcoin's "Never-Setting Sun":

  • Robust Price Performance: Rose from around $70,000 at the start of the year to a high of $125,000 (+78%), still maintaining between $86,000-$88,000 even after pullbacks.
  • Institutional Capital Inflow: Spot ETFs saw net inflows of tens of billions of dollars, with products like BlackRock's IBIT dominating the market.
  • Highly Concentrated Holdings: ETFs hold over a million BTC; MicroStrategy holds about 670,000 BTC (3.2% of circulating supply).
  • Increased Market Dominance: BTC's dominance surged from 50% in early 2024 to 59-60% currently, a multi-year high.

2. Ethereum's "Midlife Crisis":

  • Severely Lagging Gains: Limited gains this year, current price around $2,800, far inferior to BTC's performance.
  • Collapse in Relative Value: ETH/BTC rate fell to multi-year lows, down over 60% from its historical high.
  • Lackluster Institutional Interest: Total AUM of spot ETFs is far lower than BTC ETFs, with periodic outflows.
  • Sluggish On-Chain Activity: Significantly reduced Gas fees, reflecting weak user activity and network demand.

3. Altcoins' "Twilight of the Gods":

  • Seasonal Indicator Collapse: Altcoin Season Index remained below 20 all year (above 50 indicates altcoin season), the longest period of depression on record.
  • Widespread Underperformance: Most projects in the top 100 by market cap underperformed BTC this year; many are down over 80% from 2021 highs.
  • New Listings Immediately Break Issue Price: New coins listed on major CEXs in 5 routinely broke their issue price upon listing; VC coins became "poison".
  • Liquidity Drying Up: Average daily trading volume for altcoins plummeted over 70% compared to 2021; insufficient CEX depth means any selling pressure can trigger a crash.

1.2 Historical Comparison: This Time "It's Really Different"

Looking back at the past three bull markets, the rotation logic of "BTC → ETH → altcoins" was almost an iron law of the market:

2017 Bull Market: The Classic Three-Stage Rocket

  • BTC rose from $1,000 to $20,000 (+1,900%)
  • ETH skyrocketed from $8 to $1,400 (+17,400%)
  • ICO泡沫引爆,山寨币普遍50-500倍涨幅 (ICO bubble ignited, altcoins普遍 gained 50-500x)

2020-2021 Bull Market: The DeFi and NFT Carnival

  • BTC rose from $10,000 to $69,000 (+590%)
  • ETH rose from $200 to $4,800 (+2,300%)
  • DeFi Summer and NFT frenzy pushed altcoins to gains of 10-100x普遍.

2024-2025 Bull Market: Transmission Mechanism Failure

  • BTC rose significantly from its low to $125,000 (+78%+)
  • ETH gains limited, hovering around $2,800
  • Altcoins collectively flatlined, even falling further as BTC hit new highs

The core difference is clear: In 2025, BTC's gains no longer "spill over" to ETH and altcoins. Capital seems trapped behind an invisible wall within the BTC ecosystem. The name of that wall is "institutionalization".

II. Underlying Mechanisms: How Institutional ETFs "Rewrite the Rules of the Game"

2.1 BTC Becomes a "Shadow of US Tech Stocks"

Chart: 30-day correlation coefficient between BTC and Nasdaq/Gold

In January 2024, the US SEC approved spot BTC ETFs, marking the crypto market's entry into the "institutional era." However, a side effect of this milestone is BTC gradually detaching from crypto-native narratives and becoming a "satellite asset" of traditional finance.

High Correlation with Nasdaq

In 2025, the 30-day correlation coefficient between BTC and the Nasdaq 100 index remained stable in the 0.75-0.85 range, hitting a record high; its correlation with gold dropped below 0.2. When US tech stocks (like Nvidia, Tesla) surged, BTC ETF inflows accelerated; when US stocks corrected, BTC fell in sync.

Essential Shift: BTC is no longer "digital gold" (safe-haven asset), but "digital tech stock" (risk asset). Its pricing power has shifted from crypto natives to Wall Street fund managers.

"One-Way Siphoning" Effect of Institutional Buying

Clients of traditional asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity (pensions, family offices, high-net-worth individuals) only recognize BTC, not altcoins. The reason isn't a deep understanding of crypto technology, but a trifecta of "regulatory compliance + sufficient liquidity + brand recognition":

  • BTC has SEC-approved spot ETFs.
  • BTC has CME futures and a well-developed derivatives market.
  • BTC has 15 years of brand accumulation.

In contrast, altcoins are still "unidentified assets" in the eyes of institutions,叠加 regulatory risk, liquidity risk, and project risk,根本无法 passing traditional financial due diligence.

Structural Solidification of Capital Flows: In 2025, of the hundreds of billions flowing into BTC ETFs, over 95% was locked within the BTC ecosystem, with less than 5% flowing into ETH/altcoins via OTC trades or DeFi bridges. This starkly contrasts with the past "capital spillover effect".

MicroStrategy's "Infinite Ammo" Model

Michael Saylor's MicroStrategy has become another dominant force in the BTC market. By issuing convertible bonds, secondary offerings, etc., the company continuously buys BTC, currently holding about 670,000 BTC (cost ~$30 billion).

More crucially, MSTR's stock price has long traded at a 2-3x premium to the value of its held BTC, making it a proxy tool for retail investors to "leveraged long BTC". A positive feedback loop is thus formed:

MSTR stock price rises → Market cap膨胀 → Ability to issue debt increases → Buys more BTC → Pushes BTC price higher → MSTR stock price rises again

This "corporate hoarding" model further siphons capital that could have flowed into altcoins, strengthening BTC's dominance.

2.2 Why Did ETH "Fall Behind"? Layer 2's "Vampire Attack"

Ethereum's weak performance is not only due to lack of institutional interest but also internal contradictions within its own ecosystem.

Layer 2's Liquidity Fragmentation Dilemma

The TVL (Total Value Locked) of Layer 2 networks like Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, zkSync has exceeded tens of billions,接近 60% of the mainnet's. But the problem is, the tokens of these L2s (ARB, OP, etc.) do not adequately capture value for ETH, instead diverting users and capital.

Core Contradiction: When users transact on L2s, the Gas fees paid are in L2 tokens or stablecoins, not ETH. The economic model of L2s is structurally decoupled from the ETH mainnet—the more successful L2s are, the lower the demand for ETH. This is a classic "vampire attack".

Staking Yield's "Prisoner's Dilemma"

After transitioning to PoS, ETH staking offers an annual yield of ~3-4%. Although liquid staking derivatives (like Lido's stETH) account for a significant portion of the total stake, this has not pushed the ETH price higher.

Paradox: Staked ETH is locked, reducing circulating supply (theoretically bullish for price), but it also reduces speculative demand (actually suppressing price). ETH has been downgraded from "programmable money" to "interest-bearing bond", but its 3-4% yield cannot compete with US Treasuries at 4.5%, let alone attract crypto investors seeking high returns.

Narrative Vacuum Lacking Killer Apps

The DeFi Summer and NFT frenzy of 2021 made ETH synonymous with the "world computer". But in 2025:

  • DeFi TVL halved from its peak.
  • NFT trading volume crashed 90%.
  • Emerging applications like AI Agent, on-chain games have not yet achieved scale.

The narrative contrast is stark: BTC has a clear positioning as "digital gold + institutional allocation", Solana has market consensus as "high-performance公链 + Meme culture", while ETH's positioning is模糊—not "hard currency" enough, nor "sexy" enough.

2.3 Altcoins' "Liquidity Black Hole"

If BTC is the "empire on which the sun never sets", and ETH is having a "midlife crisis", then altcoins are experiencing a true "twilight of the gods"—former star projects are falling, new projects are stillborn.

VC Coins' "High FDV Low Float" Death Trap

In 2024-2025, many VC-backed projects launched with extremely high valuations (FDV often $1-5 billion), but with only 5-10% circulating supply. This model is doomed:

  • Retail investors buy at high prices.
  • VC and team unlock selling pressure持续 for 1-3 years.
  • Prices grind lower long-term, even valuable projects can't escape.

Typical case: A知名 Layer 1 project launched with FDV $3 billion, circulating market cap only $300 million. 6 months later, price down 80%, FDV still $1 billion—valuation still inflated, but retail investors are wiped out.

Meme Coins' "Ponzi Game" and Market Fatigue

In 2025, Meme coins on Solana (like BONK, WIF, POPCAT) briefly attracted capital, but are "zero-sum games"—early players harvest later players. Lacking real value支撑, 90% of Meme coins go to zero within 3 months.

More serious is the market fatigue effect: After being "harvested" repeatedly (2022 Terra collapse, FTX bankruptcy, 2024-2025 VC coin暴雷), retail investors gradually远离 the altcoin market,形成 a psychological trauma of "once bitten, twice shy".

CEX's "Liquidity Drought" and Death Spiral

Altcoin trading volume on top exchanges like Binance, Coinbase暴跌 over 70% compared to 2021; smaller exchanges are closing down浪潮. Reasons include:

  • Regulatory Pressure: SEC's ongoing lawsuits against Binance, Coinbase.
  • User Loss: Shift to compliant products like BTC ETFs.
  • Declining Project Quality: Bad money drives out good.

Low liquidity leads to increased price volatility (order book depth for a 10% move might be less than $100k), further scaring away investors, forming a death spiral: "liquidity dries up → price crashes → investors leave → liquidity dries up further".

Narrative Exhaustion and Homogeneous Competition Dilemma

2017 had ICOs, 2020 had DeFi, 2021 had NFTs and Metaverse, 2024 had AI and RWA... but 2025 has no new narrative真正 igniting the market.

Existing sectors (Layer 1, Layer 2, DeFi, NFT) are highly saturated, projects are heavily homogenized, users cannot distinguish good from bad. Final result: Capital doesn't know where to invest, so it just "parks" in BTC.

III. Institutional Perspective: Grayscale and CoinShares' 2026 Predictions

3.1 Grayscale Report: Dawn of the Institutional Era and a Tiered Landscape

Grayscale, in its 《2026 Digital Asset Outlook: Dawn of the Institutional Era》, clearly states the crypto market is entering a new phase dominated by traditional finance.

BTC: Irreversible Institutionalization Process

Grayscale expects 2026 to accelerate the shift in digital asset investment structure, driven by two main themes:

  • Macro Demand for Alternative Store-of-Value Assets: Ongoing fiscal imbalances, inflation risks, and global money supply growth drive demand for BTC and ETH as scarce digital commodities.
  • Increasing Regulatory Clarity: Expect more countries to approve crypto ETP products; US might pass bipartisan market structure legislation, further integrating blockchain finance.

Key catalysts include:

  • The 20 Millionth Bitcoin即将 Mined: The 20 millionth BTC (out of 21 million) will be mined in March 2026, a milestone reinforcing BTC's fixed supply transparency and scarcity narrative.
  • Rising Institutional Allocation: US state pensions, sovereign wealth funds (like Harvard Endowment and UAE's Mubadala have already started) will gradually increase BTC allocation from current <0.5% to higher levels.
  • Hedge Against USD Devaluation: Amid soaring US debt and global de-dollarization trend, BTC's hedging属性 as "digital gold" becomes more prominent.

Grayscale predicts BTC could hit a new all-time high in H1 2026,突破 $150,000 as a base case.

ETH: "Sideways Accumulation" Amid Painful Transformation

Grayscale直言 ETH is undergoing a "painful transformation", needing time to adapt to institutional adoption and regulatory standards. Three转型 directions include:

  • Deep Binding of Layer 2 and Mainnet: Through economic model improvements (like further evolution of EIP-4844), making L2 success truly benefit ETH value.
  • Institutional-Grade DeFi/RWA Apps: Scaling compliant use cases like tokenized bonds, on-chain asset management.
  • Mass Consumer Adoption: On-chain social, gaming apps breaking out of "small circles".

But these transformations need 1-2 years to verify. Grayscale predicts 2026 is more likely a "sideways accumulation" phase for ETH, with relatively limited price gains, far from replicating the explosive growth of 2017 or 2021.

Altcoins: Tiered Fate and Survival of the Fittest

The report emphasizes "Not all tokens will successfully transition out of the old era", altcoins will show clear stratification:

Tier 1: Quasi-Institutional Grade Assets

  • Representatives: Solana, Avalanche, Polygon
  • Characteristics: Real users, institutional backing, regulatory path.
  • Expectation: May attract some institutional capital, but gains far inferior to BTC.

Tier 2: Ecosystem & Utility Tokens

  • Representatives: DeFi protocols (Aave, Morpho, Uniswap), AI chains (Bittensor, Near)
  • Characteristics: Benefit from real use case growth, have cash flow支撑.
  • Expectation: Limited upside, but can survive in the "utility era".

Tier 3: Speculative Tokens

  • Representatives: Meme coins, purely narrative projects, high FDV low float VC coins.
  • Characteristics: Lack practical utility, rely on retail FOMO.
  • Expectation: High probability of归零 or marginalization.

Grayscale clearly states the "普涨时代 universal rising tide era" for altcoins is彻底 over, the traditional four-year halving cycle is瓦解, replaced by more stable institutional capital inflows. Only projects with sustainable revenue, real users, and a regulatory path will survive; the rest will disappear in the "survival of the fittest".

3.2 CoinShares: From Speculation to Utility, "Hybrid Finance" Defines the Future

CoinShares' 《Outlook 2026: Toward Convergence and Beyond》 report proposes a more radical view: 2025 is the last year of speculation-driven markets, 2026 will shift towards utility, cash flow, and integration.

The Rise of "Hybrid Finance"

CoinShares introduces the "Hybrid Finance" concept: deep integration of public blockchains with traditional financial systems, creating new infrastructure neither can build alone. The core story for 2026 is "convergence":

1. Traditional Institutions Building on Public Chains:

  • BlackRock issuing on-chain money market funds (BUIDL)
  • Franklin Templeton launching tokenized treasuries
  • Banks like Citi, HSBC conducting bond issuance on private chains

2. Stablecoins Shift from Crypto Tool to Global Payment Rail:

  • Regulatory frameworks like US GENIUS Act, EU MiCA provide green lights.
  • After Stripe acquires Bridge, businesses can integrate stablecoin payments directly via API.
  • Stablecoin market cap moves from $200B towards $500B.

3. Tokenization Explosion:

  • Private credit, tokenized treasuries dominate the market.
  • On-chain products offer faster settlement, lower cost, global distribution.
  • RWA (Real World Asset) market cap expected to突破 $50 billion in 2026.

4. Value Capture Era:

  • Apps like Hyperliquid use revenue to buy back/burn tokens.
  • Tokens upgrade from "governance tools" to "equity-like assets".
  • Cash flow and fundamentals become core valuation metrics.

Institutional Dominance and Disappearing Retail FOMO

CoinShares points out that 2025 BTC ETF inflows exceeded $90 billion, showing institutional mainstreaming is irreversible. Meanwhile, retail FOMO sentiment has significantly weakened due to past trauma, narrative fatigue, and regulatory uncertainty. Retail capital chooses to观望 or is limited to mainstream assets like BTC.

2026 Price Scenario Predictions

CoinShares provides three scenarios based on macro environment:

  • Soft Landing (Base Case): BTC突破 $150,000, ETH follows limitedly, quasi-institutional altcoins rise moderately.
  • Stable Growth: BTC maintains in $110,000-$140,000 range, market volatility decreases.
  • Stagflation/Recession: Short-term pressure but medium-term recovery, BTC's "digital gold" attributes highlighted.

Core Predictions:

  • BTC's dominance rises further to over 65% (currently 59-60%).
  • Institutions dominate pricing power, retail influence marginalized.
  • Liquidity concentrates towards utility projects; only projects with "real users + real revenue + compliance path" win.
  • 90% of existing altcoins will be eliminated, market completes "natural selection".

Ultimate Judgment: CoinShares believes 2026 is not about digital assets "challenging" traditional finance, but becoming part of mainstream finance. Utility wins, hybrid finance defines the future, the crypto market will transform from "disruptor" to "integrator".

IV. Core Question: Has the Four-Year Cycle Really Ended?

4.1 The Nature of the Cycle: From "Supply-Driven" to "Demand-Driven"

The past four-year cycle was essentially a supply-driven model:

Classic Transmission of Halving Effect: BTC halving → Miner selling pressure reduces → Supply contracts → Price rises → Triggers FOMO → Retail floods in → Capital spills over to ETH → Spills over further to altcoins.

Cyclical Entry of New Capital: Each bull market had new capital sources (2017 ICO retail, 2021 DeFi/NFT players & pandemic money printing潮), this capital followed the natural flow path "BTC→ETH→altcoins".

2025 Structural Change: Demand-Side Restructuring

However, in 2025, the demand side changed fundamentally:

  • Institutional Capital's "Directed Demand": Only buys BTC, not altcoins, preventing capital "spillover".
  • Retail FOMO's "Permanent Absence": After the 2022 crash, retail lost confidence in altcoins, dare not chase even as BTC hits new highs.
  • Solidification of Liquidity Tiers: The liquidity pools of BTC, ETH, and altcoins are彻底割裂 split, capital cannot flow freely as before.

Conclusion: The "halving → BTC rise → altcoin rotation" logic of the four-year cycle hasn't ended, but its transmission mechanism has been interrupted by institutionalization. Future cycles might be "lame bull markets" of "BTC rises alone → ETH barely follows → altcoins continue to languish".

4.2 Do Altcoins Have a Future?

The answer is: Most altcoins have no future, but a few sectors still have room to survive.

Altcoin Types With No Future

  • High FDV Low Float VC Coins: Inherently flawed economic model, retail is always the bag holder.
  • Meme Coins with No Practical Use: Except for a few "cultural symbols" (like DOGE, SHIB), most will go to zero.
  • Homogeneous Layer 1/Layer 2: The market only needs 3-5 major公链 (ETH, Solana, BNB Chain, etc.), the rest are "zombie chains".

The crypto market in 2025 is undergoing a painful but necessary "rite of passage"—transitioning from a retail-dominated casino to an institution-dominated asset allocation market.

Bitcoin's "never-setting sun" is not a victory for crypto, but the "taming" of crypto by traditional finance. When BTC becomes a "shadow of US tech stocks", it gains liquidity and compliance, but loses its original intention of "decentralized money". This is progress, but also compromise.

The altcoins' "twilight of the gods" is not an end, but the eve of rebirth. When the bubble bursts and bad coins are purged, truly valuable projects will rise from the ashes. History always rhymes—every bubble破裂孕育 the seeds of the next era.

The four-year cycle has not ended; it has merely changed its face. Future bull markets may no longer be a狂欢 of "all coins rising together", but a残酷竞赛 of "the strong get stronger, the weak get eliminated". In this race, those who understand the new rules, embrace institutionalization, and adhere to value investing will have the last laugh.

Data for this report was compiled and edited by WolfDAO. Please contact us if you have any questions for updates;

Author: Nikka / WolfDAO( X : @10xWolfdao )

熱門幣種推薦

相關問答

QWhat is the main reason for the unprecedented divergence between Bitcoin and altcoins in 2025 according to the article?

AThe main reason is the structural shift driven by institutionalization, particularly the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs. This created a 'one-way siphon effect' where institutional capital from traditional asset managers like BlackRock and Fidelity flowed almost exclusively into Bitcoin, with less than 5% spilling over into ETH or altcoins. This broke the traditional cycle where Bitcoin's gains would overflow into the broader crypto market.

QHow did the article describe the change in Bitcoin's correlation and its new perceived role in the market?

AThe article states that Bitcoin's 30-day correlation with the Nasdaq 100 index reached a historically high range of 0.75-0.85, while its correlation with gold fell below 0.2. This signifies a fundamental转变: Bitcoin is no longer perceived as 'digital gold' (a safe-haven asset) but has instead become a 'digital tech stock' (a risk-on asset), with its pricing power shifting from crypto natives to Wall Street fund managers.

QWhat two major themes did Grayscale's 2026 outlook report identify as drivers for the structural shift in digital asset investing?

AGrayscale's report identified two major themes: 1) Macro demand for alternative store-of-value assets, driven by ongoing fiscal imbalances, inflation risks, and global money supply growth, boosting demand for scarce digital commodities like BTC and ETH. 2) Increasing regulatory clarity, with expectations for more countries approving crypto ETPs and potential bipartisan market structure legislation in the U.S., further integrating blockchain finance.

QAccording to the article, what is the 'vampire attack' problem facing Ethereum (ETH)?

AThe 'vampire attack' refers to the problem where the success of Layer 2 networks (like Arbitrum, Optimism) does not fully benefit ETH's value. Users on L2s pay transaction fees in the L2's native token or stablecoins, not ETH. This creates a structural decoupling: the more successful the L2 ecosystems become, the lower the direct demand for ETH itself, as economic activity is siphoned away from the mainnet.

QWhat concept did CoinShares introduce in its 2026 outlook, and what does it represent?

ACoinShares introduced the concept of 'Hybrid Finance' (HyFi). It represents the deep integration of public blockchains with traditional financial systems, creating new infrastructure that neither could build alone. This convergence involves traditional institutions building on public chains (e.g., BlackRock's on-chain money market fund), stablecoins becoming global payment rail, the explosion of tokenization (e.g., real-world assets), and a new era of value capture where tokens are valued based on cash flows and fundamentals.

你可能也喜歡

芯片设备“铁律”,正在被打破

长期以来,半导体设备行业存在一条“买方市场”铁律:设备商在新设备导入时常需大幅降价,后续重复采购时也面临持续压价压力。但这一规则正在被打破。近期,SK海力士的多家设备供应商反向提出涨价请求,反映出AI算力狂潮引发的设备供需失衡。 以TCB(热压键合)设备为例,因HBM4扩产需求,韩美半导体、韩华Semitech等厂商订单激增。尽管混合键合技术被视为未来方向,但在HBM4阶段,TCB因技术成熟、量产风险低仍是主流,且其自身也在不断升级。市场预计TCB与混合键合将在未来一段时间内共存。 AI扩产潮还导致测试设备面临关键零部件(如FPGA、CPU、Driver IC)短缺,这些部件被数据中心优先抢购,致使测试设备交付延迟,形成“AI芯片缺货-扩产-测试设备需求增加-关键部件被抢-设备延期”的连锁反应。 整体上,半导体设备行业正进入由AI驱动的新一轮上行周期。SEMI预计全球设备销售额将持续增长至2027年。增长动力主要来自三条主线:先进逻辑芯片(如台积电、英特尔扩产)、存储(尤其是HBM带动DRAM投资)以及先进封装(如CoWoS)。AI算力需求正在重塑设备市场的格局与定价权。 总之,头部设备商凭借在关键工艺节点上的技术壁垒和产能保障能力,正获得前所未有的议价权,改写半导体行业的利益分配格局。

marsbit10 分鐘前

芯片设备“铁律”,正在被打破

marsbit10 分鐘前

TradingView分析师警告:比特币必须守住6万美元,否则面临重大破位风险

比特币目前正处在一个被交易员视为心理和技术关键价位的位置。分析师weslad在6月20日的分析中指出,BTCUSDT已触及一个新的需求区,这可能决定其下一波主要走势。该区域被视为买盘已经介入,但也绝不能失守的防线。 图表分析显示,只要比特币能守住当前需求区,反弹至81,000美元供应区域的概率仍然很高。这将意味着价格回归近期跌势的起点,若买盘能维持压力,可能引发流动性争夺。 跌破6万美元将严重损害看涨前景。该水位被视作多头的底线,若收盘价明确跌破,将破坏看涨结构,并可能导致更深度的下跌。该价位的重要性不仅在于其是整数心理关口,还在于许多交易者都在关注同一支撑位,一旦失守可能触发止损盘、强制平仓和市场情绪转变。反之,若能守住该区域,则能为多头提供有力论据,表明近期抛售已达衰竭点。 上行目标81,000美元固然诱人,但比特币仍需为此创造条件。多头需要捍卫60,000美元,收复附近阻力位,并证明需求足够强劲,能将防御性反弹转变为趋势反转。在此之前,市场格局最好被理解为一个二元化的支撑测试:守住区域,则复苏希望犹存;明确失守,则市场可能开始为更深度的调整定价。

bitcoinist2 小時前

TradingView分析师警告:比特币必须守住6万美元,否则面临重大破位风险

bitcoinist2 小時前

不可能三角根本就是伪问题

加密行业构建了强大的密码学系统,但默认状态下却无法保护用户资金的隐私,所有交易和持仓都公开可查,这成为大规模资金入场的主要障碍。文章认为,区块链本质上是一台无人拥有的慢速、昂贵计算机,其核心价值在于提供无需许可的准入和去中心化信任。资金(尤其是稳定币)是天然适合上链的资产,因为账本记录即资产本身。 然而,行业长期关注的“不可能三角”(去中心化、可扩展性、安全性)并非真正瓶颈。实际阻碍在于两大设计缺陷:合法性与隐私。合法性方面,无许可特性导致监管灰色地带,但随着美国《GENIUS法案》等监管框架落地,合规环境正在改善。 更关键的缺陷是“透明度税”。链上所有交易公开,导致用户面临MEV(矿工可提取价值)被抢跑、夹击等风险,这实质上是一种持续的成本。对于家族办公室、大型机构等严肃资本而言,公开资产负债表是无法接受的。隐私并非与合规对立,现代密码学(如零知识证明)允许在不泄露具体数据的情况下证明合规性(如偿付能力、KYC),实现“可证明的合规隐私”。 作者指出,为链上交易添加隐私保护是一次纯粹升级,它将把加密系统从“公开的谷歌表格”转变为能保守秘密的共享机器,从而吸引数万亿规模的机构资金,真正释放区块链的潜力。

链捕手13 小時前

不可能三角根本就是伪问题

链捕手13 小時前

交易

現貨
合約

熱門文章

什麼是 $S$

理解 SPERO:全面概述 SPERO 簡介 隨著創新領域的不斷演變,web3 技術和加密貨幣項目的出現在塑造數字未來中扮演著關鍵角色。在這個動態領域中,SPERO(標記為 SPERO,$$s$)是一個引起關注的項目。本文旨在收集並呈現有關 SPERO 的詳細信息,以幫助愛好者和投資者理解其基礎、目標和在 web3 和加密領域內的創新。 SPERO,$$s$ 是什麼? SPERO,$$s$ 是加密空間中的一個獨特項目,旨在利用去中心化和區塊鏈技術的原則,創建一個促進參與、實用性和金融包容性的生態系統。該項目旨在以新的方式促進點對點互動,為用戶提供創新的金融解決方案和服務。 SPERO,$$s$ 的核心目標是通過提供增強用戶體驗的工具和平台來賦能個人。這包括使交易方式更加靈活、促進社區驅動的倡議,以及通過去中心化應用程序(dApps)創造金融機會的途徑。SPERO,$$s$ 的基本願景圍繞包容性展開,旨在彌合傳統金融中的差距,同時利用區塊鏈技術的優勢。 誰是 SPERO,$$s$ 的創建者? SPERO,$$s$ 的創建者身份仍然有些模糊,因為公開可用的資源對其創始人提供的詳細背景信息有限。這種缺乏透明度可能源於該項目對去中心化的承諾——這是一種許多 web3 項目所共享的精神,優先考慮集體貢獻而非個人認可。 通過將討論重心放在社區及其共同目標上,SPERO,$$s$ 體現了賦能的本質,而不特別突出某些個體。因此,理解 SPERO 的精神和使命比識別單一創建者更為重要。 誰是 SPERO,$$s$ 的投資者? SPERO,$$s$ 得到了來自風險投資家到天使投資者的多樣化投資者的支持,他們致力於促進加密領域的創新。這些投資者的關注點通常與 SPERO 的使命一致——優先考慮那些承諾社會技術進步、金融包容性和去中心化治理的項目。 這些投資者通常對不僅提供創新產品,還對區塊鏈社區及其生態系統做出積極貢獻的項目感興趣。這些投資者的支持強化了 SPERO,$$s$ 作為快速發展的加密項目領域中的一個重要競爭者。 SPERO,$$s$ 如何運作? SPERO,$$s$ 採用多面向的框架,使其與傳統的加密貨幣項目區別開來。以下是一些突顯其獨特性和創新的關鍵特徵: 去中心化治理:SPERO,$$s$ 整合了去中心化治理模型,賦予用戶積極參與決策過程的權力,關於項目的未來。這種方法促進了社區成員之間的擁有感和責任感。 代幣實用性:SPERO,$$s$ 使用其自己的加密貨幣代幣,旨在在生態系統內部提供多種功能。這些代幣使交易、獎勵和平台上提供的服務得以促進,增強了整體參與度和實用性。 分層架構:SPERO,$$s$ 的技術架構支持模塊化和可擴展性,允許在項目發展過程中無縫整合額外的功能和應用。這種適應性對於在不斷變化的加密環境中保持相關性至關重要。 社區參與:該項目強調社區驅動的倡議,採用激勵合作和反饋的機制。通過培養強大的社區,SPERO,$$s$ 能夠更好地滿足用戶需求並適應市場趨勢。 專注於包容性:通過提供低交易費用和用戶友好的界面,SPERO,$$s$ 旨在吸引多樣化的用戶群體,包括那些以前可能未曾參與加密領域的個體。這種對包容性的承諾與其通過可及性賦能的總體使命相一致。 SPERO,$$s$ 的時間線 理解一個項目的歷史提供了對其發展軌跡和里程碑的關鍵見解。以下是建議的時間線,映射 SPERO,$$s$ 演變中的重要事件: 概念化和構思階段:形成 SPERO,$$s$ 基礎的初步想法被提出,與區塊鏈行業內的去中心化和社區聚焦原則密切相關。 項目白皮書的發布:在概念階段之後,發布了一份全面的白皮書,詳細說明了 SPERO,$$s$ 的願景、目標和技術基礎設施,以吸引社區的興趣和反饋。 社區建設和早期參與:積極進行外展工作,建立早期採用者和潛在投資者的社區,促進圍繞項目目標的討論並獲得支持。 代幣生成事件:SPERO,$$s$ 進行了一次代幣生成事件(TGE),向早期支持者分發其原生代幣,並在生態系統內建立初步流動性。 首次 dApp 上線:與 SPERO,$$s$ 相關的第一個去中心化應用程序(dApp)上線,允許用戶參與平台的核心功能。 持續發展和夥伴關係:對項目產品的持續更新和增強,包括與區塊鏈領域其他參與者的戰略夥伴關係,使 SPERO,$$s$ 成為加密市場中一個具有競爭力和不斷演變的參與者。 結論 SPERO,$$s$ 是 web3 和加密貨幣潛力的見證,能夠徹底改變金融系統並賦能個人。憑藉對去中心化治理、社區參與和創新設計功能的承諾,它為更具包容性的金融環境鋪平了道路。 與任何在快速發展的加密領域中的投資一樣,潛在的投資者和用戶都被鼓勵進行徹底研究,並對 SPERO,$$s$ 的持續發展進行深思熟慮的參與。該項目展示了加密行業的創新精神,邀請人們進一步探索其無數可能性。儘管 SPERO,$$s$ 的旅程仍在展開,但其基礎原則確實可能影響我們在互聯網數字生態系統中如何與技術、金融和彼此互動的未來。

97 人學過發佈於 2024.12.17更新於 2024.12.17

什麼是 $S$

什麼是 AGENT S

Agent S:Web3中自主互動的未來 介紹 在不斷演變的Web3和加密貨幣領域,創新不斷重新定義個人如何與數字平台互動。Agent S是一個開創性的項目,承諾通過其開放的代理框架徹底改變人機互動。Agent S旨在簡化複雜任務,為人工智能(AI)提供變革性的應用,鋪平自主互動的道路。本詳細探索將深入研究該項目的複雜性、其獨特特徵以及對加密貨幣領域的影響。 什麼是Agent S? Agent S是一個突破性的開放代理框架,專門設計用來解決計算機任務自動化中的三個基本挑戰: 獲取特定領域知識:該框架智能地從各種外部知識來源和內部經驗中學習。這種雙重方法使其能夠建立豐富的特定領域知識庫,提升其在任務執行中的表現。 長期任務規劃:Agent S採用經驗增強的分層規劃,這是一種戰略方法,可以有效地分解和執行複雜任務。此特徵顯著提升了其高效和有效地管理多個子任務的能力。 處理動態、不均勻的界面:該項目引入了代理-計算機界面(ACI),這是一種創新的解決方案,增強了代理和用戶之間的互動。利用多模態大型語言模型(MLLMs),Agent S能夠無縫導航和操作各種圖形用戶界面。 通過這些開創性特徵,Agent S提供了一個強大的框架,解決了自動化人機互動中涉及的複雜性,為AI及其他領域的無數應用奠定了基礎。 誰是Agent S的創建者? 儘管Agent S的概念根本上是創新的,但有關其創建者的具體信息仍然難以捉摸。創建者目前尚不清楚,這突顯了該項目的初期階段或戰略選擇將創始成員保密。無論是否匿名,重點仍然在於框架的能力和潛力。 誰是Agent S的投資者? 由於Agent S在加密生態系統中相對較新,關於其投資者和財務支持者的詳細信息並未明確記錄。缺乏對支持該項目的投資基礎或組織的公開見解,引發了對其資金結構和發展路線圖的質疑。了解其支持背景對於評估該項目的可持續性和潛在市場影響至關重要。 Agent S如何運作? Agent S的核心是尖端技術,使其能夠在多種環境中有效運作。其運營模型圍繞幾個關鍵特徵構建: 類人計算機互動:該框架提供先進的AI規劃,力求使與計算機的互動更加直觀。通過模仿人類在任務執行中的行為,承諾提升用戶體驗。 敘事記憶:用於利用高級經驗,Agent S利用敘事記憶來跟蹤任務歷史,從而增強其決策過程。 情節記憶:此特徵為用戶提供逐步指導,使框架能夠在任務展開時提供上下文支持。 支持OpenACI:Agent S能夠在本地運行,使用戶能夠控制其互動和工作流程,與Web3的去中心化理念相一致。 與外部API的輕鬆集成:其多功能性和與各種AI平台的兼容性確保了Agent S能夠無縫融入現有技術生態系統,成為開發者和組織的理想選擇。 這些功能共同促成了Agent S在加密領域的獨特地位,因為它以最小的人類干預自動化複雜的多步任務。隨著項目的發展,其在Web3中的潛在應用可能重新定義數字互動的展開方式。 Agent S的時間線 Agent S的發展和里程碑可以用一個時間線來概括,突顯其重要事件: 2024年9月27日:Agent S的概念在一篇名為《一個像人類一樣使用計算機的開放代理框架》的綜合研究論文中推出,展示了該項目的基礎工作。 2024年10月10日:該研究論文在arXiv上公開,提供了對框架及其基於OSWorld基準的性能評估的深入探索。 2024年10月12日:發布了一個視頻演示,提供了對Agent S能力和特徵的視覺洞察,進一步吸引潛在用戶和投資者。 這些時間線上的標記不僅展示了Agent S的進展,還表明了其對透明度和社區參與的承諾。 有關Agent S的要點 隨著Agent S框架的持續演變,幾個關鍵特徵脫穎而出,強調其創新性和潛力: 創新框架:旨在提供類似人類互動的直觀計算機使用,Agent S為任務自動化帶來了新穎的方法。 自主互動:通過GUI自主與計算機互動的能力標誌著向更智能和高效的計算解決方案邁進了一步。 複雜任務自動化:憑藉其強大的方法論,能夠自動化複雜的多步任務,使過程更快且更少出錯。 持續改進:學習機制使Agent S能夠從過去的經驗中改進,不斷提升其性能和效率。 多功能性:其在OSWorld和WindowsAgentArena等不同操作環境中的適應性確保了它能夠服務於廣泛的應用。 隨著Agent S在Web3和加密領域中的定位,其增強互動能力和自動化過程的潛力標誌著AI技術的一次重大進步。通過其創新框架,Agent S展現了數字互動的未來,為各行各業的用戶承諾提供更無縫和高效的體驗。 結論 Agent S代表了AI與Web3結合的一次大膽飛躍,具有重新定義我們與技術互動方式的能力。儘管仍處於早期階段,但其應用的可能性廣泛且引人入勝。通過其全面的框架解決關鍵挑戰,Agent S旨在將自主互動帶到數字體驗的最前沿。隨著我們深入加密貨幣和去中心化的領域,像Agent S這樣的項目無疑將在塑造技術和人機協作的未來中發揮關鍵作用。

871 人學過發佈於 2025.01.14更新於 2025.01.14

什麼是 AGENT S

如何購買S

歡迎來到HTX.com!在這裡,購買Sonic (S)變得簡單而便捷。跟隨我們的逐步指南,放心開始您的加密貨幣之旅。第一步:創建您的HTX帳戶使用您的 Email、手機號碼在HTX註冊一個免費帳戶。體驗無憂的註冊過程並解鎖所有平台功能。立即註冊第二步:前往買幣頁面,選擇您的支付方式信用卡/金融卡購買:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即時購買Sonic (S)。餘額購買:使用您HTX帳戶餘額中的資金進行無縫交易。第三方購買:探索諸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方式以增加便利性。C2C購買:在HTX平台上直接與其他用戶交易。HTX 場外交易 (OTC) 購買:為大量交易者提供個性化服務和競爭性匯率。第三步:存儲您的Sonic (S)購買Sonic (S)後,將其存儲在您的HTX帳戶中。您也可以透過區塊鏈轉帳將其發送到其他地址或者用於交易其他加密貨幣。第四步:交易Sonic (S)在HTX的現貨市場輕鬆交易Sonic (S)。前往您的帳戶,選擇交易對,執行交易,並即時監控。HTX為初學者和經驗豐富的交易者提供了友好的用戶體驗。

1.8k 人學過發佈於 2025.01.15更新於 2026.06.02

如何購買S

相關討論

歡迎來到 HTX 社群。在這裡,您可以了解最新的平台發展動態並獲得專業的市場意見。 以下是用戶對 S (S)幣價的意見。

活动图片